Conklin, Pearl J., includes: Application for loan on Real Estate

Conklin, Pearl J., includes: Application for loan on Real Estate, Aug. 11, 1882.

Crew, Isaac M., includes: Application for Loan, Mortgage Loan Envelope, and Abstract of Title

Crew, Isaac M., includes: Application for Loan, March 10, 1885; Mortgage Loan Envelope no. 679 for Jan. 1, 1885 – Jan. 1, 1890 and Abstract of Title, April 13, 1885.

Crick, Henry A., includes Application for Loan, and Mortgage Loan Envelope

Crick, Henry A., includes Application for Loan, Jan. 8, 1885 and Mortgage Loan Envelope no. 637 for Jan. 1, 1885 – Jan. 1, 1890.

Dennis, George W. and Mary E. Dennis, includes: Application for Loan on Real Estate, and Abstract of Title

Dennis, George W. and Mary E. Dennis, includes: Application for Loan on Real Estate, July 10, 1882; and Abstract of Title, Sept. 2, 1882.

Mank, Isaac, Mortgage Loan Envelope no. 640

Mank, Isaac, Mortgage Loan Envelope no. 640 for Jan. 1, 1885 – Jan. 1, 1890

Rogers, Stephen A., Application for a Loan on Real Estate

Rogers, Stephen A., Application for a Loan on Real Estate, April 4, 1882.

Sampson, Albert, includes Application for a Loan on Real Estate, and an envelope with Mr. Sampson’s name crossed out

Sampson, Albert, includes Application for a Loan on Real Estate, April 19, 1882 and an envelope with Mr. Sampson’s name crossed out and postmarked Sept. 1882.

Schmidt, John, includes: Application for Loan, and Mortgage Loan Envelope, and Abstract of Title

Schmidt, John, includes: Application for Loan, Aug. 8, 1884 and Mortgage Loan Envelope no. 302 for July 1, 1884 – July 1, 1889 and Abstract of Title, Sept. 6, 1884.

Williams, Thomas J., Application for a Loan on Real Estate

Williams, Thomas J., Application for a Loan on Real Estate, April 1, 1882.

Letter to S.D. Woodruff asking if he could handle a loan which has been requested. The letter is signed Jarvis, Conklin and Co.

Letter (2 pages, handwritten) to S.D. Woodruff asking if he could handle a loan which has been requested. The letter is signed Jarvis, Conklin and Co., March 31, 1883.

Letter to S.D. Woodruff which accompanied the payment on the John Schmidt loan signed by S.L. Conklin, assistant secretary of Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Company

Letter to S.D. Woodruff (1 page, typed) which accompanied the payment on the John Schmidt loan signed by S.L. Conklin, assistant secretary of Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Company, July 9, 1889.

Letter to J.P. Bradley from L. Davis regarding a loan

Letter to J.P. Bradley from L. Davis regarding a loan. The letter is from Bytown [former name of Ottawa, Ont.], Dec. 6, 1841.

The Federal Empowerment Zone and Enterprise Community Program: Outcome on Labor Income.

Rapport de recherche

Ideal timing to transfer from an acute care hospital to an interdisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation program following a stroke: an exploratory study

Affiliation: Dany Gagnon & Sylvie Nadeau: École de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal & Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation, Institut de réadaptation de Montréal

An empirical study of the impact of two antipatterns on program comprehension

Les antipatrons sont de “mauvaises” solutions à des problèmes récurrents de conception logicielle. Leur apparition est soit due à de mauvais choix lors de la phase de conception soit à des altérations et des changements continus durant l’implantation des programmes. Dans la littérature, il est généralement admis que les antipatrons rendent la compréhension des programmes plus difficile. Cependant, peu d’études empiriques ont été menées pour vérifier l’impact des antipatrons sur la compréhension. Dans le cadre de ce travail de maîtrise, nous avons conçu et mené trois expériences, avec 24 sujets chacune, dans le but de recueillir des données sur la performance des sujets lors de tâches de compréhension et d’évaluer l’impact de l’existence de deux antipatrons, Blob et Spaghetti Code, et de leurs combinaisons sur la compréhension des programmes. Nous avons mesuré les performances des sujets en terme : (1) du TLX (NASA task load index) pour l’éffort ; (2) du temps consacré à l’exécution des tâches ; et, (3) de leurs pourcentages de réponses correctes. Les données recueillies montrent que la présence d’un antipatron ne diminue pas sensiblement la performance des sujets alors que la combinaison de deux antipatrons les entrave de façon significative. Nous concluons que les développeurs peuvent faire face à un seul antipatron, alors que la combinaison de plusieurs antipatrons devrait être évitée, éventuellement par le biais de détection et de réusinage.