The Spectator.

Mode of access: Internet.

The Tatler.

Originally published in 271 numbers, April 12, 1709 to January 2, 1711.

The Spectator,

Mode of access: Internet.

The Spectator.

Mode of access: Internet.

The tatler and the Guardian : complete in one volume, with notes, and a general index.

Originally published in 175 numbers, March 12th to October 1, 1713.

The Spectator; with notes and a general index.

"Original dedications" for vols. 1-8: v. 1, p. [xi]-xvi.

Paradise lost : a poem /

Imprint continues: sold also by Théophile Barrois, jun.; Truchy; Amyot; Librairie des étrangers; French and English Library.

The Tatler; or, Lucubrations of Isaac Bickerstaff, Esq.

Each vol. has a separate index.

The Tatler and The Guardian

"With notes and a general index."

The Spectator.

Originally published in 635 numbers, from March 1, 1711 to December 6, 1712; June 18 to December 20, 1714.

Spectator

"With a history and biographical preface by A. Chalmers."

Essays on suicide and the immortality of the soul

by the late David Hume. With remarks by the editor, to which are added two letters on suicide from Rousseau's Eloisa

Vergilius Redivivus: Studies in Joseph Addison's Latin Poetry

J.W. Binns, Modern Language Review 101.2 (2006), 504-5:
‘This book is an important contribution to the study of Anglo-Latin poetry in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries … ’Haan provides an able and authoritative account …, setting the poems in their contexts, and providing for each a very clear and penetrating analysis which traces the classical well-springs that lie behind much of Addison’s Latin writing, and also calls attention to non-traditional elements’.

The life of Joseph Addison Alexander.

Paged continuously.

Joseph A. Schumpeter, capitalism, socialism, and democracy

This is a review of "Capitalism, socialism, and democracy", by Joseph A. Schumpeter, New York, Harper Perennial, 1942 (first Harper Colophon edition published 1975). "The public mind has by now so thoroughly grown out of humor with it as to make condemnation of capitalism and all its works a foregone conclusion – almost a requirement of the etiquette of discussion. Whatever his political preference, every writer or speaker hastens to conform to this code and to emphasize his critical attitude, his freedom from ‘complacency’, his belief in the inadequacies of capitalist achievement, his aversion to capitalist and his sympathy with anti-capitalist interests. Any other attitude is voted not only foolish but anti-social and is looked upon as an indication of immoral servitude." We might easily mistake this for a voice weary of contemplating the implications for neo-liberal nostrums of our current global financial crisis were it not for the rather formal, slightly arch, style and the gender exclusive language. It was in fact penned in the depths of World War II by Harvard economist Joseph Schumpeter, who fell off the map only to re-emerge from the 1970s as oil shocks and stagflation in the west presaged the decline of the Keynesian settlement, as east Asian newly industrialising economies were modelling on his insistence that entrepreneurialism, access to credit and trade were the pillars of economic growth, and as innovation became more of a watchword for post-industrial economies in general. The second coming was perhaps affirmed when his work was dubbed by Forbes in 1983 – on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the birth of both men – as of greater explanatory import than Keynes’. (And what of our present resurgent Keynesian moment?)...