GEOTECNOLOGIAS: POTENCIALIDADES E RISCOS GEOTECHNOLOGIES: MERITS AND RISKS

Esse artigo pretende discutir como as transformações tecnológicas vêm influenciando a ciência geográfica, especificamente com o advento das geotecnologias. Diante de inúmeras potencialidades e aplicações na análise e gestão territorial, nós devemos refletir sobre seu real significado, que certamente ultrapassa o caráter meramente técnico. É necessário compreender a vasta dimensão social, política e econômica que abrangem. Atualmente as técnicas são cada vez mais utilizadas, aceitas e menos compreendidas, o que pode implicar riscos para a sociedade em função de interpretações equivocadas e muitas vezes desprovidas de princípios éticos. Vinte anos após a “unificação” do mundo com a queda do Muro de Berlim, o cenário sociocultural e político se redefine em um paradigma de contradições. As inovações tecnológicas funcionam como um instrumento emblemático subordinado ao mercado financeiro e a globalização marca a atual fase do capitalismo, que segue seu curso encontrando as limitações inerentes à tecnologia em que se sustenta. This paper intends to discuss how the technological changes have affected the geographical science, specifically with the advent of geotechnologies. Up against with great potential and applications in analysis and land management, we must to reflect on its real meaning, which certainly goes beyond the merely technical. It’s necessary to understand the broad social, political and economic dimension wich inclued. Currently, the techniques are increasingly used, accepted and least understood, which may to implicate a risk to society due to misinterpretation and often devoid of ethical principles. Twenty years after the "unification" of the world with the fall of the Berlin Wall, the cultural and political landscape was altered in a paradigm of contradictions. Technological innovations work as a emblematic instrument subordinate to financial markets and globalization marks the current phase of capitalism, which runs its course finding the limitations inherent in the technology which supports.

Participant association and emergent curriculum in a MOOC: can the community be the curriculum?

We investigated how participants associated with each other and developed community in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) about Rhizomatic Learning (Rhizo14). We compared learner experiences in two social networking sites (SNSs), Facebook and Twitter. Our combination of thematic analysis of qualitative survey data with analysis of participant observation, activity data, archives and visualisation of SNS data enabled us to reach a deeper understanding of participant perspectives and explore SNS use. Community was present in the course title and understood differently by participants. In the absence of explanation or discussion about community early in the MOOC, a controversy between participants about course expectations emerged that created oppositional discourse. Fall off in activity in MOOCs is common and was evident in Rhizo14. As the course progressed, fewer participants were active in Facebook and some participants reported feelings of exclusion. Despite this, activity in Facebook increased overall. The top 10 most active participants were responsible for 47% of total activity. In the Rhizo14 MOOC, both community and curriculum were expected to emerge within the course. We suggest that there are tensions and even contradictions between ‘Community Is the Curriculum’ and Deleuze and Guattari's principles of the rhizome, mainly focussed on an absence of heterogeneity. These tensions may be exacerbated by SNSs that use algorithmic streams. We propose the use of networking approaches that enable negotiation and exchange to encourage heterogeneity rather than emergent definition of community.

Le aporie del ritorno: la trasmissione intergenerazionale della memoria traumatica nel sud globale di lingua portoghese

Questa tesi propone un indagine sulla memoria del retorno a partire da una prospettiva critica che assume il “sud globale di lingua portoghese” come spazio storico e concettuale di riferimento. Si riflette sull'idea di specificità attribuita alla colonizzazione promossa dal Portogallo in Africa tenendo conto delle contraddizioni associate al movimento migratorio innescato dal processo violento di decolonizzazione dell’Africa portoghese.
 Le memorie trauamatiche sul retorno espongono la violenza come componente costitutiva della realtà coloniale ma ripropongono anche dinamiche che permettono l’occultamento del razzismo. L'esplorazione della “soffitta”, assunta come metafora della memoria familiare custodita nello spazio domestico, accompagna quella dell’archivio pubblico. L’analisi dell’archivio ufficiale e della memoria familiare riflette il tentativo di stabilire un dialogo tra storia e memoria superando la logica di antitesi che tradizionalmente le contrappone. Utilizzando il concetto criticamente problematico di “postmemoria” si riflette sulla riconfigurazione del rapporto con il passato in funzione di un’idea di “eredità come compito” assunto nel presente). La possibilità di “salvare” il passato dalla progressiva scomparsa dei testimoni comporta un pericolo di abuso ideologico connaturato al processo di trasmissione. La traduzione delle memorie coloniali sul retorno dallo spazio intimo allo spazio del dibattito pubblico mostra la relazione tra la costruzione della mitologia familiare e l’adozione del discorso lusotropicale. Il tentativo di definire la natura indecifrabile del retornado comporta la possibilità di sanzionare la violenza coloniale negando una responsabilità collettiva riferita al colonialismo. Si presenta il tentativo di configurare i termini di una questione post-coloniale portoghese dai contorni opachi. Questa tesi approda ad una conclusione aperta, articolata sul rischio sempre presente di appropriazione delle categorie critiche post-coloniali da parte dell’ideologia egemonica. Attraverso le (post)memorie (post)coloniali la denuncia del razzismo in quanto eredità permanente e la riconfigurazione dell’archivio coloniale costituiscono operazioni possibili, necessarie, ma non per questo scontate o prive di rischi.

Towards Europe 2050: the role of institutions, EU research, and citizens for climate justice. The urban challenge in Amsterdam, Bilbao, Freiburg, and Lisbon.

The climate crisis is the greatest challenge humanity has ever faced, and in 2023 the average global temperature reached new records, prompting the UN Secretary General to declare that 'the era of global warming is over, and the era of global boiling has arrived'. In this context, urban areas play a key role, and can be considered a bottleneck of the climate crisis. The European Commission is investing billions of euros in research and innovation projects in urban areas, while the European Green Deal strategy has the ambition of making Europe the first carbon-neutral continent on the planet by 2050. However, studies and research show that the causes of the climate crisis are rooted in an economic system that produces profound inequalities, and the very solutions to address the consequences of global warming risk deepening them. In this context, the role of cities is not only to decarbonise their urban fabric, but to build solutions to the social challenge posed by the climate crisis, promoting paradigm shifts capable of producing trajectories towards so-called 'climate justice'. This research analyses, through a holistic view, European policies in these fields, and delves into the actions and projects of four European cities - Amsterdam, Bilbao, Freiburg, and Lisbon - through a qualitative approach aimed at identifying strengths and contradictions of strategies to tackle the climate crisis. Delving into the collective dynamics and social impacts of the actions promoted, the research proposes a comprehensive view of the role that urban areas can play not only in decarbonising society, but in promoting a paradigm shift capable of addressing the economic causes and social consequences of the climate crisis.