Monuments, mobility and Medieval perceptions of designed landscapes: The Pleasance, Kenilworth

The Pleasance was a ���virandarium��� or pleasure garden, constructed by Henry V in the grounds of his castle at Kenilworth. Despite its high academic profile and the survival of well-preserved earthwork remains, the Pleasance has never previously been subjected to a programme of detailed archaeological survey and investigation. This article discusses the results of a new analytical earthwork survey undertaken by staff from English Heritage in 2012. It considers the contribution that these new findings make to the wider debate on medieval designed landscapes, with a particular focus on mobility and its role in unlocking the meaning and symbolism embedded in elite landscapes.

Monuments should not be trusted: exhibition catalogue

Catalogue of the group exhibition Monuments Should Not Be Trusted, curated by Lina Dzuverovic.

Monuments should not be trusted exhibition

Monuments Should Not Be Trusted brings together over 30 leading artists and groups from the ���golden years��� of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia - the period between the early 1960s and the mid 1980s. Over 100 artworks and artefacts illuminate the key contradictions of this single party state ��� built after WWII on socialist principles, yet immersed in ���utopian consumerism.��� This is the first time in the UK that the art of this period, which has attracted increasing attention, has been shown in the context of the social, economic and political conditions that gave rise to it. It draws on new and innovative research on this period, and features many of its most celebrated artists. The exhibition begins with the rise of consumerism, midway through President Josip Broz Tito���s 37 year presidency, and ends a few years after his death in 1980. As well as artists��� works in moving image, collage, photography, sculpture and painting, the exhibition encompasses music, TV clips and fascinating artefacts, such as gifts made by workers for President Tito���s birthday, and relay batons which were carried across the country and ceremonially presented to him.

Public Monuments and the Development of Siamese Nationalism, 1908-1945

A careful study of Siam's public monuments is the key to understanding the development of the Siamese nation in its formative period, from 1908 to 1945. As Siam's elites attempted to modernize the state in order to compete with the more developed powers of the West, they recognized that nationalism could potentially be used as a force to increase popular unity, consolidate modernization programs, legitimize their own authority, and protect the country from foreign conquest. The problem they faced, however, was how best to communicate nationalism to the people. Different factions throughout this era had their own idea of what it meant to be Siamese, and all of them wanted to control the national image. But literacy in Siam was extremely low, and art too expensive for most individuals to possess. Public political monuments, the focus of this thesis, therefore became the primary means of manifesting and propagating the underlying tenets of the new Siamese nation. Public monuments express the changing imaginings of the Siamese nation in this period of enormous transformations and turbulence, through the motives behind their commissioning, the political messages they convey, and popular reactions to the monuments. Three primary strains of Siamese nationalism emerged during this period: royalist nationalism, republican nationalism, and military nationalism. These three imaginings of the nation continually developed and interacted with each other, but each was particularly dominant at a given time in Siamese history. Monuments of the royalist period (1908-1925) embody the desire of Siam's kings to not only promote national pride amongst the Siamese people, but also advocate an image of nation and king as one. Monuments of the republican period (1925-1939) express the changing and sometimes contradictory events of their times, as they demonstrate new national values based on the sovereignty of the people, the value of the constitution, and the growing power of the military. And monuments of the military period (1939-1945) espouse an assertive and militaristic national image of warfare, patriotism, authority, and vigor. This thesis explores the nationalistic themes expressed in these monuments, and how these themes played out in the course of Siam's wider history.

��Von Menschen und G��ttern verlassene Leichname��. Totenkult im 'Mus��e des Monuments Fran��ais' (1791-1816)?

Das 'Mus��e des Monuments Fran��ais' ging 1793 aus der Revolution hervor. Das ehemalige Kloster, in dem enteignete Kircheng��ter gelagert wurden, mutierte unter Alexandre Lenoir zu einer chronologisch geordneten Ruhmesst��tte der franz��sischen Geschichte. Grabm��ler und Monumente erinnern an verschiedene Personen dieser Geschichte ��� von H��lo��se ��ber viele K��nige bis hin zu Descartes. Allerdings war das 'Mus��e des Monuments Fran��ais' weniger ein Ort des royalen Totenkults als vielmehr ein Museum, in dem auch die k��niglichen Grabm��ler als Exponate innerhalb der Pr��sentation der franz��sischen Geschichte fungierten. Daher f��hrte es unter Zeitgenossen zu einer Polarisierung in Anh��nger und Gegner: So waren zum Beispiel Michelet und Wilhelm von Humboldt vom 'Mus��e des Monuments Fran��ais' begeistert, w��hrend Chateaubriand es strikt ablehnte. Im 'Mus��e des Monuments Fran��ais��� waren die Grabst��tten und Skulpturen permanente Zeugnisse der Niederlage des K��nigtums. In der Restauration wurde das Museum Ende 1816 geschlossen, die k��niglichen Grabm��ler wurden zur��ck in die Kirche von Saint Denis ��berf��hrt.