Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 42 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Kurt Pinthus (p. I 21, 1-130)

1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Pierre van Paassen, 31.01.1944; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Frederick M. Padelford, 25.03.1941; 1 Exposé und Beilage von Karl O. Paetel sowie sowie Briefwechsel mit Karl A. Wittfogel; 2 Briefe zwischen Karl A. Wittfogel und Margot von Mendelssohn, 01.06.1941, 04.06.1941; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an D. D. Paige, August 1944; 2 Briefe zwischen Maria Pape und Max Horkheimer, 23.07.1949, 29.07.1949; 1 Brief von Fritz Pappenheim an Max Horkheimer, 11.03.1939; 2 Briefe zwischen Claire Patek-Hohenadl und Max Horkheimer, 18.02.1945, 02.03.1945; 4 Briefe zwischen Wilhelm Pauck und Max Horkheimer, 1938; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Thomas Peardon, September 1941; 2 Briefe zwischen Christine Peck und Max Horkheimer, 01.02.1944, 16.02.1944; 2 Briefe zwischen Alexander H. Pekelis und Max Horkheimer, 20.10.1941, 29.10.1941; 4 Briefe zwischen Pendle Hill Wallingford und Max Horkheimer, 21.05.1940, 1940; 1 Einladung von The People Lobby an Max Horkheimer, April 1937; 1 Brief von Franz L. Neumann an Selig Perlman, 08.10.1941; 2 Briefe zwischen Florence Pfleger und Max Horkheimer, 30.10.1944, 06.11.1944; 2 Briefe zwischen The Philharmonic-Symphony Society of New York und Max Horkheimer, 11.06.1936, 22.06.1936; 2 Briefe zwischen Philosophical Library New York und Max Horkheimer, 09.09.1941; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Donald A. Piatt, Oktober 1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Alfred Pinkus, 27.08.1942; 20 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Kurt Pinthus und Max Horkheimer, 1940-1942; 1 Brief von Friedrich Pollock an das American Consul General Berlin, 20.05.1941; 1 Brief von Friedrich Pollock an den National Refugee Service New York, 30.04.1941; 4 Briefe zwischen The Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced Foreign Scholars, New York und Friedrich Pollock, 27.09.1940-1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an John Simon Guggeheim von der Memorial Foundation, 08.11.1940; 3 Brief zwischen Robert Plank und Max Horkheimer, 12.07.1944, 1944; 4 Briefe und 1 Beilage zwischen Richard S. Plant und Max Horkheimer, Januar 1939; 2 Briefe zwischen Caroline S. Platt und Max Horkheimer, 06.05.1942, 08.05.1942; 1 Brief und 2 Beilagen vom Pledge for Peace Committee New York an Max Horkheimer, 10.04.1944; 1 Brief vom Popular Publications, Inc. New York an Mein, 23.10.1939; 2 Briefe von Else Heim an die Popular Publikations, Inc. New York, 1939; 1 Brief und 1 Beilage von Frederick Pollock an Leonard Powers, 03.06.1941; 2 Briefe zwischen S. Pressburger udn Max Horkheimer, 18.06.1939, 05.07.1939; 2 Briefe zwsichen dem Preston Hotel, Swampscott und Max Horkheimer, 28.04.1937, 08.05.1937; 1 Brief von Lucio José F. Weil an das Preston Hotel, Swampscott, 25.06.1936; 5 Briefe zwischen F. V. Preve und Max Horkheimer, 1937; 4 Briefe zwischen Rena Proulx und Max Horkheimer, 1934, 1937; 2 Briefe zwischen dem Psychatry Journal of the Biology and the Pathology of Interpersonal Relations Washington und Max Horkheimer, 21.08.1939, 11.09.1939;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 19 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Alfred Haas (p. I 10, 1-250)

20 Briefe zwischen Alfred Haas und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1941; 2 Briefe von Willy Haas an Max Horkheimer, 1938; 3 Briefe zwischen Virginia Haber und Max Horkheimer, 12.09.1945, August 1945; 7 Briefe zwischen Hugo Hahn und Max Horkheimer, 1942-1946; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Charles G. Haines, 23.10.1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Hall, 02.07.1939; 2 Briefe zwischen H. Duncan Hall und Max Horkheimer, 04.08.1939, 24.07.1939; 2 Briefe zwsichen Herbert Berkerath und Max Horkheimer, 10.10.1939, 09.10.1939; 23 Briefe zwischen Wolfgang Hallgarten und Max Horkheimer, 1937-1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an die American Philosophic Society Philadelphia, 15.04.1940; 2 Briefe zwischen Betty Drury und Max Horkheimer, 29.02.1940, 20.02.1940; 6 Briefe zwischen Nina Almond und Max Horkheimer, 1939; 1 Brief von Ruth E. Hollander an Max Horkheimer, 08.09.1938; 1 Brief von dem Brooklyn College an Wolfgang Hallgarten, 29.04.1938; 4 briefe zwischen dem Brooklyn College und Max Horkheimer, 18.05.1938, 17.05.1938; 2 Briefe zwischen Robert Maynard Hutchins und Max Horkheimer, 02.11.1937, 28.10.1937; 2 Briefe zwsichen Hardt und Max Horkheimer, 01.10.1943; 4 Briefe zwischen Gertrude Hardt und Max Horkheimer, 1947-1948; 4 Briefe zwischen den Harper & Brothers New York und Max Horkheimer, 24.10.1950, 1950; 1 Brief von Friedrich Pollock an Margot von Mendelssohn, 13.09.1950; 1 Brief von Hartoch an Max Horkheimer, 09.06.1937; 4 Briefe zwischen dem Harvard College Cambridge Massachusetts und Max Horkheimer, 1939-1940; 3 Briefe zwischen Felix Hase und Max Horkheimer, 1936, 13.03.1936; 1 Brief von Freda E. Hecht an Max Horkheimer, 01.03.1947; 1 Brief von Ernest S. Hediger an Max Horkheimer, 02.09.1940; 2 Briefe zwischen Agnes Heilbut und Max Horkheimer, 18.07.1938,; 7 Briefe zwischen Eduard Heimann und Max Horkheimer, 1936-1939; 1 Brief von Fritz Hein an Max Horkheimer, 14.06.1949; 2 Briefe zwischen Walter Heinemann und Max Horkheimer, 15.02.1945, 12.03.1945; 2 Briefe zwischen Philipp Heller und Max Horkheimer, 16.09.1944, 09.10.1944; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Hellmann, 23.03.1939; 4 Briefe zwischen L. E. Hellmann und Max Horkheimer, 1939; 4 Briefe zwischen P. A. Hemerijk und Max Horkheimer, 1936-1937, 03.02.1936; 5 Briefe zwischen Carl G. Hempel und Max Horkheimer, 1939-1941; 1 Lebenslauf von Hans Henning; 1 Brief von Else Henschke an Max Horkheimer, 24.07.1940; 1 Briefe von Isi Hepner an Max Horkheimer, 23.01.1941; 1 Brief von Leo Löwenthal an Isi Hepner, 03.02.1941; 1 Brief von Gertrude E. Herman anMax Horkheimer, 10.12.1949; 1 Brief von Wilhelm G. Hertz an Max Horkheimer, 29.09.1938; 2 Briefe zwischen Wieland Herzfelde und der National City Bank of New York, 28.11.1939, 30.11.1939; 2 Briefe zwischen Karl Hess und Max Horkheimer, 14.08.1935, 25.10.1934; 4 Briefe zwischen Karl Heymann und Max Horkheimer, 1947, 1949; 19 Briefe zwischen Robert Hilb und Max Horkheimer, 1937-1941; 2 Briefe zwischen Joseph Rosenthal und Max Horkheimer, 12.11.1940, 25.10.1940; 2 Briefe zwischen Henry Church und Max Horkheimer, 14.12.1940, 18.12.1940; 1 Brief von Ellen Hilb an Max Horkheimer, 11.03.1938; 1 Brief von Emil Hilb an Max Horkheimer, 15.04.1939; 2 Briefe zwischen Yoshitaro Hirano und Max Horkheimer, 1936, 23.01.1936; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Hirsch, 1938; 1 Brief von Arnold Hirsch an Max Horkheimer, 14.07.1949; 4 Briefe zwischen Charles Hirsch und Max Horkheimer, 1937, 1938; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Ernst Hirsch, Oktober 1938; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Julius Hirsch, 24.02.1942;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 24 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Stefan Jacobwicz (p. I 12, 176-330)

1 Brief an Ernst Jacob von Max Horkheimer; 31 Briefe zwischen Stefan Jacobwicz und Max Horkheimer, 1936-1945; 1 Brief an die American Consul Lisabon von Max Horkheimer; 23 Briefe zwischen Heinz Jacoby, Lilli Jacoby und Max Horkheimer, 1936-1943; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an John B. Norman, 29.06.1942; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an George L. Warren; 1 Brief vom Service Social d'Aide aux Emigrants Paris an Heinz Jacobi, 18.01.1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Jaeger , 29.09.1937; 5 Brief zwischen Philip C. Jessup und Max Horkheimer, 15.10.1940-1941; 3 Briefe an die Jewish National and University Library Jerusalem von Max Horkheimer, 1943, 1949; 5 Briefe zwischen der Jewish Telegraphic Agency New York und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 2 Briefe zwischen Ernest Jones und Max Horkheimer, 29.04.1938, 11.05.1938; 14 Briefe zwischen der Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, Woodbourne und Max Horkheimer,1940-1941; 1 Brief vom Journal of Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Bufallo N.Y. an Max Horkheimer, 19.11.1940; 1 Brief an das Jüdisches Schwesternheim Stuttgart an Max Horkheimer, 29.12.1937; 1 Brief von Jean Juget an Max Horkheimer, 25.11.1935; 2 Briefe zwischen der Juilliard School of Music New York und Theodor W. Adorno, 17.07.1940, 18.07.1940; 2 Briefe zwischen Gustave S. Juliber und Max Horkheimer, 09.10.1938, 01.11.1938;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 17 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit M. Gosling (p. I 9, 1-159)

11 Briefe zwischen M. Gosling und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1938; 1 Brief von Ellen Gottschalk an 04.08.1936; 1 Brief von Brill an Max Horkheimer, 15.08.1936; 2 Briefe zwischen Louise Gottschalk und Max Horkheimer, 06.12.1937, 19.04.1937; 3 Briefe zwischen Max Gottschalk und Max Horkheimer, 1941, 23.01.1941; 2 Briefe zwischen Nemes Gottschalk und Max Horkheimer, 29.03.1939, 03.04.1939; 2 Briefe zwischen Lawrence Gould und Max Horkheimer, 12.01.1947, 04.01.1947; 4 Briefe zwischen Isaeque Graeber und Max Horkheimer, 20.07.1941, 1941; 4 Briefe zwischen Malborne W. Graham und Max Horkheimer, 17.10.1940, 1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an J. A. C. Grant, 23.10.1940; 2 Briefe zwischen dem Grant Grove Lodge Kings Canyon National Park California und Max Horkheimer, 30.09.1946, 04.10.1946; 4 Brefe zwischen Liesel Gras und Max Horkheimer, 1948, 02.04.1948; 2 Briefe zwischen Claire F. Gravel und 23.03.1942, 26.03.1942; 1 Brief und 4 Briefentwürfe von Max Horkheimer an Edward S. Greenbaum, 20.06.1940; 13 Briefe zwischen B. Groethuysen und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1937; 1 Hochzeitsanzeige von Isabelle Grossen, 26.11.1938; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Isabelle Grossen, 17.12.1938; 1 Brief von Kurt Grossmann an Max Horkheimer, 29.12.1939; 3 Briefe von Eva Grosz an Max Horkheimer, 1937; 5 Briefe zwischen Franz M. Groedel und Max Horkheimer, 1939, Oktober 1939; 7 Briefe zwischen Emil Grünberg und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1940; 1 Brief von B. M. Telders an Max Horkheimer, 27.09.1938; 3 Briefe zwischen dem Academic Assistance Council London und Max Horkheimer, 1935, 29.03.1935; 1 Briefentwurft von Max Horkheimer an Karl Grünberg, 07.02.1936; 1 Brief von Juliette Favez an Max Horkheimer, 07.02.1936; 3 Briefe zwsichen Martin Grünberg und Max Horkheimer, November 1938, 18.11.1938; 3 Briefe zwischen Alfred Grünebaum und Max Horkheimer, 10.01.1939, 1939; 2 Briefe zwischen D. E. Grünebaum und Max Horkheimer, 24.11.1940, 02.12.1940; 3 Briefe zwischen Richard Güldenstein und Max Horkheimer, August 1937, 17.08.1937; 1 Brief von Daniel Guérin an Max Horkheimer, 13.07.1947; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Guerro, 08.09.1936;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 45 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit der Familie Rabinowitsch, Friedrich Pollock und Franz Neumann (p. I 21, A, 1-218)

37 Briefe zwischen Fritz Rabinowitsch, Gregor Rabinowitsch, Fred Roberts und Max Horkheimer, 1936-1943; 14 Briefe und Beilagen zwischen Finley Parker, Benjamin Parker und dem American General Consulat, 1937-1939; 4 Brief zwischen dem National Council of Jewish Women New York und Max Horkheimer, 1937; 31 Briefe und Beilagen zwischen Finley Parker, Benjamin Parker und Max Horkheimer, 1937-1939; 7 Briefe zwischen Franz L. Neumann und Finley Parker, Benjamin Parker, 09.10.1937, 1937; 2 Briefe zwischen dem American Conulat, General und dem National Council of Jewish Women, 27.07.1937, 16.08.1937; 1 Brief von Finley und Benjamin Parker an Gregor Rabinowitsch, 22.10.1937; 3 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an das United States Consulate Berlin, 1937; 1 Brief von Finley und Benjamin Parker an Hans-Heinrich Schulz, 21.09.1937; 1 Brief von Finley und Benjamin Parker an Eberhard Roethe, 21.09.1937; 6 Briefe zwischen Friedrich Pollock und Max Horkheimer, 1937-1943; 2 Briefe zwischen dem Schweizerischer Buchhändlerverein und Max Horkheimer, 31.07.1937, 10.09.1937; 2 Briefe zwischen Robert Hilb und Max Horkheimer, 07.09.1937; 2 Briefe zwischen Franz Neumann und Max Horkheimer, 29.08.1937, 31.08.1937; 11 Briefe zwischen Alexander Farquharson und Max Horkheimer, 1937; 1 Brief von Girsberger an Max Horkheimer, 29.08.1937; 1 Brief von Abner J. Rubien an Max Horkheimer, 29.07.1937; 1 Brief von Brill an Max Horkheimer, 29.07.1937; 2 Briefe zwischen Otto Nathan und Max Horkheimer, 28.07.1937, 25.04.1939; 5 Briefe zwischen dem Germany Emergency Committee London und Max Horkheimer, 1937; 2 Briefe von der National City Bank New York an das American Consul, New York, 1937; 1 Brief von John G. Jenkins an Paul F. Lazarsfeld, 05.04.1937; 3 Briefe zwischen Frank H. Bowles und Max Horkheimer, 23.03.1937, 1937;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 696 - Cultural Aspects of national Socialism. A Research Project (p. IX 170.5)

"Cultural Aspects of National Socialism. A Research Project" (1941):; 5. "Introduction" (enthalten in 3.), Typoskripte und Manuskripte (u.a. Entwurf von Theodor W. Adorno und Manuskript von Max Horkheimer), insgesamt 117 Blatt;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 563 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Alice H. Maier und Leo Löwenthal (p. VI 27, 1-253)

Briefwechsel zwischen Max Horkheimer und Alice H. Maier; 5 Briefe an Maurice und Carolyn Tumarkin von Max Horkheimer, 1957/1964; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Charles Gorman, 27.04.1957; 1 Brief von Alice H. Maier an die Marquis Company (Chicago), 06.05.1957; 2 Briefe an H. P. Edelman von Max Horkheimer, 1964; 3 Briefe zwischen Alice H. Maier und H. P. Edelman, 1957/1963; 1 Brief von Margot von Mendelssohn an Alice H. Maier, 01.04.1957; 1 Brief an Richard Corwine Stevenson von Max Horkheimer, 16.03.1957; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Inge Aicher-Scholl, 26.02.1957; 1 Brief an Herman Strasburger von Max Horkheimer, 21.01.1957; 1 Brief von Elisabeth Richter an Alice H. Maier, [1957]; 1 Brief an den Director of International Operations (Washington) von Chauncy D. Harris, 05.02.1957; 1 Brief von Alice H. Maier an Comptroller of Customs (New York), 11.01.1957; 1 Brief an Herbert Marcuse von Alice H. Maier, 14.01.1957; 2 Briefe zwischen Alice H. Maier und The Saturday Evening Post (Philadelphia), Oktober 1956; 1 Brief an die Staats-Herold Corporation (Woodside) von Alice H. Maier, 24.09.1956; 2 Briefe zwischen Alice H. Maier und Werner Thönnessen, 1956; 2 Briefe zwischen dem National Better Business Bureau (New York) und Alice H. Maier, 1956; 2 Briefe zwischen Alice H. Maier und Herman L. Filene, Januar 1956; 5 Briefe zwischen Max Horkheimer und Edwin J. Lukas, 1962 - 1963; 7 Briefe zwischen Monroe Karasik und Max Horkheimer, 1963; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an James Conant, 30.05.1963; 1 Brief an John J. McCloy von Max Horkheimer, 30.05.1963; 3 Briefe an Herman S. Klein von Alice H. Maier, 1960/1963; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Hartley Chemists (New York), 06.02.1962; 1 Brief an Columbia Chemists (New York) von Max Horkheimer, 06.02.1962; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an A. P. Bersohn, 06.06.1962; 1 Brief an A. P. Bersohn von Alice H. Maier, 20.04.1962; 1 Brief an Alice H. Maier von Paul Kind, 22.05.1962; 1 Brief an Cyrus C. Hoffman von Alice H. Maier, 23.03.1961; 2 Briefe von Alice H. Maier an Friedrich Pollock, 1960/1966;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 598 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Frederick Wild und Friedrich Pollock (p. VI 41, 287-427)

46 Briefe zwischen Max Horkheimer und Frederick Wild; 1 Brief von Frederick Pollock an Leo Löwenthal, 22.04.1948; 5 Empfehlungsschreiben für Max Horkheimer von Frederick Pollock, 16. u. 17.04.1948; 1 Telegramm von Frederick Pollock an Max Horkheimer, 28.06.1943; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Julius Schwietering, 18.02.1948; 10 Briefe zwischen der National City Bank of New York und Max Horkheimer, 1943-1944; 1 Brief von Frederick Wild an H. P. Edelman, 27.01.1944; 1 Brief von Hilda Kahn an Frederick Wild, 02.12.1943; 1 Brief von Frederick Wild an Jane Reinheimer, 30.11.1943;

Physician and patient determinants of the treatment of sleep difficulties in U.S. outpatient settings

The prevalence of sleep difficulties among the patients seen in the primary care settings is about 30%. This problem increases with age and is more common among females than males. Variations are noticed in prescription choices for different patients with sleep difficulties. Many factors affect a physician's prescription decision while chosen from a wide array of available medications. Both pharmacological and behavioral therapies are available for the treatment of sleep difficulties. It is important to know the impact of use of different types of prescriptions on health outcomes related to sleep difficulties. Thus the knowledge of prescription patterns among different types of patients (e.g. age, gender, race, insurance type etc.) becomes important for determining a clinical guideline. This study is designed to assist in evidence-based policymaking on understanding the variations in physician prescriptions for sleep difficulties and reasons for such variations. ^ A modified version of the model suggested by Eisenberg was used as a theoretical framework for this study to predict the factors influencing treatment of sleep difficulties. Multivariate logistic regression methods were used to analyze the 1996–2001 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data. ^ This study found that increased age, female gender, white race, established patients, and mental comorbidity were associated with significantly increased likelihood for prescription of some type of therapy for sleep difficulties in US outpatient settings. Patients with private insurance were associated with lower likelihood of receipt of many therapies. Psychiatrists were more likely to prescribe some kind of treatment as well as more expensive therapies for sleep difficulty as compared to other physician specialties. HMO enrolled patient visits were more likely to be associated with receipt of behavioral therapy. This study also found that 32% of patients with sleep difficulties received no type of therapy during their visits. Only 5% of the patients received behavioral therapy only. Almost three-quarters of the patients receiving some kind of medication prescription were prescribed benzodiazepines. The study results also suggest a need for wider coverage of behavioral therapy by payers in US outpatient settings. ^

Disparities in medical expenditure and utilization among hypertensive men and women in the U.S.: Cross-section and lifetime analysis

Objectives. To investigate procedural gender equity by assessing predisposing, enabling and need predictors of gender differences in annual medical expenditures and utilization among hypertensive individuals in the U.S. Also, to estimate and compare lifetime medical expenditures among hypertensive men and women in the U.S. ^ Data source. 2001-2004 the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS);1986-2000 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and National Health Interview Survey linked to mortality in the National Death Index through 2002 (2002 NHIS-NDI). ^ Study design. We estimated total medical expenditure using four equations regression model, specific medical expenditures using two equations regression model and utilization using negative binomial regression model. Procedural equity was assessed by applying the Aday et al. theoretical framework. Expenditures were estimated in 2004 dollars. We estimated hypertension-attributable medical expenditure and utilization among men and women. ^ To estimate lifetime expenditures from ages 20 to 85+, we estimated medical expenditures with cross-sectional data and survival with prospective data. The four equations regression model were used to estimate average annual medical expenditures defined as sum of inpatient stay, emergency room visits, outpatient visits, office based visits, and prescription drugs expenditures. Life tables were used to estimate the distribution of life time medical expenditures for hypertensive men and women at different age and factors such as disease incidence, medical technology and health care cost were assumed to be fixed. Both total and hypertension attributable expenditures among men and women were estimated. ^ Data collection. We used the 2001-2004 MEPS household component and medical condition files; the NHIS person and condition files from 1986-1996 and 1997-2000 sample adult files were used; and the 1986-2000 NHIS that were linked to mortality in the 2002 NHIS-NDI. ^ Principal findings. Hypertensive men had significantly less utilization for most measures after controlling predisposing, enabling and need factors than hypertensive women. Similarly, hypertensive men had less prescription drug (-9.3%), office based (-7.2%) and total medical (-4.5%) expenditures than hypertensive women. However, men had more hypertension-attributable medical expenditures and utilization than women. ^ Expected total lifetime expenditure for average life table individuals at age 20, was $188,300 for hypertensive men and $254,910 for hypertensive women. But the lifetime expenditure that could be attributed to hypertension was $88,033 for men and $40,960 for women. ^ Conclusion. Hypertensive women had more utilization and expenditure for most measures than hypertensive men, possibly indicating procedural inequity. However, relatively higher hypertension-attributable health care of men shows more utilization of resources to treat hypertension related diseases among men than women. Similar results were reported in lifetime analyses.^ Key words: gender, medical expenditures, utilization, hypertension-attributable, lifetime expenditure ^

Hepatitis B and C infections in U.S. incarcerated populations: Prevalence and related mortality

Published reports have consistently indicated high prevalence of serologic markers for hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infection in U.S. incarcerated populations. Quantifying the current and projected burden of HBV and HCV infection and hepatitis-related sequelae in correctional healthcare systems with even modest precision remains elusive, however, because the prevalence and sequelae of HBV and HCV in U.S. incarcerated populations are not well-studied. This dissertation contributes to the assessment of the burden of HBV and HCV infections in U.S. incarcerated populations by addressing some of the deficiencies and gaps in previous research. ^ Objectives of the three dissertation studies were: (1) To investigate selected study-level factors as potential sources of heterogeneity in published HBV seroprevalence estimates in U.S. adult incarcerated populations (1975-2005), using meta-regression techniques; (2) To quantify the potential influence of suboptimal sensitivity of screening tests for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) on previously reported anti-HCV prevalence estimates in U.S. incarcerated populations (1990-2005), by comparing these estimates to error-adjusted anti-HCV prevalence estimates in these populations; (3) To estimate death rates due to HBV, HCV, chronic liver disease (CLD/cirrhosis), and liver cancer from 1984 through 2003 in male prisoners in custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) and to quantify the proportion of CLD/cirrhosis and liver cancer prisoner deaths attributable to HBV and/or HCV. ^ Results were as follows. Although meta-regression analyses were limited by the small body of literature, mean population age and serum collection year appeared to be sources of heterogeneity, respectively, in prevalence estimates of antibodies to HBV antigen (HBsAg+) and any positive HBV marker. Other population characteristics and study methods could not be ruled out as sources of heterogeneity. Anti-HCV prevalence is likely somewhat higher in male and female U.S. incarcerated populations than previously estimated in studies using anti-HCV screening tests alone without the benefit of repeat or additional testing. Death rates due to HBV, HCV, CLD/cirrhosis, and liver cancer from 1984 through 2003 in TDCJ male prisoners exceeded state and national rates. HCV rates appeared to be increasing and disproportionately affecting Hispanics. HCV was implicated in nearly one-third of liver cancer deaths. ^

BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES IN RELATION TO DEMOGRAPHIC, ANTHROPOMETRIC, AND SEXUAL MATURATION VARIABLES IN U.S. HEALTH EXAMINATION SURVEY OF CHILDREN AND YOUTHS (UNITED STATES)

The determinants of change in blood pressure during childhood and adolescence were studied in a cohort of U.S. national probability sample of 2146 children examined on two occasions during the Health Examination Survey. Significant negative correlations between the initial level and the subsequent changes in blood pressure were observed. The multiple regression analyses showed that the major determinants of systolic blood pressure (SBP) change were change in weight, baseline SBP, and baseline upper arm girth. Race, time interval between examinations, baseline age, and height change were also significant determinants in SBP change. For the change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), baseline DBP, baseline weight, and weight change were the major determinants. Baseline SBP, time interval and race were also significant determinants. Sexual maturation variables were also considered in the subgroup analysis for girls. Weight change was the most important predictor of the change in SBP for the group of girls who were still in the pre-menarchal or pre-breast maturation status at the time of the follow-up examination, and who had started to menstruate or to develop breast maturation at sometime between the two examinations. Baseline triceps skinfold thickness or initial SBP were more important variables than weight change for the group of girls who had already experienced menarche or breast maturation at the time of the initial survey. For the total group, pubic hair maturation was found to be a significant predictor of SBP change at the 5% significance level. The importance of weight change and baseline weight for the changes in blood pressure warrants further study. ^

Use of contraception and contraceptive services among U.S. Hispanic women: 2006--2008

This study investigates the association between race/ethnicity and acculturation variables (language preference and nativity) with use of contraception and contraceptive services among Mexican/Mexican American and “other” Hispanic women aged 15-44 when compared to non- Hispanic white women.^ Data was analyzed from the 2006-2008 National Survey of Family Growth. The sample contained 3357 women aged 15-44. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between race/ethnicity and acculturation variables and contraceptive-related behaviors adjusted for other known covariates. ^ After multivariate analysis, neither nativity nor language preference were significantly associated with contraception use or contraceptive services. Mexican/Mexican American women did not differ in their contraception-related behaviors when compared to non-Hispanic whites. Other Hispanic women, however, were less likely to obtain contraceptive services than non-Hispanic whites (OR=0.67, 95% CI=0.45-1.00). Women aged 30-39 and 40-44 were less likely to obtain contraception and contraceptive services than those aged 15-19. Single women were less likely to use contraception (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.56-0.92) and contraceptive services (OR=0.69, 95% CI=0.53-0.89) than married/co-habiting women. Women with healthcare coverage were more likely to use contraception and contraceptive services than uninsured women.^ Among Hispanic women of different origin groups, age, marital status, and healthcare coverage were stronger indicators of contraception-related behavior than race/ethnicity, language preference, and nativity. Reproductive health programs that target increased use of contraception and contraceptive services among Hispanic origin groups should specifically target women who are over 30, single, and uninsured.^

U.S. school based sealant programs: Review of their most common characteristics

In the United States, dental caries is the most common chronic illness in children, occurring five to eight times as frequently as asthma. 11 Dental caries is an unmet health need, disproportionately affecting minority groups and individuals with low socio-economic status.15,34,36 School-Based Sealant Programs were developed to target children at risk, to provide dental services in a closer geographic area, to offer low cost preventive dental services, and to educate families about oral health and prevention.1 There is scientific, evidence based literature that shows the effectiveness of dental sealants preventing dental decay. 13^ Currently, there is no central source for cataloging School-Based Sealant Programs (SBSPs). Information is scattered around publications and documents. For instance, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) does not have information about all the existing SBSPs. ^ This literature review determined which are the most common characteristics of SBSPs in the U.S. and determined the extent to which these programs provide sealants to children of low socio-economic status. The method utilized was an electronic database search. Pubmed and EBESCO host databases were searched with Mesh terms like “dental school sealant programs”, “community dentistry”, “school based sealant programs” and “oral preventive programs”. Results were organized in terms of location, population served, providers, funding source and data shared. ^ The searches produced 77 studies, from which 40 were included in this work. Only 18 U.S. states were represented in the results; however these findings are very consistent with the Best Practice Approach – School Based Sealant Programs3. Most of the SBSPs provide their services to children from low income families, and utilized the lower labor cost providers permitted by their state regulations. The author intends that this thesis work will become an aide in the development of future programs, and as evidence for the sustainability of these programs.^

Mind-body therapy use among U.S. children and adolescents

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increased dramatically in the United States in the past several decades. While botanicals and dietary supplements have received the majority of attention in the popular and scholarly literature on alternative therapies, mind-body therapies, such as biofeedback, meditation, hypnosis, massage and chiropractic care presently constitute a large portion of the American public's use of CAM. The present study explores the patterns and prevalence of such therapy use among an under-studied population of CAM users: children and adolescents. Using data from the 2007 National Health Interview Survey, this paper describes the prevalence, patterns, and predictors of mind-body therapy use among a nationally representative sample of children (n=9,417) using a multidimensional model of health care behavior. The contribution of predisposing, enabling, and medical factors to mind-body therapy use among children will be also examined. Results provide additional evidence to a growing body of literature documenting that children and adolescents increasingly turn to mind-body therapies to alleviate symptoms, cope with chronic or life-threatening diseases, and to promote overall well-being. ^