Bemötande i vården vid övervikts- och fetmaproblematik En litteraturöversikt

Bakgrund: Övervikt och fetma orsakar idag fler dödsfall än undervikt. Det är ett folkhälsoproblem som ökar över hela världen. Övervikt och fetma leder till såväl fysiska som psykiska problem och besvär för den drabbade. Forskning har visat att patienter med övervikt eller fetma upplever mest stigmatisering i vuxen ålder. Syfte: Syftet med denna litteraturöversikt är att belysa bemötandet av patienter med övervikts- och fetmaproblematik ur patientens och vårdpersonalens perspektiv. Metoder: En litteraturöversikt. Resultat: Det framkom att patienter med högre BMI upplevde negativt bemötande från vårdpersonal, att de inte blev hörda. Patienterna sökte inte gärna vård. Det framkommer att vårdpersonalen hade en negativ attityd till patienter med övervikt eller fetma och ville helst inte vårda dessa. Slutsats: Patienter med övervikt eller fetma är en utsatt patientgrupp i såväl samhälle som inom vården. Patienterna upplever att de inte blir hörda och inte blir tagna på allvar. Vårdpersonal är enig om att vården måste hjälpa dessa patienter, trots det uppger en stor del av vårdpersonal att de inte vill vårda patienter med övervikt eller fetma relaterat till tidsbrist.

Depicting the interplay between organisational tiers in the use of a national quality registry to develop quality of care in Sweden

BACKGROUND: With a pending need to identify potential means to improved quality of care, national quality registries (NQRs) are identified as a promising route. Yet, there is limited evidence with regards to what hinders and facilitates the NQR innovation, what signifies the contexts in which NQRs are applied and drive quality improvement. Supposedly, barriers and facilitators to NQR-driven quality improvement may be found in the healthcare context, in the politico-administrative context, as well as with an NQR itself. In this study, we investigated the potential variation with regards to if and how an NQR was applied by decision-makers and users in regions and clinical settings. The aim was to depict the interplay between the clinical and the politico-administrative tiers in the use of NQRs to develop quality of care, examining an established registry on stroke care as a case study. METHODS: We interviewed 44 individuals representing the clinical and the politico-administrative settings of 4 out of 21 regions strategically chosen for including stroke units representing a variety of outcomes in the NQR on stroke (Riksstroke) and a variety of settings. The transcribed interviews were analysed by applying The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: In two regions, decision-makers and/or administrators had initiated healthcare process projects for stroke, engaging the health professionals in the local stroke units who contributed with, for example, local data from Riksstroke. The Riksstroke data was used for identifying improvement issues, for setting goals, and asserting that the stroke units achieved an equivalent standard of care and a certain level of quality of stroke care. Meanwhile, one region had more recently initiated such a project and the fourth region had no similar collaboration across tiers. Apart from these projects, there was limited joint communication across tiers and none that included all individuals and functions engaged in quality improvement with regards to stroke care. CONCLUSIONS: If NQRs are to provide for quality improvement and learning opportunities, advances must be made in the links between the structures and processes across all organisational tiers, including decision-makers, administrators and health professionals engaged in a particular healthcare process.