The historic geographical atlas of the middle and modern ages. : A series of maps and plans, chronologically arranged, delineating the migrations of the German and Asiatic nation, and the rise and fall of all the states, kingdoms, and empires, founded by them in Europe, western Asia, northern Africa, and America, from the fall of the western Roman empire, to the abdication of Napoleon. With special maps illustrative of English history. /

Mode of access: Internet.

Le grande dictionaire historique ou Le mêlange curieux de l'histoire sacrée et profane, qui contient en abregé l'histoire fabuleuse des dieux & des heroes de l'antiquité payenne: les vies et les actions remarquables des patriarches; des juges; des rois des juifs; des papes ... des empereurs; des rois, des princes illustres; & des grands capitaines; l'établissement et le progrés des ordres religieux & militaires; & la vie de leur fondateurs: les genealogies de plusieurs familles illustres de France, & d'autres païs: la description des empires ... l'histoire des conciles generaux & particuliers, sous le nom des lieux où ils ont été tenus. Le tout enrichi de remarques, de dissertations & de recherches curieuses ... tirées de differens auteurs, & sur tout du Dictionaire critique de M. Bayle.

The first edition was published in 1674 in Lyon in 1 vol.

Darby's edition of Brooke's Universal gazetteer, or, A new geographical dictionary : containing a description of the empires, kingdoms, states, provinces, cities, towns, forts, seas, harbours, rivers, lakes, mountains, capes, &c. in the known world ... to which are added, the Constitution of the United States, and the constitutions of the respective states : illustrated by a neat coloured map of the United States.

Includes "Constitutional law : comprising the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution of the United States and the constitutions of the several states composing the Union": 139 p. at end.

The five empires; an outline of ancient history.

Mode of access: Internet.

An uncensored diary from the central empires,

Mode of access: Internet.

Institutional Persistence in Eastern Europe: Economic and Political Legacies of Empires and Communism

This dissertation seeks to advance our understanding of the roles that institutions play in economic development. How do institutions evolve? What mechanisms are responsible for their persistence? What effects do they have on economic development?

I address these questions using historical and contemporary data from Eastern Europe and Russia. This area is relatively understudied by development economists. It also has a very interesting history. For one thing, for several centuries it was divided between different empires. For another, it experienced wars and socialism in the 20th century. I use some of these exogenous shocks as quasi-natural social experiments to study the institutional transformations and its effects on economic development both in the short and long run.

This first chapter explores whether economic, social, and political institutions vary in their resistance to policies designed to remove them. The empirical context for the analysis is Romania from 1690 to the 2000s. Romania represents an excellent laboratory for studying the persistence of different types of historical institutional legacies. In the 18th and 19th centuries, Romania was split between the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires, where political and economic institutions differed. The Habsburgs imposed less extractive institutions relative to the Ottomans: stronger rule of law, a more stable and predictable state, a more developed civil society, and less corruption. In the 20th century, the Romanian Communist regime tried deliberately to homogenize the country along all relevant dimensions. It was only partially successful. Using a regression discontinuity design, I document the persistence of economic outcomes, social capital, and political attitudes. First, I document remarkable convergence in urbanization, education, unemployment, and income between the two former empires. Second, regarding social capital, no significant differences in organizational membership, trust in bureaucracy, and corruption persist today. Finally, even though the Communists tried to change all political attitudes, significant discontinuities exist in current voting behavior at the former Habsburg-Ottoman border. Using data from the parliamentary elections of 1996-2008, I find that former Habsburg rule decreases by around 6 percentage points the vote share of the major post-Communist left party and increases by around 2 and 5 percentage points the vote shares of the main anti-Communist and liberal parties, respectively.

The second chapter investigates the effects of Stalin’s mass deportations on distrust in central authority. Four deported ethnic groups were not rehabilitated after Stalin’s death; they remained in permanent exile until the disintegration of the Soviet Union. This allows one to distinguish between the effects of the groups that returned to their homelands and those of the groups that were not allowed to return. Using regional data from the 1991 referendum on the future of the Soviet Union, I find that deportations have a negative interim effect on trust in central authority in both the regions of destination and those of origin. The effect is stronger for ethnic groups that remained in permanent exile in the destination regions. Using data from the Life in Transition Survey, the chapter also documents a long-term effect of deportations in the destination regions.

The third chapter studies the short-term effect of Russian colonization of Central Asia on economic development. I use data on the regions of origin of Russian settlers and push factors to construct an instrument for Russian migration to Central Asia. This instrument allows me to interpret the outcomes causally. The main finding is that the massive influx of Russians into the region during the 1897-1926 period had a significant positive effect on indigenous literacy. The effect is stronger for men and in rural areas. Evidently, interactions between natives and Russians through the paid labor market was an important mechanism of human capital transmission in the context of colonization.

The findings of these chapters provide additional evidence that history and institutions do matter for economic development. Moreover, the dissertation also illuminates the relative persistence of institutions. In particular, political and social capital legacies of institutions might outlast economic legacies. I find that most economic differences between the former empires in Romania have disappeared. By the same token, there are significant discontinuities in political outcomes. People in former Habsburg Romania provide greater support for liberalization, privatization, and market economy, whereas voters in Ottoman Romania vote more for redistribution and government control over the economy.

In the former Soviet Union, Stalin’s deportations during World War II have a long-term negative effect on social capital. Today’s residents of the destination regions of deportations show significantly lower levels of trust in central authority. This is despite the fact that the Communist regime tried to eliminate any source of opposition and used propaganda to homogenize people’s political and social attitudes towards the authorities. In Central Asia, the influx of Russian settlers had a positive short-term effect on human capital of indigenous population by the 1920s, which also might have persisted over time.

From a development perspective, these findings stress the importance of institutions for future paths of development. Even if past institutional differences are not apparent for a certain period of time, as was the case with the former Communist countries, they can polarize society later on, hampering economic development in the long run. Different institutions in the past, which do not exist anymore, can thus contribute to current political instability and animosity.

Documentary as history, memory, dream and film

A century ago, as the Western world embarked on a period of traumatic change, the visual realism of photography and documentary film brought print and radio news to life. The vision that these new mediums threw into stark relief was one of intense social and political upheaval: the birth of modernity fired and tempered in the crucible of the Great War. As millions died in this fiery chamber and the influenza pandemic that followed, lines of empires staggered to their fall, and new geo-political boundaries were scored in the raw, red flesh of Europe. The decade of 1910 to 1919 also heralded a prolific period of artistic experimentation. It marked the beginning of the social and artistic age of modernity and, with it, the nascent beginnings of a new art form: film. We still live in the shadow of this violent, traumatic and fertile age; haunted by the ghosts of Flanders and Gallipoli and its ripples of innovation and creativity. Something happened here, but to understand how and why is not easy; for the documentary images we carry with us in our collective cultural memory have become what Baudrillard refers to as simulacra. Detached from their referents, they have become referents themselves, to underscore other, grand narratives in television and Hollywood films. The personal histories of the individuals they represent so graphically–and their hope, love and loss–are folded into a national story that serves, like war memorials and national holidays, to buttress social myths and values. And, as filmic images cross-pollinate, with each iteration offering a new catharsis, events that must have been terrifying or wondrous are abstracted. In this paper we first discuss this transformation through reference to theories of documentary and memory–this will form a conceptual framework for a subsequent discussion of the short film Anmer. Produced by the first author in 2010, Anmer is a visual essay on documentary, simulacra and the symbolic narratives of history. Its form, structure and aesthetic speak of the confluence of documentary, history, memory and dream. Located in the first decade of the twentieth century, its non-linear narratives of personal tragedy and poetic dreamscapes are an evocative reminder of the distance between intimate experience, grand narratives, and the mythologies of popular films. This transformation of documentary sources not only played out in the processes of the film’s production, but also came to form its theme.

Australians may get their own stop online piracy act #SOPA: Christmas time for copyright owners

Christmas has come early for copyright owners in Australia. The film company, Roadshow, the pay television company Foxtel, and Rupert Murdoch's News Corp and News Limited--as well as copyright industries--have been clamoring for new copyright powers and remedies. In the summer break, the Coalition Government has responded to such entreaties from its industry supporters and donors, with a new package of copyright laws and policies. There has been significant debate over the proposals between the odd couple of Attorney-General George Brandis and the Minister for Communications, Malcolm Turnbull. There have been deep, philosophical differences between the two Ministers over the copyright agenda. The Attorney-General George Brandis has supported a model of copyright maximalism, with strong rights and remedies for the copyright empires in film, television, and publishing. He has shown little empathy for the information technology companies of the digital economy. The Attorney-General has been impatient to press ahead with a copyright regime. The Minister for Communications, Malcolm Turnbull, has been somewhat more circumspect, recognizing that there is a need to ensure that copyright laws do not adversely impact upon competition in the digital economy. The final proposal is a somewhat awkward compromise between the discipline-and-punish regime preferred by Brandis, and the responsive regulation model favored by Turnbull. In his new book, Information Doesn't Want to Be Free: Laws for the Internet Age, Cory Doctorow has some sage advice for copyright owners: Things that don't make money: Complaining about piracy. Calling your customers thieves. Treating your customers like thieves. In this context, the push by copyright owners and the Coalition Government to have a copyright crackdown may well be counter-productive to their interests.

A Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee on the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Bill 2015 (Cth)

The film company, Roadshow, the pay television company Foxtel, and Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp and News Limited — as well as copyright industries — have been clamouring for new copyright powers and remedies. In the summer break, the Coalition Government has responded to such entreaties from its industry supporters and donors, with a new package of copyright laws and policies. There has been significant debate over the proposals between the odd couple of Attorney-General George Brandis and the Minister for Communications, Malcolm Turnbull. There has been deep, philosophical differences between the two Ministers over the copyright agenda. The Attorney-General George Brandis has supported a model of copyright maximalism, with strong rights and remedies for the copyright empires in film, television, and publishing. He has shown little empathy for the information technology companies of the digital economy. The Attorney-General has been impatient to press ahead with a copyright regime. The Minister for Communications, Malcolm Turnbull, has been somewhat more circumspect,recognising that there is a need to ensure that copyright laws do not adversely impact upon competition in the digital economy. The final proposal is a somewhat awkward compromise between the discipline-and-punish regime preferred by Brandis, and the responsive regulation model favoured by Turnbull. In his new book, Information Doesn’t Want to Be Free: Laws for the Internet Age, Cory Doctorow has some sage advice for copyright owners: Things that don’t make money: * Complaining about piracy. * Calling your customers thieves. * Treating your customers like thieves. In this context, the push by copyright owners and the Coalition Government to have a copyright crackdown may well be counter-productive to their interests. This submission considers a number of key elements of the Coalition Government’s Copyright Crackdown. Part 1 examines the proposals in respect of the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Bill 2015 (Cth). Part 2 focuses upon the proposed Copyright Code. Part 3 considers the question of safe harbours for intermediaries. Part 4 examines the question of copyright exceptions – particularly looking at the proposal of the Australian Law Reform Commission for the introduction of a defence of fair use. Part 5 highlights the recommendations of the IT Pricing Inquiry and the Harper Competition Policy Review in respect of copyright law, consumer rights, and competition law.

Rossijskaja Karelija i karely v imperskoi politike Rossii, 1905-1917

Russian Karelians were one of the small peasant nations of the Russian Empire that began to identify themselves as nations during the late imperial period. At that historical moment Russian Karelia fell between an economically undeveloped empire and the rapidly modernizing borderland of Finland. The economic and cultural lure of Finland drew Karelians into the Finnish camp. This attraction was seen as a challenge to Russia and influenced the straggle between Russia and Finland for the Karelians. This struggle was waged from 1905 to 1917. This work is focused on the beginning stage of the struggle, its various phases, and their results. The confrontation extended into different dimensions (economic, political, ideological, church and cultural politics) and occurred on two levels: central and regional. Countermeasures against local nationalisms developed much earlier both in Russia and in other empires for use were also used in the Russian Karelian case. Economic policies were deployed to try to make relations with Russia more alluring for Karelians and to improve their economic condition. However, these efforts produced only minimal results due to the economic weakness of the empire and a lack of finances. Fear of the economic integration of the Karelians and Finns, which would have stimulated the economy of the Karelia, also hindered these attempts. The further development of the Orthodox Church, the schools and the zemstvos in Karelia yielded fewer results than expected due to the economic underdevelopment of the region and the avoidance of the Finnish language. Policizing measures were the most successfull, as all activities in Russian Karelia by the Finns were entirely halted in practice. However, the aspiration of Russian Karelians to integrate their home districts with Finland remained a latent force that just waited for an opportunity to push to the surface again. Such a chance materialized with the Russian revolution. The Karelian question was also a part of Russian domestic political confrontation. At the and of the 1800s, the Russian nationalist right had grown strong and increasingly gained the favor of the autocracy. The right political forces exploited the Karelian question in its anti-Finnish ideology and in its general resistance to the national emancipation of the minority peoples of Russia. A separate ideology was developed, focusing on the closeness of Karelians to the "great Russian people." Simultaneously, this concept found a place in the ultramonarchist myth of the particularly close connection between the people and tsar that was prominent in the era of Nicholas II. This myth assigned the Karelians a place amongst the "simple people" faithful to the tsar.

Jeesus Nasaretilainen - Jumalan Poika - Markuksen evankeliumissa

Tutkielma käsittelee Markuksen evankeliumissa esiintyvää Jumala Poika -arvonimen merkitystä. Evankelista Markus käyttää useissa yhteyksissä Jeesuksesta Jumalan Poika -tunnustusformelia. Mitä hän sillä tarkoittaa? Oliko Markus ensimmäinen kirjoittaja, joka käytti tätä arvonimeä? Kuinka evankeliumissa esiintyvät kohdat selittyvät lukijalle? Miten Jeesuksesta tuli Jumalan Poika, ja mitä tuolloin kyseisellä termillä ylipäätään tarkoitettiin? Näihin kysymyksiin etsitään tässä tutkimuksessa vastauksia. Johdannossa käsitellään Jumalan poika -arvonimen syntykontekstia, Markuksen evankeliumin syntyä sekä messiassalaisuuden teemaa. Wreden työn pohjalta syntynyttä messiassalaisuuden ongelmaa käsitellään melko laajasti, koska redaktiokritiikin kannalta sen tulokset ovat hyvin merkittäviä. Analyysiosiossa tarkastellaan yksityiskohtaisesti kymmentä Markuksen mainintaa Jeesuksesta Jumalan Poikana. Näissä maininnoissaan evankelista käyttää apuna eri osapuolia, jotka vakuuttavasti antavat tunnustuksensa Jumalan Pojasta. Evankelista antaa itse oman henkilökohtaisen tunnustuksensa heti evankeliumin alussa kohdassa Mk. 1:1. Tunnustusten ketju jatkuu Jumalan tunnustuksilla kohdissa Mk. 1:1-9 ja 9:2-7. Saastaiset henget tunnustavat myös Jeesuksen Jumalan Pojaksi kohdissa Mk. 3:11 ja 5:1-13. Metafyysisen maailman lisäksi myös näkyvän maailman luonnonvoimat tunnustavat Jeesuksen jumalallisen käskyvallan kohdassa Mk. 6:45-52, jossa Jeesus murtaa fysiikan lait kävelemällä veden päällä. Traditioon kuulunut paralleelikohta on Jeesuksen myrskyn tyynnyttäminen kohdassa Mk. 4:35-41. Tähän tutkimukseen on valittu ainoastaan ensimmäinen. Jeesuksen opetuslapsijoukosta Pietari tunnustaa Jeesuksen Jumalan Pojaksi kohdassa Mk. 8:27-30. Jeesus itse tunnustaa ylimmäisen papin edessä oman olemuksensa kohdassa Mk. 14:50-62 ja kertomalla vertauksen viinitarhan vuokraajista kohdassa Mk. 12:1-12. Evankeliumin tunnustusten sarjan päättää roomalainen upseeri Jeesuksen ristin äärellä kohdassa Mk. 15:39. Tunnustusten näkökulmasta tämä merkitsee täydellistä loppua Markuksen kirjalliselle työlle. Johtopäätöksissä pohditaan mm. sitä, miten historiallisesta Jeesus Nasaretilaisesta tuli Jumalan Poika? Miksi kastekertomus on tässä niin keskeinen? Yhtenä taustatekijänä lienee Lähi-idän alueella vuosisatoja vaikuttaneet Mesopotamian aikaiset uskonnolliset traditiot. Jumalan Pojan terminologista sisältöä päätellään kahden kysymyksen avulla. Millä perusteella Markus esittää Jeesuksen Jumalan Pojaksi, ja toiseksi missä merkityksessä Jeesus on Jumalan Poika? Vastauksena on, että Jeesus on Jumalan Poika, koska Jumala asetti hänet kasteen yhteydessä messiaaniseen tehtäväänsä. Toiseksi Jeesus on Jumala Poika siinä merkityksessä, että hän toteutti Jumalan antamaa tehtävää oikeana kärsivänä Jumalan Poikana, joka apostoli Paavalin käyttämän tradition mukaan asetettiin kuoleman jälkeen asemaan, jossa hänellä on valta (Rm. 1:4). Johtopäätöksenä on, että tradition tasolla Jeesus oli saarnaaja, ihmeiden tekijä ja parantaja, jolla oli erityisen läheinen suhde Jumalaan. Markuksen redaktion tasolla Jeesus oli metafyysinen Jumalan Poika. Evankeliumisssa punoutuvat yhteen Jeesuksesta kertova traditio ja Markuksen redaktio.

Antiguo Oriente: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente, 2005, n° 3 (número completo)

The first evangelization of the Mesopotamian regions in the Syriac tradition: the Acta Maris as a continuation of the Doctrina Addai / Ilaria Ramelli -- El culto a las tumbas de los ancestros en el Levante Mediterráneo / Jordi Vidal -- Identifiable and associated cordage. Examples from Berenike (Egyptian Red Sea Coast) / André Veldmeijer -- “Ordalías”, parentesco y estado en La contienda entre Horus y Seth / Marcelo Campagno -- Lamentos neosumerios por ciudades destruidas. Continuidad de un rito y un género del período protodinástico hasta el período seléucida / Santiago Rostom Maderna -- Reseñas bibliográficas

Why brush up your Shakespeare and your theory?: an Angela Carter companion to myths

Essa dissertação visa estudar a formação do que veio a ser conhecido como o mito Shakespeariano e sua relação com a produção literária contemporânea, exemplificada pelo romance Wise Children, da romancista inglesa Angela Carter. Tal objetivo pretende ser alcançado por meio uma revisão teórica de elementos relacionados à concepção de mito desenvolvida pelo filósofo francês Roland Barthes, tais quais a concepção tradicional de mito, o Estruturalismo, o Pós-estruturalismo, a crítica ideológica marxista e os Estudos Culturais. Um estudo dos processos históricos que deram origem ao e ajudaram a propagar o mito Shakespeariano também é levado a cabo nessa dissertação: a apropriação da figura e da obra de William Shakespeare feita pelos pré-românticos e pelos românticos em geral; a associação da figura de Shakespeare com a identidade nacional do Império Britânico; o advento da industria Shakespeariana e o papel das adaptações das peças de Shakespeare na propagação do mito Shakespeariano