977 resultados para Sill, Edward Rowland, 1841-1887.


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Written in several hands, some in red and black. Texts nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 are in the hand of Abdullah bin Abdulkadir.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Local paper. Pages slightly discolored.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

British Imperial policy in Southern Africa in the last three decades of the nineteenth century oscillated between two extremes. It began in the early 1870's with Lord Kimberley's attempt to effect confederation as a means of devolving Imperial responsibility and expenditure. It ended in 1899 with Britain's active intervention against the Boers. For most of the remaining years of those decades a middle course was adopted while the British Government struggled to reconcile its diverse political interests. Strategy, supremacy, economy, humanitarianism, and recognition of colonial aspirations were all at one time or another, in varying degrees, motivating forces behind Imperial policy. Many historians have pointed out how incompatible many of these ends were and how the attempt to pursue them all at once almost inevitably ended in at least one of them being sacrificed on the way. This study focusses on a relatively minor problem over a period of about seven years. It attempts to show how the British Government tried to reconcile, in this case, the predominant motives of economy and supremacy. The problem of the Disputed Territory now seems like a small fish in a big ocean because non the great hopes and fears that it raised were ever realized. But the anticlimactic nature of the outcome of events should not be allowed to conceal two important points: first, that the problem loomed large at the time in the eyes of the Imperial Government; and second, that in the case of its policy towards the Disputed Territory, the Government gained a greater degree of success in trying to reconcile seemingly incompatible ends than it did in many other instances.

Motion for a Resolution tabled by Abens, Adam, Agnelli, Albers, von Alemann, Arfe', Arndt, Balfe, Balfour, Bangemann, Barbagli, Barbarella, Barbi, Battersby, Berkhouwer, Berlinguer, Bethell, Bettiza, Bonaccini, Bonino, Bournias, Brandt, Brookes, Calvez, Cardia, Carettoni-Romagnoli, Cariglia, Carossino, Cassanmagnago Cerretti, Sir F. Catherwood, Cecovini, Ceravolo, Cinciari Rodano, Colla, Collins, Craxi, Curry, Dalziel, Damseaux, Dankert, De Clercq, De Gucht, Dekker, Del Duca, Delmotte, De Pasquale, Diana, Dido', Dimopoulos, Eisma, Enright, Fanti, Faure Edgar, Fellermaier, Fergusson, Ferri, Focke, Forster, Franghos, Friedrich Bruno, Gabert, Gaiotti de Biase, Gallagher, Galuzzi, Gatto, Gautier, Gendebien, Geurtsen, Giavazzi, Glinne, de Goede, Gouthier, Haagerup, Hansch, Hamilius, Herklotz, van den Heuvel, Hoff, Hooper, Hopper, Ippolito, Irmer, Jackson Christopher, Jackson Robert, Johnson, Jurgens, Katsafados, Kellet-Bowman Edward, Klinkenborg, Krouwel-Vlam, Kuhn, Lange, Leonardi, Lezzi, Lima, Linde, Linkohr, Lizin, Louwes, Macario, Mc Cartin, Macciocchi, Maher, Marshall, Mart, van Minnen, Modiano, Muntingh, Nicolson, Nielsen Tove, Nord, Normanton, O'Connell, O'Hagan, Orlandi, Pajetta, Pannella, Papapietro, Patterson, Pelikan, Pesmazoglou, Peters, Pfennig, Pininfarina, Prag, Provan, Pruvot, Puletti, Purvis, Radoux, Rieger, Ripa de Meana, Roberts, Ruffolo, Salisch, Sassano, Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg, Schieler, Schinzel, Schmid, Schon Karl, Schon Konrad, Schwencke, Scrivener, Seefeld, Seeler, Segre, Seibel-Emmerling, Seligman, Sherlock, Sieglerschmidt, Simpson, Spaak, Spencer, Spinelli, Squarcialupi, Taylor John David, Taylor John Mark, Travaglini, Tuckman, Turner, Vandemeulebroucke, Vandewiele, Van Miert, Vanneck, Veronesi, Vetter, Viehoff, Visentini, Vitale, Voyadzis, von der Vring, Visas, Sir Fred Warner, Weber, Welsh, Wettig, Wieczorek-Zeul, Zagari on the setting up of an ad hoc committee to draw up proposals concerning the progress and development of the Community. Working Documents 1980-1981, Document 1-889/80/rev., 6 June 1981

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador: