Biomarkers in nutrition: new frontiers in research and application

Nutritional biomarkers-biochemical, functional, or clinical indices of nutrient intake, status, or functional effects--are needed to support evidence-based clinical guidance and effective health programs and policies related to food, nutrition, and health. Such indices can reveal information about biological or physiological responses to dietary behavior or pathogenic processes, and can be used to monitor responses to therapeutic interventions and to provide information on interindividual differences in response to diet and nutrition. Many nutritional biomarkers are available; yet there has been no formal mechanism to establish consensus regarding the optimal biomarkers for particular nutrients and applications.

Factors influencing European consumer uptake of personalised nutrition. Results of a qualitative analysis.

The aim of this research was to explore consumer perceptions of personalised nutrition and to compare these across three different levels of "medicalization": lifestyle assessment (no blood sampling); phenotypic assessment (blood sampling); genomic assessment (blood and buccal sampling). The protocol was developed from two pilot focus groups conducted in the UK. Two focus groups (one comprising only "older" individuals between 30 and 60 years old, the other of adults 18-65 yrs of age) were run in the UK, Spain, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Germany (N = 16). The analysis (guided using grounded theory) suggested that personalised nutrition was perceived in terms of benefit to health and fitness and that convenience was an important driver of uptake. Negative attitudes were associated with internet delivery but not with personalised nutrition per se. Barriers to uptake were linked to broader technological issues associated with data protection, trust in regulator and service providers. Services that required a fee were expected to be of better quality and more secure. An efficacious, transparent and trustworthy regulatory framework for personalised nutrition is required to alleviate consumer concern. In addition, developing trust in service providers is important if such services to be successful. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Multidrug transporter proteins of the major facilitator superfamily: not only for drug efflux

Multidrug resistance in prokaryotes is due primarily to efflux of offending antimicrobials from the cell by representatives of several different families of integral membrane transporter proteins. Clearly, in evolutionary terms, these proteins did not arise specifically to pump human-made antimicrobials out of the cell and thereby confer resistance. Despite this, often only their role in antibiotic resistance is characterised and highlighted.
In recent years, however, a transition from the traditional anthropocentric perception of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in microorganisms has occurred, with naturally produced antimicrobials now generally regarded as physiologically important signalling molecules or sources of nutrition for bacteria rather than antimicrobial agents, and bacterial multidrug efflux proteins not merely as a defensive response to antimicrobials but as important players in fundamental physiological processes such as cellular homeostasis.
This emerging perspective supports the notion that a better understanding of the complexities of infection and multidrug resistance in bacteria can be achieved via a more detailed understanding of those physiological processes. In this chapter, we review the ‘true’ physiological roles of multidrug efflux proteins of the largest non-ATP-hydrolysing family of membrane transporters, the major facilitator superfamily, and explore the evidence for their function in processes such as pH and metal homeostasis, import and export of metabolites and biofilm formation