979 resultados para Midlands Technical College (Columbia, S.C.)--Finance
Resumo:
17 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Joseph Christ und Max Horkheimer, 1942-1943; 13 Briefe zwischen Elliot E. Cohen und Max Horkheimer, 1946-1947; 7 Briefe zwischen Stewart G. Cole und Max Horkheimer, 1944-1945 sowie 1 Sonderdruck; 1 Memorandum von Theodor W. Adorno an F. Pollock, 1948; 5 Briefe zwischen dem Collegium [Studentischer Club an der Universität Frankfurt am Main] und Max Horkheimer, 1949; 17 Briefe und Beilage zwischen dem College of Jewish Studies, 1948-1949, 1951 sowie Drucksachen und 9 Papers zum Antisemitismus; 18 Briefe und Beilagen zwischen der Columbia University New York und Max Horkheimer, 1942-1947;
Resumo:
24 Briefe und Abrechnugen von New York State Income Tax Resident Return (New York) an Henryk Grossmann, 1938 - 1948; 3 Briefe von Henryk Grossmann an das Department of Taxation and Finance, 1946; 5 Briefe zwischen C. Hartwig Inc. und der Social Studies Association (New York), 1949; 1 Brief an F. Pollock von A. P. Bersohn, 14.12.1948; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Henryk Grossmann, 1945/1947; 2 Briefe zwischen Henryk Grossmann und F. Pollock, 1948 - 1949; 1 Brief von American Scantic Line/Moore-McCormack Lines Inc (New York) an C. Hartwig Inc., 18.02.1949; 1 Brief an Collector of Internal Revenue (New York) von Max Horkheimer, 25.01.1949; 1 Brief von Frederick Wild an Herrn Edelman, 17.09.1946; 80 Briefe zwischen Julian und Lotte Gumperz und Max Horkheimer, 1934 - 1942; 4 Briefe zwischen dem Institut für Sozialforschung (Frankfurt a. M.) und Helen Mack, 1974 - 1975; 3 Briefe zwischen der Columbia University (New York) und Julian Gumperz, Juli 1934; 4 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an die Columbia University (New York), 1934/1938; 1 Brief von Julian Gumperz an A. E. Burns, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief an Louis H. Bean von Julian Gumperz, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief von Julian Gumperz an E. A. Goldenweiser, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief an F. H. Thomson von Julian Gumperz, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief von Julian Gumperz an Gardiner Means, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief an Hildegard Kneeland von Julian Gumperz, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief von Julian Gumperz an Mordecai Execiel, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief an Isador Lubin von Julian Gumperz, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief von Julian Gumperz an Boris Stern, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief an Lauchlin Currie von Julian Gumperz, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief von Julian Gumperz an B. H. Beckhart, 24.02.1938; 1 Brief von der Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung (New York) an Julian Gumperz, 08.10.1937;
Resumo:
Objective: In this secondary data analysis, three statistical methodologies were implemented to handle cases with missing data in a motivational interviewing and feedback study. The aim was to evaluate the impact that these methodologies have on the data analysis. ^ Methods: We first evaluated whether the assumption of missing completely at random held for this study. We then proceeded to conduct a secondary data analysis using a mixed linear model to handle missing data with three methodologies (a) complete case analysis, (b) multiple imputation with explicit model containing outcome variables, time, and the interaction of time and treatment, and (c) multiple imputation with explicit model containing outcome variables, time, the interaction of time and treatment, and additional covariates (e.g., age, gender, smoke, years in school, marital status, housing, race/ethnicity, and if participants play on athletic team). Several comparisons were conducted including the following ones: 1) the motivation interviewing with feedback group (MIF) vs. the assessment only group (AO), the motivation interviewing group (MIO) vs. AO, and the intervention of the feedback only group (FBO) vs. AO, 2) MIF vs. FBO, and 3) MIF vs. MIO.^ Results: We first evaluated the patterns of missingness in this study, which indicated that about 13% of participants showed monotone missing patterns, and about 3.5% showed non-monotone missing patterns. Then we evaluated the assumption of missing completely at random by Little's missing completely at random (MCAR) test, in which the Chi-Square test statistic was 167.8 with 125 degrees of freedom, and its associated p-value was p=0.006, which indicated that the data could not be assumed to be missing completely at random. After that, we compared if the three different strategies reached the same results. For the comparison between MIF and AO as well as the comparison between MIF and FBO, only the multiple imputation with additional covariates by uncongenial and congenial models reached different results. For the comparison between MIF and MIO, all the methodologies for handling missing values obtained different results. ^ Discussions: The study indicated that, first, missingness was crucial in this study. Second, to understand the assumptions of the model was important since we could not identify if the data were missing at random or missing not at random. Therefore, future researches should focus on exploring more sensitivity analyses under missing not at random assumption.^
Resumo:
The Annual Biochemical Engineering Symposium Series started in 1970 when Professors Larry E. Erickson (Kansas State University) and Peter J. Reilly (then with University of Nebraska-Lincoln) got together in Manhattan, KS along with their students for a half-day powwow and technical presentation by their students. Ever since then, it has been a forum for Biochemical Engineering students in the heartland of USA to present their research to their colleagues in the form of talks and posters. The institutions actively involved with this annual symposium include Colorado State University, Kansas State University, Iowa State University, University of Colorado, University of Kansas, University of Missouri-Columbia, and University of Oklahoma. The University of lowa and University of Nebraska-Lincoln have also participated in the conference in recent years. The host institutions for the different symposia have been: Kansas State University (1, 3, 5, 9, 12, 16, 20), Iowa State University (6, 7, 10, 13, 17, 22), University of Missouri-Columbia (8, 14, 19, 25), Colorado State University (II, 15, 21), University of Colorado (18, 24), University of Nebraska-Lincoln (2, 4), University of Oklahoma (23). The next symposium will be held at Kansas State University. Proceedings of the Symposium are edited by faculty of the host institution and include manuscripts written and submitted by the presenters (students). These often include works-in-progress and final publication usually takes place in refereed journals. ContentsPatrick C. Gilcrease and Vincent G. Murphy, Colorado State University. Use of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) As A Nitrogen Source By A Pseudomonas florescens Species Under Aerobic Conditions. Marulidharan Narayanan, Lawrence C. Davis, and Larry E. Erickson, Kansas State University. Biodegradation Studies of Chlorinated Organic Pollutants in a Chamber in the Presence of Alfalfa Plants. S.K. Santharam, L.E. Erickson, and L.T. Fan, Kansas State University.Surfactant-Enhanced Remediation of a Non-Aqueous Phase Contaminant in Soil. Barry Vant-Hull, Larry Gold, and Robert H. Davis, University of Colorado.The Binding of T7 RNA Polymerase to Double-Stranded RNA. Jeffrey A. Kern and Robert H. Davis, University of Colorado.Improvement of RNA Transcription Yield Using a Fed-Batch Enzyme Reactor. G. Szakacs, M. Pecs, J. Sipocz, I. Kaszas, S.R. Deecker, J.C. Linden, R.P. Tengerdy, Colorado State University.Bioprocessing of Sweet Sorghum With In Situ Produced Enzymes. Brad Forlow and Matthias Nollert, University of Oklahoma.The Effect of Shear Stress ad P-selectin Site Density on the Rolling Velocity of White Blood Cells. Martin C. Heller and Theodore W. Randolph, University of Colorado.The Effects of Plyethylene Glycol and Dextran on the Lyophilization of Human Hemoglobin. LaToya S. Jones and Theodore W. Randolph, University of Colorado.Purification of Recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccine: Effect of Virus/Surfactant Interactions. Ching-Yuan Lee, Michael G. Sportiello, Stephen Cape, Sean Ferree, Paul Todd, Craig E. Kundrot, and Cindy Barnes, University of Colorado.Application of Osmotic Dewatering to the Crystallization of Oligonucleotides for Crystallography. Xueou Deng, L.E. Erickson, and D.Y.C. Fung, Kansas State University.Production of Protein-Rich Beverages from Cheese Whey and Soybean by rapid Hydration Hydrothermal Cooking. Pedro M. Coutinho, Michael K. Dowd, and Peter J. Reilly, Iowa State University.Automated Docking of Glucoamylase Substrates and Inhibitors. J. Johansson and R.K. Bajpai, University of Missouri.Adsorption of Albumin on Polymeric Microporous Membranes.
Resumo:
We report the results of downhole stable isotopic (d13Corg [organic carbon] and d15N) and elemental measurements (total organic carbon [TOC], total nitrogen [TN], and carbon/nitrogen [C/N]) of sedimentary organic matter (SOM) along with stable isotopic measurements (d18O and d13C) of left-coiling Neogloboquadrina pachyderma planktonic foraminifers from Ocean Drilling Program Site 1166. TOC and TN measurements indicate a large change from organic-rich preglacial sediments with primary organic matter to organic-poor early glacial and glacial sediments, with mainly recycled organic matter. Results of the stable isotopic measurements of SOM show a range of values that are typical of both marine and terrestrial organic matter, probably reflecting a mixture of the two. However, C/N values are mostly high (>15), suggesting greater input and/or preservation of terrestrial organic matter. Foraminifers are only present in glacial/glaciomarine sediments of latest Pliocene to Pleistocene age at Site 1166 (lithostratigraphic Unit I). The majority of this unit has d13Corg and TOC values that are similar to those of glacial sediments recovered at Site 1167 (lithostratigraphic Unit II) on the slope and may have the same source(s). Although the low resolution of the N. pachyderma (s.) d18O and d13C data set precludes any specific paleoclimatic interpretation, downcore variations in foraminifer d18O and d13C values of 0.5 per mil to 1 per mil amplitude may indicate glacial-interglacial changes in ice volume/temperature in the Prydz Bay region.