828 resultados para Permutation polynomials
Resumo:
ACM Computing Classification System (1998): G.1.1, G.1.2.
Resumo:
Given the polynomials f, g ∈ Z[x] of degrees n, m, respectively, with n > m, three new, and easy to understand methods — along with the more efficient variants of the last two of them — are presented for the computation of their subresultant polynomial remainder sequence (prs). All three methods evaluate a single determinant (subresultant) of an appropriate sub-matrix of sylvester1, Sylvester’s widely known and used matrix of 1840 of dimension (m + n) × (m + n), in order to compute the correct sign of each polynomial in the sequence and — except for the second method — to force its coefficients to become subresultants. Of interest is the fact that only the first method uses pseudo remainders. The second method uses regular remainders and performs operations in Q[x], whereas the third one triangularizes sylvester2, Sylvester’s little known and hardly ever used matrix of 1853 of dimension 2n × 2n. All methods mentioned in this paper (along with their supporting functions) have been implemented in Sympy and can be downloaded from the link http://inf-server.inf.uth.gr/~akritas/publications/subresultants.py
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 42A05. Secondary: 42A82, 11N05.
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C10.
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 33A65, 33C20.
Resumo:
MSC 2010: 41A10, 41A15, 41A25, 41A36
Resumo:
MSC 2010: 30C10
Resumo:
MSC 2010: 33C45, 40G05
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 11D09, 11A55, 11C08, 11R11, 11R29; Secondary: 11R65, 11S40; 11R09.
Resumo:
MSC 2010: 11B83, 05A19, 33C45
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 15A29.
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 11A15.
Resumo:
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 14L99, 14R10, 20B27.
Resumo:
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 33C45, 40G05.
Resumo:
We characterize the preference domains on which the Borda count satises Arrow's "independence of irrelevant alternatives" condition. Under a weak richness condition, these domains are obtained by xing one preference ordering and including all its cyclic permutations ("Condorcet cycles"). We then ask on which domains the Borda count is non-manipulable. It turns out that it is non-manipulable on a broader class of domains when combined with appropriately chosen tie-breaking rules. On the other hand, we also prove that the rich domains on which the Borda count is non-manipulable for all possible tie-breaking rules are again the cyclic permutation domains.