Censure.cn : Google s’attaque au marché chinois

Étude de cas

The Money Question and the Good Life

This paper proposes a theory of the good life for use in answering the question how much money the rich should spend on fighting poverty. The paper moves from the abstract to the concrete. To begin with, it investigates various ways to get an answer to the question what is good, and finds itself drawn to objective theories of the good. It then develops, taking Bernard Williams and Martha Nussbaum as its guides, a broad outline of a theory of the good. It holds that something evil happens to people if they do not have a real choice from a reasonable number of projects that realize most of their key capacities to a certain degree, and in connection to this it points to the great importance of money. The paper goes on specifically to consider what criticisms of Nussbaum's version of the capability approach are implied in this outline of a theory of the good. Next, it gets more specific and asks how much money the rich can give -and how they can be restricted in spending their money- without suffering any evil. It does three suggestions: the tithe suggestion, the ecological (or footprint) suggestion, and the fair trade suggestion. To conclude, the paper returns to the question how much money the rich should spend on fighting poverty.

Working Children: their Agency and self-organization

In recent years, ‘agency’ has appeared in academic writings as a new way of referring to active involvement from below in development interventions. The concept of ‘agency’ starts from the assumption that people are actually agents themselves, continuously acting in and reacting to circumstances. In child labour activism, this concept has been applied to working children in the understanding that, in order to improve their working conditions, children should be organised in organizations that are exclusively for and (ideally) run by working children. This paper aims to evaluate the extent to which child labourers can become agents of change through their own organizations. The paper will draw on two studies carried out by the IREWOC foundation. In 2002 a study was undertaken in Bolivia to give practical meaning to the concept of child agency. Secondly, in 2004/2005 an investigation was carried out on the functioning and impact of children’s organizations in Peru, Bolivia and Brazil. The applied research methods were mainly anthropological and used participant observation, (semi-) informal interviews and group interviewing with working children, their parents and adult representatives of the working children’s organizations. Both investigations show that in focussing on children as active participants, the structural constraints under which children have to live also need to be highlighted. One needs to understand how material poverty, mental deprivation and disempowerment help to shape resilience and defiance, but also anger, distrust and marginalisation.

Travail des enfants, enfants des rues et approche par les capabilités : Liens méthodologiques et implications pour les politiques

Le débat sur le travail des enfants a pris une ampleur considérable ces vingt dernières années. Les politiques se sont majoritairement orientées vers la promotion de l’éducation. Pourtant, le débat n’a guère fait de place à la question des enfants des rues. Intégrer cette catégorie d’enfants au débat pose de nouvelles questions. En particulier, l’éducation doit prendre une forme non violente et des espaces de travail doivent être ouverts pour les enfants des rues.

Une approche géographique du « travail » des enfants des rues

Cet article propose de décrire le quotidien des enfants des rues de Yaoundé (Cameroun) et d’Antananarivo (Madagascar) en mettant l’accent sur les activités générant des revenus. Quels espaces de travail émergent au sein de la ville, suivant quelles logiques? Ce questionnement nous permet de dessiner les contours, incertains, de l’univers de la rue. Il ouvre aussi la réflexion sur le devenir des enfants et leur capacité à s’insérer au sein de la société urbain. Nous prenons en compte les actions de l’Etat, des ONG et les représentations des habitants.