858 resultados para Supreme Court
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"Postscript by William Vans": p. [13]-15 at end.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"October term, 1828."
Resumo:
Med's case.--Arguments of counsel; Benjamin R. Curtis. esq., for the respondent, Ellis Gray Loring, esq., for the petitioner, Hon. Rufus Choate, for the petitioner, Charles P. Curtis, esq., for the respondent.--Opinion of the court.
Resumo:
Sabin
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Notes of cases taken by Judge William Cushing during his tenure on the Massachusetts superior and supreme courts. (Formerly MS 2141.)
Resumo:
Vols. for 1874/75 reported by J.M. Shirley; 1875-76 by D. Hall.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Lettered on cover: Pennsylvania. Workmen's compensation law with rules of procedure. Supreme, Superior and Common pleas court decisions. IV. Mackey. 1921.
Resumo:
Discusses two aspects of Hong Kong law: 1) the judgment of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal in A Solicitor v The Law Society of Hong Kong on whether Hong Kong courts were bound, post-1997, by pre-1997 House of Lords or Privy Council decisions, by pre-1997 decisions of their own, or by post-1997 overseas decisions from any jurisdiction; and 2) the need for clarification in the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance of whether a company can have a single legal representative, the ultra vires rule and the duties of company directors
Resumo:
Case note of Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Fox (2009) 258 ALR 673 ----- In Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Fox (2009) 83 ALJR 1086 ; 258 ALR 673 the High Court considered the liability of a principal contractor for the negligence of independent subcontractors on a building site. In its decision, the court considered the nature and the scope of the duty owed by principals to independent contractors.
Resumo:
Since the High Court decision of Cook v Cook (1986) 162 CLR 376, a person who voluntarily undertakes to instruct a learner driver of a motor vehicle is owed a lower standard of care than that owed to other road users. The standard of care was still expressed to be objective; however, it took into account the inexperience of the learner driver. Therefore, a person instructing a learner driver was owed a duty of care the standard being that of a reasonable learner driver. This ‘special relationship’ was said to exist because of the passenger’s knowledge of the driver’s inexperience and lack of skill. On 28 August 2008 the High Court handed down its decision in Imbree v McNeilly [2008] HCA 40, overruling Cook v Cook.