Examination report on the City of Blue Grass, Iowa for the period July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013

Examination report on the City of Blue Grass, Iowa for the period July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013

Report on a special investigation of the University of Iowa Athletic Ticket Office and the operations of the Hawkeye Express for the period September 1, 2005 through November 30, 2013

Report on a special investigation of the University of Iowa Athletic Ticket Office and the operations of the Hawkeye Express for the period September 1, 2005 through November 30, 2013

Report on a special investigation of the Malvern Public Library for the period July 1, 2006 through October 31, 2013

Report on a special investigation of the Malvern Public Library for the period July 1, 2006 through October 31, 2013

INTERMED predicts non-return to work in an occupational rehabilitation setting for individuals with orthopaedic trauma-part 2

Introduction.- The model presented in part I (19 predictors) had good predictive values for non-return to work 2 years after vocational rehabilitation for orthopaedic trauma. However, the number of predictors is high for the detection of patients at risk in a clinic. For example, the INTERMED for itself consists of 20 questions and needs 20 minutes to be filled in. For this reason, the aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of different models for the prediction of non-return to work.Patients and methods.- In this longitudinal prospective study, the cohort consisted of 2156 included inpatients with orthopaedic trauma attending a rehabilitation hospital after a work, traffic, sport or leisure related injury. Two years after discharge, 1502 patients returned a questionnaire regarding return to work. We compared the area under the receiver-operator-characteristics curve (ROC) between different models: INTERMED total score, the 4 partial INTERMED scores, the items of the most predictive partial score; with or without confounders.Results.- The ROC for the total score of the INTERMED plus the five confounders of the of the part one (qualified work, speaking French, lesion of upper extremity, education and age) was 0.72. The sole partial INTERMED score to predict return to work was the social sub score. The ROC for the five items of the latter sub score of the INTERMED was 0.69. The ROC for the five items of the social subscale of the INTERMED combined with five predictors was 0.73. This was significantly better than the use of only the five items from INTERMED alone (delta 0.034; 95% CI 0.017 to .050). The model presented in part I (INTERMED total score plus 18 predictors) was not significantly better than the five items INTERMED social score plus five confounders.Discussion.- The use of a model with ten variables (INTERMED social five items plus five confounders) has good predictive value to detect patients not returning to work after vocational rehabilitation after orthopaedic trauma. The parsimony of this model facilitates its use in a clinic for the detection of patients at risk.

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Urbana, Iowa for the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Urbana, Iowa for the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014

How important are interview methods and questionnaire designs in research on self-reported juvenile delinquency? An experimental comparison of internet vs. paper-and-pencil questionnaires and different definitions of the reference period

There has been relatively little change over recent decades in the methods used in research on self-reported delinquency. Face-to-face interviews and selfadministered interviews in the classroom are still the predominant alternatives envisaged. New methods have been brought into the picture by recent computer technology, the Internet, and an increasing availability of computer equipment and Internet access in schools. In the autumn of 2004, a controlled experiment was conducted with 1,203 students in Lausanne (Switzerland), where "paper-and-pencil" questionnaires were compared with computer-assisted interviews through the Internet. The experiment included a test of two different definitions of the (same) reference period. After the introductory question ("Did you ever..."), students were asked how many times they had done it (or experienced it), if ever, "over the last 12 months" or "since the October 2003 vacation". Few significant differences were found between the results obtained by the two methods and for the two definitions of the reference period, in the answers concerning victimisation, self-reported delinquency, drug use, failure to respond (missing data). Students were found to be more motivated to respond through the Internet, take less time for filling out the questionnaire, and were apparently more confident of privacy, while the school principals were less reluctant to allow classes to be interviewed through the Internet. The Internet method also involves considerable cost reductions, which is a critical advantage if self-reported delinquency surveys are to become a routinely applied method of evaluation, particularly so in countries with limited resources. On balance, the Internet may be instrumental in making research on self-reported delinquency far more feasible in situations where limited resources so far have prevented its implementation.

Report on a review of State employee grievance processes, settlement agreements entered into by the State and payments made during the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2014

Report on a review of State employee grievance processes, settlement agreements entered into by the State and payments made during the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2014

Report on a special investigation of the State Public Defender’s Office for the period July 1, 2009 through August 31, 2013

Report on a special investigation of the State Public Defender’s Office for the period July 1, 2009 through August 31, 2013

Potential yield, return, and tree diversity of managed, uneven-aged Douglas-fir stands

Abstract

Report on a special investigation of the Mahaska County Soil and Water Conservation District for the period March 24, 2006 through August 31, 2013

Report on a special investigation of the Mahaska County Soil and Water Conservation District for the period March 24, 2006 through August 31, 2013

Report on a special investigation of the Monona County Auditor’s Office for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013

Report on a special investigation of the Monona County Auditor’s Office for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Pomeroy, Iowa for the period August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Pomeroy, Iowa for the period August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Vincent, Iowa for the period August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Vincent, Iowa for the period August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Walcott, Iowa for the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Walcott, Iowa for the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014