965 resultados para Shadwell, Thomas, 1642?-1692.


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/G03680

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/G03681

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/G03813

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/G03814

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/G03849

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/G04273

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/G04423

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Vorbesitzer: Samuel Thomas von Soemmerring; Sophie von Soemmerring; Akzessionsnummer: 2904/10;

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

von ihm selbst in seiner Mund- und Schreibart beschrieben und zum Nutzen seiner Nebenmenschen hrsg. von seinem Sohne dem Schäfer Thomas in Weißenborn

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Research examining programs designed to retain patients in health care focus on repeated interactions between outreach workers and patients (Bradford et al. 2007; Cheever 2007). The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who are peer-mentored at their intake exam remain in care longer and attend more physicians' visits than those who were not mentored. Using patients' medical records and a previously created mentor database, the study determined how many patients attended their intake visit but subsequently failed to establish regular care. The cohort study examined risk factors for establishing care, determined if patients lacking a peer mentor failed to establish care more than peer mentor assisted patients, and subsequently if peer mentored patients had better health outcomes. The sample consists of 1639 patients who were entered into the Thomas Street Patient Mentor Database between May 2005 and June 2007. The assignment to the mentored group was haphazardly conducted based on mentor availability. The data from the Mentor Database was then analyzed using descriptive statistical software (SPSS version 15; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results indicated that patients who had a mentor at intake were more likely to return for primary care HIV visits at 90 and 180 days. Mentored patients also were more likely to be prescribed ART within 180 days from intake. Other risk factors that impacted remaining in care included gender, previous care status, time from diagnosis to intake visit, and intravenous drug use. Clinical health outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. This supports that mentoring did improve outcomes. Continuing to use peer-mentoring programs for HIV care may help in increasing retention of patients in care and improving patients' health in a cost effective manner. Future research on the effects of peer mentoring on mentors, and effects of concordance of mentor and patient demographics may help to further improve peer-mentoring programs. ^