The rhetorics of violence in Joshua: Foucauldian Power, Israelite Identity, and the Ethics of Interpretation

The goals of this project are manifold. First, I will attempt to discover evidence in the book of Joshua that will lend support to the theory of a Josianic influence enacted in the 7th century BCE. I will do this through an analysis of the rhetoric in selected stories in Joshua using the ideas of Foucault. Second, I will address the significance of this kind of analysis as having potential for the emancipation of oppressed peoples. The first section delineates scholarly discussion on the literary and historical context of the book of Joshua. These scholarly works are foundational to this study because they situate the text within a particular period in history and within certain ideologies. Chapter 2 discusses the work of Foucault and how his ideas will be applied to particular texts of the book of Joshua. The focused analysis of these texts occurs within chapters 3 to 6. Chapter 7 presents an integration of the observations made through the analyses performed in the previous chapters and expands on the ethical significance of this study.

Ethics in a capitalistic society

The problem of semantics is inherent in any discussion of ethics. The general term "ethics" is itself commonly confused. In addition, systems of ethics must be built upon assumptions, and assumptions are necessarily subject to lengthy debate. These two problems are encountered in my investigation of the ethical practices of the modern business community and to remedy the situation I have taken two steps: the first being an attempt to clarify the meaning of terms used therein;-and the second being a clear description of the assumptions utilized to further my analysis. To satisfy those who would disagree with these assumptions, I have attempted to outline the consequences of differing premises. The first assumption in my discussion is that the capitalistic economy is powered by the motivation supplied by man's self-interest. We are conditioned to basing our courses of action upon an orientation toward gratifying this self-interest. Careers are chosen by blending aptitude, interest, and remuneration. of course, some people are less materially inclined than others, but the average member of our capitalistic society is concerned with the physical rewards derived from his employment. Status and happiness are all-important considerations in pursuing a chosen course of action, yet all too often they are measured in physical terms. The normal self-interest natural to mankind is heightened in capitalism, due to the emphasis placed upon material compensation. Our thinking becomes mechanistic as life devolves into a complex game played by the rules. We are accustomed to performing meaningless or unpleasant duties to fulfill our gratifications. Thought, consequently, interferes with the completion of our everyday routines. We learn quickly not to be outspoken, as the outspoken one threatens the security of his fellow man. The majority of the people are quite willing to accept others views on morality, and indeed this is the sensible thing to do as one does not risk his own neck. The unfortunate consequence of this situation has been the substitution of the legal and jural for the moral and ethical. Our actions are guided by legal considerations and nowhere has this been more evident than in the business community. The large legal departments of modern corporations devote full time to inspecting the legality of corporate actions. The business community has become preoccupied with the law, yet this is necessarily so. Complex, modern, capitalistic society demands an elaborate framework of rules and regulations. Without this framework it would be impossible to have an orderly economy, to say nothing of protecting the best interests of the people. However, the inherent complexities, contradictions, and sometimes unfair aspects of our legal system can tempt men to take things into their own hands. From time to time cases arise where men have broken laws while acting in good faith, and other cases where men have been extremely unethical without being illegal. Examples such as these foster the growth of cynicism, and generally create an antagonistic attitude toward the law on the part of business. My second assumption is that the public, on the whole, has adopted an apathetic attitude toward business morality. when faced with an ethical problem, far too many people choose to cynically assume that, if I don't do it someone else will. "The danger of such an assumption lies in that it eliminates many of the inhibitions that normally would preclude unethical action. The preventative factor in contemplating an unethical act not only lies in it going against the "right course of action", but also in that it would display the actor as one of the few, immoral practitioners. However, if the contemplator feels that many other people follow the same course of action, he would not feel himself to be so conspicuous. These two assumptions underly my entire discussion of modern business ethics., and in my judgment are the two most important causal factors in unethical acts perpetrated by the business community. The future elimination of these factors seems improbable, if not futile, yet there is no reason to consider things worse than they ever have been before. The heightened public interest in business morality undoubtedly lies in part in the fact that examples of corporate malpractice are of such magnitude in scope, and hence more newsworthy.

Repensando o sentido formativo da atividade filosófica à luz do “Trabalho sobre si-mesmo” de Wittgenstein: se filosofar é trabalhar sobre si, o que se trabalha quando se filosofa?

Pós-graduação em Educação - FFC

Die Praktische Philosophie in der Praxis und ihre Perspektiven für die Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik

Die vorliegende Arbeit setzt sich zum Ziel, die gesellschaftliche Relevanz der Praktischen Philosophie vor allem für die beiden Strömungen der Philosophischen Praxis als Beratung und der Fachdidaktik der Philosophie und Ethik aufzuzeigen.rnDabei sollen die umfassenden Themenfelder der philosophischen Praxis in einen systematischen Zusammenhang gebracht und auf die Grundfragen der Praktischen Philosophie und ihre Methoden zurückgeführt werden.rnZentraler Bestandteil dieser Fundierung lebensrelevanter Bereiche philosophischer Praxis sind neben den methodischen Perspektiven der Praktischen Philosophie (Phänomenologie, Hermeneutik, Dialektik) vor allem anthropologische und allgemein ethische Fragestellungen. In Form einer integralen Philosophie und Ethik können diese philosophischen Kompetenzen dazu beitragen, sowohl in beratenden Berufen als auch in Berufen des Bildungssektors Hilfestellungen zu leisten. rnEin Anliegen der Philosophischen Praxis besteht dabei darin, das Selbstverständnis und Weltverständnis des Menschen in seiner Entwicklung zu fördern. Innerhalb dieses Bildungsprozesses der menschlichen Orientierungsfähigkeit in der Gesellschaft leisten gerade kulturanthropologische Untersuchungen zu kulturellen Phänomenen wertvolle Beiträge und sind daher für eine Deutung von Menschenbildern und kulturellen Ausprägungen fruchtbar zu machen. Das fachliche Selbstverständnis dieser Disziplin ist an der Schnittstelle verschiedener Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften angesiedelt und liefert aufgrund seiner Alltags- und Lebensnähe eine wissenschaftliche Haltung im Sinne der Philosophischen Praxis, die sowohl den individuellen Menschen als auch seine wissenschaftliche Erforschung und Deutung im Blick hat.rnDies ist vor allem für fachdidaktische Überlegungen im Rahmen eines schulischen Philosophie- und Ethikunterrichts relevant, denen an sowohl fachwissenschaftlichen Diskursen als auch an Problemfragen der jeweils persönlich betroffenen Lerngruppe gelegen ist.rnDie Perspektiven der Philosophischen Praxis als Strömung der Praktischen Philosophie bestehen darin, für die Didaktik der Philosophie ein Instrumentarium in Form von Methoden, Problemfragen und Inhalten zusammenzustellen, das auch der Philosophie als Universitäts- und Unterrichtsfach neue Wege eröffnen kann.rnDaher soll die vorliegende Arbeit deutlich machen, dass die bisher in der akademischen Philosophie kaum oder wenig beachtete Form der Philosophischen Praxis als wichtiger Teil der Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik erkannt werden kann. Die Philosophische Praxis in der hier zusammengestellten Form kann daher wichtige Impulse für eine sich entwickelnde Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik liefern. rnDie Philosophie leistet dabei einen wichtigen Beitrag für einen integralen Bildungsbegriff. Die untersuchten Autoren und philosophischen Strömungen lassen erkennen, dass die Tradition der Philosophischen Praxis und Selbstsorge seit der Antike eine bedeutende Strömung der Philosophie darstellt, deren Wiederaufnahme von gesellschaftlicher Relevanz sein kann, da sie sich gerade zu Fragen der „Selbstfindung“, „Selbstverwirklichung“ und „Glückssuche“, wie sie in der Gegenwart virulent sind, philosophisch fundiert zu äußern vermag. Vor allem philosophiedidaktische Überlegungen sollten die an dieser Stelle bedeutsamen Konvergenzen akademischer Philosophie und alltäglicher Problemfragen, wie sie im schulischen Kontext zu stellen sind, berücksichtigen. Die im zweiten Teil der Arbeit durchgeführte kritische Untersuchung und Gegenüberstellung philosophiedidaktischer Positionen konnte zeigen, inwiefern verschiedene didaktische Konzepte Bezüge zu Themenfeldern der Philosophischen Praxis aufweisen. Dadurch konnte die Arbeit zeigen, inwiefern die zwei Bereiche der beratenden und schulischen Praxis der Philosophie im Zusammenhang stehen.rn

The Art of Aidagara: Ethics, Aesthetics, and the Quest for an Ontology of Social Existence in Watsuji Tetsurō’s Rinrigaku

This paper provides an analysis of the key term aidagara (“betweenness”) in the philosophical ethics of Watsuji Tetsurō (1889-1960), in response to and in light of the recent movement in Japanese Buddhist studies known as “Critical Buddhism.” The Critical Buddhist call for a turn away from “topical” or intuitionist thinking and towards (properly Buddhist) “critical” thinking, while problematic in its bipolarity, raises the important issue of the place of “reason” versus “intuition” in Japanese Buddhist ethics. In this paper, a comparison of Watsuji’s “ontological quest” with that of Martin Heidegger (1889-1976), Watsuji’s primary Western source and foil, is followed by an evaluation of a corresponding search for an “ontology of social existence” undertaken by Tanabe Hajime (1885-1962). Ultimately, the philosophico-religious writings of Watsuji Tetsurō allow for the “return” of aesthesis as a modality of social being that is truly dimensionalized, and thus falls prey neither to the verticality of topicalism nor the limiting objectivity of criticalism.

ARISTOTLE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF VIRTUE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE POLITICS AND THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS AND ITS RELATION TO TODAY

While much of Aristotle's works are preserved in various volumes, two of his famous works are the Nichmachean Ethics and the Politics, both of which contain a rich compilation of ethical and political thought. In the Ethics, Aristotle describes a thorough understanding of ethical and intellectual virtue. By pursuing these virtues, Aristotle argues that a person can achieve a life of fulfilling happiness. The ideal polis as described in the Politics serves as a place where the virtuous life is attained in the best manner.Citizens who pursue virtue make the polis better, and the rulers that guide the polis ensure that the citizens have every opportunity to pursue the virtuous life. In this thesis, I see how relevant Aristotle's theory is by laying out the basic principles of the Ethics and the Politics and the connections between the two works. Indoing so, I found that Aristotle's ideal theory points out a significant flaw in our political system: the fact that we do not share a common moral conception such as the one concerned with the virtuous life as Aristotle proposes. This does not suggest thatAristotle's view was actualized during his time period, but that Aristotle conceives of an ideal life and an ideal polis that could be realized. Certainly there are issues with Aristotle's thesis concerning the inferiority of slaves and women. But what is morepoignant is the impracticality of instituting a shared common conception when today's political system permits various ideas about ethics and morality.

Ethics, Interrupted: Community and Impersonality in Levinas

Despite the influence of Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics on the rethinking of community in post-identitarian terms (most prominently in the work of Maurice Blanchot, Alphonso Lingis, and, to a lesser extent, Jean-Luc Nancy), the question of community remains a problematic spot in Levinas’s own philosophy. I would argue that, instead of grounding a new thinking of community, the dyadic relation of Same and Other poses a structural problem when trying to open the ethical relation to the wider realm of others while keeping radical difference in place. As external observer and guarantor of justice, for instance, is the Third excluded a priori from the ethical relation? Is community always only another term for the political? Or, as Levinas himself puts it in Otherwise Than Being: “What meaning can community take on in difference without reducing difference?” Identifying in the notion of impersonality a way to access Levinas’s thought on community, this paper aims at rethinking the scene of address and the ethical relation in terms of displacement, dislocation and interruption.

The ethics of Confucius : the sayings of the master and his disciples upon the conduct of the superior man, /

Appendix: The great principle of Confucius [by Chen Huan Chang]: p. 299-305.

Wilhelm Traugott Krug's System der praktischen Philosophie.

1. Dikäologie oder philosophische Rechtslehre - 2. Aretologie oder philosophische Tugendlehre.