Análise comparativa de soluções adotadas para a reabilitação de pavimentos flexíveis que integram a rede rodoviária nacional

A presente dissertação tem como objetivo efetuar a análise comparativa de soluções adotadas de reabilitação de pavimentos flexíveis que integram a rede rodoviária nacional. No âmbito desta análise apresenta-se o estado da arte respeitante à reabilitação de pavimentos flexíveis, nomeadamente: mecanismos de degradação, famílias de degradações, avaliação da capacidade de carga dos pavimentos, metodologia utilizada no dimensionamento do reforço de pavimentos, sendo também efetuada uma análise comparativa de técnicas de reforço de pavimentos e dos tratamentos antifendas. Neste contexto, apresenta-se um caso de estudo no qual é efetuada uma análise de três soluções possíveis para a reabilitação estrutural do pavimento do IC 20 entre Almada e a Costa de Caparica. É feita a descrição da solução projetada pela EP, SA patenteada em concurso público lançado em 2007, a qual é de certa forma inovadora ao nível do tratamento retardador da reflexão de fendas. Aquela solução técnica é constituída pela aplicação de grelhas de fibra de vidro e grelhas de fibra de carbono, seguidas da colocação de uma camada de desgaste em mistura betuminosa rugosa com betume modificado com baixa percentagem de borracha reciclada de pneus usados (BBr - BBB). Complementarmente, é efetuada a análise da solução do projeto de reabilitação do IC 20, patenteado pela Subconcessionária do Baixo Tejo, que contemplou a aplicação de misturas betuminosas rugosas com betume modificado com média percentagem de borracha reciclada de pneus usados (BBr - BBM). Para além da solução patenteada pela subconcessionária, é analisada a solução do projeto de alterações (variante) apresentado pelo agrupamento de empresas construtoras, que foi adotado na execução da obra realizada no IC 20. A intervenção de reabilitação estrutural contemplou a utilização de uma camada de ligação em AC 16 10/20 (MBAM) e uma camada de desgaste em mistura betuminosa rugosa com betume modificado com média percentagem de borracha reciclada de pneus usados (BBr - BBM). Adicionalmente à caracterização de diferentes soluções de reabilitação de pavimentos flexíveis adotados em Portugal, é efetuada uma análise comparativa dos custos de ciclo de vida (construção, manutenção e conservação) de cada tipo de solução de reabilitação.

VirtualECare: group decision supported by idea generation and argumentation

In the last years there has been a considerable increase in the number of people in need of intensive care, especially among the elderly, a phenomenon that is related to population ageing (Brown 2003). However, this is not exclusive of the elderly, as diseases as obesity, diabetes, and blood pressure have been increasing among young adults (Ford and Capewell 2007). As a new fact, it has to be dealt with by the healthcare sector, and particularly by the public one. Thus, the importance of finding new and cost effective ways for healthcare delivery are of particular importance, especially when the patients are not to be detached from their environments (WHO 2004). Following this line of thinking, a VirtualECare Multiagent System is presented in section 2, being our efforts centered on its Group Decision modules (Costa, Neves et al. 2007) (Camarinha-Matos and Afsarmanesh 2001).On the other hand, there has been a growing interest in combining the technological advances in the information society - computing, telecommunications and knowledge – in order to create new methodologies for problem solving, namely those that convey on Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS), based on agent perception. Indeed, the new economy, along with increased competition in today’s complex business environments, takes the companies to seek complementarities, in order to increase competitiveness and reduce risks. Under these scenarios, planning takes a major role in a company life cycle. However, effective planning depends on the generation and analysis of ideas (innovative or not) and, as a result, the idea generation and management processes are crucial. Our objective is to apply the GDSS referred to above to a new area. We believe that the use of GDSS in the healthcare arena will allow professionals to achieve better results in the analysis of one’s Electronically Clinical Profile (ECP). This attainment is vital, regarding the incoming to the market of new drugs and medical practices, which compete in the use of limited resources.

A study on the authentication method for TAmI in ambient intelligence (secure group decision making toolkit)

It is difficult to get the decision about an opinion after many users get the meeting in same place. It used to spend too much time in order to find solve some problem because of the various opinions of each other. TAmI (Group Decision Making Toolkit) is the System to Group Decision in Ambient Intelligence [1]. This program was composed with IGATA [2], WebMeeting and the related Database system. But, because it is sent without any encryption in IP / Password, it can be opened to attacker. They can use the IP / Password to the bad purpose. As the result, although they make the wrong result, the joined member can’t know them. Therefore, in this paper, we studied the applying method of user’s authentication into TAmI.

Modelling group decision simulation through argumentation

Group decision making plays an important role in today’s organisations. The impact of decision making is so high and complex, that rarely the decision making process is made individually. In Group Decision Argumentation, there is a set of participants, with different profiles and expertise levels, that exchange ideas or engage in a process of argumentation and counter-argumentation, negotiate, cooperate, collaborate or even discuss techniques and/or methodologies for problem solving. In this paper, it is proposed a Multi-Agent simulator for the behaviour representation of group members in a decision making process. Agents behave depending on rational and emotional intelligence and use persuasive argumentation to convince and make alternative choices.

ABS4GD: a multi-agent system that simulates group decision processes considering emotional and argumentative aspects

Emotion although being an important factor in our every day life it is many times forgotten in the development of systems to be used by persons. In this work we present an architecture for a ubiquitous group decision support system able to support persons in group decision processes. The system considers the emotional factors of the intervenient participants, as well as the argumentation between them. Particular attention will be taken to one of components of this system: the multi-agent simulator, modeling the human participants, considering emotional characteristics, and allowing the exchanges of hypothetic arguments among the participants.

Personality, emotion, and mood in agent-based group decision making

Group decision making plays an important role in organizations, especially in the present-day economy that demands high-quality, yet quick decisions. Group decision-support systems (GDSSs) are interactive computer-based environments that support concerted, coordinated team efforts toward the completion of joint tasks. The need for collaborative work in organizations has led to the development of a set of general collaborative computer-supported technologies and specific GDSSs that support distributed groups (in time and space) in various domains. However, each person is unique and has different reactions to various arguments. Many times a disagreement arises because of the way we began arguing, not because of the content itself. Nevertheless, emotion, mood, and personality factors have not yet been addressed in GDSSs, despite how strongly they influence results. Our group’s previous work considered the roles that emotion and mood play in decision making. In this article, we reformulate these factors and include personality as well. Thus, this work incorporates personality, emotion, and mood in the negotiation process of an argumentbased group decision-making process. Our main goal in this work is to improve the negotiation process through argumentation using the affective characteristics of the involved participants. Each participant agent represents a group decision member. This representation lets us simulate people with different personalities. The discussion process between group members (agents) is made through the exchange of persuasive arguments. Although our multiagent architecture model4 includes two types of agents—the facilitator and the participant— this article focuses on the emotional, personality, and argumentation components of the participant agent.

Context-aware emotion-based model for group decision making

Involving groups in important management processes such as decision making has several advantages. By discussing and combining ideas, counter ideas, critical opinions, identified constraints, and alternatives, a group of individuals can test potentially better solutions, sometimes in the form of new products, services, and plans. In the past few decades, operations research, AI, and computer science have had tremendous success creating software systems that can achieve optimal solutions, even for complex problems. The only drawback is that people don’t always agree with these solutions. Sometimes this dissatisfaction is due to an incorrect parameterization of the problem. Nevertheless, the reasons people don’t like a solution might not be quantifiable, because those reasons are often based on aspects such as emotion, mood, and personality. At the same time, monolithic individual decisionsupport systems centered on optimizing solutions are being replaced by collaborative systems and group decision-support systems (GDSSs) that focus more on establishing connections between people in organizations. These systems follow a kind of social paradigm. Combining both optimization- and socialcentered approaches is a topic of current research. However, even if such a hybrid approach can be developed, it will still miss an essential point: the emotional nature of group participants in decision-making tasks. We’ve developed a context-aware emotion based model to design intelligent agents for group decision-making processes. To evaluate this model, we’ve incorporated it in an agent-based simulator called ABS4GD (Agent-Based Simulation for Group Decision), which we developed. This multiagent simulator considers emotion- and argument based factors while supporting group decision-making processes. Experiments show that agents endowed with emotional awareness achieve agreements more quickly than those without such awareness. Hence, participant agents that integrate emotional factors in their judgments can be more successful because, in exchanging arguments with other agents, they consider the emotional nature of group decision making.

LAID - a smart decision room with ambient intelligence for group decision making and argumentation support considering emotional aspects

Decision Making is one of the most important activities of the human being. Nowadays decisions imply to consider many different points of view, so decisions are commonly taken by formal or informal groups of persons. Groups exchange ideas or engage in a process of argumentation and counter-argumentation, negotiate, cooperate, collaborate or even discuss techniques and/or methodologies for problem solving. Group Decision Making is a social activity in which the discussion and results consider a combination of rational and emotional aspects. In this paper we will present a Smart Decision Room, LAID (Laboratory of Ambient Intelligence for Decision Making). In LAID environment it is provided the support to meeting room participants in the argumentation and decision making processes, combining rational and emotional aspects.

Modeling group decision meeting participants with an Agent-based approach

This paper aims to present a multi-agent model for a simulation, whose goal is to help one specific participant of multi-criteria group decision making process.This model has five main intervenient types: the human participant, who is using the simulation and argumentation support system; the participant agents, one associated to the human participant and the others simulating the others human members of the decision meeting group; the directory agent; the proposal agents, representing the different alternatives for a decision (the alternatives are evaluated based on criteria); and the voting agent responsiblefor all voting machanisms.At this stage it is proposed a two phse algorithm. In the first phase each participantagent makes his own evaluation of the proposals under discussion, and the voting agent proposes a simulation of a voting process.In the second phase, after the dissemination of the voting results,each one ofthe partcipan agents will argue to convince the others to choose one of the possible alternatives. The arguments used to convince a specific participant are dependent on agent knowledge about that participant. This two-phase algorithm is applied iteratively.

Intervenção com procedimentos de autossugestão na autoeficácia e controlo da dor

Introdução – A dor predomina em muitas patologias médicas e acarreta diversas implicações para o doente. O presente estudo visou avaliar a eficácia de uma intervenção autossugestiva, como complemento ao tratamento médico, no aumento da autoeficácia e controlo da dor. Metodologia – Para a concretização deste objetivo, 205 pacientes adultos com dor foram distribuídos aleatoriamente por dois grupos que se distinguiram quanto à intervenção recebida durante 12 semanas, nomeadamente IAS (intervenção autossugestiva) e ISAS (intervenção sem autossugestão). Os dois grupos foram comparados quanto à evolução da autoeficácia e do controlo da dor ao longo desse período. Resultados e discussão – Os resultados mostraram um aumento estatisticamente significativo destas variáveis no grupo IAS mas não no grupo ISAS, sugerindo a eficácia da intervenção autossugestiva. Este estudo representa, assim, um importante contributo para a prática clínica com os doentes com dor.