Microfabrication processes for microfluidic devices on a single laser Workstation: direct writing lithography on SU-8, laser ablation on polymers and mask manufacturing

We demonstrate the capability of a laser micromachining workstation for cost-effective manufacturing of a variety of microfluidic devices, including SU-8 microchannels on silicon wafers and 3D complex structures made on polyimide Kapton® or poly carbonate (PC). The workstation combines a KrF excimer laser at 248 nm and a Nd3+:YVO4 DPSS with a frequency tripled at 355 nm with a lens magnification 10X, both lasers working at a pulsed regime with nanoseconds (ns) pulse duration. Workstation also includes a high-resolution motorized XYZ-tilt axis (~ 1 um / axis) and a Through The Lens (TTL) imaging system for a high accurate positioning over a 120 x 120 mm working area. We have surveyed different fabrication techniques: direct writing lithography,mask manufacturing for contact lithography and polymer laser ablation for complex 3D devices, achieving width channels down to 13μ m on 50μ m SU-8 thickness using direct writing lithography, and width channels of 40 μm for polyimide on SiO2 plate. Finally, we have tested the use of some devices for capillary chips measuring the flow speed for liquids with different viscosities. As a result, we have characterized the presence of liquid in the channel by interferometric microscopy.

Tratamiento de imágenes de mineral acarreado post-voladura. Análisis de curvas granulométricas y comparativa mediante sistemasplit on-line y Split desktop: automático y manual

En este proyecto se han analizado distintas imágenes de fragmentos de rocas de distintas granulometrías correspondientes a una serie de voladuras de una misma cantera. Cada una de las voladuras se componen de 20 imágenes. A posteriori utilizando el programa Split Desktop en su versión 3.1, se delimitaron los fragmentos de roca de los que está compuesta la imagen, obteniéndose posteriormente la curva granulométrica correspondiente a dicha imagen. Una vez se calculan las curvas granulométricas correspondientes a cada imagen, se calcula la curva media de todas ellas, pudiéndose considerar por tanto la curva media de cada voladura. Se han utilizado las distintas soluciones del software, manual, online y automático, para realizar los análisis de dichas imágenes y a posteriori comparar sus resultados. Dichos resultados se muestran a través de una serie de gráficos y tablas que se explican con detalle para la comprensión del estudio. De dichos resultados es posible afirmar que, el tratamiento de imágenes realizado de manera online y automático por Split, desemboca en el mismo resultado, al no haber una diferencia estadística significativa. Por el contrario, el sistema manual es diferente de los otros dos, no pudiéndose afirmar cual es mejor de los dos. El manual depende del operario que trabaje las imágenes y el online de los ajustes realizados y por tanto, ambos tienen ciertas incertidumbres difíciles de solucionar. Abstract In this project, different images of rock fragments of different grain sizes corresponding to a series of blasts from the same quarry have been analyzed. To study each blast, 20 images has been used and studied with the software Split Desktop 3.1. Rock fragments from each image has been delimitated with the software, obtaining a grading curve of each one. Once these curves are calculated, the mean curve of these data set is obtained and can be considered the mean curve of each blast. Different software solutions as manual, online and automatic, has been used for the analysis of these images. Then the results has been compared between them. These results are shown through a series of graphs and tables, that are explained in detail, to enhance the understanding of the study. From these results, it can be said that the image processing with online and automatic options from Split, leads to the same result, after an statistical study. On the contrary, the manual Split mode is different from the others; however is not possible to assert what will be the best. The manual Split mode depends on the operator ability and dedication, although the online mode depends on the software settings, so therefore, both have some uncertainties that are difficult to solve.