The role of a nursing home administrator's education in influencing quality of care in US nursing homes

Nursing home literature links poor management practices to poor quality of care and resident outcomes. Since Nursing Home Administrators (NHAs) require an array of skills to perform their role, it is important to explore what makes a NHA effective. This research fills a gap in the literature and provides a possible option to improve the quality of care in nursing homes. Purpose of the study. The study examines whether NHAs with advanced education (defined as a Masters degree or more) are associated with better quality of care in licensed nursing homes (NHs). Design and Methods. Data was derived from the CDC’s 2004 National Nursing Home Survey, which is a representative sample of NHs across the US. A Donabedian- inspired structure-process-outcomes study model was created to explain how education relates to quality of care. Quality of care was defined as onsite oral care, employee influenza vaccination rates and staff recognition programs. Statistical analyses included multivariate logistic regression; covariates included facility-level variables used in similar peer-reviewed research but also included select measures from the Area Resource File to control for county-level factors. Results. Descriptive and analytical analyses confirm that NHAs with a Bachelor’s degree, Associate degree or high school diploma perform less well than NHAs with a Masters degree or more. NHAs with advanced education are more likely to have onsite dental care and recognition programs for staff than NHAs with a Bachelor’s degree (or less). Also NHAs with less than graduate education are more likely to provide off-site dental care. Employee vaccination rates are not impacted by education. Adding certification, tenure or years of experience to a NHA with advanced education gives them an advantage. In fact, certification and experience alone do not have a positive relationship to care indicators; however adding these to advanced education produces a significant result. Implications. This research provides preliminary evidence that advanced education for the NHA is associated with better quality of care. If future research can confirm these findings, there is merit in revisiting the qualifications. Education can be a legitimate option to support quality improvement efforts in US nursing homes. ^

Costs and quality of medication reconciliation practice in primary care clinics

Medication reconciliation, with the aim to resolve medication discrepancy, is one of the Joint Commission patient safety goals. Medication errors and adverse drug events that could result from medication discrepancy affect a large population. At least 1.5 million adverse drug events and $3.5 billion of financial burden yearly associated with medication errors could be prevented by interventions such as medication reconciliation. This research was conducted to answer the following research questions: (1a) What are the frequency range and type of measures used to report outpatient medication discrepancy? (1b) Which effective and efficient strategies for medication reconciliation in the outpatient setting have been reported? (2) What are the costs associated with medication reconciliation practice in primary care clinics? (3) What is the quality of medication reconciliation practice in primary care clinics? (4) Is medication reconciliation practice in primary care clinics cost-effective from the clinic perspective? Study designs used to answer these questions included a systematic review, cost analysis, quality assessments, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Data sources were published articles in the medical literature and data from a prospective workflow study, which included 150 patients and 1,238 medications. The systematic review confirmed that the prevalence of medication discrepancy was high in ambulatory care and higher in primary care settings. Effective strategies for medication reconciliation included the use of pharmacists, letters, a standardized practice approach, and partnership between providers and patients. Our cost analysis showed that costs associated with medication reconciliation practice were not substantially different between primary care clinics using or not using electronic medical records (EMR) ($0.95 per patient per medication in EMR clinics vs. $0.96 per patient per medication in non-EMR clinics, p=0.78). Even though medication reconciliation was frequently practiced (97-98%), the quality of such practice was poor (0-33% of process completeness measured by concordance of medication numbers and 29-33% of accuracy measured by concordance of medication names) and negatively (though not significantly) associated with medication regimen complexity. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for concordance of medication number per patient per medication and concordance of medication names per patient per medication were both 0.08, favoring EMR. Future studies including potential cost-savings from medication features of the EMR and potential benefits to minimize severity of harm to patients from medication discrepancy are warranted. ^

Black/white disparities in infant mortality rates in the U.S.: A quality of care perspective

The infant mortality rate for non-Hispanic Black infants in the U.S. is 13.63 deaths per 1,000 live births while the IMR for non-Hispanic White persons in the U.S. is 5.76 deaths per 1,000 live births. Black women are 2 times as likely as White women to deliver preterm infants and Black women are 2 times as likely as White women to deliver low birth weight infants (weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth). Differential underlying risk factors among mothers of different racial/ethnic groups for delivering pre-term and low birth weight infants have been historically accepted as the cause of racial disparities in IMRs. However, differential underlying risk status may not be the only major causative factor. Differential or unequal access to and provision of care is widely speculated to be a leading contributing factor to the wide racial disparity in infant mortality.2 This paper conducts a systematic review of existing literature investigating racial disparities in obstetrical care provided by healthcare practitioners to evaluate whether inequities in healthcare services provided to pregnant mothers and their neonates exist. The search terms "racial disparities obstetrical care," "racial differences quality of prenatal care," and "infant mortality racial disparities" were entered into the EBSCO Medline, Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Academic Search Complete databases, and articles between years 1990–2011 were selected for abstract review. The only articles included were those that used statistical methods to assess whether racial inequalities were present in the obstetrical services provided to pregnant women. My literature search returned 5 articles. Four of the five studies yielded significant racial differences in obstetrical care. However, the one study that used a large, nationally representative valid sample did not represent significant differences. Thus, this review provides initial evidence for racial disparities in obstetrical care, but concludes that more studies are needed in this area. Not all of the studies reviewed were consistent in the use and measurement of services, and not all studies were significant. The policy and public health implications of possible racial disparities in obstetrical care include the need to develop standard of care protocols for ALL obstetrical patients across the United States to minimize and/or eliminate the inequities and differences in obstetrical services provided.^

Comparison of health behaviors of Mexican American and non -Hispanic White females: Implications for health promotion programs

Hispanics form the second-largest minority group in the United States totaling 22 million people. Health data on this population are sparse and inconsistent. This study seeks to determine use of preventative services and risk factor behaviors of Mexican American and non-Hispanic White females residing in South Texas.^ Baseline data from female respondents in household surveys in six South Texas counties (Ramirez and McAlister, 1988; McAlister et al., 1992) were analyzed to test the following hypotheses: (1) Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White females exhibit different patterns of health behaviors; (2) Mexican American females will exhibit different health behaviors regardless of age; and (3) the differences between Mexican American women and non-Hispanic White females are due to education and acculturation factors.^ Over the past decade, the traditional behaviors of Mexican American females have begun to change due to education, acculturation, and their participation in the labor force. The results from this study identify some of the changes that will require immediate attention from health care providers. Results revealed that regardless of ethnicity, age, education, and language preference, non-Hispanic White females were significantly more likely to participate in preventive screening practices than were Mexican American females. Risk factor analysis revealed a different pattern with Mexican American females significantly more likely to be non-smokers, non-alcoholic drinkers, and to have good fat avoidance practices compared to non-Hispanic White females. However, compared to those who are less-educated or Spanish-speaking, Mexican American females with higher levels of education and preference for speaking English only showed positive and negative health behaviors that were more similar to the non-Hispanic White females. The positive health behaviors that come with acculturation, e.g., more participation in preventive care and more physical activity, are welcome changes. But this study has implications for global health development and reinforces a need for "primordial" prevention strategies to deter the unwanted concomitants of economic development and acculturation. Smoking and drinking behaviors among Mexican American females need to be kept at low levels to prevent increased morbidity and premature deaths in this population. ^

Use of health system data to study morbidity related to pregnancy Loss

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/compilations/IUSSP/IUSSP-Chapter11.pdf

Influencia de un programa de ejercicio aeróbico en la calidad de vida de pacientes afectadas por cáncer de mama = Influence of an aerobic exercise program on breast cancer patients’ quality of life

INTRODUCCIÓN Actualmente las supervivientes de cáncer de mama viven durante más tiempo. Sin embargo, los tratamientos utilizados presentan importantes efectos secundarios que afectan y marcan su calidad de vida. Numerosos estudios han mostrado que el ejercicio es una herramienta apta, segura y efectiva reduciendo algunos de estos efectos secundarios y, en suma, mejorando la calidad de vida de estas pacientes, aspecto que presenta al ejercicio físico como una intervención integral para ellas. Por el contrario, se ha observado que las supervivientes de cáncer de mama reducen la cantidad de ejercicio que realizan después de dichos tratamientos. Por ello, el objetivo de este proyecto es examinar los efectos de un programa integral de ejercicio en la calidad de vida y la cantidad de ejercicio físico que realizan las pacientes con cáncer de mama en su tiempo, tras finalizar sus tratamientos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS Se diseñó un Ensayo Clínico Aleatorizado. Noventa pacientes diagnosticadas de cáncer de mama en estadios tempranos que habían terminado sus tratamientos de radioterapia y quimioterapia recientemente, fueron reclutadas por la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, desde enero de 2013 hasta junio de 2014. Las pacientes fueron aleatorizadas tras las mediciones iniciales al grupo control (tratamientos habituales) o grupo intervención, durante tres meses. La intervención consistió en 24 clases de ejercicio combinando práctica aeróbica y de fuerza con el fin de reducir los efectos secundarios de dichos tratamientos. La calidad de vida, la cantidad de ejercicio físico realizado en tiempo de ocio, VO2max, la fuerza, la movilidad articular del hombro, la fatiga, la depresión y la ansiedad fueron medidos al inicio y después de los tres meses en todos los pacientes. RESULTADOS Un total de 89 pacientes con una media de 49.06±8.75 de edad fueron finalmente analizadas. El grupo intervención (n=44) mostraron significativamente mejores resultados en calidad de vida (p=0.0001; d=0.85), cantidad de ejercicio en tiempo de ocio (p=0.0001; d=2.77), en variables de la composición corporal, en variables físicas y en variables psicológicas comparado con el grupo control (n=45). Además, se observó una correlación significativa entre la calidad de vida y el ejercicio realizado en tiempo de ocio en el grupo intervención (r= 0.58; p=0.001), que no fue patente en el grupo control. Se observaron cambios significativos en el grupo de intervención relativos a la composición corporal, con aumento de la masa muscular (p=0.001) y reducción de la masa grasa (p=0.0001). Tanto las variables físicas como psicológicas también mostraron diferencias significativas a favor al grupo de intervención en las comparaciones entre grupos. CONCLUSIONES Según estos resultados, un programa de ejercicio físico específico es una intervención integral que mejora los hábitos y la calidad de vida de las supervivientes de cáncer de mama, lo que reduce determinados efectos secundarios de los tratamientos y aumenta la salud física y psicológica general de estas mujeres. Este tipo de intervenciones pude ser una herramienta barata y efectiva para ofrecer a los pacientes, integrada en los tratamientos habituales. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION It is well known that breast cancer survivors are living longer. However, breast cancer treatments present serious side effects, which could affect breast cancer survivors’ (BCS) health and quality of life (QoL). Exercise has been presented as a feasible, safe and effective tool in reducing some of these side effects and to improve survivors’ QoL, acting as an integrative treatment for them, although it has been observed that BCS reduce their leisure time exercise (LTE) levels. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of an integrative exercise program in QoL and LTE in BCS after the completion of their adjuvant treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed. Ninety patients diagnosed with an early stage of breast cancer and who recently finished chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments were recruited by the Technical University of Madrid from January 2013 to June 2014. Patients were randomized after baseline assessments to the intervention group (IG) or to the control group (CG) (usual care) for three months. The Intervention consisted in 24 supervised exercise classes, combining aerobic and resistance exercises in order to reduce the most common side effects of the treatments. QoL, LTE, body composition, VO2max, strength, shoulder range of motion, fatigue, depression and self-esteem were measured in all the patients at baseline and after three months. RESULTS A total of 89 patients aged 49.06±8.75 years were finally assessed. IG (n=44) showed significant better results in QoL (p=0.0001; d=0.85), LTE (p=0.0001; d=2.77), in body composition, in the physical variable and in psychological outcomes, compared with the CG (n=45). In addition, a correlation between QoL and LTE (r= 0.58; p=0.001) was found in the IG, while CG did not show this correlation. Significant changes in body composition were observed in the group comparisons, especially in lean mass (p=0.001) and body fat mass (p= 0.0001). Positive changes were also observed in the physical and psychological variables in comparisons between groups. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that this exercise program may be an integrative intervention, which is able to improve QoL and LTE levels in breast cancer survivors, reducing breast cancer side effects of treatments and improving their physical and psychological general health. Exercise may be an effective and inexpensive strategy to be included in patients integrative care.