Policy Options for Improving the Functioning and Efficiency of the Digital Single Market in the Field of Copyright. CEPS Special Report No. 121, 19 November 2015

This study explores the existing policy problems and the possible options for reforming the EU copyright framework as provided by EU Directive 29/2001 on Copyright in the Information Society (InfoSoc Directive) and related legislation, with a specific focus on the need to strengthen the Internal Market for creative content. We find two main policy problems: i) the absence of a Digital Single Market for creative works; and ii) the increasing tension between the current system of exceptions and limitations and the legal treatment of emerging uses of copyrighted content in the online environment. Without prejudicing a future impact assessment that might focus on more specific and detailed policy options, our analysis suggests that ‘more Europe’ would be needed in the field of copyright, given the existing sources of productive, allocative and dynamic efficiency associated with the current system. Looking at copyright from an Internal Market perspective would, in this respect, also help to address many of the shortcomings in the current framework, which undermine legal certainty and industrial policy goals.

The Implementation, Application and Effects of the EU Directive on Copyright in the Information Society. CEPS Special Report No. 120, 19 November 2015

This study provides an ex-post evaluation of the EU copyright framework as provided by EU Directive 29/2001 on Copyright in the Information Society (InfoSoc Directive) and related legislation, focusing on four key criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and relevance. The evaluation finds that the EU copyright framework scores poorly on all four accounts. Of the four main goals pursued by the InfoSoc, only the alignment with international legislation can be said to have been fully achieved. The wider framework on copyright still generates costs by inhibiting content production, distribution and creation and generating productive, allocative and dynamic inefficiencies. Several problems also remain in terms of both internal and external coherence. Finally, espite its overall importance and relevance as a domain of legislation in the fields of content and media, the EU copyright framework is outdated in light of technological developments. Policy options to reform the current framework are provided in the CEPS companion study on the functioning and efficiency of the Digital Single Market in the field of copyright (CEPS Special Report No. 121/November 2015).

Regulation on ‘cross-border portability’ of online content services: Roaming for Netflix or the end of copyright territoriality? CEPS Commentary, 15 February 2016

In a communication to the Parliament and the Council entitled “Towards a modern, more European copyright framework” and dated 9 December 2015,1 the European Commission confirmed its intention to progressively remove the main obstacles to the functioning of the Digital Single Market for copyrighted works. The first step of this long-term plan, which was first announced in Juncker’s Political Guidelines2 and the Communication on “A Digital Single Market strategy for Europe”,3 is a proposal for a regulation aimed at ensuring the so-called ‘cross-border portability’ of online services giving access to content such as music, games, films and sporting events.4 In a nutshell, the proposed regulation seeks to enable consumers with legal access to such online content services in their country of residence to use the same services also when they are in another member state for a limited period of time. On the one hand, this legislative proposal has the full potential to resolve the (limited) issue of portability, which stems from the national dimension of copyright and the persisting territorial licensing and distribution of copyright content.5 On the other hand, as this commentary shows, the ambiguity of certain important provisions in the proposed regulation might affect its scope and effectiveness and contribute to the erosion of the principle of copyright territoriality.

The bookbinders' price-book, calculated for the different modes of binding, as agreed upon at a general meeting of the trade, in December, 1812, at the Crown and Anchor Tavern, Strand. To commence January 1st, 1813.

Xerox copy.

Norfolk copyright entries, 1837, 1851-3, 1856-7, 1858-9, 1864, 1866-71. Registers of copyrights and copies of the Court records for copyrights of the Federal District Court at Norfolk, Virginia, generally referred to as the Court of the Eastern District of Virginia.

Bibliography: leaf 42.

Remarks on the life and death of the fam'd Mr. Blood : giving an account [brace]of his plot in Ireland, to surprize Dublin Castle; several transactions in his head-quarters in the city; rescue of Captain Mason at Doncaster; attempt on the person of his Grace the Duke of Ormond; seizing on the crown and scepter in the Tower; coming into favour with his Prince; concern about his Grace the Duke of Buckingham; sickness, death, and twice interment : published for publick information.

Leaf A₂ mis-signed as A₁.

Crown lands guide, 1914.

Includes bibliography.

The effort of the Danish kings to recover the English crown after the death of Harthacnut,

Mode of access: Internet.

The cactus and the crown.

Mode of access: Internet.

The first copyright statute; an essay on An act for the encouragement of learning, 1710.

Includes text of the act.

Report on the status of international copyright protection and on the Brussels meeting of the Committee of experts.

Mode of access: Internet.

The first American civil war; first period, 1775-1778, with chapters on the continental or revolutionary army and on the forces of the crown,

Mode of access: Internet.

Crown and bridge construction /

Mode of access: Internet.