Rheumatoid arthritis: links with cardiovascular disease and the receptor for advanced glycation end products

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is increased in patients with chronic inflammatory disease, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Furthermore it has become clear at a pathophysiological level, that atherosclerosis has striking similarities with autoimmune disease. This realization has come at a time of paradigm shift in how rheumatologists manage RA, with the availability of biological agents targeting key inflammatory cytokines. This review will focus on the possible causes of increased vascular disease in RA, including the role of traditional CV risk factors. Mechanisms potentially at play, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), altered coagulation, and cyclooxygenase (COX) -2 inhibitors will be covered in brief. The Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) has been identified as a candidate molecule influencing response to ongoing inflammation and autoimmunity. There will be a focus on the role of RAGE in CV disease and RA. As has been the case with many novel molecules, functional polymorphisms are thought to alter disease expression and assist us in coming to terms with the biological activities of the parent molecule. The review will conclude with a discussion of the potential role of the RAGE Glycine 82 Serine polymorphism

Drug utilization evaluation of parenteral proton pump inhibitors

Current evidence supports parenteral infusion of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers and such treatment seems reasonable where there is active bleeding or visible vessel on endoscopy. Parenteral boluses of PPI can be used in patients nil by mouth who cannot tolerate oral therapy. We sought to examine the appropriateness of parenteral PPI use. Drug utilisation evaluation was performed on 94 patients admitted to a 500 bed metropolitan hospital. 39 patients received continuous parenteral infusion of omeprazole (8 mg/ h) over a mean of 60 ± 29 h. 55 patients had parenteral boluses (40 mg bd) of omeprazole over a mean of 5 ± 4 days. Indications for PPI infusion (n = 39) were: major haemorrhage requiring transfusion (23), minor haemorrhage (8), dyspepsia (4) and others (4). 31 of the 39 patients on PPI infusion had upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. PPI infusion was commenced prior to endoscopy in 26 (84%) patients. 13 patients (33%) had active bleeding or visible non bleeding vessels at endoscopy. Only 11 patients (28%) had endoscopically treated peptic ulcers. Indications for parenteral PPI boluses (n = 55) included patients nil by mouth unable to take maintenance PPI orally (21), minor haemorrhage (8), peptic ulcer prophylaxis in seriously unwell (6), major haemorrhage (4), dyspepsia (2), postoprative period following peptic ulcer surgery (2) and others (12). Endoscopy was performed in 10 patients (18%) with only 1 endoscopically treated peptic ulcer. Our data suggest significant inappropriate use of parenteral PPI, which may be used for minor GI bleeding and dyspepsia and are typically commenced prior to endoscopy. These findings can explain the costly hospital expenditure on PPI.