A importância da análise da informação criminal para a investigação: O contributo dos NAIIC

Ao longo dos anos a Guarda Nacional Republicana tem vindo a desenvolver o seu modelo de investigação criminal. Alicerçado em três vertentes funcionais: operativa, criminalística e análise de informação criminal, este modelo visa garantir uma eficácia operacional da Guarda, no âmbito das competências que lhe são atribuídas enquanto Órgão de Polícia Criminal. Perspetivando uma evolução da investigação criminal exercida pelos Comandos Territoriais, assente numa avaliação da vertente de análise de informação criminal, surge a presente investigação, subordinada ao tema “A Importância da Análise de Informação Criminal para a Investigação: o Contributo dos NAIIC”. Com o objetivo de compreender qual o contributo que os Núcleos de Análise de Informações e Informação Criminal dos Comandos Territoriais conferem às investigações, apoiamo-nos num processo indutivo, que intenta generalizar os problemas observados nos vários Núcleos, para caracterizar a vertente de análise de informação criminal no dispositivo territorial. Visando uma análise quantitativa e qualitativa dos resultados, os métodos de recolha de dados explorados foram: dois inquéritos por questionário, um direcionado aos Chefes dos Núcleos de Análise de Informações e Informação Criminal e outro aos Chefes dos Núcleos de Investigação Criminal dos Comandos e Destacamentos Territoriais, assim como um inquérito por entrevista, realizado a cinco Oficiais da Guarda, com reconhecidos conhecimentos e experiência profissional nesta área. Conclui-se que os Núcleos de Análise de Informações e Informação Criminal têm contribuído para as investigações, enfatizando os aspetos relevantes de grandes volumes de informação, com vista a apoiar a ação dos investigadores. Todavia, foram observadas algumas limitações que importa suprimir, de forma a potenciar este contributo. Foram identificadas nestes Núcleos, insuficiências nos acessos à informação, lacunas nas ferramentas de análise, reduzido efetivo em determinados Comandos e algumas falhas de cooperação e coordenação, entre estes e os Núcleos de Investigação Criminal.

Política criminal, debido proceso y trámite del procedimiento sumario en El Salvador

Política criminal, su influencia en el diseño del procedimiento sumario en El Salvador – Respeto del debido proceso en el trámite del procedimiento sumario en El Salvador – Tramite del procedimiento sumario.

Quantification of standards of proof thresholds in criminal and civil litigation

Standards of proof in law serve the purpose of instructing juries as to the expected levels of confidence in determinations of fact. In criminal trials, to reach a guilty verdict a jury must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt, and in civil trials by a preponderance of the evidence. The purposes of this study are to determine the quantitative thresholds used to make these determinations; to ascertain the levels of juror agreement with basic principles of justice; and to try to predict thresholds and beliefs by juror personality characteristics. Participants read brief case descriptions and indicated thresholds in percentages, their beliefs in various principles, and completed three personality measures. A 92-94% threshold in criminal and an 80% threshold in civil matters was found; but prediction by personality was not supported. Significant percentages of jurors disavowed the presumptions of innocence and right to counsel.

TAKING ORGANIZATIONS SERIOUSLY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY, ORGANIZATIONS AND THE CRIMINAL LAW

In the post-Enlightenment period, Anglo-American criminal law has been applied with increased force, and an ever expanding scope, to collective actors like corporations and other organizations. Recent scholarship has focused on developing “truly organizational” bases of liability that break with the conventional approach of imputing individual conduct to an organization and instead analyze culpable conduct and intent in a way that reflects the distinct and independent capacity of organizations to pursue their interests or goals collaboratively. In 2004, Canada enacted amendments inspired by these ideas in the hope they would lead to more effective criminal enforcement against organizations. Twelve years later, however, the promise of Bill C-45 is largely unfulfilled. In this thesis, I explore how much of this failure of law reform to deliver transformational change is attributable to an individualist bias that permeates how we think about what it means to be responsible and how this then shapes the responsibility ascription process. Using an analytical framework that combines criminal law theory with selected aspects of rational-structural theory and organization culture, I suggest that a promising way forward may lie in reframing the essential qualities required to be a subject of the criminal law in a way that captures the unique attributes that make organizations different from individuals. The resulting organizational concept of responsible agency allows for an integration of organizational reality into how we assess organizational culpability while keeping the ambit of criminal liability within the limits of what is practicable and fair. This better aligns with the spirit of Bill C-45: to impose criminal liability in a way that takes organizations – and their crimes – seriously.

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2016

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2016

The Orientation and Onboarding of South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy Instructors

The goal of this research is to enhance what is currently being presented in the Human Resource orientation and to provide an onboarding checklist for the supervisors of newly hired instructors at the South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy. Research supports the overall goal of creating a two day orientation for newly hired instructors at SCCJA.

Criminal Records Summary of Activity by Circuit/County For Period 07/01/2015 Thru 06/30/2016 - Program-ID CRM60

This gives the criminal records summary of activity by circuit/county.

Age of pending criminal cases report for period 7/1/2016 thru 9/30/2016

This gives statistics on the age of pending criminal cases broken down by circuits and counties.

Criminal records summary of activity by circuit/county for period 7/1/2016 Thru 9/30/2016

This gives the criminal records summary of activity by circuit/county.

Financial and Criminal Responsibility for Public Funds – Protection of the Constitutional Fundamental Social Law of Health

Abstract: The implementation of Fundamental Constitutional Health and Social Rights is necessary, appropriate and proportionate, following the demands of the population. Accountability and self-responsibility play a very important role. This requires the development of constitutional principles that protect public funds against corruption and offer a constitutional right to health protection. Financial and criminal liability might provide an incentive to improve the management of public funds and reinforce fundamental constitutional principles, particularly regarding the right to health. Constitutional, administrative and criminal issues, as well as public management and administration and the science of good governance, should be articulated in a single strategy also in the health sector. In Portugal and Brazil, as examples, the Federal Court / Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court / High Court of Justice or the Court of Auditors should be considered together.

Debilidad del control territorial por parte del estado. Estudio de caso: el surgimiento de la banda criminal de “los rastrojos” en el Valle del Cauca (2006-2014)

El propósito de la presente investigación es el de analizar la debilidad que ha tenido el Estado colombiano con respecto a la obtención del control territorial en algunas áreas específicas del departamento del Valle del Cauca, considerando variables fundamentales como la coerción, el capital y la justicia, en su mayoría planteadas por Charles Tilly como elementos básicos de cualquier Estado. Se analizan y explican los periodos de violencia, y la consolidación de grupos al margen de la ley en Colombia y en el departamento del Valle del Cauca, evidenciando la debilidad del Estado en ciertas áreas a lo largo de los años, tomando finalmente como estudio de caso el surgimiento de la banda criminal de “los Rastrojos” posterior a la desmovilización de las AUC, como actor al margen de la ley que disputa el poder y ejerce ilegalmente funciones del Estado.

The United Nations 'quasi-prosecutorial' investigative mechanisms: assessing a new institutional model in the international criminal justice landscape

This work aims to provide a theoretical examination of three recently created bodies of the United Nations mandated to investigate the alleged international crimes committed in Syria (IIIM), Iraq (UNITAD) and Myanmar (IIMM). Established as a compromise solution in the paralysis of international criminal jurisdictions, these essentially overlapping entities have been depicted as a ‘new generation’ of UN investigative mechanisms. While non-judicial in nature, they depart indeed from traditional commissions of inquiry in several respects due to their increased criminal or ‘quasi-prosecutorial’ character. After clarifying their legal basis and different mandating authorities, a comparative institutional analysis is thus carried out in order to ascertain whether these ‘mechanisms’ can be said to effectively represent a new institutional model. Through an in-depth assessment of their mandates, the thesis is also intended to outline both the strengths and the criticalities of these organs. Given their aim to facilitate criminal proceedings by sharing information and case files, it is suggested that more attention shall be paid to the position of the person under investigation. To this end, some proposals are made in order to enhance the mechanisms’ frameworks, especially from the angle of procedural safeguards. As a third aspect, the cooperation with judicial authorities is explored, in order to shed light on the actors involved, the relevant legal instruments and the possible obstacles, in particular from a human rights perspective. Ultimately, drawing from the detected issues, the thesis seeks to identify some lessons learned which could be taken into account in case of creation of new ad hoc investigative mechanisms or of a permanent institution of this kind.

Estudio político-criminal y dogmático sobre los delitos de financiación ilegal de partidos políticos

En el año 2012, el legislador español modificó el artículo 31 bis CP de modo que los partidos políticos quedaban sometidos al régimen de responsabilidad penal previsto para las personas jurídicas, tras haber sido excluidos del mismo en el año 2010. Tres años más tarde, en 2015, fruto del Plan de Regeneración Democrática del Partido Popular, se aprobó la última reforma al sistema de financiación de los partidos políticos, en la que se prohibieron las donaciones procedentes de personas jurídicas o se limitó la cantidad máxima donada por una persona física a 50.000 euros anuales. Ese mismo año 2015, se introdujeron en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico los delitos de financiación ilegal de los partidos políticos. Este conjunto de reformas dibujó un panorama completamente renovado en el ámbito de la financiación ilícita de las formaciones políticas. Así pues, el presente trabajo constituye un estudio omnicomprensivo en el que se busca analizar el fenómeno de la financiación ilegal de los partidos políticos en su conjunto, desde la regulación administrativa de la financiación de las formaciones políticas, hasta los nuevos tipos penales de financiación ilegal y la compleja aplicación del régimen de responsabilidad criminal de las personas jurídicas a las organizaciones partidistas. En este sentido, nuestro fin último ha sido aportar las claves interpretativas necesarias para que los operadores jurídicos puedan hacer frente a los distintos supuestos de financiación ilegal de los partidos políticos.

Fondamento e limiti costituzionali del potere punitivo nel sistema di legalità integrata

La ricerca affronta la questione della punizione nella prospettiva del diritto costituzionale nazionale integrata con quella del diritto europeo dei diritti dell’uomo. Nella Parte I è sostenuta la tesi secondo cui la trasformazione della Costituzione penale avviata sotto l’influsso della giurisprudenza CEDU rappresenta complessivamente un avanzamento nel processo di costituzionalizzazione del potere punitivo. Questa conclusione è supportata attraverso un confronto della filosofia costituzionale classica sulla punizione con i diversi approcci interpretativi alla Costituzione penale sviluppati durante il XX secolo (approcci tradizionale, costituzionalistico ed EDU). Nella Parte II è invece sostenuta la tesi secondo cui, nonostante gli effetti positivi dell’armonizzazione sovranazionale, lo statuto costituzionale della punizione dovrebbe comunque rimanere formalmente autonomo dal diritto EDU. Non solo, infatti, nessun paradigma dei rapporti interordinamentali finora sviluppato può giustificarne un’integrazione totale, ma essa rischierebbe anche di diminuire la normatività dell’aspetto sociale della Costituzione penale, già ipocostituzionalizzato rispetto a quello liberale. Nella Conclusione sono quindi sviluppati gli elementi fondamentali di un approccio interpretativo alternativo alla Costituzione penale che risponda meglio di quelli esistenti alle esigenze sia di garantire la massima costituzionalizzazione della punizione sia di facilitare l’integrazione sovranazionale. In base a un simile approccio costituzionalmente fondato, sostanzialista, rights-based e inclusivo di tutte le ideologie costituenti, la Costituzione potrebbe essere letta nel senso di prevedere un modello di disciplina unitario per tutte le forme di esercizio del potere punitivo (salvo quello disciplinare, distinguibile sotto l’aspetto istituzionale) caratterizzato da: una riserva di legge a intensità variabile; uno scrutinio stretto della Corte sulla giustificabilità costituzionale della pena; l’estensione dell’ambito di applicazione dei principi di colpevolezza e rieducazione; un pieno sviluppo degli aspetti di garanzia collettiva dei classici principi costituzionalpenalistici (obblighi di tutela penale e garanzia dell’effettiva collocazione della pena in capo al soggetto colpevole), nonché derivabili dall’art. 3 Cost. (proporzionalità della pena alle condizioni materiali del soggetto punito).

Emotions in legal decisions: the construction of objective narratives in Italian criminal trials

Drawing on ethnographic data collected in Italian courts and prosecution offices, this dissertation offers new perspectives on legal decision-making by highlighting the importance of emotions for constructing and evaluating legal narratives. Focusing on criminal cases, it describes and dissects how judges and prosecutors use emotions in reflection and action tied to lay narratives and legal constraints. The analysis shows that legal professionals engage in different types of emotional dynamics when dealing with stories; first, they develop gut feelings, which are either endorsed or kept at distance by means of emotional reflexivity, to comply with legal ideals of objectivity and impartiality. Second, empathy emerges as a crucial tool to direct the interaction with lay people and to interpret legal prerequisites, such as credibility, and intent. Finally, the dissertation shows that lay stories lead legal professionals to become passionate and committed towards the correct application of the law, the restoration of the moral order, and the achievement of justice. In light of the empirical findings, this thesis strives to develop a theoretical understanding of legal decision-making as narrative work that includes emotional dynamics consistent with rational, objective action.