La construcción de la imagen : Un análisis interaccional del discurso político

El trabajo se propone analizar algunas de las estrategias mediante las cuales el uso del lenguaje en el discurso político influye en la conformación de las representaciones sociales. Específicamente, abordará desde una perspectiva interactiva las construcciones simbólicas del contexto en y a través del discurso. Esto significa considerar ciertas estructuras del contexto como consecuencias de la práctica discursiva misma; entre ellas se encuentran las situaciones, los participantes y sus roles e identidades. La hipótesis explorada es que las formas de representación de estos elementos generan una para-realidad discursiva que va conformando una construcción simbólica determinada de la imagen del hablante. El análisis se llevará a cabo dentro del marco teórico del Análisis Crítico del Discurso (ACD), en la línea propuesta por Fairclough y Wodak (2000), van Dijk (2000) y Bolívar (1997). Se partirá de la base de que el dicurso político es hegemónico, implica relaciones de poder y control, y actúa como un medio de dominación, realizando una labor ideológica en la medida en que articula ciertas y determinadas representaciones de la realidad y de las identidades individuales y grupales. Por tanto, es una tarea esencial desenmascarar y cuestionar esa dominación mediante un análisis discursivo que ponga en evidencia las estrategias empleadas y las representaciones que éstas generan y ocultan. Los textos seleccionados para el análisis corresponden a los dos discursos que el Presidente de la Argentina, Dr. Fernando de la Rúa, dirigió al país los días 16/3/01 y 18/3/01 en oportunidad de la presentación de un nuevo Plan Económico

La construcción de la imagen : Un análisis interaccional del discurso político

El trabajo se propone analizar algunas de las estrategias mediante las cuales el uso del lenguaje en el discurso político influye en la conformación de las representaciones sociales. Específicamente, abordará desde una perspectiva interactiva las construcciones simbólicas del contexto en y a través del discurso. Esto significa considerar ciertas estructuras del contexto como consecuencias de la práctica discursiva misma; entre ellas se encuentran las situaciones, los participantes y sus roles e identidades. La hipótesis explorada es que las formas de representación de estos elementos generan una para-realidad discursiva que va conformando una construcción simbólica determinada de la imagen del hablante. El análisis se llevará a cabo dentro del marco teórico del Análisis Crítico del Discurso (ACD), en la línea propuesta por Fairclough y Wodak (2000), van Dijk (2000) y Bolívar (1997). Se partirá de la base de que el dicurso político es hegemónico, implica relaciones de poder y control, y actúa como un medio de dominación, realizando una labor ideológica en la medida en que articula ciertas y determinadas representaciones de la realidad y de las identidades individuales y grupales. Por tanto, es una tarea esencial desenmascarar y cuestionar esa dominación mediante un análisis discursivo que ponga en evidencia las estrategias empleadas y las representaciones que éstas generan y ocultan. Los textos seleccionados para el análisis corresponden a los dos discursos que el Presidente de la Argentina, Dr. Fernando de la Rúa, dirigió al país los días 16/3/01 y 18/3/01 en oportunidad de la presentación de un nuevo Plan Económico

Algunos aspectos de la reformulación del discurso científico

Fil: Móccero, María Leticia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.

La parcialidad en la noticia periodística : Análisis crítico del discurso

Fil: Coria, Ana María. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.

De las formas históricas de existencia de la individualidad a la forma sujeto del discurso : Marx, Althusser, Pêcheux

Fil: Karczmarczyk, Pedro. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.

Relectura del discurso novomundista de Alejo Carpentier y Abel Posse en el contexto de la nueva novela historica

The purpose of this dissertation was to analyze the narrative works of Alejo Carpentier and Abel Posse within the context of the new Latin American historical novel that revises the Old World-New World Encounter. Focusing on El arpa y la sombra and Los perros del paraíso , the dissertation studied the particular manner in which Latin American novelists, and particularly Alejo Carpentier and Abel Posse, approach and question traditional historiography. The research also compared different novels to identify various trends within the new historical novel that rewrites the foundational period of Latin American literature. ^ This study considered the theories of the new historical novel as proposed by critics such as Seymour Menton, Fernando de Aínsa, Linda Hutcheon, and Brian MacHale. The new novel was examined within the frameworks of postmodern literary and historiographic theories. The study also contemplated the philosophical views that have influenced postmodern thought, and, especially, the ideas of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Lyotard, Harbermas, and Foucault. ^ Research showed two major trends within the new Latin American historical novel. In the case of the first trend, initiated by Alejo Carpentier in 1949 with El reino de este mundo, the novelist's approach is founded on historicism and factual rigor. The second trend, initiated by Reinaldo Arenas with El mundo alucinante in 1969, is marked by irreverence, parody, irony, and carnavalization. Characterized by intertextuality, dialogism, and anachronism, novels such as Carpentier's El arpa y la sombra and Posse's Los perros del paraíso, undermine the values and beliefs instituted by the traditional historiographic paradigm and the discourse of power. ^

Relectura del discurso narrativo de las primeras tres decadas de la Republica Cubana en el contexto de los rasgos de la picaresca

The purpose of this dissertation was to study the narrative discourse of three Cuban novelists who produced their works from 1902 to 1933, using a typology that reveals a picaresque view of Cuban society. Focusing on La conjura and La manigua sentimental by Jesús Castellanos (1879–1912), Las honradas and Las impuras by Miguel de Carrión (1875–1929), and Generales y doctores and Juan Criollo by Carlos Loveira (1882–1928), this dissertation identified and defined picaresque traits and elements in the characterization, contrasting main and secondary, male and female characters, at all social levels. ^ The study considered the theories of the Spanish picaresque novel proposed by Antonio Maravall, Américo Castro, Claudio Guillén, Marcel Bataillon, and other critics, in order to delineate a model of traditional picaresque behavior, which was then applied to the analysis of each character. Sociopolitical and cultural conditions, as well as the psychology of the Cuban collective as presented by the authors, were also analyzed to pinpoint similarities and differences between the traditional Golden Age rogue and the characters created by the authors. ^ Critics who have studied the influence of the Spanish picaresque genre on the Latin American novel make no reference to any of the authors or novels included in this study. Key analyses, however, identified the presence of characters that use picaresque modes of behavior as a means to manipulate the structures of power in order to survive and as a futile attempt to achieve their ends within a socioeconomic context that is undergoing a significant transition. Castellanos' characters use their picaresque behavior mainly to attain a higher social status. Carrion concentrates on picaresque behavior in women as a means to manipulate the dominant male society, while Loveira's picaresque characters are mainly interested in securing a position of political power. ^

Relectura del discurso novomundista de Alejo Carpentier y Abel Posse en el contexto de la nueva novela histórica

The purpose of this dissertation was to analyze the narrative works of Alejo Carpentier and Abel Posse within the context of the new Latin American historical novel that revises the Old World-New World Encounter. Focusing on El arpa y la sombra and Los perros del paraíso, the dissertation studied the particular manner in which Latin American novelists, and particularly Alejo Carpentier and Abel Posse, approach and question traditional historiography. The research also compared different novels to identify various trends within the new historical novel that rewrites the foundational period of Latin American literature. This study considered the theories of the new historical novel as proposed by critics such as Seymour Menton, Fernando de Aínsa, Linda Hutcheon, and Brian MacHale. The new novel was examined within the frameworks of postmodern literary and historiographic theories. The study also contemplated the philosophical views that have influenced postmodern thought, and, especially, the ideas of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Lyotard, Harbermas, and Foucault. Research showed two major trends within the new Latin American historical novel. In the case of the first trend, initiated by Alejo Carpentier in 1949 with El reino de este mundo, the novelist’s approach is founded on historicism and factual rigor. The second trend, initiated by Reinaldo Arenas with El mundo alucinante in 1969, is marked by irreverence, parody, irony, and carnavalization. Characterized by intertextuality, dialogism, and anachronism, novels such as Carpentier´s El arpa y la sombra and Posse´s Los perros del paraíso, undermine the values and beliefs instituted by the traditional historiographic paradigm and the discourse of power.

Relectura del discurso narrativo de las tres primeras décadas de la República cubana en el contexto de los rasgos de la picaresca

The purpose of this dissertation was to study the narrative discourse of three Cuban novelists who produced their works from 1902 to 1933, using a typology that reveals a picaresque view of Cuban society. Focusing on La conjura and La manigua sentimental by Jesús Castellanos (1879-1912), Las honradas and Las impuras by Miguel de Carrión (1875-1929), and Generales y doctores and Juan Criollo by Carlos Loveira (1882-1928), this dissertation identified and defined picaresque traits and elements in the characterization, contrasting main and secondary, male and female characters, at all social levels. The study considered the theories of the Spanish picaresque novel proposed by Antonio Maravall, Américo Castro, Claudio Guillén, Marcel Bataillon, and other critics, in order to delineate a model of traditional picaresque behavior, which was then applied to the analysis of each character. Sociopolitical and cultural conditions, as well as the psychology of the Cuban collective as presented by the authors, were also analyzed to pinpoint similarities and differences between the traditional Golden Age rogue and the characters created by the authors. Critics who have studied the influence of the Spanish picaresque genre on the Latin American novel make no reference to any of the authors or novels included in this study. Key analyses, however, identified the presence of characters that use picaresque modes of behavior as a means to manipulate the structures of power in order to survive and as a futile attempt to achieve their ends within a socioeconomic context that is undergoing a significant transition. Castellanos’ characters use their picaresque behavior mainly to attain a higher social status. Carrión concentrates on picaresque behavior in women as a means to manipulate the dominant male society, while Loveira’s picaresque characters are mainly interested in securing a position of political power.