972 resultados para United States. Bureau of Human Nutrition and Home Economics.
Resumo:
no. 105-119
Resumo:
no. 42-72
Resumo:
no.173-183 (1910) [incomplete]
Resumo:
16-22
Resumo:
no.38-50 (1903) [incomplete]
Resumo:
no.189-198 (1910-1911)
Resumo:
no.102-111 (1907)
Resumo:
no. 21-25 (1900-1901)
Resumo:
no.78-90 (1905-1906) [incomplete]
Resumo:
no.91-101 (1906-1907)
Resumo:
The ‘Normative Power Europe’ debate has been a leitmotif in the academic discourse for over a decade. Far from being obsolete, the topic is as relevant as when the term was first coined by Ian Manners in 2002.1 ‘To be or not to be a normative power’ is certainly one of the existential dilemmas in the foreign policy of the European Union. This paper, however, intends to move beyond the black-and-white debate on whether the European Union is a normative power and to make it more nuanced by examining the factors that make it such. Contrary to the conventional perception that the European Union is a necessarily ‘benign’ force in the world, it assumes that it has aspirations to be a viable international actor. Consequently, it pursues different types of foreign policy behaviour with a varying degree of normativity in them. The paper addresses the question of under what conditions the European Union is a ‘normative power’. The findings of the study demonstrate that the ‘normative power’ of the European Union is conditioned upon internal and external elements, engaged in a complex interaction with a decisive role played by the often neglected external elements.
