Evolución del conocimiento del hormigón estructural hasta 1973

Esta tesis analiza los criterios con que fueron proyectadas y construidas las estructuras de hormigón hasta 1973, fecha coincidente con la Instrucción EH-73, que en contenido, formato y planteamiento, consagró la utilización de los criterios modernamente utilizados hasta ahora. Es heredera, además, de las CEB 1970. Esos años marcan el cambio de planteamiento desde la Teoría Clásica hacia los Estados Límite. Los objetivos perseguidos son, sintéticamente: 1) Cubrir un vacío patente en el estudio de la evolución del conocimiento. Hay tratados sobre la historia del hormigón que cubren de manera muy completa el relato de personajes y realizaciones, pero no, al menos de manera suficiente, la evolución del conocimiento. 2) Servir de ayuda a los técnicos de hoy para entender configuraciones estructurales, geometrías, disposiciones de armado, formatos de seguridad, etc, utilizados en el pasado, lo que servirá para la redacción más fundada de dictámenes preliminares sobre estructuras existentes. 3) Ser referencia para la realización de estudios de valoración de la capacidad resistente de construcciones existentes, constituyendo la base de un documento pre-normativo orientado en esa dirección. En efecto, esta tesis pretende ser una ayuda para los ingenieros de hoy que se enfrentan a la necesidad de conservar y reparar estructuras de hormigón armado que forman parte del patrimonio heredado. La gran mayoría de las estructuras, fueron construidas hace más de 40 años, por lo que es preciso conocer los criterios que marcaron su diseño, su cálculo y su construcción. Pretende determinar cuáles eran los límites de agotamiento y por tanto de seguridad, de estructuras dimensionadas con criterios de antaño, analizadas por la metodología de cálculo actual. De este modo, se podrá determinar el resguardo existente “real” de las estructuras dimensionadas y calculadas con criterios “distintos” a los actuales. Conocer el comportamiento de las estructuras construidas con criterios de la Teoría Clásica, según los criterios actuales, permitirá al ingeniero de hoy tratar de la forma más adecuada el abanico de necesidades que se puedan presentar en una estructura existente. Este trabajo se centra en la evolución del conocimiento por lo que no se encuentran incluidos los procesos constructivos. En lo relativo a los criterios de proyecto, hasta mediados del siglo XX, éstos se veían muy influidos por los ensayos y trabajos de autor consiguientes, en los que se basaban los reglamentos de algunos países. Era el caso del reglamento prusiano de 1904, de la Orden Circular francesa de 1906, del Congreso de Lieja de 1930. A partir de la segunda mitad del siglo XX, destacan las aportaciones de ingenieros españoles como es el caso de Alfredo Páez Balaca, Eduardo Torroja y Pedro Jiménez Montoya, entre otros, que permitieron el avance de los criterios de cálculo y de seguridad de las estructuras de hormigón, hasta los que se conocen hoy. El criterio rector del proyecto de las estructuras de hormigón se fundó, como es sabido, en los postulados de la Teoría Clásica, en particular en el “momento crítico”, aquel para el que hormigón y acero alcanzan sus tensiones admisibles y, por tanto, asegura el máximo aprovechamiento de los materiales y sin pretenderlo conscientemente, la máxima ductilidad. Si el momento solicitante es mayor que el crítico, se dispone de armadura en compresión. Tras el estudio de muchas de las estructuras existentes de la época por el autor de esta tesis, incluyendo entre ellas las Colecciones Oficiales de Puentes de Juan Manuel de Zafra, Eugenio Ribera y Carlos Fernández Casado, se concluye que la definición geométrica de las mismas no se corresponde exactamente con la resultante del momento crítico, dado que como ahora resultaba necesario armonizar los criterios de armado a nivel sección con la organización de la ferralla a lo largo de los diferentes elementos estructurales. Los parámetros de cálculo, resistencias de los materiales y formatos de seguridad, fueron evolucionando con los años. Se fueron conociendo mejor las prestaciones de los materiales, se fue enriqueciendo la experiencia de los propios procesos constructivos y, en menor medida, de las acciones solicitantes y, consiguientemente, acotándose las incertidumbres asociadas lo cual permitió ir ajustando los coeficientes de seguridad a emplear en el cálculo. Por ejemplo, para el hormigón se empleaba un coeficiente de seguridad igual a 4 a finales del siglo XIX, que evolucionó a 3,57 tras la publicación de la Orden Circular francesa de 1906, y a 3, tras la Instrucción española de 1939. En el caso del acero, al ser un material bastante más conocido por cuanto se había utilizado muchísimo previamente, el coeficiente de seguridad permaneció casi constante a lo largo de los años, con un valor igual a 2. Otra de las causas de la evolución de los parámetros de cálculo fue el mejor conocimiento del comportamiento de las estructuras merced a la vasta tarea de planificación y ejecución de ensayos, con los estudios teóricos consiguientes, realizados por numerosos autores, principalmente austríacos y alemanes, pero también norteamericanos y franceses. En cuanto a los criterios de cálculo, puede sorprender al técnico de hoy el conocimiento que tenían del comportamiento del hormigón desde los primeros años del empleo del mismo. Sabían del comportamiento no lineal del hormigón, pero limitaban su trabajo a un rango de tensióndeformación lineal porque eso aseguraba una previsión del comportamiento estructural conforme a las hipótesis de la Elasticidad Lineal y de la Resistencia de Materiales, muy bien conocidas a principios del s. XX (no así sucedía con la teoría de la Plasticidad, aún sin formular, aunque estaba implícita en los planteamientos algunos ingenieros especializados en estructuras de fábrica (piedra o ladrillo) y metálicas. Además, eso permitía independizar un tanto el proyecto de los valores de las resistencias reales de los materiales, lo que liberaba de la necesidad de llevar a cabo ensayos que, en la práctica, apenas se podían hacer debido a la escasez de los laboratorios. Tampoco disponían de programas informáticos ni de ninguna de las facilidades de las que hoy se tienen, que les permitiera hacer trabajar al hormigón en un rango no lineal. Así, sabia y prudentemente, limitaban las tensiones y deformaciones del material a un rango conocido. El modus operandi seguido para la elaboración de esta tesis, ha sido el siguiente: -Estudio documental: se han estudiado documentos de autor, recomendaciones y normativa generada en este ámbito, tanto en España como con carácter internacional, de manera sistemática con arreglo al índice del documento. En este proceso, se han detectado lagunas del conocimiento (y su afección a la seguridad estructural, en su caso) y se han identificado las diferencias con los procedimientos de hoy. También ha sido necesario adaptar la notación y terminología de la época a los criterios actuales, lo que ha supuesto una dificultad añadida. -Desarrollo del documento: A partir del estudio previo se han ido desarrollando los siguientes documentos, que conforman el contenido de la tesis: o Personajes e instituciones relevantes por sus aportaciones al conocimiento de las estructuras de hormigón (investigación, normativa, docencia). o Caracterización de las propiedades mecánicas de los materiales (hormigón y armaduras), en relación a sus resistencias, diagramas tensión-deformación, módulos de deformación, diagramas momento-curvatura, etc. Se incluye aquí la caracterización clásica de los hormigones, la geometría y naturaleza de las armaduras, etc. o Formatos de seguridad: Se trata de un complejo capítulo del que se pretende extraer la información suficiente que permita a los técnicos de hoy entender los criterios utilizados entonces y compararlos con los actuales. o Estudio de secciones y piezas sometidas a tensiones normales y tangenciales: Se trata de presentar la evolución en el tratamiento de la flexión simple y compuesta, del cortante, del rasante, torsión, etc. Se tratan también en esta parte del estudio aspectos que, no siendo de preocupación directa de los técnicos de antaño (fisuración y deformaciones), tienen hoy mayor importancia frente a cambios de usos y condiciones de durabilidad. o Detalles de armado: Incluye el tratamiento de la adherencia, el anclaje, el solapo de barras, el corte de barras, las disposiciones de armado en función de la geometría de las piezas y sus solicitaciones, etc. Es un capítulo de importancia obvia para los técnicos de hoy. Se incluye un anejo con las referencias más significativas a los estudios experimentales en que se basaron las propuestas que han marcado hito en la evolución del conocimiento. Finalmente, junto a las conclusiones más importantes, se enuncian las propuestas de estudios futuros. This thesis analyzes the criteria with which structures of reinforced concrete have been designed and constructed prior to 1973. Initially, the year 1970 was chosen as starting point, coinciding with the CEB recommendations, but with the development of the thesis it was decided that 1973 was the better option, coinciding with the Spanish regulations of 1973, whose content, format and description introduced the current criteria. The studied period includes the Classic Theory. The intended goals of this thesis are: 1) To cover a clear gap in the study of evolution of knowledge about reinforced concrete. The concept and accomplishments achieved by reinforced concrete itself has been treated in a very complete way by the main researchers in this area, but not the evolution of knowledge in this subject area. 2) To help the engineers understand structural configurations, geometries, dispositions of steel, safety formats etc, that will serve as preliminary judgments by experts on existing structures. To be a reference to the existing studies about the valuation of resistant capacity of existing constructions, constituting a basic study of a pre-regulation document. This thesis intends to be a help for the current generation of engineers who need to preserve and repair reinforced concrete structures that have existed for a significant number of years. Most of these structures in question were constructed more than 40 years ago, and it is necessary to know the criteria that influenced their design, the calculation and the construction. This thesis intends to determine the safety limits of the old structures and analyze them in the context of the current regulations and their methodology. Thus, it will then be possible to determine the safety of these structures, after being measured and calculated with the current criteria. This will allow the engineers to optimize the treatment of such a structure. This work considers the evolution of the knowledge, so constructive methods are not included. Related to the design criteria, there existed until middle of the 20th century a large number of diverse European tests and regulations, such as the Prussian norm of 1904, the Circular French Order of 1906, the Congress of Liège of 1930, as well as individual engineers’ own notes and criteria which incorporated the results of their own tests. From the second half of the 20th century, the contributions of Spanish engineers as Alfredo Páez Balaca, Eduardo Torroja and Pedro Jiménez Montoya, among others, were significant and this allowed the advancement of the criteria of the calculation of safety standards of concrete structures, many of which still exist to the present day. The design and calculation of reinforced concrete structures by the Classic Theory, was based on the ‘Critical Bending Moment’, when concrete and steel achieve their admissible tensions, that allows the best employment of materials and the best ductility. If the bending moment is major than the critical bending moment, will be necessary to introduce compression steel. After the study of the designs of many existing structures of that time by the author of this thesis, including the Historical Collections of Juan Manuel de Zafra, Eugenio Ribera and Carlos Fernandez Casado, the conclusion is that the geometric definition of the structures does not correspond exactly with the critical bending moment inherent in the structures. The parameters of these calculations changed throughout the years. The principal reason that can be outlined is that the materials were improving gradually and the number of calculated uncertainties were decreasing, thus allowing the reduction of the safety coefficients to use in the calculation. For example, concrete used a coefficient of 4 towards the end of the 19th century, which evolved to 3,57 after the publication of the Circular French Order of 1906, and then to 3 after the Spanish Instruction of 1939. In the case of the steel, a much more consistent material, the safety coefficient remained almost constant throughout the years, with a value of 2. Other reasons related to the evolution of the calculation parameters were that the tests and research undertaken by an ever-increasing number of engineers then allowed a more complete knowledge of the behavior of reinforced concrete. What is surprising is the extent of knowledge that existed about the behavior of the concrete from the outset. Engineers from the early years knew that the behavior of the concrete was non-linear, but they limited the work to a linear tension-deformation range. This was due to the difficulties of work in a non-linear range, because they did not have laboratories to test concrete, or facilities such as computers with appropriate software, something unthinkable today. These were the main reasons engineers of previous generations limited the tensions and deformations of a particular material to a known range. The modus operandi followed for the development of this thesis is the following one: -Document study: engineers’ documents, recommendations and regulations generated in this area, both from Spain or overseas, have been studied in a systematic way in accordance with the index of the document. In this process, a lack of knowledge has been detected concerning structural safety, and differences to current procedures have been identified and noted. Also, it has been necessary to adapt the notation and terminology of the Classic Theory to the current criteria, which has imposed an additional difficulty. -Development of the thesis: starting from the basic study, the next chapters of this thesis have been developed and expounded upon: o People and relevant institutions for their contribution to the knowledge about reinforced concrete structures (investigation, regulation, teaching). Determination of the mechanical properties of the materials (concrete and steel), in relation to their resistances, tension-deformation diagrams, modules of deformation, moment-curvature diagrams, etc. Included are the classic characterizations of concrete, the geometry and nature of the steel, etc. Safety formats: this is a very difficult chapter from which it is intended to provide enough information that will then allow the present day engineer to understand the criteria used in the Classic Theory and then to compare them with the current theories. Study of sections and pieces subjected to normal and tangential tensions: it intends to demonstrate the evolution in the treatment of the simple and complex flexion, shear, etc. Other aspects examined include aspects that were not very important in the Classic Theory but currently are, such as deformation and fissures. o Details of reinforcement: it includes the treatment of the adherence, the anchorage, the lapel of bars, the cut of bars, the dispositions of reinforcement depending on the geometry of the pieces and the solicitations, etc. It is a chapter of obvious importance for current engineers. The document will include an annex with the most references to the most significant experimental studies on which were based the proposals that have become a milestone in the evolution of knowledge in this area. Finally, there will be included conclusions and suggestions of future studies. A deep study of the documentation and researchers of that time has been done, juxtaposing their criteria and results with those considered relevant today, and giving a comparison between the resultant safety standards according to the Classic Theory criteria and currently used criteria. This thesis fundamentally intends to be a guide for engineers who have to treat or repair a structure constructed according to the Classic Theory criteria.

Disrupting evolutionary processes: The effect of habitat fragmentation on collared lizards in the Missouri Ozarks

Humans affect biodiversity at the genetic, species, community, and ecosystem levels. This impact on genetic diversity is critical, because genetic diversity is the raw material of evolutionary change, including adaptation and speciation. Two forces affecting genetic variation are genetic drift (which decreases genetic variation within but increases genetic differentiation among local populations) and gene flow (which increases variation within but decreases differentiation among local populations). Humans activities often augment drift and diminish gene flow for many species, which reduces genetic variation in local populations and prevents the spread of adaptive complexes outside their population of origin, thereby disrupting adaptive processes both locally and globally within a species. These impacts are illustrated with collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris) in the Missouri Ozarks. Forest fire suppression has reduced habitat and disrupted gene flow in this lizard, thereby altering the balance toward drift and away from gene flow. This balance can be restored by managed landscape burns. Some have argued that, although human-induced fragmentation disrupts adaptation, it will also ultimately produce new species through founder effects. However, population genetic theory and experiments predict that most fragmentation events caused by human activities will facilitate not speciation, but local extinction. Founder events have played an important role in the macroevolution of certain groups, but only when ecological opportunities are expanding rather than contracting. The general impact of human activities on genetic diversity disrupts or diminishes the capacity for adaptation, speciation, and macroevolutionary change. This impact will ultimately diminish biodiversity at all levels.

Mineral surfaces and bioavailability of heavy metals: A molecular-scale perspective

There is a continual influx of heavy metal contaminants and pollutants into the biosphere from both natural and anthropogenic sources. A complex variety of abiotic and biotic processes affects their speciation and distribution, including adsorption onto and desorption from mineral surfaces, incorporation in precipitates or coprecipitates, release through the dissolution of minerals, and interactions with plants and microbes. Some of these processes can effectively isolate heavy metals from the biosphere, whereas others cause their release or transformation to different species that may be more (or less) bioavailable and/or toxic to organisms. Here we focus on abiotic adsorption and precipitation or coprecipitation processes involving the common heavy metal contaminant lead and the metalloids arsenic and selenium in mine tailings and contaminated soils. We have used extremely intense x-rays from synchrotron sources and a structure-sensitive method known as x-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy to determine the molecular-level speciation of these elements at concentrations of 50 to several thousand ppm in the contaminated environmental samples as well as in synthetic sorption samples. Our XAFS studies of As and Pb in the mine tailings show that up to 50% of these contaminants in the samples studied may be present as adsorbed species on mineral surfaces, which makes them potentially more bioavailable than when present in sparingly soluble solid phases. Our XAFS studies of Se(VI) sorption on Fe2+-containing sulfates show that this element undergoes redox reactions that transform it into less bioavailable and less toxic species. This type of information on molecular-level speciation of heavy metal and metalloid contaminants in various environmental settings is needed to prioritize remediation efforts and to assess their potential hazard to humans and other organisms.

Knowledge spirals, situational leadership and informal learning applied on b-learning methodology

The methodology “b-learning” is a new teaching scenario and it requires the creation, adaptation and application of new learning tools searching the assimilation of new collaborative competences. In this context, it is well known the knowledge spirals, the situational leadership and the informal learning. The knowledge spirals is a basic concept of the knowledge procedure and they are based on that the knowledge increases when a cycle of 4 phases is repeated successively.1) The knowledge is created (for instance, to have an idea); 2) The knowledge is decoded into a format to be easily transmitted; 3) The knowledge is modified to be easily comprehensive and it is used; 4) New knowledge is created. This new knowledge improves the previous one (step 1). Each cycle shows a step of a spiral staircase: by going up the staircase, more knowledge is created. On the other hand, the situational leadership is based on that each person has a maturity degree to develop a specific task and this maturity increases with the experience. Therefore, the teacher (leader) has to adapt the teaching style to the student (subordinate) requirements and in this way, the professional and personal development of the student will increase quickly by improving the results and satisfaction. This educational strategy, finally combined with the informal learning, and in particular the zone of proximal development, and using a learning content management system own in our University, gets a successful and well-evaluated learning activity in Master subjects focused on the collaborative activity of preparation and oral exhibition of short and specific topics affine to these subjects. Therefore, the teacher has a relevant and consultant role of the selected topic and his function is to guide and supervise the work, incorporating many times the previous works done in other courses, as a research tutor or more experienced student. Then, in this work, we show the academic results, grade of interactivity developed in these collaborative tasks, statistics and the satisfaction grade shown by our post-graduate students.

Corneal biomechanics: a review

Biomechanics is often defined as ‘mechanics applied to biology’. Due to the variety and complexity of the behaviour of biological structures and materials, biomechanics is better defined as the development, extension and application of mechanics for a better understanding of physiology and physiopathology and consequently for a better diagnosis and treatment of disease and injury. Different methods for the characterisation of corneal biomechanics are reviewed in detail, including those that are currently commercially available (Ocular Response Analyzer and CorVis ST). The clinical applicability of the parameters provided by these devices are discussed, especially in the fields of glaucoma, detection of ectatic disorders and orthokeratology. Likewise, other methods are also reviewed, such as Brillouin microscopy or dynamic optical coherence tomography and others with potential application to clinical practice but not validated for in vivo measurements, such as ultrasonic elastography. Advantages and disadvantages of all these techniques are described. Finally, the concept of biomechanical modelling is revised as well as the requirements for developing biomechanical models, with special emphasis on finite element modelling.

Rubbing of the gravestone of Harvard librarian Nathaniel Ward made by David S. Ferriero, October 15, 1972

Large rubbing of the gravestone of Nathaniel Ward, librarian of Harvard college for one week in 1768. The rubbing was made by David S. Ferriero, and is signed and dated October 15, 1972 in the lower right corner.

Quality of Democracy in Quadruple Helix Structures: The Quality of Democracy in the United States and in Austria, Challenges and Opportunities for Development. ACES Working Papers, 2012

This contribution focuses on analyzing the quality of democracy of the United States (U.S.) and of Austria by using a comparative approach. Even though comparisons are not the only possible or legitimate method of research, this analysis is based on the opinion that comparisons provide crucial analytical perspectives and learning opportunities. Following is the proposition, put directly forward: national political systems (political systems) are comprehensively understood only by using an international comparative approach. International comparisons (of country-based systems) are common (see the status of comparative politics, for example in Sodaro, 2004). Comparisons do not have to be based necessarily on national systems alone, but can also be carried out using “within”-comparisons inside (or beyond) sub-units or regional sub-national systems, for instance the individual provinces in the case of Austria (Campbell, 2007, p. 382).

Homogeneous Spatial Units (HSU) - a Pan-European geographical basis for environmental and socio-economic modelling

The spatial data set delineates areas with similar environmental properties regarding soil, terrain morphology, climate and affiliation to the same administrative unit (NUTS3 or comparable units in size) at a minimum pixel size of 1km2. The scope of developing this data set is to provide a link between spatial environmental information (e.g. soil properties) and statistical data (e.g. crop distribution) available at administrative level. Impact assessment of agricultural management on emissions of pollutants or radiative active gases, or analysis regarding the influence of agricultural management on the supply of ecosystem services, require the proper spatial coincidence of the driving factors. The HSU data set provides e.g. the link between the agro-economic model CAPRI and biophysical assessment of environmental impacts (updating previously spatial units, Leip et al. 2008), for the analysis of policy scenarios. Recently, a statistical model to disaggregate crop information available from regional statistics to the HSU has been developed (Lamboni et al. 2016). The HSU data set consists of the spatial layers provided in vector and raster format as well as attribute tables with information on the properties of the HSU. All input data for the delineation the HSU is publicly available. For some parameters the attribute tables provide the link between the HSU data set and e.g. the soil map(s) rather than the data itself. The HSU data set is closely linked the USCIE data set.

Land use and urban development impact of BART: interpretive summary of the final report.

Transportation Department, Washington, D.C.

Gradual lessons in grammar, or, Guide to the construction of the English language by the analysis and composition of sentences /

On spine: Tower's English grammar.

A description of the early printed books owned by the Grolier club with a brief account of their printers and the history of typography in the fifteenth century.

Revised edition of the "Catalogue of early printed books, presented by David W. Bruce ... 1894." Descriptive and historical notes by R. H. Lawrence; translations from colophons, etc., by N. G. McCrea.