Revisió de la Guia d’avaluació del testimoni en violència de gènere (GAT-VIG-R)

L’actual document és el resultat final d’un treball engegat l’any 2009 per la comunitat de pràctica dels Psicòlegs dels equips d’assessorament tècnic penal arran de la implementació progressiva del programa Compartim, de gestió del coneixement al Departament de Justícia. És en aquest marc de treball col·laboratiu que els psicòlegs dels equips d’assessorament tècnic penal vam decidir que el contingut del producte de coneixement a elaborar havia de centrar-se en una tasca en què tots i totes ens hi sentíssim vinculats i motivats perquè respongués a una necessitat tècnica important: l’anàlisi de la credibilitat dels testimonis en violència de gènere atesa l’increment demanda per part dels òrgans judicials sobre el testimoni en violència de gènere, des de la creació l’any 2004 del Jutjat de Violència vers la Dona. Així és en aquest camp en què decidim, l’any 2009, fer un pas endavant i analitzar en profunditat les tècniques que hi ha actualment sobre l’anàlisi de la credibilitat del testimoni adult en violència de gènere per tal de valorar la seva possible eficàcia i la seva posterior administració mitjançant la revisió de la Guia d’avaluació del testimoni en violència de gènere, instrument de Juárez, J.R., Mateu, A. i Sala, E. el 2007 (publicat pel CEJFE, Departament de Justícia, 2007). Ja el novembre de 2010 publicàvem un primer estudi on es presentaven unes primeres conclusions fetes arran de la revisió de la Guia d’avaluació del testimoni en violència de gènere esmentada. Després d’aquests 3 anys, a hores d’ara ja estem en disposició de poder presentar els resultats d’un treball que, independentment dels seus resultats, de la seva futura aplicació i de la seves possibles repercussions en l’àmbit de la justícia, volem remarcar que és fruit d’un treball conjunt, col·laboratiu i cooperatiu, fruit del debat, de l’intercanvi de coneixements, de la reflexió i de l’optimització tècnica de professionals especialitzats en l’àmbit com són el conjunt dels psicòlegs dels equips d’assessorament tècnic penal de Catalunya. Així en aquest espai s’ha aconseguit el que ja s’havia iniciat a l’anterior estudi: convertir el coneixement implícit en explícit, l’informal en formal, de privat a públic, en definitiva socialitzar i compartir el coneixement dels membres individuals de la comunitat per tal de poder dotar la nostra organització d’un patrimoni intel·lectual col·lectiu de més qualitat i, finalment, poder donar un millor servei públic des de la globalitat del territori. D’aquesta manera, i en la mateixa línia de treball, des de la publicació de l’anterior estudi (novembre 2010) i fins ara, es va continuar amb l’ampliació de la mostra incrementat aquesta de 31 a 83 casos cosa que ja ens permet amb més seguretat dibuixar un perfil sociodemogràfic, psicològic i del testimoni en casos de violència de gènere sobre els quals els òrgans judicials demanen pericials psicològiques de la denunciant.

Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.

In many European countries, image quality for digital x-ray systems used in screening mammography is currently specified using a threshold-detail detectability method. This is a two-part study that proposes an alternative method based on calculated detectability for a model observer: the first part of the work presents a characterization of the systems. Eleven digital mammography systems were included in the study; four computed radiography (CR) systems, and a group of seven digital radiography (DR) detectors, composed of three amorphous selenium-based detectors, three caesium iodide scintillator systems and a silicon wafer-based photon counting system. The technical parameters assessed included the system response curve, detector uniformity error, pre-sampling modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Approximate quantum noise limited exposure range was examined using a separation of noise sources based upon standard deviation. Noise separation showed that electronic noise was the dominant noise at low detector air kerma for three systems; the remaining systems showed quantum noise limited behaviour between 12.5 and 380 µGy. Greater variation in detector MTF was found for the DR group compared to the CR systems; MTF at 5 mm(-1) varied from 0.08 to 0.23 for the CR detectors against a range of 0.16-0.64 for the DR units. The needle CR detector had a higher MTF, lower NNPS and higher DQE at 5 mm(-1) than the powder CR phosphors. DQE at 5 mm(-1) ranged from 0.02 to 0.20 for the CR systems, while DQE at 5 mm(-1) for the DR group ranged from 0.04 to 0.41, indicating higher DQE for the DR detectors and needle CR system than for the powder CR phosphor systems. The technical evaluation section of the study showed that the digital mammography systems were well set up and exhibiting typical performance for the detector technology employed in the respective systems.

Diagnostic Accuracy of (18)F-FDG-PET and PET/CT in the Differential Diagnosis between Malignant and Benign Pleural Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and meta-analyze published data about the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (CT) in the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign pleural lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A comprehensive literature search of studies published through June 2013 regarding the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG-PET and PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of pleural lesions was carried out. All retrieved studies were reviewed and qualitatively analyzed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of pleural lesions on a per-patient-based analysis were calculated. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to measure the accuracy of these methods. Subanalyses considering device used (PET or PET/CT) were performed. RESULTS: Sixteen studies including 745 patients were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis of 11 selected studies provided the following results: sensitivity 95% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 92-97%), specificity 82% (95%CI: 76-88%), LR+ 5.3 (95%CI: 2.4-11.8), LR- 0.09 (95%CI: 0.05-0.14), DOR 74 (95%CI: 34-161). The AUC was 0.95. No significant improvement of the diagnostic accuracy considering PET/CT studies only was found. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDG-PET and PET/CT demonstrated to be accurate diagnostic imaging methods in the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign pleural lesions; nevertheless, possible sources of false-negative and false-positive results should be kept in mind.

Fracture Discrimination by Combined Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Microarchitectural Texture Analysis.

The use of bone mineral density (BMD) for fracture discrimination may be improved by considering bone microarchitecture. Texture parameters such as trabecular bone score (TBS) or mean Hurst parameter (H) could help to find women who are at high risk of fracture in the non-osteoporotic group. The purpose of this study was to combine BMD and microarchitectural texture parameters (spine TBS and calcaneus H) for the detection of osteoporotic fractures. Two hundred and fifty five women had a lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) DXA. Additionally, texture analyses were performed with TBS on spine DXA and with H on calcaneus radiographs. Seventy-nine women had prevalent fragility fractures. The association with fracture was evaluated by multivariate logistic regressions. The diagnostic value of each parameter alone and together was evaluated by odds ratios (OR). The area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were assessed in models including BMD, H, and TBS. Women were also classified above and under the lowest tertile of H or TBS according to their BMD status. Women with prevalent fracture were older and had lower TBS, H, LS-BMD, and TH-BMD than women without fracture. Age-adjusted ORs were 1.66, 1.70, and 1.93 for LS, FN, and TH-BMD, respectively. Both TBS and H remained significantly associated with fracture after adjustment for age and TH-BMD: OR 2.07 [1.43; 3.05] and 1.47 [1.04; 2.11], respectively. The addition of texture parameters in the multivariate models didn't show a significant improvement of the ROC-AUC. However, women with normal or osteopenic BMD in the lowest range of TBS or H had significantly more fractures than women above the TBS or the H threshold. We have shown the potential interest of texture parameters such as TBS and H in addition to BMD to discriminate patients with or without osteoporotic fractures. However, their clinical added values should be evaluated relative to other risk factors.

Climatic extremes improve predictions of spatial patterns of tree species.

Understanding niche evolution, dynamics, and the response of species to climate change requires knowledge of the determinants of the environmental niche and species range limits. Mean values of climatic variables are often used in such analyses. In contrast, the increasing frequency of climate extremes suggests the importance of understanding their additional influence on range limits. Here, we assess how measures representing climate extremes (i.e., interannual variability in climate parameters) explain and predict spatial patterns of 11 tree species in Switzerland. We find clear, although comparably small, improvement (+20% in adjusted D(2), +8% and +3% in cross-validated True Skill Statistic and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve values) in models that use measures of extremes in addition to means. The primary effect of including information on climate extremes is a correction of local overprediction and underprediction. Our results demonstrate that measures of climate extremes are important for understanding the climatic limits of tree species and assessing species niche characteristics. The inclusion of climate variability likely will improve models of species range limits under future conditions, where changes in mean climate and increased variability are expected.