994 resultados para Pergolesi, Giovanni Battista, 1710-1736.
Resumo:
Plate [XXVIII], Focillon 536 bis, signed Cavalier Piranesi f. Presumably 1767 or later.
Resumo:
Title page and text in Italian, English and French.
Resumo:
Approbatio dated 1 aprilis 1762; Catalogo dei rami incisi posseduti dalla Regia Calcografia di Roma, 1876, provides dates 1762-1764. Cf. Hindd.
Resumo:
Hind transcribes the date 1764 from the Catalogo generale dei rami incisi posseduti dalla Regia Calcografia di Roma, 1876.
Resumo:
Approbatio dated 30 agosto 1762; Catalogo dei rami incisi posseduti dalla Regia Calcografia di Roma (1876) provides dates 1762-1764. Cf. Hind.
Resumo:
Acquisition made accessible thanks to a 2015-2017 grant from the Council on Libraries and Information Resources.
Resumo:
Reprint (2nd work). Originally published: Firenze : Tipografia della Gazzetta d'Italia, 1875.
Resumo:
University of Illinois bookplate: "From the library of Conte Antonio Cavagna Sangiuliani di Gualdana Lazelada di Bereguardo, purchased 1921".
Resumo:
Bound with: Ferro, Giovanni Battista, 18th cent. In Jo. Baptistam Zenum S.R.E. cardinalem anniversaria funebris .... Venetiis : [s.n, 1778?].
Resumo:
Bibliography, v. 3, p. 313-316.
Resumo:
In the last years, thanks to the improvement in the prognosis of cancer patients, a growing attention has been given to the fertility issues. International guidelines on fertility preservation in cancer patients recommend that physicians discuss, as early as possible, with all patients of reproductive age their risk of infertility from the disease and/or treatment and their interest in having children after cancer, and help with informed fertility preservation decisions. As recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology, sperm cryopreservation and embryo/oocyte cryopreservation are standard strategies for fertility preservations in male and female patients, respectively; other strategies (e.g. pharmacological protection of the gonads and gonadal tissue cryopreservation) are considered experimental techniques. However, since then, new data have become available, and several issues in this field are still controversial and should be addressed by both patients and their treating physicians. In April 2015, physicians with expertise in the field of fertility preservation in cancer patients from several European countries were invited in Genova (Italy) to participate in a workshop on the topic of "cancer and fertility preservation". A total of ten controversial issues were discussed at the conference. Experts were asked to present an up-to-date review of the literature published on these topics and the presentation of own unpublished data was encouraged. On the basis of the data presented, as well as the expertise of the invited speakers, a total of ten recommendations were discussed and prepared with the aim to help physicians in counseling their young patients interested in fertility preservation. Although there is a great interest in this field, due to the lack of large prospective cohort studies and randomized trials on these topics, the level of evidence is not higher than 3 for most of the recommendations highlighting the need of further research efforts in many areas of this field. The participation to the ongoing registries and prospective studies is crucial to acquire more robust information in order to provide evidence-based recommendations.
Resumo:
Over the course of his career, Ludwig van Beethoven (1770–1827) admired and befriended many violin virtuosos. In addition to being renowned performers, many of these virtuosos were prolific composers in their own right. Through their own compositions, interpretive style and new technical contributions, they inspired some of Beethoven’s most beloved violin works. This dissertation places a selection of Beethoven’s violin compositions in historical and stylistic context through an examination of related compositions by Giovanni Battista Viotti (1755–1824), Pierre Rode (1774–1830) and Franz Clement (1780–1842). The works of these violin virtuosos have been presented along with those of Beethoven in a three-part recital series designed to reveal the compositional, technical and artistic influences of each virtuoso. Viotti’s Violin Concerto No. 2 in E major and Rode’s Violin Concerto No. 10 in B minor serve as examples from the French violin concerto genre, and demonstrate compositional and stylistic idioms that affected Beethoven’s own compositions. Through their official dedications, Beethoven’s last two violin sonatas, the Op. 47, or Kreutzer, in A major, dedicated to Rodolphe Kreutzer, and Op. 96 in G major, dedicated to Pierre Rode, show the composer’s reverence for these great artistic personalities. Beethoven originally dedicated his Violin Concerto in D major, Op. 61, to Franz Clement. This work displays striking similarities to Clement’s own Violin Concerto in D major, which suggests that the two men had a close working relationship and great respect for one another. The first recital was performed in Ulrich Recital Hall; the second and third recitals were performed in Gildenhorn Recital Hall at the University of Maryland. All three performances were collaborations with pianist, Hsiang-Ling Hsiao. A Recording of the first program can be found in the Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (DRUM). Recordings of the second and third recitals can be accessed at the University of Maryland Hornbake Library.
Resumo:
En esta nueva edición se ha modificado el título y se han eliminado algunos errores tipográficos, entre otros. Pero el hecho de que esta obra fuera primero publicada en su versión inglesa (Norrnative Systems, Wien - New York, Springer Verlag, 1971) ha provocado algunas confusiones que conviene aclarar. El libro fue escrito en castellano y el título originario era Sistemas normativos, que nos fue sugerido por Mario Bunge, editor de la serie "Library of Exact Philosophy" en la que apareció la versión inglesa. La traducción fue llevada a cabo por los autores, con enorme ayuda de Mrs. Joan Mackie, quien revisó todo el texto. Esa traducción apareció primero y la versión original (castellana) fue publicada cuatro años más tarde por Editorial Astrea con un título cambiado: Introducción a la metodología de las ciencias jurídicas y sociales. Este cambio en la versión castellana fue sugerido por Astrea y aceptado a regañadientes por los autores. Además, como en la traducción inglesa resolvimos suprimir algunos párrafos por parecernos demasiado locales (§ 5 del cap. 11) y en la versión castellana fue añadido el § 7 del cap. IV, ambas ediciones no resultaron idénticas. Es así como mucha gente pensó que la versión inglesa era la original, que luego fue traducida al castellano. El título con que la obra aparece ahora fue tomado de la excelente traducción italiana de Pierluigi Chiassoni y Giovanni Battista Ratti (Torino, G. Giappichelli Editare, 2005), quienes incluyeron los párrafos suprimidos en la versión inglesa, de modo que la versión italiana es prácticamente idéntica al texto original, que con esta edición aparece ahora en Astrea, también con su título original.
Resumo:
riveduto nuovamente et corretto / dal propio autore ...
Resumo:
L’enigma della relazione tra Gesù e Giovanni il Battista ha da sempre stimolato l’immaginazione storica degli studiosi, suscitando una varietà di ipotesi e valutazioni, spesso assai diverse. Ciò nonostante, tutti concordano su un punto: che, almeno nella sua fase maggiore in Galilea, il ministero di Gesù fosse una realtà essenzialmente autonoma, diversa, originale e irriducibile rispetto alla missione di Giovanni. In controtendenza con questa “impostazione predefinita”, il presente studio sostiene la tesi secondo cui Gesù portò avanti la sua missione come intenzionale e programmatica prosecuzione dell’opera prematuramente interrotta di Giovanni. Nella prima parte, si esamina approfonditamente quale memoria della relazione sia conservata nelle fonti più antiche, cioè Q (qui analizzata con particolare attenzione) e Marco – a cui si aggiunge Matteo, che, in ragione dello stretto legame storico-sociologico con Q, offre un esempio illuminante di rinarrazione della memoria altamente originale eppure profondamente fedele. La conclusione è che la memoria più antica della relazione Gesù-Giovanni è profondamente segnata da aspetti di accordo, conformità e allineamento. Nella seconda parte si esaminano una serie di tradizioni che attestano che Gesù era percepito pubblicamente in relazione al Battista e che egli stesso condivideva e alimentava tale percezione riallacciandosi a lui in polemica con i suoi avversari, e dipingendolo come una figura di capitale importanza nella predicazione e nell’insegnamento a seguaci e discepoli. Infine, si argomenta l’esistenza di ampie e sostanziali aree di accordo tra i due a livello di escatologia, istruzioni etiche e programma sociale, missione penitenziale verso i peccatori e attività battesimale. L’ipotesi che Gesù portasse avanti l’attività riformatrice di Giovanni, in termini di una campagna purificatoria “penitenziale-battesimale-esorcistica” in preparazione dell’avvento di Dio, consente infine di armonizzare in modo soddisfacente i due aspetti più caratteristici dell’attività di Gesù (normalmente giustapposti, quando non contrapposti): escatologia e miracoli, il Gesù profeta e il Gesù taumaturgo.