Case study: Making it happen, embedding digital technologies in curriculum activities

Case study on how South Eastern Regional College are taking a strategic approach to managing and developing digital technologies to enhance the student experience.

Jisc NUS student digital experience benchmarking tool

A benchmarking tool developed by Jisc in collaboration with the National Union of Students (NUS) and the Student Engagement Partnership (TSEP). The tool is a starting point for discussions between staff and students about what is working in the digital learning environment and what they can work on together to improve it.

Case study: Developing digital learning at Prospects College for Advanced Technology

Case study on how a digital learning fellow at Prospects College for Advanced Technology has developed a digital learning strategy that focuses on vocational training and work-based learning.

Building digital capability: Being an effective digital leader

This is a version of the Jisc ‘Six Elements of Digital Capabilities’ model, specifically to support Jisc’s members in the area of Digital Leadership. It is one example of the base model being used in a particular context and is not meant to be definitive.

Building digital capability: Example learner profile

This is a version of the Jisc ‘Six Elements of Digital Capabilities’ model, specifically for learners. It is an update on the earlier ‘7 elements of digital literacy’ model (2009) and has many continuities with this framework. This version was produced in response to feedback that the base model alone does not provide enough detail to support embedding into practice. However, it is an example of how the base model could be used to define the digital capabilities of learners and is meant to be adapted to suit specific settings.

Building digital capability: Leading and managing an effective digital organisation (team, service, department)

This is a version of the Jisc ‘Six Elements of Digital Capabilities’ model, specifically to support Jisc’s members in the area of Digital Leadership. It is one example of the base model being used in a particular context and is not meant to be definitive.

Building digital capability: Example researcher profile

This is a version of the Jisc ‘Six Elements of Digital Capabilities’ model, specifically for research students and research sta . It is an update on the earlier ‘7 elements of digital literacy’ model (2009) and has many continuities with this framework. It is one example of how the base model is being used.

Building digital capability: the six elements defined

A digital capability framework which describes the skills needed by staff in a wide range of academic, administrative and professional roles to thrive in a digital environment. This will provide a structure to help managers and individuals understand what is needed and supports the development of tools. We have produced an initial model of the framework which describes digital capability as six overlapping elements.

Building digital capability: Example teacher profile

This is a version of the Jisc ‘Six Elements of Digital Capabilities’ model, specifically for teaching sta or for academic sta in their teaching role. It is an update on the earlier ‘7 elements of digital literacy’ model (2009) and has many continuities with this framework. This version was produced in response to feedback that the base model alone does not provide enough detail to support embedding into practice. However, it is an example of how the base model could be used to define the digital capabilities of teaching sta and is meant to be adapted to suit specific settings.

Framing digital capabilities for UK HE and FE staff: Resources and references

This list does not include the actual frameworks, specifications, standards etc reviewed for the Jisc digital capabilities programme. These are secondary resources - articles, reports, research outcomes and professional reviews - which are sometimes linked to specific frameworks. They were used to help plan the frameworks review, construct the new Jisc digital capabilities framework and to write the accompanying reports. Further down you will find a list of web sites, blog posts and professional resources which provide useful additional information and materials, not necessarily evidence-based and not always drawn on directly for this project.

Digital ‘lens’ on the UK PSF: supporting the digital capabilities of teaching staff in UK HE

This resource can also be used by professional staff who are seeking accreditation via the UK PSF for relevant aspects of their role, e.g. staff who support the use of technologies for learning and/or support the development of digital literacies.

Deepening digital know-how: building digital talent

This report covers findings from a project funded by Jisc to review how the digital capabilities of teaching and professional sta are currently framed in UK HE and FE. The project also reported on the learning, technology and organisational landscape for UK HE and FE as this influences future requirements for sta digital capability.

Report on Knowledge Exchange workshop Price of keeping knowledge: financial streams for digital preservation

In contrast to cost modeling activities, the pricing of services must be simple and transparent. Calculating and thus knowing price structures, would not only help identify the level of detail required for cost modeling of individual instititutions, but also help develop a ”public” market for services as well as clarify the division of task and the modeling of funding and revenue streams for data preservation of public institutions. This workshop has built on the results from the workshop ”The Costs and Benefits of Keeping Knowledge” which took place 11 June 2012 in Copenhagen. This expert workshop aimed at: •Identifying ways for data repositories to abstract from their complicated cost structures and arrive at one transparent pricing structure which can be aligned with available and plausible funding schemes. Those repositories will probably need a stable institutional funding stream for data management and preservation. Are there any estimates for this, absolute or as percentage of overall cost? Part of the revenue will probably have to come through data management fees upon ingest. How could that be priced? Per dataset, per GB or as a percentage of research cost? Will it be necessary to charge access prices, as they contradict the open science paradigm? •What are the price components for pricing individual services, which prices are currently being paid e.g. to commercial providers? What are the description and conditions of the service(s) delivered and guaranteed? •What types of risks are inherent in these pricing schemes? •How can services and prices be defined in an all-inclusive and simple manner, so as to enable researchers to apply for specific amount when asking for funding of data-intensive projects?Please