The Law reports. in the courts of Probate and Divorce.

Vols. for 1881-1890 have subtitle: Cases determined in the Courts of Probate and Divorce, in the Admiralty and ecclesiastical courts, and on appeal therefrom in the Privy Council, and in the Court of Appeal.

Acts and joint resolutions passed by the General Assembly of the State of Virginia, during the session of 1891-92.

Acts and joint resolutions.--Commissioners of Deeds for Virginia.--List of charters.--Tables showing the time for the commencement of the regular terms of the Supreme Court of Appeals.--Synopsis of the financial operations of the treasury for the fiscal year ending the 30th day of September, 1891.--[State indebtedness]--[Tables showing the time for the commencement of the regular terms of the] circuit, county and corporation courts.--Separate election precincts.--Names and numbers of the magisterial districts in the counties of Virginia as reported to this date.

The judges of England; with sketches of their lives, and miscellaneous notices connected with the courts at Westminster, from the time of the conquest.

Vols. 7-9 published by J. Murray.

The practice in the courts of law and equity in Virginia /

Includes index.

Corporation laws of Virginia (being an Act concerning corporations, which became a law May 21, 1903; with amendments contained in acts 1904, 1906, and 1908; and other general acts relating to corporations) together with abstracts of the decisions of the courts, and a full collection of forms,

Mode of access: Internet.

A Collection of cases decided by the General Court of Virginia, chiefly relating to the penal laws of the Commonwealth, copied from the records of said court, with explanatory notes

Spine title: Virginia cases.

Depositions and other ecclesiastical proceedings from the courts of Durham, extending from 1311 to the reign of Elizabeth.

Includes indexes.

The Norris-LaGuardia act and the courts,

"Introduction [by] Judge Joseph Padway."

Efforts to combat fraud and abuse in the insurance industry : hearings before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, first session-[].

Part 1, April 24, 1991; pt. 2, June 26, 1991; pt. 3, July 19, 1991; pt. 4, October 17, 1991; pt. 5, April 29-30, 1992; pts. 6-7, July 2, 29 and 30, 1992.

The American decisions; cases of general value and authority decided in the courts of several states

Vols. 1-11 compiled and annotated by J. Proffatt; v. 12-100 by A. C. Freeman

Jurisdiction and procedure of the courts of the United States in civil actions under the Constitution, United States Code and the new Federal rules of civil procedure as amended.

Kept up to date by supplements and replacement volumnes.

Register, Department of Justice and the courts of the United States.

Description based on: 43rd ed. (1957).

California rules of court : rules of practice and procedure adopted by the Judicial Council and the Supreme Court /

Mode of access: Internet.

Register, Department of Justice and the courts of the United States.

Description based on: 43rd ed. (1957).

Ethics and intervention: The 'humanitarian exception' and the problem of abuse in the case of Iraq

This article investigates the ethics of intervention and explores the decision to invade Iraq. It begins by arguing that while positive international law provides an important framework for understanding and debating the legitimacy of war, it does not cover the full spectrum of moral reasoning on issues of war and peace. To that end, after briefly discussing the two primary legal justifications for war (implied UN authorization and pre-emptive self-defence), and finding them wanting, it asks whether there is a moral 'humanitarian exceptions to this rule grounded in the 'just war' tradition. The article argues that two aspects of the broad tradition could be used to make a humanitarian case for war: the 'holy war' tradition and classical just war thinking based on natural law. The former it finds problematic, while the latter it argues provides a moral space to justify the use of force to halt gross breaches of natural law. Although such an approach may provide a moral justification for war, it also opens the door to abuse. It was this very problem that legal positivism from Vattel onwards was designed to address. As a result, the article argues that natural law and legal positivist arguments should be understood as complementary sets of ideas whose sometimes competing claims must be balanced in relation to particular cases. Therefore, although natural law may open a space for justifying the invasion of Iraq on humanitarian terms, legal positivism strictly limits that right. Ignoring this latter fact, as happened in the Iraq case, opens the door to abuse.