Opas historiallisen ajattelun opettamiseen

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Valamon luostarin historiankirjoituksen historiaa

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Mikrotason tutkimus koulutuskulttuurisista siirtymistä

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Keskiajan naishistoria : kuvitelmia ja vääriä tulkintoja?

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Väitöskirjat haastavat pohtimaan antirasistisen koulukasvatuksen ja nuorisotyön edellytyksiä

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Sivistyksestä sivilisaatioon. Kulttuurikäsitys J. V. Snellmanin historiallisessa ajattelussa

From Bildung to Civilisation. Conception of Culture in J. V. Snellman’s Historical Thinking The research explores Johan Vilhelm Snellman’s (1806–1881) conception of culture in the context of his historical thinking. Snellman was a Finnish, Swedish-speaking journalist, teacher and thinker, who held a central position in the Finnish national discourse during the nineteenth century. He has been considered as one of the leading theorists of a Finnish nation, writing widely about the themes such as the advancement of the national education, Finnish language and culture. Snellman is already a widely studied person in Finnish intellectual history, often characterised as a follower of G. W. F. Hegel’s philosophical system. My own research introduces a new kind of approach on Snellman’s texts, emphasising the conceptual level of his thought. With this approach, my aim is to broaden the Finnish research tradition on conceptual history. I consider my study as a cultural history of concepts, belonging also to the field of intellectual history. My focus is on one hand on the close reading of Snellman’s texts and on the other hand on contextualising his texts to the European intellectual tradition of the time. A key concept of Snellman’s theoretical thinking is his concept of bildning, which can be considered as a Swedish counterpart of the German concept of Bildung. The Swedish word incorporated all the main elements of the German concept. It could mean education or the so-called high culture, but most fundamentally it was about the self-formation of the individual. This is also the context in which Snellman’s concept of bildning has often been interpreted. In the study, I use the concept of bildning as a starting point of my research but I broaden my focus on the cognate concepts such as culture (kultur), spirit (anda) and civilisation. The purpose of my study is thus to illustrate how Snellman used and modified these concepts and from these observations to draw a conclusion about the nature of his conception of culture. Snellman was an early Finnish philosopher of history but also interested in the practice of the writing of history. He did not write any historical presentations himself but followed the publications in the field of history and introduced European historical writing to the Finnish, Swedish-speaking reading audience in his newspapers. The primary source material consists of different types of Snellman’s texts, including philosophical writings, lecture material, newspaper articles and private letters. I’m reading Snellman’s texts in the context of other texts produced both by his Finnish predecessors and contemporaries and by Swedish, German and French writers. Snellman’s principal philosophical works, Versuch einer spekulativen Entwicklung der Idee der Persönlichkeit (1841) and Läran om staten (1842), were both written abroad. Both of the works were contributions to contemporary debates on the international level, especially in Germany and Sweden. During the 1840s and 1850s Snellman had two newspapers of his own, Saima and Litteraturblad, which were directed towards the Swedish-speaking educated class. Both of the newspapers were very popular and their circulations were among the largest of their day in Finland. The topics of his articles and reviews covered literature, poetry, philosophy and education as well as issues concerning the economic, industrial and technical development in Finland. In his newspapers Snellman not only brought forth his own ideas but also spread the knowledge of European events and ideas to his readers. He followed very carefully the cultural and political situation in Western Europe. He also followed European magazines and newspapers and was well acquainted with German, French and also English literature – and of course Swedish literature to with which he had the closest ties. In his newspapers Snellman wrote countless number of literary reviews and critics, introducing his readers to European literature. The study consists of three main chapters in which I explore my research question in three different, yet overlapping contexts. In the first of these chapters, I analyse Snellman’n theoretical thinking and his concepts of bildning, kultur, anda and civilisation in the context of earlier cultural discourse in Finland as well as the tradition of German idealistic philosophy and neo-humanism. With the Finnish cultural discourse I refer to the early cultural discussion in Finland, which emerged after the year 1809, when Finland became an autonomous entity of its own as a Grand Duchy of Russia. Scholars of the Academy of Turku opened a discussion on the themes such as the state of national consciousness, the need for national education and the development of the Finnish language as a national language of Finland. Many of these academics were also Snellman’s teachers in the early years of his academic career and Snellman clearly formulated his own ideas in the footsteps of these Finnish predecessors. In his theoretical thinking Snellman was a collectivist; according to him an individual should always be understood in connection with the society, its values and manners, as well as to the traditions of a culture where an individual belongs to. In his philosophy of the human spirit Snellman was in many ways a Hegelian but his notion of education or ‘bildning’ includes also elements that connect him with the wider tradition of German intellectual history, namely the neo-humanist tradition and, at least to some extent, to the terminology of J. G. Herder or J. G. Fichte, for example. In this chapter, I also explore Snellman’s theory of history. In his historical thinking Snellman was an idealist, believing in the historical development of the human spirit (Geist in German language). One can characterise his theory of history by stating that it is a mixture of a Hegelian triumph of the spirit and Herderian emphasis on humanity (Humanität) and the relative nature of ‘Bildung’. For Snellman, the process of ‘bildning’ or ‘Bildung’ is being realised in historical development through the actions of human beings. Snellman believed in the historical development of the human civilization. Still Snellman himself considered that he had abandoned Hegel’s idea about the process of world history. Snellman – rightly or wrongly – criticised Hegel of emphasising the universal end of history (the realisation of the freedom of spirit) at the expense of the historical plurality and the freedom of each historical era. Snellman accused Hegel of neglecting the value and independency of different historical cultures and periods by imposing the abstract norm, the fulfilment of the freedom of spirit, as the ultimate goal of history. The historicist in Snellman believed in the individuality of each historical period; each historical era or culture had values, traditions and modes of thought of its own. This historicist in Snellman could not accept the talk about one measure or the end of history. On the other hand Snellman was also a universalist. He believed that mankind had a common task and that task was the development of ‘Bildung’, freedom or humanity. The second main chapter consists of two parts. In the first part, I explore the Finnish nationalistic discourse from the cultural point of view by analysing the notions such as a nation, national spirit or national language and showing how Snellman formulated his own ideas in a dialogic situation, participating in the Finnish discourse but also reacting to international discussions on the themes of the nation and nationality. For Snellman nationality was to a great extent the collective knowledge and customs or practices of the nation. Snellman stated that nationality is to be considered as a form of ‘bildning’. This could be seen not simply as affection for the fatherland but also for the mental identity of the nation, its ways of thinking, its practices, national language, customs and laws, the history of the nation. The simplest definition of nationality that Snellman gives is that nationality is the social life of the people. In the second part of the chapter I exam Snellman’s historical thinking and his understanding about historical development, interaction between different nations and cultures in the course of history, as well as the question of historical change; how do cultures or civilisations develop and who are the creators of culture? Snellman did not believe in one dominating culture but understood the course of history as a dialogue between different cultures. On the other hand, his views are very Eurocentric – here he follows the ideas of Hegel or for example the French historian François Guizot – for Snellman Europe represented the virtue of pluralism; in Europe one could see the diversity of cultures which, on the other hand, were fundamentally based on a common Christian tradition. In the third main chapter, my focus is on the writing of history, more precisely on Snellman’s ideas on the nature of history as a science and on the proper way of writing historical presentations. Snellman wrote critics on the works of history and introduced his readers to the writing of history especially in France, Sweden and German-speaking area – in some extend also in Britain. Snellman’s collectivistic view becomes evident also in his reviews on historical writing. For Snellman history was not about the actions of the states and their heads, nor about the records of ruling families and battles fought. He repeatedly stressed that history is a discipline that seeks to provide a total view of a phenomenon. A historian should not only collect information on historical events, since this information touches only the surface of a certain epoch or civilisation; he has to understand an epoch as totality. This required an understanding about the major contours in history, connections between civilisations and an awareness of significant turning points in historical development. In addition, it required a holistic understanding about a certain culture or historical era, including also the so-called inner life of a specific nation, a common people and their ways of life. Snellman wrote explicitly about ‘cultural history’ in his texts, referring to this kind of broad understanding of a society. In historical writing Snellman found this kind of broader view from the works of the French historians such as François Guizot and Jules Michelet. In all of these chapters, I elaborate the conceptual dimension of Snellman’s historical thinking. In my study I argue that Snellman not only adopted the German concepts of Bildung or Kultur in his own thinking but also developed the Swedish concepts in a way that include personal and innovative aspects. Snellman’s concept of bildning is not only a translation from ‘Bildung’ but he uses the Swedish concept in a versatile way that includes both the moral aspect of human development and social dimension of a human life. Along with ‘bildning’ Snellman used also the terms ‘kultur’ and ‘civilisation’ when referring to the totality of a certain nation or historical era, including both the so-called high culture (arts, science, religion) and the modes of thought as well as ways of life of the people as a whole. Unlike many of his Finnish contemporaries, Snellman did not use civilisation as a negative concept, lacking the moral essence of German term ‘Bildung’ or ‘Kultur’. Instead, for Snellman civilisation was a neutral term and here he comes close to the French tradition of using the term. In the study I argue that Snellman’s conception of culture in fact includes a synthesis of the German tradition of ‘Bildung’ and the French tradition of ‘civilisation’.

Kotimaiset julkaisut valtakunnallisessa tiedonkeruussa

Esitys Kotimaiset tieteelliset artikkelit näkyviksi! -seminaarissa 25.4.2013 Helsingissä

Suomalaisten metsäteollisuusyhtiöiden suorat investoinnit Kiinaan ja OLI-paradigma

Tämän tutkimuksen tavoitteena on selvittää, mitkä tekijät aiheuttavat suomalaisten metsäteollisuusyhtiöiden suorien investointien kasvua Kiinassa. Tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan kahden Suomen johtavan metsäteollisuusyrityksen, UPM:n sekä Stora Enson, suoria investointeja Kiinaan paperi- ja kartonkiteollisuudessa. Taustateoriana on OLI-paradigma, jonka avulla tutkitaan investointeihin vaikuttavia yritys- ja sijaintikohtaisia tekijöitä sekä syitä siihen, miksi yritys valitsee suoran investoinnin kansainvälistymismuodoksi. Tutkimus on kvalitatiivinen, ja aineisto koostuu muun muassa yritysten vuosikertomuksista sekä maita koskevista tutkimuksista ja tilastoista. Tutkimuksen tulokset osoittavat, että omistajuuskohtaisista tekijöistä tutkimus- ja kehitystoiminta, tuoteinnovaatiot sekä yritysvastuullisuus ovat suomalaisyhtiöiden vahvuuksia Kiinassa. Kiinan ominaisuuksista puolestaan markkinoiden koko ja liiketoimintaympäristö ovat keskeisiä investointien kasvua selittäviä tekijöitä.

Kuormanohjauksen vaikutus kaksion sähkönkulutuskäyrään

Tutkimuksen tarkoituksena oli selvittää millainen kaksion sähkönkulutuskäyrä on ja mistä kuormista se koostuu. Tarkoituksena oli myös tutkia miten kuormansiirrot vaikuttavat sähkönkulutuskäyrään ja onko kuormansiirroissa säästöpotentiaalia ajatellen asiakkaan sähkökustannuksia. Säästöpotentiaalia laskettaessa oletettiin, että asiakkaalla on sähkösopimus, jonka hinta seuraa sähköpörssin (Nord Pool) spot-hintoja. Tutkimustuloksista nähdään, että asunnon pohjakuorma aiheutuu kylmälaitteista ja suuret sähkön kulutuspiikit aiheutuvat liedestä, astianpesukoneesta ja pyykinpesukoneesta. Kuormansiirtojen vaikutus normaaliin sähkönkulutus käyrään on se, että suurten kuormien aiheuttamat kulutuspiikit siirtyivät myöhemmäksi iltaan. Laskelmissa selvisi, että kuormansiirto ei tuo asiakkaalle merkittäviä säästöjä, koska säästöjen saanti edellyttäisi pidempiä mittausjaksoja sekä päivittäisiä suuria hinnanvaihteluita sähkön spot-hinnoissa. Tutkittiin myös millaisia kylmälaitteiden kulutuskäyrät ovat ja miten pysäytykset ja uudelleenkäynnistyksen vaikuttavat niihin.

Influence of tail biting on weight gain, lesions and condemnations at slaughter of finishing pigs

The present study assessed the association of tail-biting lesions in finishing pigs with weight gain, occurrence of locomotion or respiratory disorders and abscesses during finishing period, and carcass condemnation at slaughter. The study was carried out on 4 different farms. For each animal with a tail biting lesion, two control pigs were selected. The total number of animals in the study was 312, with 104 of them being tail-bitten. Tail lesions were classified according to the degree of severity into four scores: score 0 -normal tail withou lesion; score 1-3 - increasing lesion severity, and score 4 - healed lesions. Overall, the occurrence of severe tail lesions (score 3) varied from 55 to 73% of tail-bitten pigs among farms. On all farms, healing of tail lesions was observed in 95% to 100% of the animals at the evaluation performed within 41-43 days after the commencement of the study. In two out of the four evaluated farms, pigs with score of 3 showed lower weight gain (P<0.05) compared with score 0 pigs. Before slaughter, the occurrence of locomotion problems and nodules/abscesses was associated (P<0.05) with the presence of tail-biting lesions. At slaughter, tail-biting lesions were associated (P<0.05) with the presence of abscesses, lung lesions (pleuritis and embolic pneumonia) or arthritis in carcasses. Carcass condemnation was associated with the presence of tail-biting lesions (P<0.05). Overall, carcass condemnation rate was 21.4%, of which animals with tail-biting lesions accounted for 66.7% of condemnations. Among the animals diagnosed with cannibalism at farm level, only two had not healed their lesions at slaughter. The fact that there were a lot of carcass condemnations, despite the fact that tail-bitten animals had no more active lesions, suggests that different situations may be observed between the field and slaughter, reinforcing the need to analyze pigs both at farm and slaughter to allow proper assessment of losses related to tail biting. Collectively, the observations of the present study show that complications associated with tail-biting found in slaughterhouses are probably underestimating field prevalence.

ICT-palveluiden asiakaslähtöinen tuotteistaminen, case Valtion IT-palvelukeskus

Syksyllä 2012 Valtion IT-palvelukeskuksen teettämässä asiakastyytyväisyyskyselyssä alle puolet vastanneista oli tyytyväisiä palveluiden tuotteistamiseen, joka heijastui asiakkaan kokemaan palvelun arvoon. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää valtionhallinnon asiakkaille tarjottavien ICT-palveluiden asiakaslähtöiseen tuotteistamiseen vaikuttavat oleelliset osa-alueet. Tutkimus oli luonteeltaan kvalitatiivinen ja tutkimusmenetelmänä käytettiin grounded theory -menetelmää. Tutkimusaineisto koostui 11 johtajahaastattelusta. Tutkimustuloksia käsiteltiin kolmessa teemassa: ICT-palvelu, tuotteistaminen ja asiakaslähtöisyys. Tutkimustulosten perusteella asiakaslähtöiseen tuotteistukseen vaikuttavia tekijöitä ovat yhteinen tavoite ja yhteistyö; asiakasymmärrys, hyödyt ja lisäarvo, laatu ja luottamus, osaaminen ja oppiminen, vastuut ja roolit sekä vuorovaikutus. Tutkimustulokset antavat hyvän lähtökohdan asiakaslähtöisen tuotteistuksen kehittämiseen ja palveluiden laadun parantamisen kehitystoimenpiteiden suunnitteluun.

Matkailusta kiinnostuneiden kuluttajien eWOM-viestintä sosiaalisessa mediassa

Tässä pro gradu -tutkielmassa tarkastellaan matkailusta kiinnostuneiden kuluttajien elektronista word-of-mouth-viestintää (eWOM) sosiaalisessa mediassa. Aihepiiriä lähestyttiin neljän osaongelman kautta: 1) miten hyvin sosiaalisen median eri kanavat tunnetaan ja miten paljon niitä käytetään, 2) millaisia sosiaalisen median kuluttajatyyppejä on tunnistettavissa, 3) miten kuluttajat osallistuvat eWOM-viestintään matkailukontekstissa ja 4) millaista kuluttajien ja matkanjärjestäjän välinen vuorovaikutus on Facebookissa. Tutkielman teoreettinen viitekehys painottuu word-of-mouth-viestinnän tarkasteluun niin perinteisessä kuin elektronisessa muodossa. Viestintäteorioiden ohella teoriassa tarkastellaan sosiaalisen median ilmiötä yleisellä tasolla, minkä lisäksi tutkielmassa perehdytään tarkemmin eWOM-viestinnän ilmenemiseen erilaisilla kanavilla, kuten blogeissa, mielipide- ja arviointisivustoilla sekä kuvanjakopalveluissa. Empiirisen tutkimuksen lähestymistavaksi valittiin kvantitatiivinen tutkimus, jossa aineisto kerättiin sähköisellä kyselyllä yhteistyössä matkanjärjestäjä Tjäreborgin kanssa. Yli 1000 vastausta käsittänyt otos antoi ajankohtaisen läpileikkauksen suomalaisten matkailusta kiinnostuneiden kuluttajien sosiaalisen median käytöstä sekä heidän osallistumisestaan eWOM-viestintään. Tutkimustuloksissa havaittiin suomalaisten melko samankaltainen, suppeahko sosiaalisen median kanavien käyttö: tällä hetkellä sosiaalisen median käyttö painottuu vahvasti verkkoyhteisöpalvelu Facebookiin ja videopalvelu Youtubeen. Harvinaisemmat kanavat, kuten Instagram, Pinterest, Foursquare, olivat suurimmalle osalle vastaajista täysin vieraita. Myös osallistuminen eWOM-viestintään oli suhteellisen passiivista painottuen pikemminkin tiedon etsintään ja muiden kuluttajien jakamien julkaisujen tarkasteluun kuin aktiiviseen kommentointiin ja sisällöntuottamiseen. Sosiaalisen median käytön perusteella pystyttiin tunnistamaan kolme erilaista sosiaalisen median käyttäjäryhmää (hitaat omaksujat, jämähtäneet facebookkaajat ja aktiiviset edelläkävijät), joiden välillä havaittiin eroavaisuuksia niin eWOM-viestintään osallistumisessa kuin kanavien käyttöaktiivisuudessa. Esimerkiksi nuoremmat, useita eri kanavia aktiivisesti käyttävät kuluttajat olivat rohkeampia jakamaan matkakuvansa sosiaalisessa mediassa, kun taas vanhemmat kuluttajat suhtautuivat varsin varauksellisesti lomakuvien jakamiseen sosiaalisen median sivustoilla. Kuluttajat suhtautuivat myötämielisesti matkanjärjestäjän kanssa viestimiseen yrityksen Facebook-sivulla; esimerkiksi tarjoukset, arvonnat, ajankohtaiset uutiset lomakohteesta sekä mahdollisuus vaikuttaa yrityksen toimintaan koettiin hyvin kiinnostavaksi sisällöksi Facebookissa. Tämän perusteella voidaan todeta, että kuluttajat kokevat Facebook-kanavan olevan kiinnostava väylä rakentaa vuorovaikutusta matkanjärjestäjän kanssa.