Active smoking and the risk of type 2 diabetes : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rapport de synthèse : Introduction : plusieurs études observationnelles suggèrent qu'il existe une association entre le tabagisme actif et l'incidence du diabète de type 2. Toutefois de telles études n'ont jamais été synthétisées de façon systématique. Objectif : conduire une revue systématique avec meta-analyse des études évaluant l'association entre le tabagisme actif et l'incidence du diabète de type 2. Méthode : nous avons effectué une recherche dans les bases de donnée électroniques MEDLINE et EMBASE de 1966 à mai 2007, et l'avons complétée par une recherche manuelle des bibliographies des articles clés retenus ainsi que par la recherche d'abstracts de congrès scientifiques et le contact d'experts. Pour être inclues dans notre revue, les études devaient avoir un design de type cohorte, reporter un risque de glycémies jeun élevée, d'intolérance au glucose ou de diabète de type 2 en relation avec le statut tabagique des participants lors du recrutement et devaient exclure les sujets avec un diabète au début de l'étude. Deux auteurs ont sélectionné de façon indépendante les études et ont extrait les données. Les risques relatifs de diabète étaient ensuite compilés, utilisant un modèle de type « random effect ». Résultats : la recherche a aboutit à 25 études de cohorte prospectives (N=1'165'374 participants) et a reporté en tout 45'844 cas de diabète de type 2 pendant une durée de suivi s'étendant sur 5 à 30 années. Sur les 25 études, 24 reportaient un risque augmenté de diabète chez les fumeurs par comparaison aux non fumeurs. Le risque relatif (RR) commun de toutes les études était de 1.44 (intervalle de confiance (IC) à 95% : 1.31-1.58). Le risque de diabète était plus élevé chez les fumeurs de plus de 20 cigarettes par jour (RR : 1.61, IC 95% : 1.43-1.80) en comparaison aux fumeurs ayant une consommation inférieure (RR : 1.29, IC 95% : 1.13-1.48) et le risque était moindre pour les anciens fumeurs (RR :1.23; IC 95% : 1.14-1.33) comparé aux fumeurs actifs. Ces éléments parlent en faveur d'un effet dose-réponse et donc d'une relation de causalité, sans pour autant la prouver. Conclusion : notre étude révèle que le tabagisme actif est associé avec un risque augmenté de 44% de diabète de type 2. Des recherches futures sont nécessaires pour évaluer si cette association est causale et pour clarifier les mécanismes d'action. Dans l'intervalle, les professionnels de santé devraient mentionner l'éviction du diabète comme une raison supplémentaire d'arrêter de fumer ou de ne pas commencer à fumer.

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.

BACKGROUND: The increased use of meta-analysis in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a randomised controlled trial. Study publication bias and outcome reporting bias have been recognised as a potential threat to the validity of meta-analysis and can make the readily available evidence unreliable for decision making. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this update, we review and summarise the evidence from cohort studies that have assessed study publication bias or outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials. Twenty studies were eligible of which four were newly identified in this update. Only two followed the cohort all the way through from protocol approval to information regarding publication of outcomes. Fifteen of the studies investigated study publication bias and five investigated outcome reporting bias. Three studies have found that statistically significant outcomes had a higher odds of being fully reported compared to non-significant outcomes (range of odds ratios: 2.2 to 4.7). In comparing trial publications to protocols, we found that 40-62% of studies had at least one primary outcome that was changed, introduced, or omitted. We decided not to undertake meta-analysis due to the differences between studies. CONCLUSIONS: This update does not change the conclusions of the review in which 16 studies were included. Direct empirical evidence for the existence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias is shown. There is strong evidence of an association between significant results and publication; studies that report positive or significant results are more likely to be published and outcomes that are statistically significant have higher odds of being fully reported. Publications have been found to be inconsistent with their protocols. Researchers need to be aware of the problems of both types of bias and efforts should be concentrated on improving the reporting of trials.

Fatigue: revue et approche diagnostique [Fatigue: review and systematic approach to potential causes]

Fatigue is defined as a sensation of exhaustion during or after usual activities. As much as one third of patients consulting a primary care physician report this complaint. After investigation, two-thirds of the patients have a somatic or psychiatric diagnosis. This review presents a seven-step approach to the patient who complains of fatigue.

Individual patient data systematic review and meta-analysis of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasonography for detecting raised intracranial pressure: protocol of the ONSD research group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) research group project is to establish an individual patient-level database from high quality studies of ONSD ultrasonography for the detection of raised intracranial pressure (ICP), and to perform a systematic review and an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA), which will provide a cutoff value to help physicians making decisions and encourage further research. Previous meta-analyses were able to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD ultrasonography in detecting raised ICP but failed to determine a precise cutoff value. Thus, the ONSD research group was founded to synthesize data from several recent studies on the subject and to provide evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD ultrasonography in detecting raised ICP. METHODS: This IPDMA will be conducted in different phases. First, we will systematically search for eligible studies. To be eligible, studies must have compared ONSD ultrasonography to invasive intracranial devices, the current reference standard for diagnosing raised ICP. Subsequently, we will assess the quality of studies included based on the QUADAS-2 tool, and then collect and validate individual patient data. The objectives of the primary analyses will be to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD ultrasonography and to determine a precise cutoff value for detecting raised ICP. Secondly, we will construct a logistic regression model to assess whether patient and study characteristics influence diagnostic accuracy. DISCUSSION: We believe that this IPD MA will provide the most reliable basis for the assessment of diagnostic accuracy of ONSD ultrasonography for detecting raised ICP and to provide a cutoff value. We also hope that the creation of the ONSD research group will encourage further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42012003072.

Journal autographe du général Kléber ou Carnet de notes détachées et de pensées diverses ; Opinion émise sur Bonaparte comme général et premier consul ; Eloge de Caffarell, mort en Egypte ; Armée d'Orient ([Reprod.])

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 11.1a.477