Transitional justice in the judiciary: lessons from the portuguese democratisation

The nature of the Portuguese transition to democracy and the following state crises (1974-1975) created a ‘window of opportunity’ in which the ‘reaction to the past’ was much stronger than in the other Southern or even of Central and Eastern European transitions. In Portugal, initiatives of symbolic rupture with the past began soon after the April 25, 1974, coup d’état and transitional justice policies assumed mainly three formulas. First, the institutional reforms directed primarily to abusive state institutions such as the political police (PIDE-DGS) and political courts (Plenary courts) in order to dismantle the repressive apparatus and prevent further human rights abuses and impunity. Secondly, the criminal prosecutions addressed to perpetrators considered as being the most responsible for repression and abuses. Finally, lustration or political purges (saneamentos, the term used in Portugal to designate political purges) which were, in fact, the most common form of political justice in Portuguese transition to democracy. This paper deals with the peculiarities of transitional justice in Portugal devoting a particular attention to the judicial, a key sector to understand the way the Portuguese dealt with their authoritarian past.

Equidade na saúde e nos cuidados de saúde : migrantes e não migrantes na infecção de VIH/SIDA em Portugal

RESUMO - Este estudo tem como objectivo analisar a questão da equidade em saúde e nos cuidados de saúde entre migrantes e não migrantes no contexto da infecção de VIH/SIDA. A equidade em saúde e nos cuidados de saúde são valores de justiça distributiva. Este princípio representa um direito essencial para atingir uma melhor saúde e preocupa-se com a redução das desigualdades injustas em saúde e nos cuidados de saúde entre classes socioeconómicas. Os migrantes podem ser mais propensos a piores níveis de saúde do que os não migrantes devido a desigualdades sociais, na infecção por VIH/SIDA. Há escassez de estudos sobre a equidade em saúde e nos cuidados de saúde entre migrantes e não migrantes, aplicado ao contexto de VIH/SIDA em Portugal. Este é um país recente de migração e apresenta um aumento do número de casos de VIH/SIDA. O desenvolvimento deste estudo é importante para uma melhor compreensão da realidade da equidade em saúde e cuidados de saúde entre migrantes e não migrantes. Para a metodologia deste estudo, foram utilizados os dados da notificação obrigatória dos casos de VIH/SIDA em Portugal. A nacionalidade foi utilizada como aproximação ao estatuto de migrante. Através deste estudo empírico, foi possível constatar que os não nacionais estão sobre-representados nos casos notificados com um aumento no número de casos nos últimos anos. Estes dados sugerem uma iniquidade na saúde e nos cuidados de saúde a favor dos nacionais. Os portugueses representam. ----- ABSTRACT - The main goal of this work was to analyze the equity in health and health care between migrants and non migrants in the HIV/AIDS context. Equity in health and health care is a value of distributive justice. Is a primary right in order to achieve a better health and is concerned with a reduction in unfair inequality in health and health care between socioeconomic classes. Migrants are more susceptible to worse health levels due to socio inequalities, especially in the HIV/AIDS disease, when compared to non migrants. There is a scarcity of studies about health and health care between migrants and non migrants applied to the HIV/AIDS context in Portugal. Migration in Portugal is a recent, but increasing, phenomenon regarding the number of HIV/AIDS cases. This study brings a new overview over the equity of health and health care between migrants and non migrants. The methodology of this study uses mandatory notification of the HIV/AIDS cases detected in Portugal, and the nationality was used as a proxy to the migrant status. This empirical study allowed, detect that non nationals are overrepresented among notified cases, although the number has increased in the last years. This data suggests an inequity in health and health care in favor of nationals. Portuguese people’s represent the majority of notified cases, and the PALOP citizens come in second place.

Is This Septic Shock? A Rare Case of Distributive Shock

The authors report a rare case of shock in a patient without significant clinical history, admitted to the intensive care unit for suspected septic shock. The patient was initially treated with fluid therapy without improvement. A hypothesis of systemic capillary leak syndrome was postulated following the confirmation of severe hypoalbuminemia, hypotension, and hemoconcentration - a combination of three symptoms typical of the disease. The authors discussed the differential diagnosis and also conducted a review of the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Critical analysis of the allocation policy for liver transplantation in Brazil

Liver transplantation is now the standard treatment for end-stage liver disease. Given the shortage of liver donors and the progressively higher number of patients waiting for transplantation, improvements in patient selection and optimization of timing for transplantation are needed. Several solutions have been suggested, including increasing the donor pool; a fair policy for allocation, not permitting variables such as age, gender, and race, or third-party payer status to play any role; and knowledge of the natural history of each liver disease for which transplantation is offered. To observe ethical rules and distributive justice (guarantee to every citizen the same opportunity to get an organ), the "sickest first" policy must be used. Studies have demonstrated that death has no relationship with waiting time, but rather with the severity of liver disease at the time of inclusion. Thus, waiting time is no longer part of the United Network for Organ Sharing distribution criteria. Waiting time only differentiates between equally severely diseased patients. The authors have analyzed the waiting list mortality and 1-year survival for patients of the State of São Paulo, from July 1997 through January 2001. Only the chronological criterion was used. According to "Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo" data, among all waiting list deaths, 82.2% occurred within the first year, and 37.6% within the first 3 months following inclusion. The allocation of livers based on waiting time is neither fair nor ethical, impairs distributive justice and human rights, and does not occur in any other part of the world.

Transplants: bioethics and justice

Bioethics, as a branch of philosophy that focuses on questions relative to health and human life, is closely tied to the idea of justice and equality. As such, in understanding the concept of equality in its original sense, that is, in associating it to the idea to treat "unequals" (those who are unequal or different, in terms of conditions or circumstances) unequally (differentially), in proportion to their inequalities (differences), we see that the so-called "one-and-only waiting list" for transplants established in law no. 9.434/97, ends up not addressing the concept of equality and justice, bearing upon bioethics, even when considering the objective criteria of precedence established in regulation no. 9.4347/98, Thus, the organizing of transplants on a one-and-only waiting list, with a few exceptions that are weakly applicable, without a case by case technical and grounded analysis, according to each particular necessity, ends up institutionalizing inequalities, condemning patients to happenstance and, consequently, departs from the ratio legis, which aims at seeking the greatest application of justice in regards to organ transplants. We conclude, therefore, that from an analysis of the legislation and of the principles of bioethics and justice, there is a need for the creation of a collegiate of medical experts, that, based on medical criteria and done in a well established manner, can analyze each case to be included on the waiting list, deferentially and according to the necessity; thus, precluding that people in special circumstances be treated equal to people in normal circumstances.

«L’amour pour principe…». L’actualité d’Auguste Comte

Convegno "Ritorno al Conflito : teorie ed esperienze del XXI secolo", realizado em Bari, de 22 - 23 Out. 2015

Environmental conflicts, environmental justice and valuation

In this article some historical and contemporary environmental conflicts are described. The international environmental liability of mining corporations is discussed. Comparisons are made with conflicts in the United States and in South Africa which fall under the rubric of the Environmental Justice movement. Such conflicts are fought out in many languages, and the economic valuation of damages is only one of such languages. Who has the power to impose particular languages of valuation? Who rules over the ways and means of simplifying complexity, deciding that some points of view are out of order? Who has power to determine which is the bottom-line in an environmental discussion?

I want you! An experiment studying the selection effect when assigning distributive power.

We study whether selection affects motivation. In our experiment subjects first answer a personality questionnaire. They then play a 3-person game. One of the three players decides between an outside option assigning him a positive amount, but leaving the two others empty-handed and allowing one of the other two players to distribute a pie. Treatments differ in the procedure by which distributive power is assigned: to a randomly determined or to a knowingly selected partner. Before making her decision the selecting player could consult the personality questionnaire of the other two players. Results show that knowingly selected players keep less for themselves than randomly selected ones and reward the selecting player more generously.

Inequality in CO2 emissions across countries and its relationship with income inequality: a distributive approach

This paper analyses the inequality in CO2 emissions across countries (and groups of countries) and the relationship of this inequality with income inequality across countries for the period (1971-1999). The research employs the tools that are usually applied in income distribution analysis. The methodology used here gives qualitative and quantitative information on some of the features of the inequalities across countries that are considered most relevant for the design and discussion of policies aimed at mitigating climate change. The paper studies the relationship between CO2 emissions and GDP and shows that income inequality across countries has been followed by an important inequality in the distribution of emissions. This inequality has diminished mildly, although the inequality in emissions across countries ordered in the increasing value of income (inequality between rich and poor countries) has diminished less than the “simple” inequality in emissions. Lastly, the paper shows that the inequality in CO2 emissions is mostly explained by the inequality between groups with different per capita income level. The importance of the inequality within groups of similar per capita income is much lower and has diminished during the period, especially in the low-middle income group.

Assessment of current anglo-saxon proposals about criminal justice and the justification of legal punishment: Moore, Duff and Finnis on retribution, and the challenging compatibility with the up-and-coming Restorative Justice

Pendent