938 resultados para Conception of science
Resumo:
Title also in Japanese.
Resumo:
At head of title: Department of Science and Art of the Committee of Council of Education.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"Chronological table of a few eminent inquirers and of their more important works": p. [589]-591.
Resumo:
Photocopy. Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms, 1981
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Partly reprinted from various periodicals.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"First report by Dr. W.J. Russell, F.R.S., and Capt. W. de W. Abney ..."--P. [3].
Resumo:
"Printed for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology."
Resumo:
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06
Resumo:
This article reports on a phenomenographic investigation into conceptions of learning for 15 Indigenous Australian university students over the three years of their degree courses. The ways in which they went about learning were also investigated along with the relationship between individual students' 'core' conceptions of learning and the ways in which they learned. Results indicated that their conceptions and ways of learning were similar in some respects to those found for other university students. However, some students went about learning in ways that were incongruent with the core conception of learning they held. This can be regarded as dissonance between strategies and conceptions of learning. The implications of this for teaching and learning for such students are discussed.
Resumo:
Is it ever justifiable to target non-combatants deliberately? This article assesses Michael Walzer's claim that the deliberate targeting of non-combatants may be justifiable during 'supreme emergencies', a view that has received some support but that has elicited little debate. It argues that the supreme emergencies exception to the prohibition on targeting non-combatants is problematic for at least four reasons. First, its utilitarianism contradicts Walzer's wider ethics of war based on a conception of human rights. Second, the exception may undermine the principle of non-combatant immunity. Third, it is based on a historical fallacy. Finally, it is predicated on a strategic fallacy-the idea that killing noncombatants can win wars. The case for rejecting the exception, however, has been opposed by those who persuasively argue that it is wrong to tie leaders' hands when they confront supreme emergencies. The final part of the article addresses this question and suggests that the principle of proportionality may give political leaders room for manoeuvre in supreme emergencies without permitting them deliberately to target non-combatants.