Reliability of operational data from pig herds and performance ratings by veterinarians and pig farmers collected during telephone interviews for the evaluation of a PCV2 piglet vaccination

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a telephone survey in gaining an understanding of the possible herd and management factors influencing the performance (i.e. safety and efficacy) of a vaccine against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) in a large number of herds and to estimate customers¿ satisfaction.ResultsDatasets from 227 pig herds that currently applied or have applied a PCV2 vaccine were analysed. Since 1-, 2- and 3-site production systems were surveyed, the herds were allocated in one of two subsets, where only applicable variables out of 180 were analysed. Group 1 was comprised of herds with sows, suckling pigs and nursery pigs, whereas herds in Group 2 in all cases kept fattening pigs. Overall 14 variables evaluating the subjective satisfaction with one particular PCV2 vaccine were comingled to an abstract dependent variable for further models, which was characterized by a binary outcome from a cluster analysis: good/excellent satisfaction (green cluster) and moderate satisfaction (red cluster). The other 166 variables comprised information about diagnostics, vaccination, housing, management, were considered as independent variables. In Group 1, herds using the vaccine due to recognised PCV2 related health problems (wasting, mortality or porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome) had a 2.4-fold increased chance (1/OR) of belonging to the green cluster. In the final model for Group 1, the diagnosis of diseases other than PCV2, the reason for vaccine administration being other than PCV2-associated diseases and using a single injection of iron had significant influence on allocating into the green cluster (P¿<¿0.05). In Group 2, only unchanged time or delay of time of vaccination influenced the satisfaction (P¿<¿0.05).ConclusionThe methodology and statistical approach used in this study were feasible to scientifically assess ¿satisfaction¿, and to determine factors influencing farmers¿ and vets¿ opinion about the safety and efficacy of a new vaccine.

Biographie d'Albert Cohn

par Isidore Loeb

Spisok evrejskich izdanij, napečatannych v Rossii i v carstv pol'skom prednaznačennych dlja vystavki

[Verf.: Albert Harkavy]

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 15 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Hans Fried (p. I 8, 1-201)

11 Briefe zwischen Hans Fried und Max Horkheimer, 1938-1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an die Albert Teachers Agency New York, 21.03.1941; 2 Briefe zwischen dem American Committee for International Studies, Princeton, New York und Max Horkheimer, 11.01.1941, 16.01.1941; 1 Brief von Sullivan & Cromwell New York an Max Horkheimer, 18.03.1940; 12 Briefe zwischen der Columbia University in the City of New York und Max Horkheimer, 1938-1940; 2 Briefe von Hans Fried an die Columbia University in the City of New york, 1938-1939; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an das Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced German Scholars New York; 2 Briefe zwischen der Ittleson Foundation New York und Max Horkheimer, 19.11.1938, 28.11.1938; 1 Brief von Max Goldschmidt an Hans Fried, 21.04.1938; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Max Goldschmidt, 25.04.1938; 2 Briefe von Alice Friedlaender an Max Horkheimer, 1932, 1944; 3 Briefe zwischen Charles S. Friedman und Max Horkheimer, 21.03.1942, 1936, 1942; 4 Briefe von C. J. Friedrich an Max Horkheimer, 1941; 4 Briefe von Franz L. Neumann an C. J. Friedrich, 1941; 8 Briefe zwischen den Friends of Europe London und Max Horkheimer, 1934-1938; 3 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an John W. Fries, 1939; 2 Briefe von Gertrud Fries an Max Horkheimer, 1936; 1 Brief von Josef Fröbes an Max Horkheimer, 24.08.1937; 3 Briefe zwischen Fruin und Max Horkheimer, 1936; 14 Briefe zwischen Eduard Fuchs und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1939;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 13 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Familie Eder (p. I 7, 1-223)

7 Briefe zwischen Edward Mead Earle, American Committee for International Studies, Princeton N. J. und Max Horkheimer, 1940-1941; 3 Briefe zwischen Margaret Ebert und Margot von Mendelssohn, 1941, 28.08.1941; 6 Briefe zwischen C. C. Eckhardt und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 5 Briefe zwischen Kay Eckstein und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 2 Briefe zwischen George Eckstein und Max Horkheimer, 16.05.1939, 35.05.1939; 1 Brief von F. K. Eden an Max Horkheimer, 02.04.1944; 33 Briefe zwischen Leopold Eder, Frieda Eder, Ruth Eder und Max Horkheimer, 1937-1940; 2 Briefe zwischen Dale Edwards und Max Horkheimer, 16.07.1940; 1 Brief von Hedwig Ehrlich an Max Horkheimer; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Albert Einstein, 20.02.1935; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an W. Eisemann, 02.11.1939; 1 Brief von Else Eisner an Max Horkheimer, 09.12.1935; 2 Briefe zwischen Edit Elbogen und Max Horkheimer, 24.03.1942, 26.03.1942; 1 Brief von Käte von Hirsch an Max Horkheimer, 03.08.1941; 2 Briefe von Emmy Elbogen an Margot von Mendelssohn, 1945; 2 Briefe zwischen Paul Elbogen und Max Horkheimer, 02.06.1944, 09.06.1944; 4 Briefe zwischen Norbert Elias und Max Horkheimer, 1934-1935; 1 Brief von Werner B. Ellinger an Max Horkheimer, 16.12.1937; 19 Briefe zwischen dem Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced Foreign Scholars New York und Max Horkheimer, 1938-1944; 2 Briefe zwischen dem Emergency Rescue Committee New York und Max Horkheimer, 12.06.1941, 14.06.1941; 1 Brief von F.L. Neumann an Emhardt, 13.02.1939; 23 Briefe zwischen Alice Engel und Max Horkheimer, 1937-1941; 9 briefe zwischen Paul Doernberg, Sofie Doernberg und Max Horkheimer, 1940-1942; 3 Briefe zwischen der Hebrew Sheltering and Immigrant Aid Society New York und Max Horkheimer, 05.01.1942, 1942; 1 Brief von der Selfhelp of Emigres from Central Europe, New York an Max Horkheimer, 18.08.1941; 2 Briefe zwischen R. Weissmann und Max Horkheimer, 09.01.1941, 03.02.1941; 5 Briefe zwischen Ernst Engelberg und Max Horkheimer, 1939-1940, 07.06.1939; 1 Brief von Fritz Epstein an Max Horkheimer, 10.04.1937; 1 Brief von Erika Ermel an Max Horkheimer, 15.09.1948; 2 Briefe zwischen Max Ernst und Max Horkheimer, 23.01.1936; 4 Briefe zwischen Margot Esser und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1936; 16 Briefe zwischen Rene Etiemble und Max Horkheimer, 1936-1938; 4 Briefe zwischen L.M. Ettlinger und Max Horkheimer, 1937; 8 Briefe zwischen Walter Fabien und Max Horkheimer, 1937-1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Henry Pratt Fairchild, 25.03.1941; 2 Briefe zwischen Marvin Farber und Max Horkheimer, 14.03.1940, 17.05.1940; 4 Briefe zwischen Walter Farley udn Max Horkheimer, 1935, 01.10.1935; 8 Briefe zwischen Alexander Farquharson und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1939;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 56 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Felix Weil (p. I 26, 131-348)

12 Briefe zwischen Anna Weil und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1936; 82 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Felix Weil, Margot de Weil und Max Horkheimer, 1934-1941; 1 Brief von D. Charnass an Felix Weil, 25.04.1936; 4 Briefe zwischen Dolson Wood Company und Max Horkheimer, 16.05.1941, 19.05.1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an das American Consul General Havana, 21.03.1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Byron H. Uhl, 07.01.1941; 2 Brief zwischen Dorothy B. Padwa und Max Horkheimer, 01.03.1940, 05.03.1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Collector of Customs, 08.10.1938; 1 Brief von D. Charnass an Felix Weil, 25.04.1936; 2 Briefe zwischen D. Charnass und Charles Rosenheck, 25.04.1936; 1 Zeugnis von The State Education Department an Charles Rosenheck, 25.04.1936; 1 Zeugniskopie, 24.04.1936; 1 Brief von Charles Rosenheck über Felix Weil, 23.04.1936; 1 Bescheinigung von Albert Marinelli, 24.04.1936; 3 Briefe zwischen George Weil und Max Horkheimer, 22.02.1937, 1937; 2 Briefe zwischen Georg Weil und Max Horkheimer, 06.04.1942, 08.04.1942; 1 Brief von Hans Weil an Max Horkheimer, 01.01.1939; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Duggan; 1 Brief und Beilage von Hans Weil an Paul Tillich, 11.10.1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Hilde Frankel, 12.10.1940; 3 Briefe und 1 Beilage Juliana Weil, 06.06.1936, 1936; 1 Brief von Weinbaum an Max Horkheimer; 2 Briefe zwischen Jacob Weinberger und Max Horkheimer, 20.02.1946, 28.02.1946; 2 Briefe zwischen Ria Weinig, Margit Weinig und Max Horkheimer, 20.07.1949, 29.07.1949; 1 Brief und Beilage von B. Weinryb an Max Horkheimer, 04.03.1941; 1 Brief von Philipp Weintraub an Max Horkheimer, 20.11.1937;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 20 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Katharina von Hirsch (p. I 10, 251-461)

57 Briefe zwischen Katharina von Hirsch und Max Horkheimer, 1935-1941; 5 Briefe zwischen dem United States Committee for the Care of European Children New York und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 2 Briefe von Alfred Haas an Felix Weil, 1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an M. A. Warren, 18.07.1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an den American Consulate General London, 05.07.1940; 1 Brief von Juilette Favez an Katharina von Hirsch, 31.05.1937; 46 Briefe zwischen Trude Hirschberg und Max Horkheimer, 1934-1945; 4 Briefe zwischen Leo Hochberger und Max Horkheimer, 1938-1946, 26.04.1946; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an George L. Warren; 1 Lebenslauf von Siegfried Höxter; 4 Briefe zwischen Paul Hofmann und Max Horkheimer, 1937, 14.10.1937; 4 Briefe zwischen Albert Hofstadter und Max Horkheimer, 1941, 27.10.1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Hajo Holborn, 03.05.1940; 2 Briefe zwischen W. Holden und Max Horkheimer, 01.11.1938, 09.12.1938; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Ernest V. Hollis, 04.06.1940;

"I understood what she meant when she said '21st century medicine'": A qualitative analysis of patient responses for plans for colorectal cancer screening following a recommendation from their physician

Although physician recommendation has been significantly associated with colorectal cancer screening (CRCS), it still does not motivate all patients to get CRCS. Although improved physician recommendation for CRCS has been shown to increase patient CRCS screening, questions remain about what elements of that discussion may lead to screening. The objective of this study is to describe patients' perceptions and interpretations about their physician's recommendation for CRCS during their annual wellness exam. A subset of patients (n=51) participating in a supplement study of a behavioral intervention trial designed to increase CRCS completed a follow-up, open-ended interview two to four weeks after their annual wellness visit. Using qualitative methods, transcripts of these interviews were analyzed. Findings suggest that most patients would follow their physician's recommendation for CRCS despite not engaging in much discussion. Patients may refrain from CRCS discussion because of a commitment to CRCS, awareness of screening guidelines, and trust in physician's honesty and beneficence. Yet many patients left their wellness exams with questions, refraining because of future plans to consult with their physicians, perceived time constraints or a lack of a patient-physician relationship. If patients are leaving their wellness exams with unanswered questions, interventions should prepare physicians for patient reticence, teaching physicians how to assure patients that CRCS is a primary care activity where all questions and concerns, including cost and scheduling, may be resolved.^

La seducción del continente americano. Simbolismo e ideología en La piedra que crece, de Albert Camus

En el cuento "La piedra que crece" Albert Camus textualiza de manera sugerente, la seducción que el continente americano, en su porción más agreste y natural, adquiere para este pensador de mediados del siglo pasado. Continente y cultura que parecen ofrecer al escritor francés una posible salida a ese universo cerrado, sin horizontes, que postula el Existencialismo. Este cuento se erige como símbolo contenedor de ideas tangenciales a las manifestadas por Camus en el resto de sus escritos. Aquí se advierte una mirada esperanzada acerca del porvenir de la cultura y, en definitiva, de la humanidad que le da sentido, que se contrapone diametralmente con la postura existencialista. Por ello en este trabajo me propongo, por una parte transmitir una impresión de lectura, y por otra, demostrar de qué manera la captación de un espacio-otro, adquiere una dimensión simbólica e ideológica que socava los postulados existenciales en sus raíces más profundas