Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation

This study compared the effectiveness of the multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials (mfVEP) elicited by pattern pulse stimulation with that of pattern reversal in producing reliable responses (signal-to-noise ratio >1.359). Participants were 14 healthy subjects. Visual stimulation was obtained using a 60-sector dartboard display consisting of 6 concentric rings presented in either pulse or reversal mode. Each sector, consisting of 16 checks at 99% Michelson contrast and 80 cd/m2 mean luminance, was controlled by a binary m-sequence in the time domain. The signal-to-noise ratio was generally larger in the pattern reversal than in the pattern pulse mode. The number of reliable responses was similar in the central sectors for the two stimulation modes. At the periphery, pattern reversal showed a larger number of reliable responses. Pattern pulse stimuli performed similarly to pattern reversal stimuli to generate reliable waveforms in R1 and R2. The advantage of using both protocols to study mfVEP responses is their complementarity: in some patients, reliable waveforms in specific sectors may be obtained with only one of the two methods. The joint analysis of pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimuli increased the rate of reliability for central sectors by 7.14% in R1, 5.35% in R2, 4.76% in R3, 3.57% in R4, 2.97% in R5, and 1.78% in R6. From R1 to R4 the reliability to generate mfVEPs was above 70% when using both protocols. Thus, for a very high reliability and thorough examination of visual performance, it is recommended to use both stimulation protocols.

Influência de pigmentos e opacificadores na estabilidade de cor, dureza, absorção e solubilidade de um silicone facial submetido ao envelhecimento acelerado

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Estudo comparativo da influência do método de posicionamento convencional e natural da cabeça em radiografias cefalométricas laterais na análise facial de arnett e análise facial de arnett modificada

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Verificação da relação entre proporção áurea e estética facial, antes e depois do tratamento ortodôntico, utilizando radiografias cefalométricas laterais e fotograficas

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Verificação da proporção áurea de indivíduos com alteração de perfil facial antes e depois do tratamento ortodôntico em radiografias cefalométricas laterais

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Fatores de risco para melasma facial em mulheres: um estudo caso-controle

Pós-graduação em Patologia - FMB

Influência da pigmentação, técnica de união e envelhecimento acelerado sobre a resistência de união entre resina acrílica e silicone facial

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Reproductive cycle of the Neotropical cichlid yellow peacock bass Cichla kelberi: A novel pattern of testicular development

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare by means of McNamara as well as Legan and Burstone's cephalometric analyses, both manual and digitized (by Dentofacial Planner Plus and Dolphin Image software) prediction tracings to post-surgical results. METHODS: Pre and post-surgical teleradiographs (6 months) of 25 long face patients subjected to combined orthognathic surgery were selected. Manual and computerized prediction tracings of each patient were performed and cephalometrically compared to post-surgical outcomes. This protocol was repeated in order to evaluate the method error and statistical evaluation was conducted by means of analysis of variance and Tukey's test. RESULTS: A higher frequency of cephalometric variables, which were not statistically different from the actual post-surgical results for the manual method, was observed. It was followed by DFPlus and Dolphin software; in which similar cephalometric values for most variables were observed. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the manual method seemed more reliable, although the predictability of the evaluated methods (computerized and manual) proved to be reasonably satisfactory and similar.