Escriure (correctament) per al web

The article presents the requirements of written text to be read on the web, as well as the general recommendations for editing text aimed at facilitating its reading. After introducing the overview of reading of written text, techniques, and strategies, the author turns to factors that condition reading on the web, as well as other specifics. Based on these elements, a series of recommendations is offered for good practices for writing correctly for the web, organised by the three basic components of written text: style or tone, structure, and presentation (orthographic and typographic corrections). Also introduced are tools that can be useful for improving text editing in a corporate environment

Web content accessibility guidelines: from 1.0 to 2.0

This poster explains the changes introduced in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 from WCAG 1.0 and proposes a checklist for adapting existing websites. Finally, it describes the most common criticisms of the WCAG and places them in the context of its origin and initial aims.

A software to calculate soil hydraulic conductivity in internal drainage experiments (SHC, Version 2.00)

A software for the calculation of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity K(theta) is presented for commonly used methods found in the literature, based on field experiments in which a soil profile is submitted to water infiltration followed by internal drainage. The software is available at: dourado@esalq.usp.br.

Directrius per a l'accessibilitat al contingut web, versió 1.0. Recomanació de W3C, 5 de maig de 1999

Aquestes directrius expliquen com fer que el contingut web sigui accessible a persones ambdiscapacitats i s'adrecen a creadors de contingut (autors de pàgines web o dissenyadors de llocs web) ia creadors d'eines d'autor. L'objectiu principal d'aquestes directrius és promoure l'accessibilitat.Tanmateix, l'aplicació de les directrius facilitarà l'accés al contingut a tot tipus d'usuari, sigui quin siguil'agent d'usuari usat (navegador web, navegador de veu, telèfon mòbil, ordinador de cotxe, etc.) o les condicions de l'entorn de consulta (entorns sorollosos, espais mal il·luminats, entorns en què no es poden usar lesmans, etc.). L'aplicació d'aquestes directrius també ajudarà els usuaris a trobar la informació d'unamanera més ràpida dins el web. Les directrius no pretenen desincentivar l'ús d'imatges, vídeo, etc., sinóque expliquen com fer que el contingut multimèdia sigui més accessible a una àmplia audiència.Aquest és un document de referència per a uns principis d'accessibilitat i idees de disseny. Algunes deles estratègies comentades tracten d'aspectes relatius a la internacionalització del web i a l'accés desde terminals mòbils. Tanmateix, el document se centra en l'accessibilitat i no tracta exhaustivament delsaspectes relacionats amb altres activitats del W3C. Si voleu més informació sobre aquests temes podeuconsultar les pàgines inicials W3C Mobile Access Activity (per a l'accés des de terminals mòbils) i W3CInternationalization Activity (per als aspectes d'internacionalització). Aquest document està pensat per a ser estable en el temps i, per tant, no dóna informació específica sobre si els navegadors funcionen o no amb una determinada tecnologia, ja que aquesta informació varia molt ràpidament. Aquesta informació es pot trobar al web de la Web Accessibility Initiative ,WAI, (Iniciativa d'Accessibilitat Web) [WAI-UA-SUPPORT].Aquest document inclou un annex que organitza tots els punts de verificació ordenats per tema i perprioritat. Els punts de l'annex estan enllaçats a les respectives definicions en el document. Els temesrecollits en l'annex inclouen les imatges, el contingut multimèdia, les taules, els marcs, els formularis iels scripts. L'annex es presenta en forma de taula o com a simple llista. Un document a part, amb el títol Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (Tècniques per a les directrius per a l'accessibilitat al contingut web, versió 1.0) ([TECHNIQUES]) explica com posar a la pràctica els punts citats fins aquí. El document de tècniques explica cada punt amb més detalls i dóna exemples usant el llenguatge d'etiquetatge d'hipertext (HTML), fulls d'estil en cascada (CSS), el llenguatge d'integració multimèdia sincronitzada (SMIL) o el llenguatge d'etiquetatge matemàtic (MathML). Aquest document també inclou tècniques per a provar o validar una pàgina web i un índex Directrius per a l'accessibilitat al contingut web, versió 1.0 dels elements i atributs HTML amb les tècniques que els usen. El document de tècniques està pensat per a seguir de prop els canvis tecnològics i es preveu que s'actualitzi més sovint que les directrius.

La Universidad española en la web: pautas para una comunicación más efectiva

Estudio del grado de accesibilidad de las webs corporativas de las universidades españolas, según el cumplimiento de las Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) y otros indicadores.

The International LAM Registry: a component of an innovative web-based clinician, researcher, and patient-driven rare disease research platform.

BACKGROUND: A relative inability to capture a sufficiently large patient population in any one geographic location has traditionally limited research into rare diseases. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinicians interested in the rare disease lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) have worked with the LAM Treatment Alliance, the MIT Media Lab, and Clozure Associates to cooperate in the design of a state-of-the-art data coordination platform that can be used for clinical trials and other research focused on the global LAM patient population. This platform is a component of a set of web-based resources, including a patient self-report data portal, aimed at accelerating research in rare diseases in a rigorous fashion. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between clinicians, researchers, advocacy groups, and patients can create essential community resource infrastructure to accelerate rare disease research. The International LAM Registry is an example of such an effort. 82.

Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability

Background: The NDI, COM and NPQ are evaluation instruments for disability due to NP. There was no Spanish version of NDI or COM for which psychometric characteristics were known. The objectives of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the Spanish version of the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire (NDI), and the Core Outcome Measure (COM), to validate its use in Spanish speaking patients with non-specific neck pain (NP), and to compare their psychometric characteristics with those of the Spanish version of the Northwick Pain Questionnaire (NPQ).Methods: Translation/re-translation of the English versions of the NDI and the COM was done blindly and independently by a multidisciplinary team. The study was done in 9 primary care Centers and 12 specialty services from 9 regions in Spain, with 221 acute, subacute and chronic patients who visited their physician for NP: 54 in the pilot phase and 167 in the validation phase. Neck pain (VAS), referred pain (VAS), disability (NDI, COM and NPQ), catastrophizing (CSQ) and quality of life (SF-12) were measured on their first visit and 14 days later. Patients' self-assessment was used as the external criterion for pain and disability. In the pilot phase, patients' understanding of each item in the NDI and COM was assessed, and on day 1 test-retest reliability was estimated by giving a second NDI and COM in which the name of the questionnaires and the order of the items had been changed.Results: Comprehensibility of NDI and COM were good. Minutes needed to fill out the questionnaires [median, (P25, P75)]: NDI. 4 (2.2, 10.0), COM: 2.1 (1.0, 4.9). Reliability: [ICC, (95%CI)]: NDI: 0.88 (0.80, 0.93). COM: 0.85 (0.75,0.91). Sensitivity to change: Effect size for patients having worsened, not changed and improved between days 1 and 15, according to the external criterion for disability: NDI: -0.24, 0.15, 0.66; NPQ: -0.14, 0.06, 0.67; COM: 0.05, 0.19, 0.92. Validity: Results of NDI, NPQ and COM were consistent with the external criterion for disability, whereas only those from NDI were consistent with the one for pain. Correlations with VAS, CSQ and SF-12 were similar for NDI and NPQ (absolute values between 0.36 and 0.50 on day 1, between 0.38 and 0.70 on day 15), and slightly lower for COM (between 0.36 and 0.48 on day 1, and between 0.33 and 0.61 on day 15). Correlation between NDI and NPQ: r = 0.84 on day 1, r = 0.91 on day 15. Correlation between COM and NPQ: r = 0.63 on day 1, r = 0.71 on day 15.Conclusion: Although most psychometric characteristics of NDI, NPQ and COM are similar, those from the latter one are worse and its use may lead to patients' evolution seeming more positive than it actually is. NDI seems to be the best instrument for measuring NP-related disability, since its results are the most consistent with patient's assessment of their own clinical status and evolution. It takes two more minutes to answer the NDI than to answer the COM, but it can be reliably filled out by the patient without assistance.

Construct validity of the French version of the PRWE (Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation) with the French version of the DASH (Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand) is good to very good in a population of patients with wrist injuries in an inpatient rehabilitation unit

Objective.- The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation is a specific questionnaire for the wrist [1]. It consists of 15 questions with a total score of 100. It was recently translated into French [2]. However, its validity has not been tested in this language. The Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), with well-established psychometric properties, is considered as the reference questionnaire for the evaluation of upper extremities. The objective of this study is to measure the construct validity of the PRWE-F with the DASH-F in patients with wrist pathology.Patients and methods.- Fifty-one patients (40 m, 11 w, mean age 42 years), 25 fractures of the radius and 26 lesions of the carpus.Questionnaires PRWE-F and DASH-F at entry and at discharge (0 to 100). Calculation of the construct validity of the PRWE-F comparing with the DASH-F with Pearson correlation coefficients (r) at entry and at discharge. Level of significance (alpha) was set at 5%.Results.- Correlation DASH/PRWE at entry: r = 0.799 (95% CI 0.671 to 0.881), P < 0.0001. Correlation DASH/PRWE at discharge: r = 0.847 (95% CI: 0.745 to 0.910), P < 0.0001.Discussion.- The construct validity of the two instruments indicates that they measure the same concept. Our correlation between DASH-F and PRWE-F, going from 0.799 to 0.847, are comparable to those published in different languages (0.71 to 0.84) [3,4]. The questionnaires PRWE-F can thus be used in rehabilitation patients presenting with wrist pathologies; it is comparable to the DASH but described by MacDermid [1] to be more specific. Compared to the DASH it has the advantage of consisting of two dimensions. Its construct validity is excellent. This questionnaire should be evaluated in other populations, and it should be compared with hand questionnaires more specific than the DASH.

Qualités des sites internet anglophones traitant du trouble obsessionnel complusif

Enjeux et contexte : Dans les questions de santé mentale, internet constitue de plus en plus une source d'information pour les personnes souffrant de troubles psychiatriques ainsi que de leurs proches. D'autre part, le trouble obsessionnel compulsif revêt une importance grandissante et bénéficie d'un intérêt croissant en raison de sa fréquence et de la charge qu'il représente pour le patient et pour la société. Les patients souffrant de trouble obsessionnel compulsif, qu'ils soient diagnostiqués ou non, ainsi que leurs proches peuvent être amenés à rechercher une information de bonne qualité sur net sur le sujet. Cette étude vise à évaluer la qualité de l'information issue de l'internet concernant les sites anglophones traitant du trouble obsessionnel compulsif et de comparer les résultats des requêtes en utilisant un moteur de recherche général (Google) à celles obtenues avec un moteur de recherche spécialisé (Omni Medical Search). Des mots-clés relatifs au trouble obsessionnel compulsif ont été introduits dans Google et Omni Medical Search. Les sites retenus ont été évalués selon leur responsabilité, interactivité, lisibilité et la qualité de leur contenu. Le Label HON et la version brève de l'échelle DISCERN ont été utilisés comme indicateurs possibles de la qualité du contenu. Sur les 235 adresses retrouvées, 53 sites retenus ont été analysés. Résultats : La qualité du contenu des sites examinés est relativement bonne. L'utilisation d'un moteur de recherche spécialisé ne constitue pas un avantage par comparaison au moteur général utilisé par la grande majorité des internautes. Un score > 16 de la version brève du DISCERN est associé à une meilleure qualité du contenu. En conclusion : cette étude montre que le contenu des sites web concernant le trouble obsessionnel compulsif est acceptable. L'utilisation d'un moteur de recherche spécialisé n'offre pas d'avantage par rapport à Google. Comme implications pratiques : internet renferme des sites de haute qualité sur le trouble obsessionnel compulsif. L'accès à ces sites ne nécessite pas l'utilisation d'un moteur de recherche spécialisé. En revanche, une discussion entre le patient et le soignant à propos de l'information disponible sur internet demeure indispensable Perspectives : en dépit des limitations de notre étude, on peut dire que l'information contenue dans le web concernant le trouble obsessionnel compulsif est acceptable. Le contenu et la présentation de cette information pourraient être améliorés. Quant à l'internaute qui cherche une information de qualité, il pourrait être guidé par deux éléments : le HON et la version brève du DISCERN.

Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites.

OBJECTIVE: To extract and to validate a brief version of the DISCERN which could identify mental health-related websites with good content quality. METHOD: The present study is based on the analysis of data issued from six previous studies which used DISCERN and a standardized tool for the evaluation of content quality (evidence-based health information) of 388 mental health-related websites. After extracting the Brief DISCERN, several psychometric properties (content validity through a Factor analysis, internal consistency by the Cronbach's alpha index, predictive validity through the diagnostic tests, concurrent validity by the strength of association between the Brief DISCERN and the original DISCERN scores) were investigated to ascertain its general applicability. RESULTS: A Brief DISCERN composed of two factors and six items was extracted from the original 16 items version of the DISCERN. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were more than acceptable for the complete questionnaire (alpha=0.74) and for the two distinct domains: treatments information (alpha=0.87) and reliability (alpha=0.83). Sensibility and specificity of the Brief DISCERN cut-off score > or =16 in the detection of good content quality websites were 0.357 and 0.945, respectively. Its predictive positive and negative values were 0.98 and 0.83, respectively. A statistically significant linear correlation was found between the total scores of the Brief DISCERN and those of the original DISCERN (r=0.84 and p<0.0005). CONCLUSION: The Brief DISCERN seems to be a reliable and valid instrument able to discriminate between websites with good and poor content quality. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The Brief DISCERN is a simple tool which could facilitate the identification of good information on the web by patients and general consumers.

French version of the Family Attitude Scale: Psychometric properties and relation of attitudes to the respondent's psychiatric status.

The Family Attitude Scale (FAS) is a self-report measure of critical or hostile attitudes and behaviors towards another family member, and demonstrates an ability to predict relapse in psychoses. Data are not currently available on a French version of the scale. The present study developed a French version of the FAS, using a large general population sample to test its internal structure, criterion validity and relationships with the respondents' symptoms and psychiatric diagnoses, and examined the reciprocity of FAS ratings by respondents and their partners. A total of 2072 adults from an urban population undertook a diagnostic interview and completed self-report measures, including an FAS about their partner. A subset of participants had partners who also completed the FAS. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed an excellent fit by a single-factor model, and the FAS demonstrated a strong association with dyadic adjustment. FAS scores of respondents were affected by their anxiety levels and mood, alcohol and anxiety diagnoses, and moderate reciprocity of attitudes and behaviors between the partners was seen. The French version of the FAS has similarly strong psychometric properties to the original English version. Future research should assess the ability of the French FAS to predict relapse of psychiatric disorders.