922 resultados para Roofwater harvesting
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of North Bulls Bay S279 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Charleston County.
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of Mark Bay S283 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Charleston County.
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of Bulls Bay S286 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Charleston County.
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of Alligator Creek S328 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Charleston County.
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of Santee Point S340 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Georgetown County.
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of Jones Creek S342 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Georgetown County.
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of Brookgreen S354 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Georgetown County.
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of Drunken Jack Island S357 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Georgetown County.
Resumo:
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources provides maps to recreational and state shellfish grounds, available to the public for recreational harvesting or to commercial harvest. This map shows the location of Murrells Inlet S358 Recreational Shellfish Ground in Georgetown County.
Resumo:
En alimentation animale, l’utilisation adéquate des aliments nécessite une connaissance précise des valeurs nutritionnelles de leurs composantes, dont celle en acides aminés. Cependant, ces valeurs nutritionnelles dépendent de la teneur en acides aminés essentiels (AAE) totaux et de la digestibilité iléale standardisée (DIS) de ces AAE. Cette dernière varie en fonction de plusieurs facteurs, dont l’origine botanique des graines, les conditions de culture des récoltes, le stockage des aliments, les traitements physico-chimiques appliqués aux grains, les facteurs antinutritionnels (FANs) et les techniques expérimentales utilisées pour le dosage et l’estimation de la digestibilité des AAE. Une approche par méta-analyse a permis d’établir des modèles de prédiction de la valeur nutritionnelle en AAE des ingrédients à partir de leur composition chimique en considérant la protéine brute (PB), les AAE totaux, la teneur en fibre (Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) et Fibre Brute (FB)) et les FANs comme les inhibiteurs de la trypsine. En se référant à l’analyse graphique et statistique, les données ont été réparties en 4 groupes : 1) les tourteaux (tourteau de soja, colza/canola et coton); 2) les légumineuses (féveroles, lupins, pois et soja); 3) les céréales (blé, orge, avoine, sorgho et maïs); 4) les drêches de distilleries (blé et maïs). Ainsi, un modèle général ajusté en fonction du type d’ingrédients a été généré et les facteurs de variation de la digestibilité en AAE ont été identifiés. Pour les tourteaux, la DIS des AAE est réduite par un accroissement de la teneur en NDF, tandis que la DIS des AAE de la féverole, pois et lupin est principalement influencée par la teneur en PB et en FANs. Concernant les graines de soja la DIS des AAE est réduite par une hausse de la teneur en fibre (FB et ADF). Enfin pour les céréales et les sous- produit de céréales telles que les drêches, la PB et les fibres (ADF ou NDF) étaient les meilleurs nutriments pour prédire la DIS des AAE. Ces résultats démontrent que la DIS des AAE peut être prédite avec précision à partir de la composition chimique pour la plupart des ingrédients.
Resumo:
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2015
Resumo:
Dissertação de Mestrado, Engenharia e Gestão de Sistemas de Água, 4 de Março de 2016, Universidade dos Açores.
Resumo:
Trabalho Final de Mestrado para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Engenharia Civil
Resumo:
This article evaluates the sustainability and economic potential of microalgae grown in brewery wastewater for biodiesel and biomass production. Three sustainability and two economic indicators were considered in the evaluation within a life cycle perspective. For the production system the most efficient process units were selected. Results show that harvesting and oil separation are the main process bottlenecks. Microalgae with higher lipid content and productivity are desirable for biodiesel production, although comparable to other biofuel’s feedstock concerning sustainability. However, improvements are still needed to reach the performance level of fossil diesel. Profitability reaches a limit for larger cultivation areas, being higher when extracted biomass is sold together with microalgae oil, in which case the influence of lipid content and areal productivity is smaller. The values of oil and/or biomass prices calculated to ensure that the process is economically sound are still very high compared with other fuel options, especially biodiesel.
Resumo:
This study performs a sustainability evaluation of biodiesel from microalga Chlamydomonas sp. grown in 20 % (v/v) of brewery’s wastewater, blended with pentose sugars (xylose, arabinose or ribose resulting from the hydrolysis of brewer’s spent grains (BSG). The life cycle steps considered for the study are: microalgae cultivation, biomass processing and lipids extraction at the brewery site, and its conversion to biodiesel at a dedicated external biofuel’s plant. Three sustainability indicators (LCEE, FER and GW) were considered and calculated using experimental data. Literature data was used, whenever necessary, to complement life cycle data, thus allowing a more accurate sustainability evaluation. A comparative analysis of the biodiesel life cycle steps was also conducted, with the main goal of identifying which steps need to be improved. Results show that biomass processing, especially cell harvesting, microalgae cultivation, and lipids extraction are the main process bottlenecks. It is also analysed the influence on the microalgae biodiesel sustainability of adding each pentose sugar to the cultivation media, concluding that it strongly influences the biomass and lipid productivity. In particular, the addition of xylose is preferable in terms of lipid productivity, but from a sustainability point of view, ribose is the best, though the difference from xylose is not significant. Nevertheless, culture without pentose addition presents the best sustainability results.