856 resultados para Estimations
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (16)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (7)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (4)
- Archive of European Integration (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (15)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (14)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (44)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (11)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (53)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (38)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (13)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (87)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (21)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (62)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (14)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (3)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (18)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (12)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (66)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (7)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (96)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (63)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
This study investigated the coralligenous reefs' benthic assemblages at 6 sites off Chioggia, in the northern Adriatic Sea, comparing 2 different methods of analysis of photographic samples: the grid method (overlapping a grid of 400 cells) and the random point method (random distribution of 100 points on the photo). For the first method, taxonomic recognition and the percentage coverage estimations were performed manually using photoQuad software. In the second, CoralNet semi-automated web-based annotation system was applied. This allows for assisted and supervised identification, the success rate of which gradually improves after initial software training. The results obtained with the two methods of analysing photographic samples are slightly different. The random points method gives lower species richness values and some differences in coverage estimations; all of this is reflected in the calculation of the biotic index. NAMBER values are significantly lower with the random points method and provide locally different classifications (3 out of 6 sites). However, the results obtained with the two methods are closely related to each other and depict a similar spatial trend. These results rise caution in applying different, albeit similar, methods in the analysis of benthic assemblages aimed to environmental quality assessment.