Interhemispheric coupling between the posterior sylvian regions impacts successful auditory temporal order judgment.

Accurate perception of the temporal order of sensory events is a prerequisite in numerous functions ranging from language comprehension to motor coordination. We investigated the spatio-temporal brain dynamics of auditory temporal order judgment (aTOJ) using electrical neuroimaging analyses of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) recorded while participants completed a near-threshold task requiring spatial discrimination of left-right and right-left sound sequences. AEPs to sound pairs modulated topographically as a function of aTOJ accuracy over the 39-77ms post-stimulus period, indicating the engagement of distinct configurations of brain networks during early auditory processing stages. Source estimations revealed that accurate and inaccurate performance were linked to bilateral posterior sylvian regions activity (PSR). However, activity within left, but not right, PSR predicted behavioral performance suggesting that left PSR activity during early encoding phases of pairs of auditory spatial stimuli appears critical for the perception of their order of occurrence. Correlation analyses of source estimations further revealed that activity between left and right PSR was significantly correlated in the inaccurate but not accurate condition, indicating that aTOJ accuracy depends on the functional decoupling between homotopic PSR areas. These results support a model of temporal order processing wherein behaviorally relevant temporal information--i.e. a temporal 'stamp'--is extracted within the early stages of cortical processes within left PSR but critically modulated by inputs from right PSR. We discuss our results with regard to current models of temporal of temporal order processing, namely gating and latency mechanisms.

Spatial distribution of motor units recruited during electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscle versus the femoral nerve.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated differences in the spatial recruitment of motor units (MUs) in the quadriceps when electrical stimulation is applied over the quadriceps belly versus the femoral nerve. METHODS: M-waves and mechanical twitches were evoked using over-the-quadriceps and femoral nerve stimulation of gradually increasing intensity from 22 young, healthy subjects. Spatial recruitment was investigated using recruitment curves of M-waves recorded from the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) and of twitches recorded from the quadriceps. RESULTS: At maximal stimulation intensity (Imax), no differences were found between nerve and over-the-quadriceps stimulation. At submaximal intensities, VL M-wave amplitude was higher for over-the-quadriceps stimulation at 40% Imax, and peak twitch force was greater for nerve stimulation at 60% and 80% Imax. CONCLUSIONS: For the VM, MU spatial recruitment during nerve and over-the-quadriceps stimulation of increasing intensity occurred in a similar manner, whereas significant differences were observed for the VL. Muscle Nerve, 2013.

Adaptive changes in a radial maze task: Efficient selection of baited arms with reduced foraging in senescent hooded rats

Qualitative differences in strategy selection during foraging in a partially baited maze were assessed in young and old rats. The baited and non-baited arms were at a fixed position in space and marked by a specific olfactory cue. The senescent rats did more re-entries during the first four-trial block but were more rapid than the young rats in selecting the reinforced arms during the first visits. Dissociation between the olfactory spatial cue reference by rotating the maze revealed that only few old subjects relied on olfactory cues to select the baited arms and the remainder relied mainly on the visuo-spatial cues.

Working memory load improves early stages of independent visual processing.

Increasing evidence suggests that working memory and perceptual processes are dynamically interrelated due to modulating activity in overlapping brain networks. However, the direct influence of working memory on the spatio-temporal brain dynamics of behaviorally relevant intervening information remains unclear. To investigate this issue, subjects performed a visual proximity grid perception task under three different visual-spatial working memory (VSWM) load conditions. VSWM load was manipulated by asking subjects to memorize the spatial locations of 6 or 3 disks. The grid was always presented between the encoding and recognition of the disk pattern. As a baseline condition, grid stimuli were presented without a VSWM context. VSWM load altered both perceptual performance and neural networks active during intervening grid encoding. Participants performed faster and more accurately on a challenging perceptual task under high VSWM load as compared to the low load and the baseline condition. Visual evoked potential (VEP) analyses identified changes in the configuration of the underlying sources in one particular period occurring 160-190 ms post-stimulus onset. Source analyses further showed an occipito-parietal down-regulation concurrent to the increased involvement of temporal and frontal resources in the high VSWM context. Together, these data suggest that cognitive control mechanisms supporting working memory may selectively enhance concurrent visual processing related to an independent goal. More broadly, our findings are in line with theoretical models implicating the engagement of frontal regions in synchronizing and optimizing mnemonic and perceptual resources towards multiple goals.

Justification du système économique et perception du travail en groupe

L'étude classique des attributions de responsabilité instiguée par Heider en psychologie sociale s'est principalement bornée à aborder ce processus psychosocial dans une perspective individualiste qui se cantonne aux niveaux intra-individuel et interpersonnel (selon la distinction opérée par Doise). Les réflexions et les travaux empiriques présentés dans cette thèse ont deux objectifs. Dans un premier temps, il s?agit d'élargir cette perspective aux autres niveaux sociologique et idéologique (en faisant notamment recours à l'approche des attributions sociales et aux propositions de Fauconnet sur les règles de responsabilité). Deuxièmement, il s?agit d'éprouver la pertinence d'une telle approche dans un contexte particulier : celui du travail en groupe dont la nature des rapports sociaux qui y étaient présentés ont été manipulés à l'aide de scénarii chez des étudiant-e-s de l?Université de Lausanne. L?objectif principal de cette thèse est donc de tester un modèle d?ancrage des attributions de responsabilité qui permette de souligner les dynamiques représentationnelles sous-jacentes en termes de légitimation ou de remise en cause de l?organisation des groupes. Dans l?ensemble les résultats indiquent que si la nature des rapports sociaux (re)présentés dans un groupe sont de puissants déterminants de la manière de légitimer ou de remettre en cause l?organisation des groupes, le niveau individuel d'adhésion à des croyances idéologiques dominantes, comme la justification du système économique, représente un modérateur des prises de position des répondant-e-s interrogé-e-s. De plus, il semble que ces processus évoluent dans le temps, faisant ainsi apparaître l'existence de phénomènes de socialisation relativement plus complexes que ne le laissent entendre les recherches actuellement effectuées dans ce domaine. En effet, si des connaissances idéologiques sur le monde sont acquises dans les filières universitaires et n?interviennent pas toujours dans les processus de formation des représentations du travail en groupe, des connaissances spécifiques aux disciplines et à la politique de sélection universitaire semblent intervenir dans le processus de légitimation des rapports sociaux dans les groupes au niveau des attributions. En tentant une articulation entre les concepts d?ancrage des représentations sociales, d?attribution et de socialisation, cette thèse permet ainsi de souligner la pertinence qu?il y a à insérer une problématique en termes de croyances idéologiques dans l?étude des groupes sociaux.<br/><br/>Heider?s approach of responsibility attributions almost exclusively emphasized on an individualistic point of view ; i.e. focusing at an intraindividual and interpersonnal level of analysis according to Doise?s distinction. The reflexions and empirical studies presented here firstly aim at broaden this perspective by taking socio-structural as well as societal levels of analysis into account. Secondly, it is to test this approach in the particular domain of organized groups. Manipulation of the structure of social relations in work groups on screenplays were undertaken (in a population of students from the Lausanne University). Hence, the main goal of these studies is to test the impact of the social ancoring of social representations in the responsibility processes in terms of legitimation or opposition to the group organization. All in all, the results show that social structures are powerfull predictors of the formation of social representations of a work situation and so forth of the attribution process. Nevertheless hegemonic ideological beliefs, such as Economical System Justification, do play a substantial moderating role in this process. It also proves to be evolving through time. The present findings show that a complexe process of socialization is occuring during the student?s university life. Indeed, the results let us believe that ideological beliefs may not interact anytime in the group?s perception and in the construction of the representation of the situation. In the same time, it seems that more discipline specific oriented knowledge and the impact of selection policy at the Lausanne University also predict the groupe legimation process and interfer with the ideological beliefs. Trying to articulate concepts of fields of research like social representations, attribution and socialization, the present thesis allows to underline the heuristic potential of reabilitating ideological beliefs at a dispositional level in the study of group process.

Perception of acceleration in motion-in-depth with only monocular and both monocular and binocular information

Observers are often required to adjust actions with objects that change their speed. However, no evidence for a direct sense of acceleration has been found so far. Instead, observers seem to detect changes in velocity within a temporal window when confronted with motion in the frontal plane (2D motion). Furthermore, recent studies suggest that motion-in-depth is detected by tracking changes of position in depth. Therefore, in order to sense acceleration in depth a kind of second-order computation would have to be carried out by the visual system. In two experiments, we show that observers misperceive acceleration of head-on approaches at least within the ranges we used [600-800 ms] resulting in an overestimation of arrival time. Regardless of the viewing condition (only monocular or monocular and binocular), the response pattern conformed to a constant velocity strategy. However, when binocular information was available, overestimation was highly reduced.