Reversal of myocyte hypertrophy by ventricular unloading: cardiac improvement without adrenergic receptor up-regulation and relocalization.

In previous studies, we found that the improved contractile ability of cardiac myocytes from patients who have had left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support was due to a number of beneficial changes, most notably in calcium handling (increased sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium binding and uptake), improved integrity of cell membranes due to phospholipid reconstruction (reduced lysophospholipid content), and an upregulation of adrenoreceptors (increased adrenoreceptor numbers). However, in the case presented here, there was no increase in adrenoreceptor number, which is something that we usually find in core tissue at the time of LVAD removal or organ transplantation; also, there was no homogeneous postassist device receptor distribution. However, the patient was well maintained for 10 months following LVAD implantation, until a donor organ was available, regardless of the lack of adrenoreceptor improvement. We conclude from these studies that cardiac recovery is the result of the initiation of multiple repair mechanisms, and that the lack of expected changes, in this case increased adrenoreceptors, is not always an accurate indicator of anticipated outcome. We suggest that interventions and strategies have to consider multiple, beneficial changes due to unloading and target a number of biochemical and structural areas to produce improvement, even if not all of these improvements occur.

Effects of variable Gs expression on $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptor stimulated adenylyl cyclase response

An exact knowledge of the kinetic nature of the interaction between the stimulatory G protein (G$\sb{\rm s}$) and the adenylyl cyclase catalytic unit (C) is essential for interpreting the effects of Gs mutations and expression levels on cellular response to a wide variety of hormones, drugs, and neurotransmitters. In particular, insight as to the association of these proteins could lead to progress in tumor biology where single spontaneous mutations in G proteins have been associated with the formation of tumors (118). The question this work attempts to answer is whether the adenylyl cyclase activation by epinephrine stimulated $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptors occurs via G$\sb{\rm s}$ proteins by a G$\sb{\rm s}$ to C shuttle or G$\sb{\rm s}$-C precoupled mechanism. The two forms of activation are distinguishable by the effect of G$\sb{\rm s}$ levels on epinephrine stimulated EC50 values for cyclase activation.^ We have made stable transfectants of S49 cyc$\sp-$ cells with the gene for the $\alpha$ protein of G$\sb{\rm s}$ $(\alpha\sb{\rm s})$ which is under the control of the mouse mammary tumor virus LTR promoter (110). Expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ was then controlled by incubation of the cells for various times with 5 $\mu$M dexamethasone. Expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ led to the appearance of GTP shifts in the competitive binding of epinephrine with $\sp{125}$ICYP to the $\beta$-adrenergic receptors and to agonist dependent adenylyl cyclase activity. High expression of G$\sb{\rm s}\alpha$ resulted in lower EC50's for the adenylyl cyclase activity in response to epinephrine than did low expression. By kinetic modelling, this result is consistent with the existence of a shuttle mechanism for adenylyl cyclase activation by hormones.^ One item of concern that remains to be addressed is the extent to which activation of adenylyl cyclase occurs by a "pure" shuttle mechanism. Kinetic and biochemical experiments by other investigators have revealed that adenylyl cyclase activation, by hormones, may occur via a Gs-C precoupled mechanism (80, 94, 97). Activation of adenylyl cyclase, therefore, probably does not occur by either a pure "'Shuttle" or "Gs-C Precoupled" mechanism, but rather by a "Hybrid" mechanism. The extent to which either the shuttle or precoupled mechanism contributes to hormone stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity is the subject of on-going research. ^

Molecular mechanisms of protein kinase-mediated desensitization and internalization of the $\beta$-adrenergic receptor

The $\beta$-adrenergic receptor ($\beta$AR), which couples to G$\sb{\rm s}$ and activates adenylylcyclase, has been a prototype for studying the activation and desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors. The main objective of the present study is to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of protein kinase-mediated desensitization and internalization of the $\beta$AR.^ Activation of cAPK or PKC causes a rapid desensitization of $\beta$AR stimulation of adenylylcyclase in L cells, which previous studies suggest involves the cAPK/PKC consensus phosphorylation site in the third intracellular loop of the $\beta$AR, RRSSK$\sp{263}$. To determine the role of the individual serines in the cAPK- and PKC-meditated desensitizations, wild type (WT) and mutant $\beta$ARs containing the substitutions, Ser$\sp{261} \to$ A, Ser$\sp{262} \to$ A, Ser$\sp{262} \to$ D, and Ser$\sp{261/262} \to$ A, were constructed and stably transfected into L cells. The cAPK-mediated desensitization was decreased 70-80% by the Ser$\sp{262} \to$ A, Ser$\sp{262} \to$ D, and the Ser$\sp{261/262} \to$ A mutations, but was not altered by the Ser$\sp{261} \to$ A substitution, demonstrating that Ser$\sp{262}$ was the primary site of the cAPK-induced desensitization. The PMA/PKC-induced desensitization was unaffected by either of the single serine to alanine substitutions, but was reduced 80% by the double serine to alanine substitution, suggesting that either serine was sufficient to confer the PKC-mediated desensitization. Coincident stimulation of cAPK and PKC caused an additive desensitization which was significantly reduced (80%) only by the double substitution mutation. Quantitative evaluation of the coupling efficiencies and the GTP-shift of the WT and mutant receptors demonstrated that only one of the mutants, Ser$\sp{262} \to$ A, was partially uncoupled. The Ser$\sp{262} \to$ D mutation did not significantly uncouple, demonstrating that introducing a negative charge did not appear to mimic the desensitized state of the receptor.^ To accomplish the in vivo phosphorylation of the $\beta$AR, we used two epitope-modified $\beta$ARs, hemagglutinin-tagged $\beta$AR (HA-$\beta$AR) and 6 histidine-tagged $\beta$AR (6His-$\beta$AR), for a high efficiency purification of the $\beta$AR. Neither HA-$\beta$AR nor 6His-$\beta$AR altered activation and desensitization of the $\beta$AR significantly as compared to unmodified wild type $\beta$AR. 61% recovery of ICYP-labeled $\beta$AR was obtained with Ni-NTA column chromatography.^ The truncation 354 mutant $\beta$AR(T354), lacking putative $\beta$ARK site(s), displayed a normal epinephrine stimulation of adenylylcyclase. Although 1.0 $\mu$M epinephrine induced 60% less desensitization in T354 as compared to wild type $\beta$AR, 1.0 $\mu$M epinephrine-mediated desensitization in T354 was 35% greater than PGE$\sb1$-mediated desensitization, which is essentially identical in both WT and T354. These results suggested that sequences downstream of residue 354 may play a role in homologous desensitization and that internalization may be attributed to the additional desensitization besides the cAMP mechanism in T354 $\beta$AR. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

The differential expression of the $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptor modifies agonist-dependent adenylylcyclase activation

There have been multiple reports which indicate that variations in $\beta$AR expression affect the V$\sb{\rm max}$ observed for the agonist-dependent activation of adenylylcyclase. This observation has been ignored by most researchers when V$\sb{\rm max}$ values obtained for wild type and mutant receptors are compared. Such an imprecise analysis may lead to erroneous conclusions concerning the ability of a receptor to activate adenylylcyclase. Equations were derived from the Cassel-Selinger model of GTPase activity and Tolkovsky and Levitzki's Collision Coupling model which predict that the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ for the activation of adenylylcyclase are a function of receptor number. Experimental results for L cell clones in which either hamster or human $\beta$AR were transfected at varying levels showed that EC$\sb{50}$ decreases and V$\sb{\rm max}$ increases as receptor number increases. Comparison of these results with simulations obtained from the equations describing EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ showed a close correlation. This documents that the kinetic parameters of adenylylcyclase activation change with the level of receptor expression and relates this phenomenon to a theoretical framework concerning the mechanisms involved in $\beta$AR signal transduction.^ One of the terms used in the equations which expressed the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ as a function of receptor number is coupling efficiency, defined as $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$. Calculation of $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ can be accomplished for wild type receptors with the easily measured experimental values of agonist K$\sb{\rm d}$, EC$\sb{50}$ and receptor number. This was demonstrated for hamster $\beta$AR which yielded a coupling efficiency of 0.15 $\pm$ 0.003 and human $\beta$AR which yielded a coupling efficiency of 0.90 $\pm$ 0.031. $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ replaces the traditional qualitative evaluation of the ability to activate adenylylcyclase, which utilizes V$\sb{\rm max}$ without correction for variation in receptor number, with a quantitative definition that more accurately describes the ability of $\beta$AR to couple to G$\sb{\rm s}$.^ The equations which express the EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$ for adenylylcyclase activation as a function of receptor number and coupling efficiency were tested to determine whether they could accurately simulate the changes seen in these parameters during desensitization. Data from original desensitization experiments and data from the literature (24,25,52,54,83) were compared to simulated changes in EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$. In a variety of systems the predictions of the equations were consistent with the changes observed in EC$\sb{50}$ and V$\sb{\rm max}$. In addition reductions in the calculated value of $\rm k\sb1/k\sb{-1}$ was shown to correlate well with $\beta$AR phosphorylation and to be minimally affected by sequestration and down-regulation. ^

$\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptor desensitization, internalization and phosphorylation in response to full and partial agonists

The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that partial agonists produce less desensitization because they generate less of the active conformation of the $\beta\sb2$-adrenergic receptor ($\beta$AR) (R*) and in turn cause less $\beta$AR phosphorylation by beta adrenergic receptor kinase ($\beta$ARK) and less $\beta$AR internalization. In the present work, rates of desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation caused by a series of $\beta$AR agonists were correlated with a quantitative measure, defined as coupling efficiency, of agonist-dependent $\beta$AR activation of adenylyl cyclase. These studies were preformed in HEK-293 cells overexpressing the $\beta$AR with hemagglutinin (HA) and 6-histidine (6HIS) epitopes introduced into the N- and C-termini respectively. Agonists chosen provided a 95-fold range of coupling efficiencies, and, relative to epinephrine, the best agonist, (100%) were fenoterol (42%), albuterol (4.9%), dobutamine (2.5%) and ephedrine (1.1%). At concentrations of these agonists yielding $>$90% receptor occupancy, the rate and extent of the rapid phase (0-30 min) of agonist induced desensitization of adenylyl cyclase followed the same order as coupling efficiency, that is, epinephrine $\ge$ fitnoterol $>$ albuterol $>$ dobutamine $>$ ephedrine. The rate of internalization, measured by a loss of surface receptors during desensitization, with respect to these agonists also followed the same order as the desensitization and exhibited a slight lag. Like desensitization and internalization, $\beta$AR phosphorylation exhibited a dependency on agonist strength. The two strongest agonists epinephrine and fenoterol provoked 11 to 13 fold increases in the level of $\beta$AR phosphorylation after just 1 min, whereas the weakest agonists dobutamine and ephedrine caused only 3 to 4 fold increases in phosphorylation. With longer treatment times, the level of $\beta$AR phosphorylation declined with the strong agonists, but progressively increased with the weaker partial agonists. The major conclusion drawn from this study is that the occupancy-dependent rate of receptor phosphorylation increases with agonist coupling efficiencies and that this is sufficient to explain the desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation data obtained.^ The mechanism of activation and desensitization by the partial $\beta$AR agonist salmeterol was also examined in this study. This drug is extremely hydrophobic and its study presents possibly unique problems. To determine whether salmeterol induces desensitization of the $\beta$AR its action has been studied using our system. Employing the use of reversible antagonists it was found that salmeterol, which has an estimated coupling efficiency near that of albuterol caused $\beta$AR desensitization. This desensitization was much reduced relative to epinephrine. Consistent with its coupling efficiency, it was found to be similar to albuterol in its ability to induce internalization and phosphorylation of the $\beta$AR. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

REGULATION OF BRAIN NORADRENERGIC-RECEPTOR FUNCTION BY ADRENOCORTICOTROPHIN AND ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUGS (ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR, CYCLIC-AMP, ADENYLATE CYCLASE, IMIPRAMINE, STRESS)

Human behavior appears to be regulated in part by noradrenergic transmission since antidepressant drugs modify the number and function of (beta)-adrenergic receptors in the central nervous system. Affective illness is also known to be associated with the endocrine system, particularly the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The aim of the present study was to determine whether hormones, in particular adrencorticotrophin (ACTH) and corticosterone, may influence behavior by regulating brain noradrenergic receptor function.^ Chronic treatment with ACTH accelerated the increase or decrease in rat brain (beta)-adrenergic receptor number induced by a lesion of the dorsal noradrenergic bundle or treatment with the antidepressant imipramine. Chronic administration of ACTH alone had no effect on (beta)-receptor number although it reduced norepinephrine stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in brain slices. Treatment with imipramine also reduced the cyclic AMP response to norepinephrine but was accompanied by a decrease in (beta)-adrenergic receptor number. Both the imipramine and ACTH treatments reduced the affinity of (beta)-adrenergic receptors for norepinephrine, but only the antidepressant modified the potency of the neurotransmitter to stimulate second messenger production. Neither ACTH nor imipramine treatment altered Gpp(NH)p- or fluoride-stimulated adenylate cyclase, cyclic AMP, cyclic GMP, or cyclic GMP-stimulated cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase, or the activity of the guanine nucleotide binding protein (Gs). These findings suggested that post-receptor components of the cyclic nucleotide generating system are not influenced by the hormone or antidepressant. This conclusion was verified by the finding that neither treatment altered adenosine-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in brain tissue.^ A detailed examination of the (alpha)- and (beta)-adrenergic receptor components of norepinephrine-stimulated cyclic AMP production revealed that ACTH, but not imipramine, administration reduced the contribution of the (alpha)-receptor mediated response. Like ACTH treatment, corticosterone diminished the (alpha)-adrenergic component indicating that adrenal steroids probably mediate the neurochemical responses to ACTH administration. The data indicate that adrenal steroids and antidepressants decrease noradrenergic receptor function by selectively modifying the (alpha)- and (beta)-receptor components. The functional similarity in the action of the steroid and antidepressants suggests that adrenal hormones normally contribute to the maintenance of receptor systems which regulate affective behavior in man. ^

The β2-adrenergic receptor/βarrestin complex recruits the clathrin adaptor AP-2 during endocytosis

βarrestins mediate the desensitization of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) and many other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Additionally, βarrestins initiate the endocytosis of these receptors via clathrin coated-pits and interact directly with clathrin. Consequently, it has been proposed that βarrestins serve as clathrin adaptors for the GPCR family by linking these receptors to clathrin lattices. AP-2, the heterotetrameric clathrin adaptor protein, has been demonstrated to mediate the internalization of many types of plasma membrane proteins other than GPCRs. AP-2 interacts with the clathrin heavy chain and cytoplasmic domains of receptors such as those for epidermal growth factor and transferrin. In the present study we demonstrate the formation of an agonist-induced multimeric complex containing a GPCR, βarrestin 2, and the β2-adaptin subunit of AP-2. β2-Adaptin binds βarrestin 2 in a yeast two-hybrid assay and coimmunoprecipitates with βarrestins and β2AR in an agonist-dependent manner in HEK-293 cells. Moreover, β2-adaptin translocates from the cytosol to the plasma membrane in response to the β2AR agonist isoproterenol and colocalizes with β2AR in clathrin-coated pits. Finally, expression of βarrestin 2 minigene constructs containing the β2-adaptin interacting region inhibits β2AR endocytosis. These findings point to a role for AP-2 in GPCR endocytosis, and they suggest that AP-2 functions as a clathrin adaptor for the endocytosis of diverse classes of membrane receptors.

Expression of a β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 inhibitor prevents the development of myocardial failure in gene-targeted mice

Heart failure is accompanied by severely impaired β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) function, which includes loss of βAR density and functional uncoupling of remaining receptors. An important mechanism for the rapid desensitization of βAR function is agonist-stimulated receptor phosphorylation by the βAR kinase (βARK1), an enzyme known to be elevated in failing human heart tissue. To investigate whether alterations in βAR function contribute to the development of myocardial failure, transgenic mice with cardiac-restricted overexpression of either a peptide inhibitor of βARK1 or the β2AR were mated into a genetic model of murine heart failure (MLP−/−). In vivo cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Both MLP−/− and MLP−/−/β2AR mice had enlarged left ventricular (LV) chambers with significantly reduced fractional shortening and mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening. In contrast, MLP−/−/βARKct mice had normal LV chamber size and function. Basal LV contractility in the MLP−/−/βARKct mice, as measured by LV dP/dtmax, was increased significantly compared with the MLP−/− mice but less than controls. Importantly, heightened βAR desensitization in the MLP−/− mice, measured in vivo (responsiveness to isoproterenol) and in vitro (isoproterenol-stimulated membrane adenylyl cyclase activity), was completely reversed with overexpression of the βARK1 inhibitor. We report here the striking finding that overexpression of this inhibitor prevents the development of cardiomyopathy in this murine model of heart failure. These findings implicate abnormal βAR-G protein coupling in the pathogenesis of the failing heart and point the way toward development of agents to inhibit βARK1 as a novel mode of therapy.

Conversion of agonist site to metal-ion chelator site in the β2-adrenergic receptor

Previously metal-ion sites have been used as structural and functional probes in seven transmembrane receptors (7TM), but as yet all the engineered sites have been inactivating. Based on presumed agonist interaction points in transmembrane III (TM-III) and -VII of the β2-adrenergic receptor, in this paper we construct an activating metal-ion site between the amine-binding Asp-113 in TM-III—or a His residue introduced at this position—and a Cys residue substituted for Asn-312 in TM-VII. No increase in constitutive activity was observed in the mutant receptors. Signal transduction was activated in the mutant receptors not by normal catecholamine ligands but instead either by free zinc ions or by zinc or copper ions in complex with small hydrophobic metal-ion chelators. Chelation of the metal ions by small hydrophobic chelators such as phenanthroline or bipyridine protected the cells from the toxic effect of, for example Cu2+, and in several cases increased the affinity of the ions for the agonistic site. Wash-out experiments and structure–activity analysis indicated, that the high-affinity chelators and the metal ions bind and activate the mutant receptor as metal ion guided ligand complexes. Because of the well-understood binding geometry of the small metal ions, an important distance constraint has here been imposed between TM-III and -VII in the active, signaling conformation of 7TM receptors. It is suggested that atoxic metal-ion chelator complexes could possibly in the future be used as generic, pharmacologic tools to switch 7TM receptors with engineered metal-ion sites on or off at will.

Identification of the endophilins (SH3p4/p8/p13) as novel binding partners for the β1-adrenergic receptor

Several G-protein coupled receptors, such as the β1-adrenergic receptor (β1-AR), contain polyproline motifs within their intracellular domains. Such motifs in other proteins are known to mediate protein–protein interactions such as with Src homology (SH)3 domains. Accordingly, we used the proline-rich third intracellular loop of the β1-AR either as a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein in biochemical “pull-down” assays or as bait in the yeast two-hybrid system to search for interacting proteins. Both approaches identified SH3p4/p8/p13 (also referred to as endophilin 1/2/3), a SH3 domain-containing protein family, as binding partners for the β1-AR. In vitro and in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, SH3p4 specifically binds to the third intracellular loop of the β1-AR but not to that of the β2-AR. Moreover, this interaction is mediated by the C-terminal SH3 domain of SH3p4. Functionally, overexpression of SH3p4 promotes agonist-induced internalization and modestly decreases the Gs coupling efficacy of β1-ARs in HEK293 cells while having no effect on β2-ARs. Thus, our studies demonstrate a role of the SH3p4/p8/p13 protein family in β1-AR signaling and suggest that interaction between proline-rich motifs and SH3-containing proteins may represent a previously underappreciated aspect of G-protein coupled receptor signaling.

Characterization of the α1B-adrenergic receptor gene promoter region and hypoxia regulatory elements in vascular smooth muscle

We previously demonstrated that α1B-adrenergic receptor (AR) gene transcription, mRNA, and functionally coupled receptors increase during 3% O2 exposure in aorta, but not in vena cava smooth muscle cells (SMC). We report here that α1BAR mRNA also increases during hypoxia in liver and lung, but not heart and kidney. A single 2.7-kb α1BAR mRNA was detected in aorta and vena cava during normoxia and hypoxia. The α1BAR 5′ flanking region was sequenced to −2,460 (relative to ATG +1). Transient transfection experiments identify the minimal promoter region between −270 and −143 and sequence between −270 and −248 that are required for transcription of the α1BAR gene in aorta and vena cava SMC during normoxia and hypoxia. An ATTAAA motif within this sequence specifically binds aorta, vena cava, and DDT1MF-2 nuclear proteins, and transcription primarily initiates downstream of this motif at approximately −160 in aorta SMC. Sequence between −837 and −273 conferred strong hypoxic induction of transcription in aorta, but not in vena cava SMC, whereas the cis-element for the transcription factor, hypoxia-inducible factor 1, conferred hypoxia-induced transcription in both aorta and vena cava SMC. These data identify sequence required for transcription of the α1BAR gene in vascular SMC and suggest the atypical TATA-box, ATTAAA, may mediate this transcription. Hypoxia-sensitive regions of the α1BAR gene also were identified that may confer the differential hypoxic increase in α1BAR gene transcription in aorta, but not in vena cava SMC.

Substitution of a mutant α2a-adrenergic receptor via “hit and run” gene targeting reveals the role of this subtype in sedative, analgesic, and anesthetic-sparing responses in vivo

Norepinephrine contributes to antinociceptive, sedative, and sympatholytic responses in vivo, and α2 adrenergic receptor (α2AR) agonists are used clinically to mimic these effects. Lack of subtype-specific agonists has prevented elucidation of the role that each α2AR subtype (α2A, α2B, and α2C) plays in these central effects. Here we demonstrate that α2AR agonist-elicited sedative, anesthetic-sparing, and analgesic responses are lost in a mouse line expressing a subtly mutated α2AAR, D79N α2AAR, created by two-step homologous recombination. These functional changes are accompanied by failure of the D79N α2AAR to inhibit voltage-gated Ca2+ currents and spontaneous neuronal firing, a measure of K+ current activation. These results provide definitive evidence that the α2AAR subtype is the primary mediator of clinically important central actions of α2AR agonists and suggest that the D79N α2AAR mouse may serve as a model for exploring other possible α2AAR functions in vivo.

Decreased blood pressure response in mice deficient of the α1b-adrenergic receptor

To investigate the functional role of different α1-adrenergic receptor (α1-AR) subtypes in vivo, we have applied a gene targeting approach to create a mouse model lacking the α1b-AR (α1b−/−). Reverse transcription–PCR and ligand binding studies were combined to elucidate the expression of the α1-AR subtypes in various tissues of α1b +/+ and −/− mice. Total α1-AR sites were decreased by 98% in liver, 74% in heart, and 42% in cerebral cortex of the α1b −/− as compared with +/+ mice. Because of the large decrease of α1-AR in the heart and the loss of the α1b-AR mRNA in the aorta of the α1b−/− mice, the in vivo blood pressure and in vitro aorta contractile responses to α1-agonists were investigated in α1b +/+ and −/− mice. Our findings provide strong evidence that the α1b-AR is a mediator of the blood pressure and the aorta contractile responses induced by α1 agonists. This was demonstrated by the finding that the mean arterial blood pressure response to phenylephrine was decreased by 45% in α1b −/− as compared with +/+ mice. In addition, phenylephrine-induced contractions of aortic rings also were decreased by 25% in α1b−/− mice. The α1b-AR knockout mouse model provides a potentially useful tool to elucidate the functional specificity of different α1-AR subtypes, to better understand the effects of adrenergic drugs, and to investigate the multiple mechanisms involved in the control of blood pressure.

Essential role of β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 in cardiac development and function

The β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (βARK1) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family that mediates the agonist-dependent phosphorylation and desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors. We have cloned and disrupted the βARK1 gene in mice by homologous recombination. No homozygote βARK1−/− embryos survive beyond gestational day 15.5. Prior to gestational day 15.5, βARK1−/− embryos display pronounced hypoplasia of the ventricular myocardium essentially identical to the “thin myocardium syndrome” observed upon gene inactivation of several transcription factors (RXRα, N-myc, TEF-1, WT-1). Lethality in βARK1−/− embryos is likely due to heart failure as they exhibit a >70% decrease in cardiac ejection fraction determined by direct in utero intravital microscopy. These results along with the virtual absence of endogenous GRK activity in βARK1−/− embryos demonstrate that βARK1 appears to be the predominant GRK in early embryogenesis and that it plays a fundamental role in cardiac development.

β2-Adrenergic receptor regulation by GIT1, a G protein-coupled receptor kinase-associated ADP ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein

G protein-coupled receptor activation leads to the membrane recruitment and activation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases, which phosphorylate receptors and lead to their inactivation. We have identified a novel G protein-coupled receptor kinase-interacting protein, GIT1, that is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for the ADP ribosylation factor (ARF) family of small GTP-binding proteins. Overexpression of GIT1 leads to reduced β2-adrenergic receptor signaling and increased receptor phosphorylation, which result from reduced receptor internalization and resensitization. These cellular effects of GIT1 require its intact ARF GAP activity and do not reflect regulation of GRK kinase activity. These results suggest an essential role for ARF proteins in regulating β2-adrenergic receptor endocytosis. Moreover, they provide a mechanism for integration of receptor activation and endocytosis through regulation of ARF protein activation by GRK-mediated recruitment of the GIT1 ARF GAP to the plasma membrane.