Late Neogene time scale for ODP Leg 138 sites

The sediments recovered during Leg 138 provide a remarkable opportunity to improve the geological time scale of the late Neogene. We have developed new time scales in the following steps. First, we constructed age models on the basis of shipboard magnetostratigraphy and biostratigraphy, using the time scale of Berggren, Kent, and Flynn (1985). Second, we refined these age models using shipboard GRAPE density measurements to provide more accurate correlation points. Third, we calibrated a time scale for the past 6 m.y. by matching the high-frequency GRAPE density variations to the orbital insolation record of Berger and Loutre (1991); we also took into account d18O records, where they were available. Fourth, we generated a new seafloor anomaly time scale using our astronomical calibration of C3A.n (t) at 5.875 Ma and an age of 9.639 Ma for C5n.1n (t) that is based on a new radiometric calibration (Baksi, 1992). Fifth, we recalibrated the records older than 6 Ma to this new scale. Finally, we reconsidered the 6- to 10-Ma interval and found that this could also be partially tuned astronomically.

Acoustic multi-frequency indicator of four major groups on a spatial grid in the Bay of Biscay

The first data set contains the mean and cofficient of variation (standard deviation divided by mean) of a multi-frequency indicator I derived from ER60 acoustic information collected at five frequencies (18, 38, 70, 120, and 200 kHz) in the Bay of Biscay in May of the years 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010 (Pelgas surveys). The multi-frequency indicator was first calculated per voxel (20 m long × 5 m deep sampling unit) and then averaged on a spatial grid (approx. 20 nm × 20 nm) for five 5-m depth layers in the surface waters (10-15m, 15-20m, 20-25m, 25-30m below sea surface); there are missing values in particular in the shallowest layer. The second data set provides for each grid cell and depth layer the proportion of voxels for which the multi-frequency indicator I was indicative of a certain group of organisms. For this the following interpretation was used: I < 0.39 swim bladder fish or large gas bubbles, I = 0.39-0.58 small resonant bubbles present in gas bearing organisms such as larval fish and phytoplankton, I = 0.7-0.8 fluidlike zooplankton such as copepods and euphausiids, and I > 0.8 mackerel. These proportions can be interpreted as a relative abundance index for each of the four organism groups.