910 resultados para CONCIENCIA (MORAL)
Resumo:
Este documento ofrece un análisis sociológico del papel que cumplía el honor como valor en la sociedad neogranadina a finales de la Colonia a partir de algunos conceptos clave que ofrecen autores clásicos de la disciplina. El honor se puede enmarcar dentro de lo que algunos autores han denominado solidaridades sociales o conciencia colectiva. Es decir, dentro del conjunto de creencias y valores compartidos por los integrantes de una misma sociedad. Dado que para la época estudiada la herencia española en torno al honor ya había logrado un alto nivel de arraigo, es posible pensar que el interés por proteger el honor hacía parte del sentimiento común en la sociedad neogranadina. Y es que el hecho de que la noción de honor estuviese anclada en los valores religiosos, que tanto la Iglesia como la Corona promovieron, condujo a que el fundamento del honor tuviese un carácter moral, logrando así una alta difusión dentro del territorio americano. La idea del honor determinaba, en buena medida, los parámetros del orden social deseado.
Resumo:
Resumen tomado de la revista
Resumo:
Resumen basado en el del autor
Resumo:
El programa trabaja la conciencia emocional como una de las posibles vías que favorecen el conocimiento profundo de uno umismo, la compresión de la relación que existe entre emoción, pensamiento y acción, la responsabilidad que se tiene en lo que se siente, se piensa y se hace y la fortaleza para cambiar (contando con prudencia y equilibrio) como una de las formas más viables y duraderas de crecer y madurar.
Resumo:
Resumen tomado de la publicación
Resumo:
Distinguir dos moralidades: realismo moral y moral de reciprocidad. La teoría de Piaget está encaminada a explicar el modo en que se desarrolla el pensamiento moral práctico, pero los resultados (verbales) de sus estudios se refieren únicamente al pensamiento moral teórico del niño. Piaget cree, que en el niño, la reflexión moral consiste en una toma de conciencia progresiva de la actividad moral. El realismo moral responde a algo efectivo y espontáneo en el pensamiento infantil. Piaget está tanto en contra de los métodos autoritarios como de los métodos puramente individuales. El niño siente un gran placer por la investigación activa, ello unido a sus necesidades de cooperación. Es fundamental que la experimentación individual y la reflexión común se equilibren.
Resumo:
Se presenta como una responsabilidad conjunta de la Administración regional y de las ONGD el promover la educación para la cooperación al desarrollo. Se recomienda la inserción de todos los temas relacionados con la cooperación al desarrollo en los currículos y programaciones de las diferentes áreas y etapas del sistema educativo de Castilla-La Mancha.
Resumo:
Resumen basado en el de la publicaci??n
Resumo:
Colofón en p. 256
Resumo:
59 p.
Resumo:
ResumenEl consume de heroína por parte de jóvenes artesanos de San José se convirtió en un problema político en 1929. El autor analiza los grupos consumidores de droga, y presenta un retrato del mundo de los trabajadores josefinos. También rescata algunos rasgos de los aparatos estatales que aplicaron medidas para la supresión del escándalo y aporta elementos para conocer cómo se expresaba la conciencia de clase fuera de las organizaciones obreras.
Resumo:
Although internet chat is a significant aspect of many internet users’ lives, the manner in which participants in quasi-synchronous chat situations orient to issues of social and moral order remains to be studied in depth. The research presented here is therefore at the forefront of a continually developing area of study. This work contributes new insights into how members construct and make accountable the social and moral orders of an adult-oriented Internet Relay Chat (IRC) channel by addressing three questions: (1) What conversational resources do participants use in addressing matters of social and moral order? (2) How are these conversational resources deployed within IRC interaction? and (3) What interactional work is locally accomplished through use of these resources? A survey of the literature reveals considerable research in the field of computer-mediated communication, exploring both asynchronous and quasi-synchronous discussion forums. The research discussed represents a range of communication interests including group and collaborative interaction, the linguistic construction of social identity, and the linguistic features of online interaction. It is suggested that the present research differs from previous studies in three ways: (1) it focuses on the interaction itself, rather than the ways in which the medium affects the interaction; (2) it offers turn-by-turn analysis of interaction in situ; and (3) it discusses membership categories only insofar as they are shown to be relevant by participants through their talk. Through consideration of the literature, the present study is firmly situated within the broader computer-mediated communication field. Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis were adopted as appropriate methodological approaches to explore the research focus on interaction in situ, and in particular to investigate the ways in which participants negotiate and co-construct social and moral orders in the course of their interaction. IRC logs collected from one chat room were analysed using a two-pass method, based on a modification of the approaches proposed by Pomerantz and Fehr (1997) and ten Have (1999). From this detailed examination of the data corpus three interaction topics are identified by means of which participants clearly orient to issues of social and moral order: challenges to rule violations, ‘trolling’ for cybersex, and experiences regarding the 9/11 attacks. Instances of these interactional topics are subjected to fine-grained analysis, to demonstrate the ways in which participants draw upon various interactional resources in their negotiation and construction of channel social and moral orders. While these analytical topics stand alone in individual focus, together they illustrate different instances in which participants’ talk serves to negotiate social and moral orders or collaboratively construct new orders. Building on the work of Vallis (2001), Chapter 5 illustrates three ways that rule violation is initiated as a channel discussion topic: (1) through a visible violation in open channel, (2) through an official warning or sanction by a channel operator regarding the violation, and (3) through a complaint or announcement of a rule violation by a non-channel operator participant. Once the topic has been initiated, it is shown to become available as a topic for others, including the perceived violator. The fine-grained analysis of challenges to rule violations ultimately demonstrates that channel participants orient to the rules as a resource in developing categorizations of both the rule violation and violator. These categorizations are contextual in that they are locally based and understood within specific contexts and practices. Thus, it is shown that compliance with rules and an orientation to rule violations as inappropriate within the social and moral orders of the channel serves two purposes: (1) to orient the speaker as a group member, and (2) to reinforce the social and moral orders of the group. Chapter 6 explores a particular type of rule violation, solicitations for ‘cybersex’ known in IRC parlance as ‘trolling’. In responding to trolling violations participants are demonstrated to use affiliative and aggressive humour, in particular irony, sarcasm and insults. These conversational resources perform solidarity building within the group, positioning non-Troll respondents as compliant group members. This solidarity work is shown to have three outcomes: (1) consensus building, (2) collaborative construction of group membership, and (3) the continued construction and negotiation of existing social and moral orders. Chapter 7, the final data analysis chapter, offers insight into how participants, in discussing the events of 9/11 on the actual day, collaboratively constructed new social and moral orders, while orienting to issues of appropriate and reasonable emotional responses. This analysis demonstrates how participants go about ‘doing being ordinary’ (Sacks, 1992b) in formulating their ‘first thoughts’ (Jefferson, 2004). Through sharing their initial impressions of the event, participants perform support work within the interaction, in essence working to normalize both the event and their initial misinterpretation of it. Normalising as a support work mechanism is also shown in relation to participants constructing the ‘quiet’ following the event as unusual. Normalising is accomplished by reference to the indexical ‘it’ and location formulations, which participants use both to negotiate who can claim to experience the ‘unnatural quiet’ and to identify the extent of the quiet. Through their talk participants upgrade the quiet from something legitimately experienced by one person in a particular place to something that could be experienced ‘anywhere’, moving the phenomenon from local to global provenance. With its methodological design and detailed analysis and findings, this research contributes to existing knowledge in four ways. First, it shows how rules are used by participants as a resource in negotiating and constructing social and moral orders. Second, it demonstrates that irony, sarcasm and insults are three devices of humour which can be used to perform solidarity work and reinforce existing social and moral orders. Third, it demonstrates how new social and moral orders are collaboratively constructed in relation to extraordinary events, which serve to frame the event and evoke reasonable responses for participants. And last, the detailed analysis and findings further support the use of conversation analysis and membership categorization as valuable methods for approaching quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication.
Resumo:
There is much still to learn about how young children’s membership with peers shapes their constructions of moral and social obligations within everyday activities in the school playground. This paper investigates how a small group of girls, aged four to six years, account for their everyday social interactions in the playground. They were video-recorded as they participated in a pretend game of school. Several days later, a video-recorded excerpt of the interaction was shown to them and invited to comment on what was happening in the video. This conversation was audio-recorded. Drawing on a conversation analysis approach, this chapter shows that, despite their discontent and complaining about playing the game of school, the girls’ actions showed their continued orientation to the particular codes of the game, of ‘no going away’ and ‘no telling’. By making relevant these codes, jointly constructed by the girls during the interview, they managed each other’s continued participation within two arenas of action: the pretend, as a player in a pretend game of school; and the real, as a classroom member of a peer group. Through inferences to explicit and implicit codes of conduct, moral obligations were invoked as the girls attempted to socially exclude or build alliances with others, and enforce their own social position. As well, a shared history that the girls re-constructed has moral implications for present and future relationships. The girls oriented to the history as an interactional resource for accounting for their actions in the pretend game. This paper uncovers how children both participate in, and shape, their everyday social worlds through talk and interaction and the consequences a taken-for-granted activity such as playing school has for their moral and social positions in the peer group.
Resumo:
One of the oldest problems in philosophy concerns the relationship between free will and moral responsibility. If we adopt the position that we lack free will, in the absolute sense—as have most philosophers who have addressed this issue—how can we truly be held accountable for what we do? This paper will contend that the most significant and interesting challenge to the long-standing status-quo on the matter comes not from philosophy, jurisprudence, or even physics, but rather from psychology. By examining this debate through the lens of contemporary behaviour disorders, such as ADHD, it will be argued that notions of free will, along with its correlate, moral responsibility, are being eroded through the logic of psychology which is steadily reconfiguring large swathes of familiar human conduct as pathology. The intention of the paper is not only to raise some concerns over the exponential growth of behaviour disorders, but also, and more significantly, to flag the ongoing relevance of philosophy for prying open contemporary educational problems in new and interesting ways.