Federal Constitutionalism and Aboriginal Difference

The author outlines a new legal approach, which he labels federal constitutionalism, to the question of aboriginal difference in Canada. This approach has the potential to open up more fruitful avenues for the resolution of aboriginal law issues than either the “frozen rights” approach currently adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada or the treaty federalism approach, which posits that treaties should be used to resolve all differences between aboriginals and non-aboriginals. The author outlines the difficulties inherent in both the frozen rights and treaty federalism approaches. Federal constitutionalism, in contrast, draws its vitality from an organic understanding of Canada’s constitutional experience. It would allow aboriginal peoples to be seen as federal actors who have historically shaped the Canadian federation. Federal constitutionalism is a multi-faceted approach that would permit aboriginal questions to be addressed using the federal principle, thereby allowing the legal focus to move away from section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. Aboriginal peoples would be able to exercise the rights of sovereignty over their own internal affairs, while individual aboriginals could participate directly in federal and provincial governments without having to proceed through the intermediary of aboriginal representatives. Federal constitutionalism would allow aboriginal peoples a guaranteed sphere of autonomy, while permitting recognition of their historical interdependence with non-aboriginal peoples.

Les obligations du franchiseur : étude du droit civil et du guide d'Unidroit sur les accords internationaux de franchise principale

"Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de Maîtrise en droit (LL.M.)". Ce mémoire a été accepté à l'unanimité et classé parmi les 15% des mémoires de la discipline.

An interview with Avigail Eisenberg : “Reasoning about the Identity of Aboriginal People”

Document de travail

NGO Duties in Relation to Human Rights. A Closer Look at One Proposal

This paper investigates the moral duties that human rights NGOs, such as Amnesty International, and development NGOs, such as Oxfam, have in relation to human rights – especially in relation to the human right to a decent standard of living. The mentioned NGOs are powerful new agents on the global scene, and according to many they might be duty-bearers in relation to human rights. However, until now their moral duties have hardly been investigated. The present paper investigates NGO duties in relation to human rights by looking in particular to a moral theory recently proposed by Leif Wenar, a theory which has some similarities to utilitarianism. In applying this theory, a case for human-rights duties of NGOs is developed mainly by considering the indispensable role that civil society plays in protecting human rights. The paper concludes that, at least, NGOs bear duties with regard to human rights when, as in certain real-life cases, NGO involvement is the only way to achieve acceptable protection against standard threats to certain goods, such as a decent standard of living.

L'interaction entre le droit civil et le droit du travail : le rôle du contrat dans l'accès aux régimes de protection des travailleurs

L’interrelation entre le droit civil et le du droit du travail présente multiples facettes. Le présent mémoire traite de l’une des manifestations de cette interaction, soit du recours à l’appareil contractuel pour donner ouverture à l’application de certaines lois de protection des travailleurs dans la sphère provinciale au Québec. L’accès aux lois du travail étant réservé aux personnes qui possèdent le statut de « travailleur » ou de « salarié » au sens de ces lois, la façon dont ces notions sont définies par le législateur est importante. Nous étudions dans notre texte l’incidence que le recours à la notion de contrat de travail peut avoir dans ce contexte. Dans la première partie du mémoire, nous étudions le rôle du droit civil dans le développement du droit du travail. Nous nous penchons sur l’existence d’un ensemble de droits et d’obligations rattaché au rapport de travail indépendamment de la volonté des parties. Ensuite, nous présentons les deux fondements possibles du rapport visé par les lois du travail, soit la thèse contractuelle et celle fondée sur la « relation du travail », ainsi que la façon dont elles sont reçues au Québec et ailleurs. Dans la troisième partie de notre texte, nous examinons les effets pratiques d’appliquer les critères du droit des contrats lorsqu’il s’agit d’établir si une personne peut bénéficier des lois du travail à partir de l’analyse de certaines décisions jurisprudentielles. Nous nous penchons de façon plus particulière sur le traitement accordé par les tribunaux aux personnes qui occupent des emplois atypiques comme les travailleurs occasionnels, saisonniers et autonomes. Nous explorons également si une approche fondée sur la réalité factuelle, les particularités du travail en cause et les objectifs des lois d’ordre public peut constituer une piste de solution à la problématique que le recours à la figure contractuelle pour déterminer l’application des lois du travail soulève.

Análisis de la relación entre ONG locales e internacionales para afianzar procesos de luchas políticas. Caso de estudio: Colombia Diversa y Human Rights Watch con respecto a la población LGBT entre 2004 – 2008

Esta monografía pretende establecer en que medida la relación entre ONG locales e internacionales ha logrado afianzar procesos de luchas políticas de la población LGBT a partir del estudio de la relación entre Colombia Diversa y Human Rights Watch. Los propósitos particulares que persigue la investigación giran en torno a tres puntos: primero, analizar el surgimiento y la consolidación de Colombia Diversa y el papel de las ONG en el sistema internacional; segundo, analizar la relación entre ONG locales y ONG internacionales, y tercero, analizar el efecto “bumerang” producto de la relación entre ONG nacionales e internacionales. La investigación recoge y aplica el modelo analítico de Margaret Keck y Kathryn Sikkink sobre redes trasnacionales de defensa y lo aplica al caso de estudio de Colombia Diversa y Human Rigths Watch. El estudio detallado del modelo planteado por Keck y Sikkink nos permite reconocer diferentes etapas de lucha, deslocalización e influencia o incorporación que permite mirar un número importante de variables para lograr comprender el trabajo de las ONG. Se espera que el presente texto sirva para que el lector entienda el funcionamiento de las redes trasnacionales de defensa aplicado a un caso poco estudiado, que incluye análisis de dinámicas internas e internacionales. Diferente a lo planteado hasta el momento en los textos que abordan el tema LGBT en Colombia, esta monografía no hace un análisis jurisprudencial fuerte de las sentencias que han reconocido los derechos de las parejas del mismo sexo, por el contrario pretende hacer un análisis amplio de la actuación de las ONG en general, sus acciones e incorporaciones a partir de los postulados del transnacionalismo.

Analísis de la interacción entre Actores No Gubernamentales Internacionales y Redes de Desobediencia civil. Caso de estudio: ORVEX-JAVU en el periodo 2007-2008

Han pasado ya más de diez años en los cuales, la otrora República de Venezuela, vive un clima de “Revolución Bolivariana” y que al mando de Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías, se vió soportada en sus cimientos por el apoyo y simpatía de millones de personas en el ámbito doméstico, regional e internacional. Sin embargo, y en el transcurso de su gestión, las amplias atribuciones que se ha tomado el poder ejecutivo sobre los demás poderes de la república han provocado arbitrariedades atentando en contra de Derechos Civiles y Políticos. Qué ha hecho o qué ha dejado de hacer la oposición venezolana y algunos sectores que la conforman, en la lucha contra la violación de los Derechos Civiles y Políticos? ¿Cuál ha sido el rol de los estudiantes de la educación superior venezolana? ¿Tienen estos estudiantes algún tipo de coalición transnacional fuera del país que les acompañe?

The Right to Water in the Case-Law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

The human right to water is nowadays more broadly recognised, mainly due to the essential societal function that this resource plays; likewise, because of the present water scarcity is generating conflicts between its different uses. Thus, this right aims at protecting human beings by guaranteeing access to clean water that is essential to satisfy vital human needs. Similarly, access to clean water is an important element to guarantee other rights including the right to life and health. The recognition of the right to water is mainly achieved in two ways: as a new and independent right and as a subordinate or derivative right. Concerning the latter, the right to water can emanate from civil and political rights, such as the right to life; or can be derived from economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to health, the right to an adequate standard of living, and the right to housing. This contribution explores the position of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding the right to water, and analyses whether the Court has recognised the right to water and, if so, in which manner.

Legal outlier, again? U.S. felon suffrage: comparative and international human rights perspectives

The judiciousness of American felon suffrage policies has long been the subject of scholarly debate, not least due to the large number of affected Americans: an estimated 5.3 million citizens are ineligible to vote as a result of a criminal conviction. This article offers comparative law and international human rights perspectives and aims to make two main contributions to the American and global discourse. After an introduction in Part I, Part II offers comparative law perspectives on challenges to disenfranchisement legislation, juxtaposing U.S. case law against recent judgments rendered by courts in Canada, South Africa, Australia, and by the European Court of Human Rights. The article submits that owing to its unique constitutional stipulations, as well as to a general reluctance to engage foreign legal sources, U.S. jurisprudence lags behind an emerging global jurisprudential trend that increasingly views convicts’ disenfranchisement as a suspect practice and subjects it to judicial review. This transnational judicial discourse follows a democratic paradigm and adopts a “residual liberty” approach to criminal justice that considers convicts to be rights-holders. The discourse rejects regulatory justifications for convicts’ disenfranchisement, and instead sees disenfranchisement as a penal measure. In order to determine its suitability as a punishment, the adverse effects of disenfranchisement are weighed against its purported social benefits, using balancing or proportionality review. Part III analyzes the international human rights treaty regime. It assesses, in particular, Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”), which proclaims that “every citizen” has a right to vote without “unreasonable restrictions.” The analysis concludes that the phrase “unreasonable restrictions” is generally interpreted in a manner which tolerates certain forms of disenfranchisement, whereas other forms (such as life disenfranchisement) may be incompatible with treaty obligations. This article submits that disenfranchisement is a normatively flawed punishment. It fails to treat convicts as politically-equal community members, degrades them, and causes them grave harms both as individuals and as members of social groups. These adverse effects outweigh the purported social benefits of disenfranchisement. Furthermore, as a core component of the right to vote, voter eligibility should cease to be subjected to balancing or proportionality review. The presumed facilitative nature of the right to vote makes suffrage less susceptible to deference-based objections regarding the judicial review of legislation, as well as to cultural relativity objections to further the international standardization of human rights obligations. In view of this, this article proposes the adoption of a new optional protocol to the ICCPR proscribing convicts’ disenfranchisement. The article draws analogies between the proposed protocol and the ICCPR’s “Optional Protocol Aiming at the Abolition of the Death Penalty.” If adopted, the proposed protocol would strengthen the current trajectory towards expanding convicts’ suffrage that emanates from the invigorated transnational judicial discourse.