996 resultados para family crisis
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
The current crisis has swept aside not only the whole of the US investment banking industry butalso the consensual perception of banking risks, contagion and their implication for bankingregulation. As everyone agrees now, risks where mispriced, they accumulated in neuralgic pointsof the financial system, and where amplified by procyclical regulation as well as by the instabilityand fragility of financial institutions.The use of ratings as carved in stone and lack of adequate procedure to swiftly deal withsystemic institutions bankruptcy (whether too-big-to-fail, too complex to fail or too-many to fail).The current paper will not deal with the description and analysis of the crisis, already covered inother contributions to this issue will address the critical choice regulatory authorities will face. Inthe future regulation has to change, but it is not clear that it will change in the right direction. Thismay occur if regulatory authorities, possibly influenced by public opinion and political pressure,adopt an incorrect view of financial crisis prevention and management. Indeed, there are twoapproaches to post-crisis regulation. One is the rare event approach, whereby financial crises willoccur infrequently, but are inescapable.
Resumo:
This paper examines the application of the guidelines for evidence-based treatments in family therapy developed by Sexton and collaborators to a set of treatment models. These guidelines classify the models using criteria that take into account the distinctive features of couple and family treatments. A two-step approach was taken: (1) The quality of each of the studies supporting the treatment models was assessed according to a list of ad hoc core criteria; (2) the level of evidence of each treatment model was determined using the guidelines. To reflect the stages of empirical validation present in the literature, nine models were selected: three models each with high, moderate, and low levels of empirical validation, determined by the number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The quality ratings highlighted the strengths and limitations of each of the studies that provided evidence backing the treatment models. The classification by level of evidence indicated that four of the models were level III, "evidence-based" treatments; one was a level II, "evidence-informed treatment with promising preliminary evidence-based results"; and four were level I, "evidence-informed" treatments. Using the guidelines helped identify treatments that are solid in terms of not only the number of RCTs but also the quality of the evidence supporting the efficacy of a given treatment. From a research perspective, this analysis highlighted areas to be addressed before some models can move up to a higher level of evidence. From a clinical perspective, the guidelines can help identify the models whose studies have produced clinically relevant results.
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
