989 resultados para Prospective organ dose estimation


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Abstract Background: The effect of statins on the endothelial function in humans remains under discussion. Particularly, it is still unclear if the improvement in endothelial function is due to a reduction in LDL-cholesterol or to an arterial pleiotropic effect. Objective: To test the hypothesis that modulation of the endothelial function promoted by statins is primarily mediated by the degree of reduction in LDL-cholesterol, independent of the dose of statin administered. Methods: Randomized clinical trial with two groups of lipid-lowering treatment (16 patients/each) and one placebo group (14 patients). The two active groups were designed to promote a similar degree of reduction in LDL-cholesterol: the first used statin at a high dose (80 mg, simvastatin 80 group) and the second used statin at a low dose (10 mg) associated with ezetimibe (10 mg, simvastatin 10/ezetimibe group) to optimize the hypolipidemic effect. The endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMV) before and 8 weeks after treatment. Results: The decrease in LDL-cholesterol was similar between the groups simvastatin 80 and simvastatin 10/ezetimibe (27% ± 31% and 30% ± 29%, respectively, p = 0.75). The simvastatin 80 group presented an increase in FMV from 8.4% ± 4.3% at baseline to 11% ± 4.2% after 8 weeks (p = 0.02). Similarly, the group simvastatin 10/ezetimibe showed improvement in FMV from 7.3% ± 3.9% to 12% ± 4.4% (p = 0.001). The placebo group showed no variation in LDL-cholesterol level or endothelial function. Conclusion: The improvement in endothelial function with statin seems to depend more on a reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels, independent of the dose of statin administered, than on pleiotropic mechanisms.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Diss., 2010

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 27, bd. 103 (1906)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 22, bd. 87 (1901)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 27, bd. 102 (1906)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 13, bd. 49 (1892)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 13, bd. 50 (1892)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 24, bd. 93 (1903)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 26, bd. 98 (1905)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 14, bd. 56 (1893)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 11, bd. 44 (1890)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 25, bd. 97 (1904)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 25, bd. 95 (1904)

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Generalregister Index bd. 1 - 60

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

jahrg. 26, bd. 99 (1905)