Computational differentiation of N-terminal signal peptides and transmembrane helices

Signal peptides and transmembrane helices both contain a stretch of hydrophobic amino acids. This common feature makes it difficult for signal peptide and transmembrane helix predictors to correctly assign identity to stretches of hydrophobic residues near the N-terminal methionine of a protein sequence. The inability to reliably distinguish between N-terminal transmembrane helix and signal peptide is an error with serious consequences for the prediction of protein secretory status or transmembrane topology. In this study, we report a new method for differentiating protein N-terminal signal peptides and transmembrane helices. Based on the sequence features extracted from hydrophobic regions (amino acid frequency, hydrophobicity, and the start position), we set up discriminant functions and examined them on non-redundant datasets with jackknife tests. This method can incorporate other signal peptide prediction methods and achieve higher prediction accuracy. For Gram-negative bacterial proteins, 95.7% of N-terminal signal peptides and transmembrane helices can be correctly predicted (coefficient 0.90). Given a sensitivity of 90%, transmembrane helices can be identified from signal peptides with a precision of 99% (coefficient 0.92). For eukaryotic proteins, 94.2% of N-terminal signal peptides and transmembrane helices can be correctly predicted with coefficient 0.83. Given a sensitivity of 90%, transmembrane helices can be identified from signal peptides with a precision of 87% (coefficient 0.85). The method can be used to complement current transmembrane protein prediction and signal peptide prediction methods to improve their prediction accuracies. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Genetic and environmental risk factors and their interactions for Parkinson's disease in a Chinese population

The interaction between genetic and environmental factors for PD was examined in a Chinese population. It was found that although the intron 2 MAOB (GT)(n) repeat polymorphism was not associated with PID in the population, a relationship might have been masked by the protective effect of tea drinking. In individuals who did not drink tea (<1 cup/day), the possession of short length less than or equal to 178 bp (GT), alleles conferred a borderline significant increased risk for PD (adjusted OR = 1.47; C.l. = 1.03-2. 1). As the extent of tea consumption increased, the association between the less than or equal to178 bp allele and PD disappeared. This result suggests that the MAOB gene may be associated with PD in Chinese if the putative protective effect of tea drinking is taken into account. The significance of this finding is unclear as the study may be limited because of its marginal significance and limited numbers. However, it does demonstrate the importance of considering putative positive and negative environmental risk factors in any examination of genetic risk factors for PD. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Transition to raloxifene with and without low-dose estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women: effects on serum lipids and fibrinogen - a pilot study

Objective To compare the effects of transferring from low-dose transdermal estrogen to raloxifene (RLX), with a phase of alternate-day RLX therapy with or without low-dose transdermal estrogen, on serum lipids and fibrinogen in postmenopausal women previously administered estrogen plus progestogen therapy. Methods Sixty postmenopausal women (mean age 55 years) were randomized to one of two treatment groups: RLX + low-dose transdermal estrogen (RLX + E) or RLX + placebo. The study consisted of four 8-week phases: phase I (all subjects low-dose transdermal estrogen 25 mug/day), phase II (double-blind RLX 60 mg every 2nd day in combination with either low-dose transdermal estrogen or placebo), phase III (all subjects RLX 60 mg every 2nd day + placebo) and phase IV (all subjects RLX 60 mg/day + placebo). Results No significant differences existed between groups for baseline measurements prior to phase I. In phase I, for all subjects combined, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotem cholesterol both showed a significant increase (median increase of 0.2 mmol/l, p = 0.008 and 0.4 mmol/l, p < 0.001, respectively), while triglycerides decreased significantly (median decrease of 0.2 mmol/l, p < 0.001). For the primary analysis (phase II to phase IV), the mean change from baseline observations showed no significant differences between the therapy groups for serum lipids, fibrinogen, vital signs or weight. In the comparison phase (phase II), changes in serum lipids, fibrinogen, vital signs and weight were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion Gradual conversion to RLX from low-dose transdermal estrogen, with a phase of alternate-day RLX therapy with or without low-dose transdermal estrogen, does not have any effect on the serum lipid profile or fibrinogen level.

Contribution towards a reflection about methodological strategies in design education and the function of drawing in design

This work presents a reflection on Design education and specifically on the role of Drawing in this area. As a subject, Design has expanded its field of action expanding into new areas such as Experience Design or Service Design. It became necessary for the designer to have more than an education based on technological knowledge or know-how. Many authors like Meredith Davis, Don Norman or Jamie Hobson point out the urgency to review the curricula of Design courses because nowadays “… design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior” (Norman 2011). When shifting from a product-centered design to a person-centered design (in a structure, a service or in a relationship) what should the function of drawing in a design course be? What should its curriculum be? Our work methodology will be to confront today’s perspectives on design theory and practice in an attempt to add to the discussion on the methodological strategies in design teaching in the contemporary context.

Contributo para uma reflexão sobre estratégias metodológicas no ensino do Design e a função do Desenho em Design

Neste trabalho apresentaremos uma reflexão sobre o ensino do Design e, especificamente, sobre a função do Desenho nessa área disciplinar. O Design, enquanto disciplina, alargou a sua área de actuação diversificando-se em novos campos como o Design de Experiência ou o Design de Serviço, não bastando ao designer uma formação ligada ao conhecimento tecnológico, ou ao “saber-fazer”. Diversos autores, como Meredith Davis, Don Norman ou Jamie Hobson, alertam para a urgência de uma reflexão aprofundada sobre as estruturas curriculares dos cursos de Design, já que na actualidade “(…) design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior” (Norman, 2011). Na passagem de um design centrado na forma, para um design centrado na pessoa (numa estrutura, num serviço, ou numa relação) qual deverá ser a função do desenho num curso de design? Qual deverá ser a sua estrutura programática? Como metodologia de trabalho iremos confrontar perspectivas actuais da teoria e da prática do design que equacionam esta problemática procurando, deste modo, contribuir para a reflexão de estratégias metodológicas no ensino do design no contexto contemporâneo.

Contribution towards a reflection about methodological strategies in Design Education and the function of Drawing in Design

This work presents a reflection on Design education and specifically on the role of Drawing in this area. As a subject, Design has expanded its field of action expanding into new areas such as Experience Design or Service Design. It became necessary for the designer to have more than an education based on technological knowledge or know-how. Many authors like Meredith Davis, Don Norman or Jamie Hobson point out the urgency to review the curricula of Design courses because nowadays “ … design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior” (Norman, 2011) When shifting from a product-centered design to a person-centered design (in a structure, a service or in a relationship) what should the function of drawing in a design course be? What should its curriculum be? Our work methodology will be to confront today’s perspectives on design theory and practice in an attempt to add to the discussion on the methodological strategies in design teaching in the contemporary context.

Reflexão sobre estratégias metodológicas no ensino do design e a função do desenho em design

Neste trabalho apresentaremos uma reflexão sobre o ensino do Design e, especificamente, sobre a função do Desenho nessa área disciplinar. O Design, enquanto disciplina, alargou a sua área de actuação diversificando-se em novos campos como o Design de Experiência ou o Design de Serviço, não bastando ao designer uma formação ligada ao conhecimento tecnológico, ou ao “saber-fazer”. Diversos autores, como Meredith Davis, Don Norman ou Jamie Hobson, alertam para a urgência de uma reflexão aprofundada sobre as estruturas curriculares dos cursos de Design, já que na actualidade “(…) design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior” (Norman, 2011). Na passagem de um design centrado na forma, para um design centrado na pessoa (numa estrutura, num serviço, ou numa relação) qual deverá ser a função do desenho num curso de design? Qual deverá ser a sua estrutura programática? Como metodologia de trabalho iremos confrontar perspectivas actuais da teoria e da prática do design que equacionam esta problemática procurando, deste modo, contribuir para a reflexão de estratégias metodológicas no ensino do design no contexto contemporâneo.

Reflexão sobre Estratégias Metodológicas no Ensino do Design e a Função do Desenho em Design

Somos habitantes de um mundo que sofre constantes transformações estruturais em qualquer área. As tecnologias, a globalização e a política dos mercados, deslocam tudo e todos da sua zona de conforto, exigindo constantes adaptações a novos vocabulários e hábitos para os quais não temos antecedentes. Novas competências devem ser adquiridas face às novas exigências, e no ensino, base de uma preparação (pessoal e profissional), impõe-se uma constante revisão de estratégias metodológicas de aquisição e partilha de conhecimento. Neste trabalho apresentaremos uma reflexão sobre o ensino do Design e, especificamente, sobre a função do Desenho nessa área disciplinar. O Design, enquanto disciplina, alargou a sua área de actuação diversificando-se em novos campos como o Design de Experiência ou o Design de Serviço, não bastando ao designer uma formação ligada ao conhecimento tecnológico, ou ao “saber-fazer”. Diversos autores, como Meredith Davis, Don Norman ou Jamie Hobson, alertam para a urgência de uma reflexão aprofundada sobre as estruturas curriculares dos cursos de Design, já que na actualidade “(…) design is more than appearance, design is about interaction, about strategy and about services. Designers change social behavior.” Na passagem de um design centrado na forma, para um design centrado na pessoa (numa estrutura, num serviço, ou numa relação) qual deverá ser a função do desenho num curso de design? Qual deverá ser a sua estrutura programática? Como metodologia de trabalho iremos confrontar perspectivas actuais da teoria e da prática do design que equacionam esta problemática procurando, deste modo, contribuir para a reflexão de estratégias metodológicas no ensino do design no contexto contemporâneo.