Walter Lorenz – Wegbegleiter und Orientierungspunkt in der interkulturellen Sozialen Arbeit

First meeting, common interests and ways together The European Centre for Social Welfare, Training and Research situated in Vienna, was our first meeting place. W. Lorenz was interested in the international comparison of the different concepts and perspectives of social welfare problems in the European countries and the different developments in the training of social professions in Europe. The challenge of intercultural, antiracist social work in the context of Erasmus-Intensive Seminars To organize an intensive seminar with the aim to train students and colleagues for intercultural and antiracist competence in social professions, we formed an European network of European universities and schools of s.w. in Vienna (VIENNET), with the support of ECCE (European Centre of Community Education) in Koblenz. “The group discovered that working on these issues in an international context raises issues of ‘difference’ with renewed acuteness”(cit. W. Lorenz). We learned to cope with a variety of differences: biographical, language, theoretical and institutional backgrounds and discourse traditions. A Venue for an Intensive Seminar In choosing a venue for an Intensive Seminar we were relatively free. We locked for a place, “one dream about”, to support in the best way our seminar aims, to promote a base built on knowledge, skills and values particularly in the area of inner/outer borders, disadvantage, ignorance, minorities, majorities, vulnerable groups, racism and xenophobia. In a small village in Burgenland (Austria), very close to the Hungarian border, we thought to have found it. Future Prospect Are we only representatives of our background institutions or did we act and exposed ourselves as persons with a very specific biography and training experience. Can we sustain this created network, as a network of experts and friends in the field of intercultural, antiracist social work? This question is still open.

Das illiterate Ich als Historiograph der Katastrophe: Zur Konstruktion von Geschichte in Hans Heberles "Zeytregister" (1618-1672)

Das "Zeytregister" des Neenstettener Schusters Hans Heberle zählt zu den bekanntesten Ego-Dokumenten des 17. Jahrhunderts, da es den seltenen Fall einer Chronik des Dreißigjährigen Krieges aus dörflicher Perspektive darstellt. Der vorliegende Beitrag möchte an diesem prominenten Beispiel modellhaft die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen historischen Verstehens erkunden, indem er unterschiedliche Zugriffsweisen erprobt. Dabei gelangt er zu der Erkenntnis, dass es nicht so sehr die expliziten Aussagen des Selbstzeugnisses sind, die über die individuelle Disposition des Autors informieren, als vielmehr gerade sein konstruktiver, individuelles Erleben überformender Grundzug und die durch ihn provozierten Spannungen des diskursiven Arrangements. Methodologische Überlegungen zu einer interdisziplinären Verknüpfung von literatur- und geschichtswissenschaftlichen Ansätzen schließen sich an.

Walter Friedländer (1891-1984) – Between Social Democracy and Social Darwinism

If the profession of social work is to have a future we must know where it came from, and the series of portraits of our pioneers is one of the paths into the origins of that profession. I feel grateful to the publishers for this online-journal and also honoured to be asked to continue the series on pioneers in social work. I gladly comply because, in connection with my research on Alice Salomon and other social workers who were expelled from Germany and other Nazi-occupied territories (Wieler1989 and 1995) I had the pleasure and privilege of meeting and interviewing Walter Friedländer shortly before he passed away. It is years ago that I visited him in his home among stacks of books and piles of papers. My memories are vivid. I still see his sparkling eyes and hear his soft voice with a very heavy German accent. I was most impressed by his memory of historical events and people which, it seemed, only a large hard-drive could retain these days. Now, I wish I had asked more questions but instead, we will have to rely largely on primary and secondary literature and box upon box of archival materials. I draw heavily on the comprehensive German and Jewish Intellectual Emigré Collection (http://library.albany.edu/speccoll/findaids/ger003.htm) which consists of nearly 50 cubic feet and another collection of the German Central Institute („Deutsches Zentralinstitut für Soziale Fragen-DZI“) in Berlin (www.dzi.de). Some of the more current archival materials were lost in a flood, and much of Friedländer’s early memorabilia up to 1933 was lost in Germany. There are also internet resources with widely differing information. I hope that I will not have overlooked too much in order to do justice to this remarkable pioneer and colleague. In order to appreciate and pay tribute to Walter Friedländer and his contributions we will have to reconsider the historical and international context of more than the 93 years of his life span: the German Monarchy, the Weimar Republic, Nazi-Fascism, Swiss, French and American exile and numerous visits to other countries.

»Imitation is the means, not the end, of art« - Peter Paul Rubens und Sir Joshua Reynolds über die Grammatik antiker Skulptur

In der vorliegenden Besprechung von Peter Paul Rubens’ Lehrschrift De imitatione statuarum (um 1610) und Sir Joshua Reynolds’ Discourse on Sculpture (1780) wird der Versuch unternommen, das Lehrgerüst der Grammatik als ein gemeinsames Referenzmodell herauszuarbeiten und die Position dieser beiden Malergrößen innerhalb der neuzeitlichen Kunsttheorie genauer zu verorten. Hierbei werden besonders die medienspezifischen Eigenschaften von Skulptur im Verhältnis zur Malerei diskutiert, die Maler bei der Nachahmung von antiker Skulptur zu beachten haben.