907 resultados para Feely, Jay
Resumo:
Three Pleistocene, five Pliocene, and thirteen late and middle Miocene calcareous nannofossil datums have been identified in the Leg 170 cored sequences collected from a transect across the Middle America Trench off the Nicoya Peninsula. Although some nannofossil zones could not be delineated, particularly in the Pliocene and upper Miocene, there appears to be a complete or very nearly complete Pleistocene through lower Miocene section at Sites 1039 and 1040. The oldest assemblages, observed at Site 1039 and 1040, are latest early Miocene in age (nannofossil Zone NN4). These assemblages are associated with gabbro intrusions into the basal sediments (one contact metamorphic hornfels sample contains relict nannofossils), indicating an age for the intrusion event of between 15.6 and 18.2 Ma at both Sites 1039 and 1040. Reference Site 1039, located on the Cocos plate, provides the best-preserved sequence of sediments of late Pleistocene to latest early Miocene age. The sediments cored in the prism sections at Sites 1040, 1041, 1042, and 1043 all indicate that the age of nannofossil assemblages in the prism sediments, including the toe, wedge, and apron, are all Pleistocene with a considerable amount of upper Miocene reworking. A period of low sediment accumulation rates (~5.3 m/m.y.) is recorded for Pliocene and upper Miocene sediments at Sites 1039, 1040, and 1043. Pliocene calcareous nannofossil assemblages characteristic of the ~2.5- to 3.75-m.y. time interval (nannofossil Zones NN16 and equivalent nannofossil Subzones CN12b and CN12a) were not resolved at any site. Nannofossil Zones NN15, NN14, NN13, and NN12 (early late Pliocene to early Pliocene) could not be resolved at any site either because of the absence of marker species. Within the Miocene at Sites 1039 and 1040, nannofossil Zones NN10-NN6 were difficult to differentiate because of the absence of several species that define the zonal boundaries. These intervals, where the nannofossil zones have not been resolved or are partially resolved, are primarily composed of carbonate ooze deposited during an ~8.5-m.y. (2.5-11 Ma) low sediment accumulation rate time interval. The absence of many of the marker species is attributed to warmer water conditions during those periods. Many of the same marker species are absent in the sediments recovered from nearby Deep Sea Drilling Project Site 155 in the Panama Basin.
Resumo:
Sulfide mineral major and trace element analyses were performed on more than 50 polished slabs representing mineralization from three seafloor hydrothermal massive sulfide deposits. Samples from the Bent Hill and ODP Mound massive sulfide deposits, both on the Juan de Fuca Ridge, can be contrasted with samples from the Trans-Atlantic Geotraverse (TAG) hydrothermal mound on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. The massive sulfide at Bent Hill is predominantly pyrite and pyrrhotite, with increasing amounts of copper-bearing sulfide minerals at the base of the massive sulfide body and through the stockwork to an interval 200 m below seafloor that hosts high copper mineralization (Deep Copper Zone). ODP Mound contains much more abundant sphalerite and copper-bearing sulfides as compared to either Bent Hill or TAG, which are predominantly pyrite with much less abundant chalcopyrite. Copper-bearing sulfides from the Deep Copper Zone beneath Bent Hill and the lowest sampled interval of ODP Mound are petrographically and chemically similar, but distinct from copper-bearing minerals higher in either sequence.
