Distinct neuronal circuits underlying the bahavioral and physiological components of the fear response

Abstract : Expression of fear involves changes in a number of behavioral and physiological parameters that are triggered by the central amygdala (CeA). The fear circuit also includes a series of brain stem nuclei that are the final effectors of the changes induced by the fear reaction. The CeA expresses many different neuropeptide receptors that can modulate fear responses. Today, the precise organization and the modulation of projections from the amygdala to the brain stem are still poorly understood. The aim of this project was to better understand the organization and the modulation of the fear circuit. To investigate this we first determined whether the CeA is composed of separate neuronal populations, where each one projects to specific brain stem nuclei, or whether single CeA neurons project to several nuclei. For this purpose, we first selected two brain stem nuclei implicated in the modulation of different components of the fear reactions, the periaqueductal gray (implicated in freezing) and the nucleus of solitary tract (implicated in heart rate modulation). We then performed double injections of two different retrograde tracers in these two nuclei and we quantified the subsequent presence of co-labelling in the CeA. We found that neurons projecting to the PAG and to the NTS are organized in separate populations. Subsequent electrophysiological recordings of the two populations revealed that PAG and NTS projecting neurons also have different electrophysiological characteristics. We then verified in vitro whether the neurons projecting to different brain stem nuclei express specific combinations of neuropeptide receptors, and whether a neuropeptide acting pre-synaptically (oxytocin) specifically modulates one of these two projections. We did not find differences at the level of expression of neurópeptide receptors, but we observed that oxytocin, a neuropeptide with anxiolytic properties, modulates PAG projecting neurons without affecting NTS projecting neurons. As oxytocin appeared to specifically modulate projections to the PAG, involved in the modulation of the freezing reaction, but did not affect the projections to the NTS, implicated in the modulation of cardiovascular parameters, we verified how this modulation translates in living animals. We investigated the effects of infra-amygdala injection of oxytocin on cardiovascular and behavioral changes induced by contextual fear conditioning. We found that oxytocin decreased the freezing response without affecting the cardiovascular system. Finally, as neuropeptides are considered potential future anxiolytics, we investigated whether diazepam and oxytocin, acting on the same circuit, had additive effects. This question was addressed exclusively with an in vitro electrophysiological approach. We obtained that oxytocin and diazepam, when co-applied, had an additive effect on both synaptic transmission and neuronal activity. These results open new perspectives for the possible clinical applications of oxytocin. Résumé : L'expression de la peur est accompagnée par de nombreux changements physiologiques et comportementaux qui sont déclenchés par l'amygdale centrale (CeA). Le circuit inclue aussi une série de noyaux du tronc cérébrale qui sont les effecteurs des différentes composantes de la réaction de peur. On sait que CeA envoie des projections aux noyaux du tronc cérébral et que ces neurones expriment une grande variété de récepteurs aux neuropeptides. Par contre, l'organisation des projections, ainsi que la modulation de ces projections par les neuropeptides reste encore peu connue. Avec ce projet, on premièrement voulu déterminer si CeA est composée de populations neuronales séparées qui projettent vers un noyau spécifique, ou bien si chaque neurones envoie des projections vers plusieurs noyaux. A ce propos, on a effectué des doubles injections de deux traceurs rétrogrades différentes dans deux noyaux du tronc cérébral impliqués dans des différentes composantes des réactions de peur. On a injecté la substance grise périaqueducale (PAG), qui est impliquée dans la réponse d'immobilisation, ainsi que le noyau du tractus solitaire (NTS) qui est responsable des changements cardiovasculaires. On a ensuite quantifié la présence de neurones contenant les deux traceurs dans CeA. On a trouvé que la plupart des neurones de l'amygdale centrale projettent vers un noyau spécifique, et on peut donc dire que l'amygdale semble être composée de populations neuronales séparées. On a ensuite mesuré les caractéristiques électrophysiologiques de ces deux projections et on a trouvé des différences substantielles concernant la résistance membranaire, la capacitance, le potentiel membranaire de repos ainsi que la fréquence des potentiels d'action spontanés. Puis, comme beaucoup de neuropéptides dans l'amygdale exercent un effet modulatoire sûr les réactions de peur et sur l'anxiété, on a étudié les effets directs et indirects d'une série de neuropeptides sur les différentes projections pour évaluer s'il y a des neuropeptides qui agissent spécifiquement sur une. On n'a pas trouvé de différences entre neurones qui projettent vers le PAG et neurones qui projettent vers le NTS concernant les effets de neuropeptides qui agissent directement sur ces cellules. Par contre, on a trouvé que l'ocytocine, un neuropeptide qui se lie à des récepteurs dans la partie latérale de l'amygdale centrale et inhibe de façon indirecte les neurones de l'amygdala centrale médiale, module les projections vers le PAG sans affecter celles qui vont vers le NTS. Comme le PAG est impliqué dans la réponse d'immobilisation, alors que le NTS est impliqué dans la modulation cardiovasculaire, on a ensuite étudié les effets de l'ocytocine injectée dans l'amygdale de rat vivants sur les réactions de peur conditionnées. On a trouvé que l'ocytocine diminue la réponse d'immobilisation sans par contre affecter la réponse cardiovasculaire. Pour terminer, on a vérifié si l'ocytocine potentialise les effets d'un médicament anxiolytique, le diazeparn. Avec une étude in vitro on a trouvé qu'une co-application d'ocytocine et diazeparn résulte en un effet additionnel à la fois sur la transmission synaptique ainsi que sur l'activité neuronale des neurones de l'amygdale centrale médiale. Ces résultats ouvrent des nouvelles perspectives pour une potentielle utilisation clinique de l'ocytocine.

Estimation of electronic coupling in π -stacked donor-bridge-acceptor systems: correction of the two-state model

Comparison of donor-acceptor electronic couplings calculated within two-state and three-state models suggests that the two-state treatment can provide unreliable estimates of Vda because of neglecting the multistate effects. We show that in most cases accurate values of the electronic coupling in a π stack, where donor and acceptor are separated by a bridging unit, can be obtained as Ṽ da = (E2 - E1) μ12 Rda + (2 E3 - E1 - E2) 2 μ13 μ23 Rda2, where E1, E2, and E3 are adiabatic energies of the ground, charge-transfer, and bridge states, respectively, μij is the transition dipole moments between the states i and j, and Rda is the distance between the planes of donor and acceptor. In this expression based on the generalized Mulliken-Hush approach, the first term corresponds to the coupling derived within a two-state model, whereas the second term is the superexchange correction accounting for the bridge effect. The formula is extended to bridges consisting of several subunits. The influence of the donor-acceptor energy mismatch on the excess charge distribution, adiabatic dipole and transition moments, and electronic couplings is examined. A diagnostic is developed to determine whether the two-state approach can be applied. Based on numerical results, we showed that the superexchange correction considerably improves estimates of the donor-acceptor coupling derived within a two-state approach. In most cases when the two-state scheme fails, the formula gives reliable results which are in good agreement (within 5%) with the data of the three-state generalized Mulliken-Hush model

Brain tissue properties differentiate between motor and limbic basal ganglia circuits.

Despite advances in understanding basic organizational principles of the human basal ganglia, accurate in vivo assessment of their anatomical properties is essential to improve early diagnosis in disorders with corticosubcortical pathology and optimize target planning in deep brain stimulation. Main goal of this study was the detailed topological characterization of limbic, associative, and motor subdivisions of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in relation to corresponding corticosubcortical circuits. To this aim, we used magnetic resonance imaging and investigated independently anatomical connectivity via white matter tracts next to brain tissue properties. On the basis of probabilistic diffusion tractography we identified STN subregions with predominantly motor, associative, and limbic connectivity. We then computed for each of the nonoverlapping STN subregions the covariance between local brain tissue properties and the rest of the brain using high-resolution maps of magnetization transfer (MT) saturation and longitudinal (R1) and transverse relaxation rate (R2*). The demonstrated spatial distribution pattern of covariance between brain tissue properties linked to myelin (R1 and MT) and iron (R2*) content clearly segregates between motor and limbic basal ganglia circuits. We interpret the demonstrated covariance pattern as evidence for shared tissue properties within a functional circuit, which is closely linked to its function. Our findings open new possibilities for investigation of changes in the established covariance pattern aiming at accurate diagnosis of basal ganglia disorders and prediction of treatment outcome.

Investigation of the Modified Beam-in-Slab Bridge System, Technical Report, 2004, Vol. 1

Technical Report

Investigation of the Modified Beam-in-Slab Bridge System, Design Guide, 2004, Vol. 3

Design guide

Investigation of the Modified Beam-in-Slab Bridge System, Design Manual, 2004, Vol. 2

Design Manual

Effective Structural Concrete Repair, Volume 2 of 3, Use of FRP to Prevent Chloride Penetration in Bridge Columns, March 2004

Structural concrete is one of the most commonly used construction materials in the United States. However, due to changes in design specifications, aging, vehicle impact, etc. – there is a need for new procedures for repairing concrete (reinforced or pretressed) superstructures and substructures. Thus, the overall objective of this investigation was to develop innovative cost effective repair methods for various concrete elements. In consultation with the project advisory committee, it was decided to evaluate the following three repair methods: • Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRPs) for use in repairing damaged prestressed concrete bridges • Fiber reinforced polymers (FRPs) for preventing chloride penetration of bridge columns • Various patch materials The initial results of these evaluations are presented in this three volume final report. Each evaluation is briefly described in the following paragraphs. A more detailed abstract of each evaluation accompanies the volume on that particular investigation.

Development of Abutment Design Standards for Local Bridge Designs, Volume 1 of 3, Development of Design Methodology, August 2004

Several superstructure design methodologies have been developed for low volume road bridges by the Iowa State University Bridge Engineering Center. However, to date no standard abutment designs have been developed. Thus, there was a need to establish an easy to use design methodology in addition to generating generic abutment standards and other design aids for the more common substructure systems used in Iowa. The final report for this project consists of three volumes. The first volume (this volume) summarizes the research completed in this project. A survey of the Iowa County Engineers was conducted from which it was determined that while most counties use similar types of abutments, only 17 percent use some type of standard abutment designs or plans. A literature review revealed several possible alternative abutment systems for future use on low volume road bridges in addition to two separate substructure lateral load analysis methods. These consisted of a linear and a non-linear method. The linear analysis method was used for this project due to its relative simplicity and the relative accuracy of the maximum pile moment when compared to values obtained from the more complex non-linear analysis method. The resulting design methodology was developed for single span stub abutments supported on steel or timber piles with a bridge span length ranging from 20 to 90 ft and roadway widths of 24 and 30 ft. However, other roadway widths can be designed using the foundation design template provided. The backwall height is limited to a range of 6 to 12 ft, and the soil type is classified as cohesive or cohesionless. The design methodology was developed using the guidelines specified by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials Standard Specifications, the Iowa Department of Transportation Bridge Design Manual, and the National Design Specifications for Wood Construction. The second volume introduces and outlines the use of the various design aids developed for this project. Charts for determining dead and live gravity loads based on the roadway width, span length, and superstructure type are provided. A foundation design template was developed in which the engineer can check a substructure design by inputting basic bridge site information. Tables published by the Iowa Department of Transportation that provide values for estimating pile friction and end bearing for different combinations of soils and pile types are also included. Generic standard abutment plans were developed for which the engineer can provide necessary bridge site information in the spaces provided. These tools enable engineers to design and detail county bridge substructures more efficiently. The third volume provides two sets of calculations that demonstrate the application of the substructure design methodology developed in this project. These calculations also verify the accuracy of the foundation design template. The printouts from the foundation design template are provided at the end of each example. Also several tables provide various foundation details for a pre-cast double tee superstructure with different combinations of soil type, backwall height, and pile type.

Development of Abutment Design Standards for Local Bridge Designs, Volume 3 of 3, Verification of Design Methodology, August 2004

Several superstructure design methodologies have been developed for low volume road bridges by the Iowa State University Bridge Engineering Center. However, to date no standard abutment designs have been developed. Thus, there was a need to establish an easy to use design methodology in addition to generating generic abutment standards and other design aids for the more common substructure systems used in Iowa. The final report for this project consists of three volumes. The first volume summarizes the research completed in this project. A survey of the Iowa County Engineers was conducted from which it was determined that while most counties use similar types of abutments, only 17 percent use some type of standard abutment designs or plans. A literature review revealed several possible alternative abutment systems for future use on low volume road bridges in addition to two separate substructure lateral load analysis methods. These consisted of a linear and a non-linear method. The linear analysis method was used for this project due to its relative simplicity and the relative accuracy of the maximum pile moment when compared to values obtained from the more complex non-linear analysis method. The resulting design methodology was developed for single span stub abutments supported on steel or timber piles with a bridge span length ranging from 20 to 90 ft and roadway widths of 24 and 30 ft. However, other roadway widths can be designed using the foundation design template provided. The backwall height is limited to a range of 6 to 12 ft, and the soil type is classified as cohesive or cohesionless. The design methodology was developed using the guidelines specified by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials Standard Specifications, the Iowa Department of Transportation Bridge Design Manual, and the National Design Specifications for Wood Construction. The second volume introduces and outlines the use of the various design aids developed for this project. Charts for determining dead and live gravity loads based on the roadway width, span length, and superstructure type are provided. A foundation design template was developed in which the engineer can check a substructure design by inputting basic bridge site information. Tables published by the Iowa Department of Transportation that provide values for estimating pile friction and end bearing for different combinations of soils and pile types are also included. Generic standard abutment plans were developed for which the engineer can provide necessary bridge site information in the spaces provided. These tools enable engineers to design and detail county bridge substructures more efficiently. The third volume (this volume) provides two sets of calculations that demonstrate the application of the substructure design methodology developed in this project. These calculations also verify the accuracy of the foundation design template. The printouts from the foundation design template are provided at the end of each example. Also several tables provide various foundation details for a pre-cast double tee superstructure with different combinations of soil type, backwall height, and pile type.

Development of Abutment Design Standards for Local Bridge Designs, Volume 2 of 3, Design Manual, August 2004

Several superstructure design methodologies have been developed for low volume road bridges by the Iowa State University Bridge Engineering Center. However, to date no standard abutment designs have been developed. Thus, there was a need to establish an easy to use design methodology in addition to generating generic abutment standards and other design aids for the more common substructure systems used in Iowa. The final report for this project consists of three volumes. The first volume summarizes the research completed in this project. A survey of the Iowa County Engineers was conducted from which it was determined that while most counties use similar types of abutments, only 17 percent use some type of standard abutment designs or plans. A literature review revealed several possible alternative abutment systems for future use on low volume road bridges in addition to two separate substructure lateral load analysis methods. These consisted of a linear and a non-linear method. The linear analysis method was used for this project due to its relative simplicity and the relative accuracy of the maximum pile moment when compared to values obtained from the more complex non-linear analysis method. The resulting design methodology was developed for single span stub abutments supported on steel or timber piles with a bridge span length ranging from 20 to 90 ft and roadway widths of 24 and 30 ft. However, other roadway widths can be designed using the foundation design template provided. The backwall height is limited to a range of 6 to 12 ft, and the soil type is classified as cohesive or cohesionless. The design methodology was developed using the guidelines specified by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials Standard Specifications, the Iowa Department of Transportation Bridge Design Manual, and the National Design Specifications for Wood Construction. The second volume (this volume) introduces and outlines the use of the various design aids developed for this project. Charts for determining dead and live gravity loads based on the roadway width, span length, and superstructure type are provided. A foundation design template was developed in which the engineer can check a substructure design by inputting basic bridge site information. Tables published by the Iowa Department of Transportation that provide values for estimating pile friction and end bearing for different combinations of soils and pile types are also included. Generic standard abutment plans were developed for which the engineer can provide necessary bridge site information in the spaces provided. These tools enable engineers to design and detail county bridge substructures more efficiently. The third volume provides two sets of calculations that demonstrate the application of the substructure design methodology developed in this project. These calculations also verify the accuracy of the foundation design template. The printouts from the foundation design template are provided at the end of each example. Also several tables provide various foundation details for a pre-cast double tee superstructure with different combinations of soil type, backwall height, and pile type.

Identification of the Best Practices for Design, Construction, and Repair of Bridge Approches, 2005

Bridge approach settlement and the formation of the bump is a common problem in Iowa that draws upon considerable resources for maintenance and creates a negative perception in the minds of transportation users. This research study was undertaken to investigate bridge approach problems and develop new concepts for design, construction, and maintenance that will reduce this costly problem. As a result of the research described in this report, the following changes are suggested for implementation on a pilot test basis: • Use porous backfill behind the abutment and/or geocomposite drainage systems to improve drainage capacity and reduce erosion around the abutment. • On a pilot basis, connect the approach slab to the bridge abutment. Change the expansion joint at the bridge to a construction joint of 2 inch. Use a more effective joint sealing system at the CF joint. Change the abutment wall rebar from #5 to #7 for non-integral abutments. • For bridges with soft foundation or embankment soils, implement practices of better compaction, preloading, ground improvement, soil removal and replacement, or soil reinforcement that reduce time-dependent post construction settlements.

Identification of the Best Practices for Design, Construction, and Repair of Bridge Approaches, January 2005

Bridge approach settlement and the formation of the bump is a common problem in Iowa that draws upon considerable resources for maintenance and creates a negative perception in the minds of transportation users. This research study was undertaken to investigate bridge approach problems and develop new concepts for design, construction, and maintenance that will reduce this costly problem. As a result of the research described in this report, the following changes are suggested for implementation on a pilot test basis: • Use porous backfill behind the abutment and/or geocomposite drainage systems to improve drainage capacity and reduce erosion around the abutment. • On a pilot basis, connect the approach slab to the bridge abutment. Change the expansion joint at the bridge to a construction joint of 2 inch. Use a more effective joint sealing system at the CF joint. Change the abutment wall rebar from #5 to #7 for non-integral abutments. • For bridges with soft foundation or embankment soils, implement practices of better compaction, preloading, ground improvement, soil removal and replacement, or soil reinforcement that reduce time-dependent post construction settlements.