Theatre Systems Compared

This article is meant as a starting point in the process of researching how theatre systems influence the functioning of theatre. The notion “theatre system” is understood as the set of organisational relationships within and between the domains of production, distribution and reception of theatre. Because the hypothesis of the Project on European Theatre Systems (STEP) is that the differences in these organisational patterns at least partly determine the types of theatre offered to city populations and their use of the supply, the present article attempts to make a start with a comparison between the theatre systems in Aarhus (Denmark), Bern (Switzerland), Debrecen (Hungary), Groningen (The Netherlands), Maribor (Slovenia), Tartu (Estonia) and Tyneside (United Kingdom). One of the findings of this comparison is that the structures of financial support for theatre by the various authorities do not differ very strongly among the countries on the European continent. However, the so-called city theatres in Central and Eastern Europe seem to have a more dominant position than in the Western European countries. For smaller, independent theatre organisations this is the other way round. In addition, the position of Bern is remarkable, because of the exceptional number of venues and theatre performances in this city. In Debrecen and Maribor, cultural centres appear to play quite an important role in the theatre life of these cities.

Writing theatre history – The mainstream approach and alternatives

Main questions: 1. How to deal with the beginnings of theatre? 2. Do we have to consider a “second birth of theatre” in the Middle Ages? 3. What influences do media have on writing theatre histories?

Post-operative monitoring of free muscle transfers by Laser Doppler Imaging: A prospective study.

PURPOSE Despite different existing methods, monitoring of free muscle transfer is still challenging. In the current study we evaluated our clinical setting regarding monitoring of such tissues, using a recent microcirculation-imaging camera (EasyLDI) as an additional tool for detection of perfusion incompetency. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study was performed on seven patients with soft tissue defect, who underwent reconstruction with free gracilis muscle. Beside standard monitoring protocol (clinical assessment, temperature strips, and surface Doppler), hourly EasyLDI monitoring was performed for 48 hours. Thereby a baseline value (raised flap but connected to its vascular bundle) and an ischaemia perfusion value (completely resected flap) were measured at the same point. RESULTS The mean age of the patients, mean baseline value, ischaemia value perfusion were 48.00 ± 13.42 years, 49.31 ± 17.33 arbitrary perfusion units (APU), 9.87 ± 4.22 APU, respectively. The LDI measured values in six free muscle transfers were compatible with hourly standard monitoring protocol, and normalized LDI values significantly increased during time (P < 0.001, r = 0.412). One of the flaps required a return to theatre 17 hours after the operation, where an unsalvageable flap loss was detected. All normalized LDI values of this flap were under the ischaemia perfusion level and the trend was significantly descending during time (P < 0.001, r = -0.870). CONCLUSION Due to the capability of early detection of perfusion incompetency, LDI may be recommended as an additional post-operative monitoring device for free muscle flaps, for early detection of suspected failing flaps and for validation of other methods.

Hole in the Head: a Play, Accompanied by a Conspectus of Knowledge, Both Repressed and Researched, that Directly Influenced the Playwright in Her Development of a New Work

"Hole in the Head" is a play about a woman who wakes up. Maude wakes up in the first act, and in every subsequent scene she undergoes some form of physical or emotional awakening as characters walk in and out of her front door."Hole in the Head" is accompanied by an introduction that attempts to understand the interplay between creativity and academia through an analysis of theatre, feminist and queer theory, and science.

The songs, duetts, choruses, & c. in Fair Rosamond : a grand opera, in four acts ; performed, for the first time, at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, February 28th, 1837

the overture, and the whole of the music, by John Barnett

Comparative analysis of bilateral memoranda on anti-human trafficking cooperation between Thailand and three neighboring countries : what do the origin and the destination states agree upon?

In order to prevent, suppress and punish human trafficking, bilateral agreements between origin of victim countries and destination countries are crucial, because their cooperation involves cross-border activities such as repatriation of victims, extradition of criminals and information-sharing. This article analyzes three bilateral legal instruments between The Government of The Kingdom of Thailand and her three neighboring countries, namely The Royal Government of Cambodia, The Government of Lao People's Democratic Republic and The Government of The Union of Myanmar. The analysis will examine the legal status of the victim, the victim as witness in criminal proceedings, the victim protection programs, the recovery and restitution of damages, the process of repatriating the victim, and the prosecution of the criminal.

Sobre la Arquitectura en la definición del Paisaje

Comúnmente la Arquitectura se manifiesta en los edificios como un hecho de la realidad que tiene siempre carácter contemporáneo y ése debe ser el valor supremo de un arte que no distingue entre antiguo y moderno, por afectar al presente y ser contemporáneo como experiencia. Los objetos se insertan irremediablemente en su medio e incluso llegan a definirlo en ocasiones: así, arquitectura y paisaje, aparecerán a veces confundidos con diferencias difíciles de determinar. El término “paisaje” es relativamente moderno y se deriva de ciertas representaciones gráficas o pictóricas producidas en Occidente en época algo posterior al Renacimiento. No obstante, el hecho de que una palabra se pueda escribir o se cite no quiere decir que la realidad a la que responde no pueda existir, pues lo escrito es solamente un medio de expresión, y es obvio que existen otros quizá más antiguos y de idéntica importancia, pues la propia escritura no es más que el reflejo de un fenómeno que ya se ha producido con anterioridad. Parece así que el testimonio de la realidad viene dado por distintos contextos en lo que suele llamarse “cultura” de modo que las culturas pueden tener aspectos de gran interés mediante diferentes sistemas de expresión variados sin que eso tenga que pasar forzosamente por el filtro de un alfabeto y una escritura. A tenor de los primeros descubrimientos, parece que la cuestión de escribir tuvo originalmente un carácter de constatación de apunte contable y tampoco se puede establecer con certeza si algunos utilizaron la escritura como el so-porte adecuado para referir mitos o historias, pues la Arqueología no ha proporcionado sino testimonios fragmentarios; de lo que si está repleta sin duda la historia es de apuntes contables. Otra cuestión que suscita dudas es la propia definición de escritura, pues parece que los más antiguos modos de expresión escrita se reducen a pictogramas que resultan aún indescifrables. Lenguas y toponimia son también herramientas muy útiles para bucear en el pasado, pero aún así persisten dudas en las escrituras que pro-vienen de las representaciones primordiales: la propia escritura en sus orígenes parece alimentarse de las propias intuiciones inmediatas de la representación, algo que evolucionaría representando esa realidad urgente e inmediata del control o el abastecimiento que luego se convertirían en los fragmentos de texto que han podido conservarse. Es notorio, sin embargo, que ese conjunto enorme de convenios gráficos estaba sujeto a la palabra y la desaparición de las culturas determinó también la desaparición consecuente de sus lenguas, y esos signos - fueran o no escritura - han pasado definitivamente a las zonas oscuras del conocimiento. Escribir supone también disponer de capacidad de abstracción gráfica que diferencie la palabra y la cosa, y es posible que la razón que llevara a ese descubrimiento fuera simplemente el de una economía de signos, pues escritura y lenguaje son limitados por definición, mientras que las cosas del mundo son innumerables: ningún idioma contiene todas las palabras para describir todo lo que puede aparecer. Aparentemente, ese el motivo por el cual existe un localismo – un término específico que refiere algo que existe en un lugar y no en otros - en lo que se refiere a dar el nombre a la cosa y también fuente de paradigma entre los pueblos que se consideran primitivos y los que se consideran civilizados. Debe tenerse en cuenta también que esa transposición se da en ambos sentidos, de modo que las culturas más aisladas también incorporan conceptos que carecen de una explicación racional consistente. Las mitologías son así eternas, pues sirven para explicar realidades que carecen de un entendimiento alcanzable y está también bastante claro que los lenguajes resultan ser un enigma, como realidad autónoma que queda en-cerrada y se explica en sí misma. Parece también que los primeros en escribir las consonantes aisladas fueron los pueblos semíticos occidentales de las orillas del Mediterráneo, pueblos que crearon un alfabeto silábico que llegó a ser utilizado incluso por los tartesios en el sur de la península ibérica como el primer alfabeto de toda Europa occidental. Resulta patente que el término “paisaje” se ha nutrido siempre de representaciones, bien escritas o artísticas, pero queda también claro que esas representaciones se suponen derivadas de la creencia en una idea de paisaje como algo que se ve representado en sí mismo, es decir, como la imagen de una realidad externa situada fuera del individuo. Eso es un hecho trascendente, pues el paisaje requiere lejanía de la cosa, de modo que el actor – aún sabiéndose inserto en su paisaje – es incapaz de percibirlo desde dentro. En el paisaje ocurre igual que en un teatro o en una representación: los actores son conscientes de su papel y su posible cometido, pero no son los que realmente pueden disfrutar de la eficacia o de la propia presencia de la obra, pues forman parte de ella. La idea de paisaje proviene de una lectura externa a la de los propios protagonistas del drama, de modo que si quieren ser un crítico del paisaje se debe abandonar la representación para mirar el espectáculo desde una distancia adecuada, al fin y a cabo externa. De ese modo, aparece la primera constatación del hecho del paisaje como una realidad construida por objetos y personajes, pero, sobre todo, es una realidad construida por miradas. Llama también la atención otorgada en las lecturas de los especialistas hacia esa referencia externa - artística si se quiere - sobre el término “paisaje”, de modo que la bibliografía no especializada sobre el particular siempre acaba en tratados de pintura o poesía. Parece sin embargo que el hombre y sus paisajes son realidades indisolubles desde la propia aparición de la especie, de modo que llevar la cuestión hacia términos exclusivamente esteticistas parece una posición parcial. Hombre y medio han formado siempre una sola unidad, aunque esa unidad se haya convertido en determinados casos en sinónimo de depredación y destrozo. Sin embargo, esa destrucción crea igualmente un paisaje como desolación que es resultado del propio quehacer del hombre: elementos que también poseen un contenido sustancial de memoria en los paisajes industriales como un momento de la Historia previo a la automatización y a la globalización de la vida actuales. Quizá el concepto más interesante desde el punto de vista teórico sea precisamente el de esa cualidad del paisaje como mirada, algo externo producido por el contemplador en un momento ajeno a la pertenencia, una mirada que no es tan sólo estética sino comprensiva, gozosa, activa o analítica - pues existen tantas maneras de mirar como sujetos - sin que pueda definirse con precisión esa contemplación más que en términos que alcanzan la propia individualidad. En términos poéticos, también podría establecerse como ese conjunto de miradas individuales crean también una estructura que hace que ese paisaje se valore y se comprenda, de modo que desde ese punto de vista ese paisaje supone una creación colectiva. Con respeto o como depredador, el hombre se ha instalado en su medio, y al hacerlo, ha dejado huellas dentro del propio paisaje que hacen que tome una determinada significación. Naturalmente, existe una teoría que distingue entre “país” y “paisaje”, asumiendo para el primero la noción exclusiva de territorio en la cual el hombre no tiene papel estético alguno. He intentado muchas veces comprender esa posición, sin acabar de entender el planteamiento que la sustenta: parece que la visión de la cosa estará siempre humanizada, aún en las zonas “vírgenes” o intactas, pues la propia visión hace que el objeto se modifique en su propia unidad perceptiva, creando una curiosa indeterminación que lleva a los conocidos equívocos entre imagen real y representación. Efectivamente, la visión de la cosa requiere de una cultura y unos medios que la informan, de modo que un texto, una pintura, una descripción o una fotografía quedarán ya humanizadas por el propio hecho de ser informadas, pues ello otorga una forma a priori. De ese modo, el paisaje figura inscrito en una función que establece tanto aspectos de un paisaje posible como aspectos del paisaje descrito y solamente podrá hablarse sobre la potencialidad del estado final de ese paisaje y nada del propio paisaje en sí, mientras ese paisaje no quede humanizado por el propio observador. Esta cuestión obliga a elegir una definición de paisaje alejada de presupuestos esteticistas para acercarla a los puramente culturales, de modo que no existe otra vía para la investigación que contemplar esa realidad física en función de las coordenadas del hombre que la habita, dotada del contenido correspondiente a esa revelación. Lejos de las posiciones de la geomorfología, el término “paisaje” implicará así unas condiciones determinadas de contemplación por parte de un sujeto por el cual el espectáculo queda humanizado en dicho acto.Cabe pensar también si no es cierto que todos los paisajes requieren de esa condición humanizada, pues aunque no estén habitados están siempre ocupados por esa mirada que los habita, al igual que un escenario sin público que carece de vigencia. A partir de ahí se sitúan las coordenadas en donde este trabajo configura la presencia de la arquitectura en la definición del paisaje, una premisa que parece ya venir otorgada desde el principio, pues esa misma mirada del espectador ya está dotando de un sentido de orden y jerarquía a la contemplación, unas cualidades que están en la base de toda actividad arquitectónica, De hecho la propia definición de “monumento natural” - en si misma una contradicción – expresa ese conflicto, dotado de un fenómeno de admiración y solape entre cultura y naturaleza, como conceptos enfrentados desde su origen. La conclusión sobre el dilema propuesta en la tesis no ha sido otra que suponer que esas dos realidades que son la cultura y el paisaje se han solapado desde el principio de los tiempos del hombre formando un binomio indeslindable. Se ha dicho antes que el proceso de invasión del territorio por el hombre es significativo, y esa significación es la que origina una creación autónoma que se aísla como un concepto abstracto de los entes naturales, tomándolos como material de trabajo, y estableciendo una oposición conceptual en la realidad perforada e interpretada por el hombre que viene a oponerse a lo que supone la caja cerrada e ignota del enigma del mundo. La cuestión de la significación del hombre sobre el territorio se subsume en la creación de unos productos que permanecen y que son testimonio de la propia cultura, de forma que la cantidad de rastro que el hombre deja sobre el territorio contribuye en mayor medida a la cualificación del paisaje como concepto. Eso lleva a establecer que cualquier paisaje - por el mero hecho de serlo y ser definido así – es ya cultural, puesto que está configurado por los productos de la cultura. Las palabras que puedan quedar encerradas en las piedras de los monumentos o de las ciudades son las de los hombres que trabajaron allí, y también las de los que las habitaron: más aún, el propio sentido del paisaje y su conservación vienen determinados por la presencia del hombre como único interprete de conceptos como ecología o conservación, algo que se pone de manifiesto también en la espantosa devastación que producen los fenómenos propios de la naturaleza. La historia natural, al igual que la vida, están conformadas por éxito y devastación, sin que uno y otra tengan especial preferencia, pues la preferencia se alimenta de otra clase de conceptos. La cuestión de atribuir valores morales al mundo natural es algo muy antiguo, y quizá sea la fuente o el manantial de las primeras religiones, una cuestión que se une a la indefectible noción de mortalidad que define la existencia del hombre frente a la inmanencia de la naturaleza. Esa propia naturaleza está dotada intuitivamente de un carácter “inocente” suponiendo que la inocencia es lo opuesto a la sabiduría. La cuestión es bien otra, ya que la naturaleza no posee ni siquiera algo que pueda definirse como “carácter”, en el sentido personal del término. La cuestión no cae, evidentemente, del lado de las definiciones o de las cualidades, sino del propio análisis de la realidad que el hombre va construyendo, destruyendo, embelleciendo o perjudicando para definir el territorio que habita, interponiendo a su manera recursos, instalaciones y en definitiva todos los testimonios posibles como principal manifestación de su esencia. Entre los artefactos que el hombre produce, uno de los más persistentes y más conspicuamente descritos es el de la arquitectura - entendida aquí en un sentido amplio - es decir, como el conjunto de modificaciones del espacio y del territorio. El espacio se puede modificar de muchos modos, pero en cualquiera de los casos constituye una de las huellas más características que el hombre establece como manifestación física de su propio ser discursivo. También la arquitectura ha demostrado ser una de los fenómenos más persistentes, incluso más que la propia lengua que la origina en su discurso primero antes que pueda ac-cederse a una idea sobre la conformación del material. Es paradigmático que el episodio descrito sobre la Torre de Babel en la Biblia la cuestión de la ambición de los hombres frente a Dios, representada precisamente en una arquitectura, se asimile a la discusión sobre el lenguaje primordial. La cuestión no es baladí, pues el fenómeno de la creación es algo que se concede exclusivamente a los dioses, que por esa razón habitan los territorios a los que los hombres no pueden llegar; territorios de albergue en los que las mitologías sitúan a dioses y demonios, con amplios espacios intermedios donde situar a las divinidades menores, héroes o seres híbridos en los que la coyunda de los dioses con los humanos produce sujetos que alivian el sentido de la mortalidad. El comentario del Génesis también concede un valor a la técnica, al mito de Prometeo y al fuego como creador de excelencia. Frente al progreso prometeico, se postula el valor divino, y la única forma posible de paliar ese progreso es la confusión del lenguaje, pues eso será lo que produzca la dispersión y la falta de acuerdo. La cuestión también puede explicar esa afición tan común por lo canónico en arquitectura que se mantiene a lo largo de grandes períodos, al igual que una gran máquina de inercia. Parece que los conceptos primordiales de la arquitectura basados en elementos simples como el hito, el dintel, lo recto y lo curvo, la rampa o la escalera, y el uso distinto o cualificado que se otorga a la piedra, el ladrillo, la madera o el metal como componentes primordiales del material arquitectónico se haya mantenido a lo largo de muchos milenios sin apenas cambios, al igual que ocurre con las costumbres alimenticias que siguen una progresión ascendente a través de lo crudo, lo asado y lo cocido, hasta obtener distintos grados de refina-miento, pero que siempre se sustentan en la sensación primigenia. El descubrimiento de la arquitectura proviene de un cierto manejo de las dimensiones, y consiguientemente de la geometría. Pero la geometría es cosa abstracta al igual que el lenguaje, de modo que para poder realizar arquitectura se hace necesaria esa capacidad de abstracción primera que luego permite la realización de un dispositivo. La realidad y su número exhiben un divorcio, al igual que las cosas y sus nombres exhiben el suyo, y el análisis numérico es solamente una forma de ver la realidad, una forma rigurosa y exacta – aunque parcial - que solamente representa el modelo ideal al cual la realidad se aproxima en mayor o menor medida: esa aproximación matemática hace que el universo pueda condensarse parcialmente en números, al igual que la realidad puede condensarse en nombres, pero ni el nombre ni el número reflejarán el mundo en toda su complejidad. El número es quizá solamente un medio de describir las cosas, como lo serían las formas puras que responden a una configuración matemática que pueda producirse en teoría en cualquier parte del Universo. Sin embargo, para el ejercicio de la arquitectura es preciso acudir a esa simplificación que exige la visión abstracta del plano como una sección cierta realidad como un corte abstracto del elemento considerado. Con su traza o sin ella, con la propia expresión matemática que lo describa o sin precisarla, esa intuición del plano como elemento generador del espacio es anterior a aquella expresión, al igual que el habla fue anterior a la escritura, pues solamente se produjo a través de ella y como refuerzo y sustituto de la memoria. Existen así abstracciones de la memoria que aparecen derivadas de los signos de la naturaleza aparecidos solamente de forma eventual y fragmentaría: así ocurre con la línea, el cuadrado y el círculo, formas iniciales y abstractas sonsacadas en cierta medida de la observación que dan origen a los primeros signos de la arquitectura primordial, de modo que cuadrados y círculos, elevados a prismas y superficies esféricas o esferoides aparecen en tumbas y edificios elementales de los primeros tiempos mediante una geometría primordial que se superpone al paisaje en el que se inserta. Es cierto también que esas formas se encuentran ya aproximadas en objetos que se encuentran en el medio físico, líneas en extremidades, ramas y miembros; ángulos rectos en algunos cristales que se observan mediante corte o formas circulares en astros y cráteres, pero esa realidad solamente presenta su forma aproximada y no su abstracción pura, de igual modo que el jeroglífico propondrá al ave rapaz para representar la idea de vigilancia y la buena vista, o incluso que la imagen del propio ojo sustituya la idea del Dios que todo lo ve en las culturas anti-guas. La elección fue resuelta, después de muchos intentos y aproximaciones, con la adopción del ángulo recto como un artificio fácil para el replanteo a través del triángulo sagrado 3:4:5 que ya se utilizó para construir las pirámides de Egipto, y que dio origen también a la mayor parte del urbanismo antiguo, coexistiendo con la forma circular primordial en el tipo denominado “tholo”. Aquella trama cuadrangular era uno de los patrones de relleno del espacio más comunes y compactos, y esa fue probablemente la razón por la que en tiempos muy posteriores fuera adoptada como una forma eficaz permanente de organización frente al desorden topológico que procura el conjunto de asociación de plantas circulares. Otra cuestión paradigmática es que esos conceptos primordiales e ignotos - que convergen en el mismo origen de las civilizaciones - se conviertan luego en algo canónico, a través del uso. El canon en sí mismo es algo ideal, como una norma aplicable a objetos de una realidad que ha sido creada solamente como indicio del ca-non, algo abstracto que tiene proporciones estrictas que son siempre las mismas y no obedece a criterios racionales: será absurdo sin embargo buscar el canon griego entre los templos de época como algunos lo hicieron, pues los edificios solamente se aproximan a los ejemplos canónicos y por esa razón se habla del “dórico del Partenón” que es diferente del de Egina o del de Paestum, siendo todos ellos evidentemente dóricos. Sin embargo, esa idea resulta útil al tratadista, al teórico de la arquitectura y al historiador, aun-que solamente refleje una vaga idea de lo que sucede más allá del tratado. Otra cuestión es la sutileza de los ejemplos de arquitectura, y del mismo modo que los cuerpos de los seres vivos jamás son simétricos, aunque respondan a un diseño simétrico general derivado de las condiciones de la división celular, los edificios supuestamente canónicos en los que los especialistas se inspiraron para definir los órdenes clásicos no disponen de esa simetría modular exacta, sino que adaptan un modelo general al lugar siempre cambiante del emplazamiento, es decir, se adaptan con habilidad a la vez que configuran el paisaje en el que se insertan. La luz de los distintos intercolumnios del Partenón es ligeramente distinta, aunque guarde un evidente sentido de simetría axial, de manera que aquellos “órdenes” que formaron la Teoría de la Arquitectura no son más que una bella interpretación sectorial de la arquitectura antigua elaborada por los tratadistas del Renacimiento y, posteriormente, por los neoclásicos. Parece, sin embargo, que ese ansia por el canon como claridad de lenguaje es algo consustancial al desarrollo de la arquitectura, una lingua franca que tiende a evitar la dispersión producida entre los mortales por los dioses antiguos, de modo que si no era posible llegar al cielo de los dioses se procuró que el lenguaje de la Tierra fuera al menos inteligible para poder entenderse entre los hombres. Parece que la estructura del poder siempre requirió de un determinado nivel de organización, y también que las instrucciones se entendieran con claridad: parece que en nuestros tiempos esos antiguos cánones se han sustituido por la obediencia a normas abstractas, dictadas por instituciones también algo abstractas y que tienen nombres divertidos compuestos por siglas, aunque no se conozca bien su virtud. El canon actual está constituido por “normas” que dejan tranquilos a algunos, aunque parece quizá que todo ese entramado formal que sirve como anestesia para el cuerpo social procura también la destrucción de los bosques en formas de montañas ingentes de papel burocrático. Durante muchos siglos las normas fueron otras, en la forma de un canon del cual nadie podía escapar: aún así, mediante la utilización de cánones o sin ellos, la arquitectura prosperó en la civilización desde los primeros refugios cavernarios o los abrigos primigenios y de ese modo fue configurando la realidad, es decir, el paisaje. Como antes se dijo, ese es un viaje de ida y vuelta en el cual ambos se confundían y subsumían: el manejo de las formas y lenguajes de la arquitectura posibilitaría con el tiempo la distinción entre el campo en donde reina el caos y la ciudad, en donde reina teóricamente el orden, creando un divorcio que duraría milenios y que aún persiste. Esa oposición generaría también una forma de paisaje y una serie de usos simbólicos y sagrados de los elementos de la arquitectura - como son puertas y murallas - que se han mantenido conceptualmente aunque hoy las ciudades ya no posean murallas físicas, ni puertas que se cierran con la llegada de la noche. En ese sentido, la arquitectura ha podido definir el paisaje, entendiendo la arquitectura no solamente como los edificios en sí, sino como el hecho de la manifestación del hombre sobre el territorio, de modo que no podrá hablarse de paisaje sin su arquitectura, del mismo modo que no puede hablarse de paisaje sin hombres. Por esta razón, la Tesis habla sobre Arquitectura y Paisaje, pero más particularmente sobre el hecho de la arquitectura en la definición del paisaje, es decir, de como los hechos arquitectónicos van a determinar o no la cualidad y la calificación de un paisaje. Deberá partirse en primer lugar de una definición de lo que se entiende y se ha entendido comúnmente por paisaje: igualmente, y habida cuenta del contexto en el que sitúa el propio trabajo de tesis, la cuestión solamente se circunscribirá a lo que se entiende como cultura occidental, pues el desarrollo de la civilización presenta siempre un color local que hace que el análisis de un fenómeno de esta envergadura tenga distintas connotaciones en las distintas áreas de civilización. De igual modo, y habida cuenta también que el paisaje se construye a través de todas las manifestaciones culturales, se hará a veces necesario indagar en otras disciplinas no arquitectónicas para comprender el alcance de algunos casos en los cuales los restos arquitectónicos han desaparecido, o en los que subsisten escasas trazas. Una definición tan amplia de la Arquitectura llevaría a escribir un relato sobre toda la cultura occidental y por ese motivo solamente se han esbozado ideas sobre la aparición de esos signos sobre el paisaje basados en elementos antiguos y primigenios que se repiten con insistencia y van dando lugar al variado repertorio de la arquitectura occidental cómo conformación de ideas sobre el me-dio y sobre el mundo que se percibe y se habita. ABSTRACT About Architecture in defining Landscape. Abstract Architecture is commonly manifested in buildings as a fact of reality that has always a contemporary character and that should be the highest value of an art that does not distinguish between ancient and modern, to affect the present and be contemporary as experience. Objects are inserted irremediably in their midst and even sometimes come to define it: thus, architecture and landscape, appear sometimes confused with differences difficult to determine. However, the term "landscape" is relatively modern and is derived from certain graphical or pictorial representations produced in the West in some subsequent period to the Renaissance. The fact that a word can be written or quoting does not mean that the reality that can not be answered, because the writing is only a mean of expression, and it is obvious that there are other and perhaps older equally important, because the writing itself is nothing more than the reflection of a phenomenon that has occurred before. It thus appears that the testimony of reality is given by different contexts in what is called "culture", so that cultures can have aspects of great interest by many different expression systems without this necessarily have to pass through the filter of alphabet and writing. Under the initial findings, it appears that the question of writing originally had a character and finding accounting entries, and it can not be established with certainty whether some used writing as the support appropriate to refer myths or stories, because archaeology has provided only fragmentary evidence. Another issue that raises questions is what can properly be defined as writing, it seems that the oldest modes are reduced to writing pictograms are still indecipherable. Languages and place names are also very useful tools for diving in the past, but still questions remain in the scriptures that come from the primordial representations: either it is very well defined what the own writing in its origins: the beginnings seem to feed on immediate intuitions of representation, which would evolve representing reality that urgent and immediate control or supply which is then inherited into fragments. It is noteworthy, however, that this huge set of graphics agreements was subject to the word and the disappearance of cultures determined also the consequent disappearance of their languages, and those signs - whether or not they write - have passed definitively to dark areas of knowledge. Writings supposed also the capacity of abstraction graph differentiates the word and the thing, and it is possible that the reason to carry this discovery was simply that of an economy of signs, for writing and language are limited by definition, while the things of the world are innumerable: no language contains all words to describe all that may appear. Apparently, that's why there is a localism - a specific term that refers to something that exists in one place and not in others - in regards to name the thing and also the source of paradigm among peoples are considered primitive and civilized. It should be noted also that transposition occurs in both directions, so that the most isolated cultures also incorporate concepts that lack a consistent rational explanation. Mythologies are eternal and therefore serve to explain realities that lack an understanding achievable and also pretty clear that languages happen to be an enigma, as an autonomous reality that is enclosed and explains itself. It also seems that the first to write consonants were isolated western Semitic peoples from the shores of the Mediterranean, peoples who created a syllabic alphabet came to be used even by tartesios in southern Iberia as the first alphabet in Western Europe. It is clear that the term "landscape" has always nurtured representations, either written or artis-tic, but it is also clear that these representations are assumed arising from belief in an idea of landscape as something that is represented in itself, as the image of a reality external located outside the individual. That is an important fact because the landscape requires remoteness of the thing, so that the actor - even knowing insert in landscape - is unable to perceive from within. The landscape is just as in a theatre or a performance: the actors are aware of their role and their possible role, but they are not the ones who can really enjoy the efficiency or the presence of the work itself, as part of it. The idea comes from an external landscape reading the principles of players in the drama, so if you want to be a critic of the landscape should leave the actual representation to watch the spectacle from a safe distance, finally external. Thus, the first finding of fact of the landscape appears as a reality constructed by objects and characters, but above all, a reality constructed by looks. Also noteworthy given the readings of specialists to the external reference - art if it could be - on the term "landscape", so no specialized literature on the subject always ends in treatises on painting or poetry. It seems however that the man and his landscapes are inseparable realities from the very onset of the species, so bring the issue into terms exclusively aesthetics seems a partial position. Man and environment have always been a single unit, but that unit has become synonymous with certain cases predation and destruction. Nevertheless, this destruction also creates a landscape as desolation that results from proper task of man elements that also have substantial contents of memory in industrial landscapes as a time of pre-automation history and globalization of current life. Perhaps the most interesting from a theoretical point of view is precisely that quality of landscape as something external produced by the viewer in a strange time of membership, a look that is not only aesthetic but sympathetic, joyful, active concept or analytical - because there are so many ways to look as subjects - it may not be precisely defined that contemplation rather than in terms that reach one's individuality. In poetic terms, it could also be set as the set of individual gazes also create a structure that makes this landscape is valued and understood, so from that point of view that landscape is a collective creation. With respect or as a predator, man has settled in his environment and in doing so has left traces in the landscape itself that make take a certain significance. Naturally, there is a theory that distinguishes what is "home" and what is "nature" providing for the first notion of the exclusive territory in which man has no aesthetic role. I tried many times to understand this position, without understanding the approach that supports: it seems that the vision of the thing is always humane, even in the "virgin" or untouched areas, as the vision itself makes the object modified in its own perceptual unit, creating a curious indeterminacy leading to the known misunderstandings between real image and representation. Indeed, the vision of the thing requires a culture and means that the report, so that a text, a picture, a description or photograph will be humanized by the very fact of being informed, as this provides a way a priori. Thus, the landscape provides a function that sets both aspects of a potential landscape as described aspects of the landscape and can only talk about the potential of the final state of the landscape, while the landscape remains humanized by the observer himself. This question forces to choose a definition of remote landscape budgets purely cultural, so there is another way for research to contemplate that physical reality in terms of the coordinates of the man who inhabits gifted content corresponding to that revelation. Far from the positions of the geomorphology, the term "landscape" and involve a certain condition by contemplation of a subject for which the show is humanized in the act. It should also consider, in the light of the above, if it is not true that all landscapes require that humanized condition, because although they are not inhabited they are always occupied by the look that dwells, like a stage without audience produces no consistent effect. From there the coordinates where this work sets the presence of architecture in defining landscape, a premise which seems to come from the beginning given lie, because that same look is already giving the viewer a sense of order and hierarchy to contemplation, qualities that are at the basis of all architectural activity, in fact the very definition of "natural monument" - in itself a contradiction - expresses this conflict, which has a phenomenon of admiration and overlap between culture and nature as concepts faced since its inception. The conclusion on the dilemma proposed in the thesis has not been another to assume that these two realities are the culture and landscape have overlapped since the beginning of man time forming a pair. It has been said before that the process of invasion of the territory by man is significant, and that meaning is the originating autonomous creation that is isolated as an abstract concept of nature, taking them as working material, and establishing a conceptual opposition in reality and punched by the man who comes to oppose representing the closed and unknown to the enigma of the world interpreted. The question of the significance of the man on the land is subsumed in the creation of products that remain and are testimony of their own culture, so that the trace amount that the man leaves the territory contributes most to the qualification landscape as a concept. That brought into any landscape - by the mere fact of being and being well defined - is already cultural, as it is configured by culture products. The words that can be locked in the stones of the monuments or cities are those of the men who worked there, and also of those who inhabited: even more, the sense of the landscape itself and its conservation are determined by the presence of man as the sole interpreter of concepts such as ecology or conservation, something which becomes manifest also in the awful devastation that produce the phenomena of nature. The natural history, like life, are shaped by success and devastation without special preference, the preference is used for feeding on other kinds of concepts. The question of moral values attributed to the natural world is very ancient, and may be the source or the source of the first religions, an issue that joins the unfailing notion of mortality that defines the existence of man against immanence of nature. That nature is endowed intuitively an "innocent" character assuming that innocence is the opposite of wisdom. The other issue is well, since nature does not even have what is defined as "character" because that is something that serves to qualify beings, but not objects. The question does not fall clearly on the side of the definitions or qualities, but from the analysis of the reality that man is building, destroying or damaging to define the territory, interposing his way resources facilities and possible witness as the main manifestation of its essence. Among the artifacts that man produces one of the most persistent and most conspicuously disclosed is architecture as a way of modification of space and territory. The space can be modified in many ways, but in either case is one of the most characteristic traces that man establishes as a physical manifestation of his own discourse being. Architecture has also proven to be one of the most persistent phenomena, even more than their own language that originates in his speech first. The paradigm wrote in the episode described on the Tower of Babel in the Bible shows the question of ambition of men before God - represented precisely in architecture - is assimilated to the discussion about the primary language. The issue is not trivial, since the phenomenon of creation is something that is granted exclusively to the gods, for that reason inhabit the territories to which men can not reach; territories where the hostel located mythologies gods and demons, with large gaps where to place the minor deities, heroes or hybrid beings where the yoke of the gods with human subjects produces relieving sense of mortality. The commentary on Genesis also gives a value to the art, the myth of Prometheus and fire as creator of excellence. In front of promethean progress, divine value is postulated, and the only possible way to alleviate this progress is the confusion of language, because that is what will produce the dispersion and lack of agreement. The issue may also explain such a common passion for the canonical architecture maintained throughout long periods, like a great machine inertia. It seems that the main concepts of architecture based on simple elements like milestone, lintels, straight and curved stairs or ramps, or other qualified and used are granted to the stone, brick, wood or metal as the primary components of the architectural material maintained throughout many millennia are almost unchanged, as is the case with the eating habits that follow a progression through the raw, the cooked and roasted or fried until obtain different degrees of refinement, but always are based on the primal feeling. The discovery of the architecture comes from a management dimensions, and consequently the geometry. But the geometry is abstract thing like the language so that to make architecture that first absorption capacity which then allows the realization of a device is necessary. Reality and its number exhibit a divorce, like things and their names displayed his; numerical analysis is just one way of seeing reality, rigorous and accurate - though partial - only represents the ideal model to which reality is coming to a greater or lesser extent: the mathematical approach makes the universe can condense on numbers, like reality may condense on names, but neither the name nor the number will reflect in all its complexity. The number is only a means of describing things, such as the pure forms that match setup a mathematical theory that occurs anywhere in the universe. However, for the practice of architecture is necessary to go to the simplification that requires abstract view of a section plane of reality, as an abstract element considered cutting. With its trace or not, with the mathematical expression that describes what or without clarify, this intuition of the plane as a generator of space predates his own expression, like speech preceded the writing, which only occurred through it and as reinforcement and replacement of memory. There are abstractions of memory displayed on the signs of nature only on casual and fragmentary, such as line, square and circle: those initials and abstract forms located in abstraction give rise to the first signs of primordial architecture, so that squares and circles, lifting two prisms and spheroids or spherical surfaces appear in tombs and elementary buildings the first few times, and that primordial geometry overlaps the landscape in which it is inserted. It is also true that these forms are approximate objects found in the physical environment, limb lines, branches and limbs; straight in some crystals angles observed by cutting or circular in stars and craters forms, but only the approximate shape and not its abstraction, just as the hieroglyphic of a falcon to represent the idea of surveillance presents the good view, or even the image of the eye itself replace the idea of the all-seeing God. The election was resolved, after many attempts and approaches, with the adoption of the right angle as an easy trick for stake through the sacred triangle 3:4:5 already used to build the pyramids of Egypt, and also gave rise to most of the old urbanism tend coexist with the primary circular form type called "Tholo". That frame homer was one of the fill patterns of common and compact space, and that was probably the reason why in much later times was adopted as a permanent effective form of organization against the topological disorder that seeks the set of association circular plants. Another issue is that these paradigmatic and unknown primary concepts - that converge at the origin of civilizations - then become something canon, through use. The canon itself is something ideal, as a rule for objects of a reality that has been created only as an indication of the ca-non, something abstract that has strict proportions are always the same and not due to rational criteria: be absurd however seek the Greek canon among the temples of time as some did, because the buildings only approximate the canonical examples and for that reason we speak of "doric from Parthenon" which is different from Aegina or Paestum, being all clearly doric. However, this idea is useful to scholar, the architectural theorist and historian, although it reflects only a vague idea of what happens beyond the book. Another issue is the subtlety of the examples of architecture, just as the bodies of living beings are never symmetrical, even if they involve a general symmetrical design derived from the conditions of cell division, the supposedly canonical buildings where specialists were inspired to define the classical orders do not have that exact modular symmetry, but a general model adapted to the ever changing location of the site shaping the landscape in which they are inserted. The light of the various bays of the Parthenon is slightly different, but keep a clear sense of axial symmetry, so that those "orders" that formed the theory of architecture are just a beautiful sectoral interpretation of ancient architecture developed by writers of the Renaissance and later by neoclassical. It seems, however, that craving for clarity of language canon as is inherent to the development of architecture, a lingua franca that tends to avoid scattering among mortals by the ancient gods, so if it was not possible the heaven of the gods sought the language of the Earth was at least intelligible to be understood. Power structure has always required a certain level of organization, and the instructions are clearly understood: it seems that in our times these ancient canons were replaced by obedience to abstract rules, issued by institutions also somewhat abstract and have funny names made up acronym, although not well known virtue. The current canon consists of "rules" that leave some quiet, although it seems that maybe all that interweaves-do formally serving as anaesthesia for the social body also seeks the destruction of forests in forms of huge mountains of bureaucratic paper. For many centuries were other rules, in the form of a canon which no one could escape: still using royalties or without them, civilization flourished in architecture from the earliest cave shelters or shelters and the primordial reality was setting mode in landscape. As noted above, this is a return trip in which both confused and subsumed: the management of forms and languages of architecture over time would allow the distinction between the field where chaos reigns and city, where order reigns theoretically creating a divorce that lasted millennia and still persists. This opposition also generate a form of landscape and a series of symbolic and sacred uses of architectural elements - such as doors and walls - which have remained conceptually although today the cities no longer having physical walls or doors close during the night. In this sense, the architecture could define the landscape, architecture is not only understood as the buildings themselves, but the fact of the manifestation of the man on the premises, so you can not speak without his landscape architecture, the same so we can not speak of landscape without men. For this reason, the thesis discusses architecture and landscape, but more particularly to the fact of architecture in defining landscape, as the facts of architectural or not will determine the quality and qualification of a landscape. One should begin first a definition of what is understood and has been commonly understood by landscape: equally, and given the context in which it places the own thesis work, the issue only be limited to what is understood as western culture, for the development of civilization always has a local colour that makes the analysis of a phenomenon of this magnitude have different connotations in different areas of civilization. Similarly, and given also that the landscape is constructed through all cultural manifestations, will sometimes necessary to investigate other non-architectural disciplines to understand the scope of some cases in which the architectural remains have disappeared, or the remaining few traces. Such a broad definition of architecture take to write a story about all of Western culture and for this reason only been sketched ideas about the appearance of these signs on the landscape based on ancient and primitive elements are repeated insistently and leading the varied repertoire of Western architecture shaping ideas about how the media and the world is perceived and inhabited.

Effects of Climate Change on Coastal Evolution

Climate determines coastal morphology through sea level and coastal processes, which are mainly steered by wind waves except in tidal inlets. They manage to erode coasts and transport their sediments if available. Coastal morphodynamic is so the result of its dialectic answers and it witness of wave direction and the whole climate through cyclone latitudes. This paper tries to approach the long term coastal processes and the trends of sedimentary coasts answer

Effects of climate change on coastal evolution

Climate determines coastal morphology through sea level and coastal processes, which are mainly steered by wind waves except in tidal inlets. They manage to erode coasts and transport their sediments if available. Coastal morphodynamic is so the result of its dialectic answers and it witness of wave direction and the whole climate through cyclone latitudes

Changes in Petrophysical Properties of the Stone Surface due to Past Conservation Treatments in Archaeological Sites of Merida (Spain)

Petrophysical properties, such as porosity, permeability, density or anisotropy de-termine the alterability of stone surfaces from archaeological sites, and therefore, the future preservation of the material. Others, like superficial roughness or color, may point out changes due to alteration processes, natural or man-induced, for ex-ample, by conservation treatments. The application of conservation treatments may vary some of these properties forcing the stone surface to a re-adaptation to the new conditions, which could generate new processes of deterioration. In this study changes resulting from the application of consolidating and hydrophobic treatments on stone materials from the Roman Theatre (marble and granite) and the Mitreo’s House (mural painting and mosaics), both archaeological sites from Merida (Spain), are analyzed. The use of portable field devices allows us to perform analyses both on site and in la-boratory, comparing treated and untreated samples. Treatments consisted of syn-thetic resins, consolidating (such as tetraethoxysilane TEOS) and hydrophobic products. Results confirm that undesirable changes may occur, with consequences ranging from purely aesthetic variations to physical, chemical and mechanical damages. This also permits us to check limitations in the use of these techniques for the evaluation of conservation treatments.

El centro comercial : una teoría tipológica : claves para el reconocimiento de una arquitectura ignorada

Existe en el panorama edificado un patrimonio construido que se reconoce como Centro Comercial. Un conjunto entendido, en sentido genérico, como familia arquitectónica que tiene características propias y específicas que la identifican. El objeto de la presente tesis doctoral consiste en argumentar que este conjunto constituye un nuevo tipo en el panorama de las tipologías arquitectónicas. Un tipo con entidad propia, que se conecta a una forma diferente de entender la idea de modelo. Un concepto que va más allá de la consideración tradicional del término. Modelo virtual. Este tipo, que surge de una estructura teórica que hemos denominado teoría tipológica, se constituye en una herramienta más para el estudio y el desarrollo proyectual de los espacios arquitectónicos, tanto del propio Centro Comercial como del conjunto de la disciplina arquitectónica, como referencia legítima. El presente trabajo de tesis se inicia con un bloque introductorio denominado Método. Definimos en él una metodología que hemos llamado emocional. Trata de la oportunidad de la tesis. Del porqué de un título que recoge la palabra ignorada. Del interés que suscita el asunto en el contexto del momento presente. Oportunidad e interés en base a una vida profesional dedicada al mundo del Centro Comercial y a la importancia del patrimonio elegido como objeto de estudio. También ha sido un aliciente detectar como las planificaciones del territorio y de los ámbitos de las relaciones colectivas no han sido capaces de integrar un resultado satisfactorio. Quizás por no considerar la complejidad de sus muchas facetas. En consecuencia, el texto busca la esencia del Centro Comercial como soporte para la crítica de su impacto en los nuevos escenarios de relación que la sociedad y el entorno físico imponen. Ámbitos donde los mecanismos históricos del asociacionismo tradicional han dado paso a otros, como el Centro Comercial, de exaltación del individualismo, pero demandados por una sociedad que se identifica con ellos. Espacios que, con Galbraith, existen por de la perversidad intrínseca del binomio consumo-producción que inducen la perplejidad. Ésta pasa a formar parte de la esencia del nuevo espacio comercial, como quedó de manifiesto en el Congreso de Minnesota de 1997, sobre el Centro Comercial. Una sociedad que ha girado hacia el logro material en términos de culto, ocasionando creciente valor significante del consumo. Razón última de la humanidad al decir de Rem Koolhaas. Culto que desemboca en la urgencia de alcanzar niveles de estatus y de identificación con el grupo. Dos parámetros que marcan la relación con el otro. Relación de comparación que excita la necesidad de posesión de objetos que llevaban a recrear en el consumidor la ilusión de ser especiales, de no pasar desapercibidos. El producto de consumo, el objeto, se eleva a la consideración de valor social. En el Centro Comercial se venden valores. Marketing de valores. El deseo del individuo, no la necesidad, queda involucrado en el proceso. La oportunidad y el interés de este estudio surgen además para aclarar el significado de un espacio que sirve al consumidor y a su entorno. Un significado que alcanza sentido, entre otros, por la aparición de un nuevo contexto tras la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Suburbanización, automóvil, nivel de vida, un nuevo papel de la mujer. La Era del Consumo. Una era que genera la paradoja de un individuo con autodeterminación y autosuficiencia crecientes, en un mundo cada vez más condicionado y controlado por dinámicas de ofertas mediatizadas e ilimitadas. La arquitectura en este contexto ha de juzgarse por su relación con un hombre contemporáneo que camina hacia una progresiva excepcionalidad. Cerramos la presentación justificando el término ignorada que aparece en el Título de la Tesis. Subrayamos la escasa existencia de estudios estructurados que relacionen Centro Comercial y arquitectura. Realidad que se constata partiendo del libro de Pevsner, Historia de las Tipologías Arquitectónicas, de 1976. Analizamos también la aceptación que el Centro Comercial, valorado en algunos ámbitos como arquitectura populista. Primer Capítulo, los antecedentes. Se propone un recorrido histórico por la arquitectura comercial de todos los tiempos. El Documento busca concretar las características de la arquitectura comercial a lo largo de la historia para determinar relaciones entre ella y el Centro Comercial. Estas correspondencias van a permitir contestar la pregunta retórica que nos hacemos al inicio del Capítulo: ¿Es la arquitectura del Centro Comercial una arquitectura subsidiaria, o tiene personalidad propia independiente de la del mundo comercial? Con Zevi40, queremos dejar constancia que la relación arquitectura-historia es imprescindible en la tarea proyectual. Un análisis novedoso solo es posible desde la búsqueda de unas raíces auténticas. Así mismo, con Guy de Maupassant, estamos convencidos que “La arquitectura, a través de los siglos, ha tenido el privilegio de dar un símbolo a cada una de las épocas, de resumir con un pequeñísimo número de monumentos típicos, el modo de pensar, de soñar de una raza y de una civilización”. Este recorrido se inicia interpretando la arquitectura comercial minoica. Llegaremos, paso a paso, hasta el siglo XX, los grandes itinerarios comerciales y el Centro Comercial. Se descubren una serie de invariantes que permiten comparar y extraer conclusiones. Resulta novedoso constatar que el Centro Comercial nace para dar respuesta al hombre contemporáneo en su afán consumista. También lo es la rápida implantación y evolución del Centro Comercial en un corto periodo de sesenta años frente al ritmo sosegado de otras soluciones comerciales. Novedad es ver como el comercio y sus arquitecturas nacen abiertos, bajo tenderetes y el Centro Comercial se presenta cerrado. Así mismo, las referencias sacras constituyen un elemento de novedad para la reflexión, en un contexto materialista. Y tantas otras. En Minos, la óptica comercial ofrece otra visión de su legendaria cultura. ¿Palacio o plataforma logística?, gestión centralizada del intercambio, ¿vida pública y vida privada? Así, hasta llegar al siglo XIX. Sus las galerías y sus pasajes acristalados concebidos en primera instancia como medida de recomposición urbana. Espacio entendido desde lo público-privado, desde lo interior-exterior, desde el dentro-afuera, desde lo cerrado-abierto. Con los nuevos mercados de abastos, representan una revolución en el ámbito de la funcionalidad, de la máquina, de la gestión moderna y de las relaciones del ciudadano con la ciudad apoyado en base al intercambio de bienes de consumo. El Centro Comercial es heredero de esta transformación. El Gran Almacén, por otra parte, es el reflejo de otra gran revolución. La que va ligada a la producción y comercialización en masa, las comunicaciones, el precio fijo y el aumento del nivel de vida. El Centro Comercial reinterpreta estas situaciones insertándolas en un nuevo modelo de gestión. En el siglo XX, maestro en técnicas de venta, aparece el hipermercado. El Híper, con su carga de pedagogía, se incorpora al esquema orgánico del Centro Comercial. La tienda en si misma constituye la pieza base de dicho puzle orgánico. Es en esta época cuando la tienda empieza su despegue autónomo como arquitectura, aportando su experiencia. Tras ello, llegamos a las grandes rutas comerciales, que proponemos como metáfora del shopping. Cerramos el capítulo concluyendo con Eugenio Ferrer que “si establecemos una relación entre el espacio y el capitalismo, entonces podemos inferir que los espacios del consumo de masas (ECM) son configuraciones nuevas respecto al pasado (...), pero el sistema que lo introduce no lo es del todo”. Segundo Capítulo. Búsqueda de claves que permitan el reconocimiento del Centro Comercial. Llegados a este punto y con la perspectiva del tiempo cabe preguntarnos, ¿qué entendemos pues por Centro Comercial? ¿Cómo lo percibimos? Abordamos ahora el problema de la percepción del Centro Comercial y su significado. Además de constituirse en símbolo, referencia siempre presente, la eficacia del Shopping es una de las principales causas de su poder de atracción. El Centro Comercial resulta de la síntesis de la revolución del consumo y de la revolución de la gestión. Espacio eficaz del entretenimiento como destino. El usuario resuelve su vida cotidiana dentro de un hábitat que considera propio y que se entiende como el lugar hiperbólico de la transacción comercial. Espacio de la abundancia para el disfrute. Una arquitectura involucrada en esta eficacia. Su sentido del lugar no es otro que el Shopping, que se desenvuelve de forma análoga en todas partes. El hogar del consumidor. Las nuevas catedrales. Las catedrales del consumo. Destino místico. Lugar de peregrinación para el consumidor fervoroso. Espacio sagrado que integra al usuario en la cultura dominante. Cultura del consumo. Templos, donde el tiempo ha perdido su sentido. Paraíso. Un espacio donde la altura, la luz natural, la dimensión general refuerzan el carácter sacro de un espacio para una nueva religión laica. Un espacio seguro, protegido que nos acerca a ideas como la de útero materno, con su carga de calidez y de significación erótica aplicado al encuentro compra-comprador y, ligado a ello, la literatura especializada habla del Centro Comercial como nave espacial hiperesterilizada o de agujero negro que absorbe la energía cultural. Más allá, la simulación, donde se percibe un simulacro de ciudad. Simulacro coherente con todo lo que el Shopping desencadena a su alrededor. El lugar de los sueños, de la fantasía. Aquí los productos se han metamorfoseado en fetiches, en significados. Televisión tridimensional, donde el usuario actúa guiado por una pulsión similar al zapping. Espacio lúdico de la fascinación por comprar o de imaginar que se compra. Espacio de simulaciones que llevan a la ensoñación. Un nuevo lugar que sustituye al espacio cotidiano, con el señuelo de la protección, en un contexto imaginariamente público. Espacio de la hiperrealidad donde no se distingue la realidad de la fantasía, donde tras episodios de confusión y desconcierto, se borran las fronteras con lo imaginario. Espacio mágico, escenario del gran espectáculo del consumo, controlado milimétricamente, al modo de la visita a un gran monumento, que ha de sobrevivir a los tiempos para dar testimonio de nuestro momento. Un icono, un símbolo que transmite un mensaje, que solo el consumidor es capaz de interpretar. Una agitada mezcla, sin precedentes, de percepciones que hablan de perplejidad y asombro ante el fenómeno del Centro Comercial, su espacio y las reacciones del hombre contemporáneo. ¿Cuáles serían las claves que nos permitirían reconocer la calidad esencial de un Centro Comercial, en esta concurrencia de perplejidades? Primero, la función de servicio. Un espacio donde ocurren muchas más cosas que lo obvio, que la compra. Un edificio que se involucra con el entorno de la mano de lo inesperado, la sorpresa y las expectativas. Esta vocación de servicio conecta Centro Comercial y naturaleza arquitectónica. Función que sugiere percepciones ligadas a la experiencia de compra. Organismo que vive y late al unísono con su visitante, colocándose al servicio de sus necesidades, de su afán de consumo, del que vive. Segundo, la comunidad servida. El Centro comercial sirve a una sociedad concreta. La sociedad consumista. Una nueva sociedad que se identifica con el edificio desarrollando un sentido de comunidad al nivel de sus deseos. Esta comunidad que se configura a su alrededor, constituye el activo más poderoso para el éxito de su realidad cotidiana y de su futuro. Tercero, un compromiso de carácter holístico. La economía de la experiencia aplicada al afán consumista de una sociedad identificada con su Centro, da lugar a una experiencia holística planificada. Diseño emocional. Colaboración para el éxito de un conjunto de establecimientos comerciales que participan en la aventura espacio-comercial del Centro Comercial. Ellos son los inductores primarios del consumo. Pero esta colaboración tiene su culminación en la amplificación del mensaje, como un inmenso altavoz, que proviene de la unidad configurada por todos ellos. El reflejo de esta amplificación de mensajes, desde la poderosa unidad constituida, es el aumento de la rentabilidad, fin último de la operación. Cuarto, la forma a través de una identificación de carácter gestáltico. Desde la lectura gestáltica que hacemos de la unidad holística, se advierte una poderosa capacidad de comunicación del sistema con su contexto. Centro y entorno se tornan entonces cómplices que complementan sus realidades. El Centro Comercial, arquitectura estructurada como sistema se percibe –ha de percibirse- como forma unitaria que procede de una mirada de raíz gestáltica que continuamente la recompone desde una óptica espacial y física, ligada a la experiencia individual. Esta unidad formal, más allá de la forma real, se constituye en esencia de de su arquitectura. Quinto, el Centro Comercial como sistema. Un sistema soportado por la Teoría General de Sistemas. La consideración del Centro Comercial como sistema es consecuencia de su estructura holística. El todo no se comporta como la suma de las partes y estas no lo hacen como lo harían en solitario. De aquí surge la necesidad de diálogo permanente entre la comercialización –proceso de incorporación de partes- y su traducción al mundo del diseño –proceso de articular arquitectónicamente las partes. Como sistema así configurado, el Centro Comercial se inserta en el paradigma contemporáneo, lo que genera realidades duales que no son excluyentes y reacciones de perplejidad e incertidumbre que el sistema corrige con su capacidad de autorregulación. Aparece también el espectador cuántico, el visitante, el consumidor, que interactúa con el sistema. Desde las herramientas que nos aporta la idea de sistema complejo, afrontamos el Mix Comercial -en definitiva la eficaz localización de las piezas en orden a sus relaciones y al organismo resultante- y su incidencia en la arquitectura que estamos concibiendo. Una arquitectura impredecible por lo mutable, que se erige en reto de la operación y del diseñador. Diseño que, de la mano del concepto de sistema se convierte en herramienta a mayor gloria de la operación global. El debate del estilismo no será más que el resultado del análisis en busca del éxito de esta operación. Sexto, una arquitectura de la negociación. Negociación como mecanismo proyectual y como resultado. La solución de proyecto nunca resulta evidente en el Centro Comercial como consecuencia de lo imprevisible del propio proceso de configuración. Su concreción solo puede ser fruto del compromiso de todos los agentes por conseguir el objetivo de la operación. Esto se consigue desde el equilibrio de intereses. Comerciales y de diseño. Un compromiso con la negociación y una negociación íntimamente ligada a la coordinación. Séptimo, el espacio y el tiempo. El debate espacio-tiempo condiciona y estructura la percepción del Centro Comercial. Introducimos conceptos como cronotopo –el instante y el lugar donde ocurre algo- y paradoja –incoherencia de la relación causa efecto- que sitúan el vínculo entre el tiempo y el espacio del Centro Comercial en un contexto de Shopping. En el discurrir paralelo del tiempo histórico –el tiempo de fuera- y del tiempo interior, el de dentro del Centro Comercial –tiempo presente o intemporalidad-, se produce el triunfo social del Centro Comercial que se traduce en haber sabido resolver en el espacio y en el tiempo las paradojas postmodernas del hombre contemporáneo. Octavo, de lo global. Globalidad que no es ajena a lo local. Una arquitectura que insertada en la dinámica de una economía de ámbito mundial, refleja las contradicciones que ella impone, fundamentalmente en los procesos de inclusión y exclusión, afectando de manera decisiva al debate de lo local, que el Centro Comercial debe incorporar como herramienta ineludible de reconocimiento. Terminamos el capítulo segundo manifestando como estas ocho claves, asumidas en su conjunto, confirman que el Centro Comercial puede aparecer como un todo conceptual cohesionado, pasando a formar parte de una familia arquitectónica coherente, cuya estructura funcional somos capaces de establecer. El Capítulo Tercero presenta con detalle la figura del arquitecto Víctor Gruen, creador reconocido del moderno Centro Comercial. Presentamos su trayectoria profesional observando como las diferentes claves analizadas en capítulos anteriores van apareciendo de manera natural a lo largo de ella "Victor Gruen may well have been the most influential architect of the twentieth century." Malcolm Gladwell. The Terrazo Jungle. Fifty Years Ago, The Mall Was Born. America Never Would Be The Same. 2004. In The New Yorker. Hombre complejo, conflictivo. Las paradojas a lo largo de su carrera fueron notables. Sin embargo siempre apareció como un hombre recto. Garret Eckbo, reconocido paisajista y colaborador de Gruen en el Centro Comercial peatonal del Centro urbano de Fresno, California, se asombraba de que alguien como Gruen hubiese sido capaz de combinar cortesía y humanidad en la carrera de ratas (sic) en la que se convirtió el universo de la comercialización americana y mantener la integridad542. Philip Johnson, en 1962, ponderando las muchas habilidades de Gruen manifestó que no estaba seguro si alguno de ellos, arquitectos artistas, hubiera sido capaz de hacer lo que Gruen hizo. A más, sobre Gruen, manifestó lo siguiente: "... El va más allá de la creación de un bello edificio. En jugar con la gente y sugerir lo que tienen que hacer, es un maestro. Y obtiene buenos resultados como hace la escultura. El suyo es un arte cívico, un sentido cívico.... Él es capaz de sentarse y poner cosas juntas. No es pomposo ni vano. Yo no me reuniría con él para hablar del diseño (de edificios). Víctor siente que cuando se habla de diseño se está ignorando todo el contexto... Su arquitectura es poderosamente limpia, no vuela la fantasía. Pero cuando te haces con su complejidad, ves que has descubierto algo más allá del diseño.... No puedes decir que haya alguien como él. La arquitectura tiene la suerte de tenerle como arquitecto..." Philip Johnson. Article in Fortune Review. 1962. El Documento de tesis cierra la visión de Gruen realizando un recorrido por los diferentes capítulos de su libro esencial, Shopping Towns Usa: The Planning of Shopping Centers. Solo su índice resulta un monumento al proceso de gestación del Centro Comercial. El libro, aquí simplemente mostrado en su estructura básica como un silencioso testigo, es la referencia canónica los Centros Comerciales contemporáneos, desde su aparición. . El Cuarto Capítulo del Documento de tesis es una recapitulación del trabajo anterior, en el que se sintetizan los conceptos de función y estilo relacionados con el Centro Comercial, se define en qué consiste cada uno de ellos y como, a partir de ahí, podemos afirmar que nos encontramos ante un tipo arquitectónico nuevo en el panorama de la disciplina arquitectónica. Terminamos el Capítulo integrando el Centro Comercial con un cuerpo teórico de referencias que se remiten a un tipo arquitectónico concreto y particular, acogiendo su singularidad como fenómeno arquitectónico autónomo. Como Conclusión de la tesis, resultado de todo lo anterior es decir, como consecuencia de la integración de un torrente de percepciones e intuiciones en un cuerpo teórico de referencias, deducidas de la existencia de unas claves que estructuran y penetran la esencia del singular modelo estudiado, haciéndolo detectable y seductor, resultan las características de un tipo arquitectónico con entidad propia que ordena, orienta y supedita la realidad y la existencia de esta nueva arquitectura. Una arquitectura nunca antes definida como tal, en el panorama tipológico de la disciplina. Teoría tipológica para una nueva arquitectura, que hemos ido proponiendo a lo largo del trabajo y que es coherente con los diferentes parámetros que se han analizado. Un conjunto edificado que, desde el estudio de sus claves esenciales y de sus invariantes perceptibles, aparece ahora más cercano, más familiar. Tanto que es posible destilar desde este conocimiento cercano e íntimo, una síntesis útil como referencia proyectual y como referencia para las grandes cuestiones que preocupan al discurrir del debate arquitectónico y sus ideas. El debate de la disciplina. El objeto de esta tesis, que consistía en establecer que el conjunto edificado que conocemos como Centro Comercial se constituye en un nuevo tipo en el panorama de las tipologías arquitectónicas, entendido el Centro Comercial en sentido genérico como familia arquitectónica con características propias y específicas que la hacen autónoma y reconocible, queda a nuestro juicio argumentado y justificado. ABSTRACT Within the frame of the built heritage there is a construction that is recognized as Shopping Center. An ensemble understood as an architectural family with its own specific recognizable characteristics. This thesis aims to explain that this building complex constitutes a new type in the panorama of architectural typology. This typology, with its singular identity, is connected to a way of understanding the idea of the model beyond an orthodox conception of the term understood as virtual model. This typology comes from a theoretical structure that we called typological theory, and it serves as yet another tool to reference the study and development design of the architectural spaces. In this first section, the Method, we emotionally explore the opportunities of this thesis. Why this typology has been ignored and the interest this work has in the present moment. An opportunity and an interest explained from an experience of a life dedicated to the world of Shopping Centers. The text then introduces the need for a rigorous knowledge of the Shopping Center’s essence in order to understand its impact in the frame of a new society and a new physical environment. A frame time where the historical mechanisms of association of civic community have given way to other gathering spaces like the Shopping Center, which encourages individualism, but is demanded by a society that relates to them. Spaces that, according to Galbraith, are a result of the intrinsic perversity of the unstoppable movement of the wheel of consumption-production. A society that has turned to worship of material achievement. Worship that provokes the appearance of an increasing value of consumption, according to Koolhaas, the only goal of humanity. Worship that ends in the need to reach certain status levels in the plane of a permanent comparison where the need of possession excites the consumer and gives them the illusion of being special. The product of consumption rises up to consideration of social values, entering a dynamic of marketing values, not only objects, but the desire of the individual remains. The study appears also to clarify the meaning of a space that serves the consumer and its context. A meaning that makes sense with the appearance of the suburbanization, the massive utilization of the car, the increase of living standards and the new role of women in the society after the Second World War, giving rise to the Age of Consumption. A world now determined and controlled by media and unlimited offers, where it’s necessary to place them in the context of the ordinary. An architecture that has to be judged precisely for its relation with this specific contemporary man. This section ends justifying the term ignored that appears in the Title of the Thesis, considering it in relation with the lack of studies structured about the Shopping Center and its architecture, drawing from Pevsner's work, A history of building types, 1976. Finally, the Shopping Center is analyzed with the most critical of thoughts, which considers it as populist architecture. The First Chapter, Precedents, proposes an historical tour of the commercial architecture throughout history. The Document looks to place on record the characteristics of the commercial architecture to set the connection between them and the Mall itself. These correspondences are going to allow us to answer the rhetorical question: is it the architecture of the Shopping Center a subsidiary architecture, or does it have its own personality independent from that of the commercial world? The reason of this historical search, citing Bruno Zevi, is that it is indispensable to establish the relationship between architecture and history, understating that an analysis is only possible when researching for their roots. Moreover, according to Guy de Maupassant, we are sure that architecture has had the privilege, across the centuries, of symbolizing as it were each age(…), through the harmony of lines and the charm of ornamentation all the grace and grandeur of an epoch. This historical reading, inseparable from a consistent design action, begins interpreting the commercial architecture of the Minoan to the 20th Century. Though this analysis of the big commercial itineraries and the study of the Shopping Center itself. A reading where we have found a series of constants that make it possible to draw conclusions from this comparison. The Mall appears to give response to the needs of a consumerist society. Comparing to the calm pace of the evolution of other commercial solutions, it is relevant its fast implantation and evolution in a short period of sixty years. Though via different solutions, the commercial spaces are considered taking into account the public-private relation, the interior-exterior, the inside-out, the closed-opened. Through that, the 19th century galleries and the food markets represent a revolution in functionality, in the machine, the modern management and the relations of the citizen within the city. All of this, the Mall inheritor feels. Likewise, the Department Store is the reflection of another great revolution. Production and commercialization en-mass, communications, the fixed price and increase of the living standard. The Mall reinterprets these situations inserting them in a new model of management. Already in the 20th century Mall and mass technologies of sale, the hypermarket is enthusiastically incorporated into the configuration of this organic scheme, constituting the base of one of the models, the French, that will be highly developed in the European continent. The shop itself constitutes, on the other hand, the key piece that completes the puzzle of the Mall and is in this epoch when it starts taking off as architecture, has an autonomous character. After all this, finally, we come to the big commercial routes, which we propose as metaphor of the shopping. Citing Eugenio Ferrer we can conclude that “If we establish a relation between the space and the capitalism, then we can infer that the spaces of the consumption of masses (ECM) are new configurations with regard to the past (...), but the system that introduces it it is not completely” Now we arrive at this point and with the perspective of time it is necessary to ask us, what do we understand about the Shopping Center? How do we perceive it? The second Chapter approaches the problem of the perception of the Mall and from this it is possible to detect and to identify key drivers that orientate the architectural comprehension of the space. The efficiency of the Shopping Center is its main power of attraction. A world that has ensued from the synthesis of the revolution of consumption and management. An effective cavern-like place of entertainment where the user, the consumer, the postmodern man solves his daily life inside a considered habitat. The hyperbolic place of commercial transaction. An abundance of space, that makes us perceive it as destination of entertainment. An architecture has evolved this efficiency, where the sense of place is at one with the sense of the Shopping. The home of the consumer. The new cathedrals. The cathedral of consumption. The place of peregrination for the fervent consumer. A sacred space that integrates the user in the dominant culture. A temple, where time itself has stopped existing. In this paroxysm, an expression of the Garden of Eden or Paradise itself. A space where the height, the natural daylight and the spatial dimension reinforce the sacred character of a new lay religion. Another common perception is that of a protected area, which leads to metaphors and considerations that suggest the idea of maternal womb, with its weight of erotic meaning, referring to the encounter of the shopper making a purchase. The literature also tells us about its perception as a sterile space capsule, a black hole that absorbs all cultural energy. Likewise, a world simulation where a mock city is perceived at first instance. Consistent with all that shopping triggers inside. A city, a space conceived as a place of dreams, fantasy, where the products have been metamorphosed into fetishes. Entertaining a television, three-dimensional television, where the user acts guided by a drive similar to zapping. A play area where the latest fascination is in the act of buying. Space simulations that unite and transcend creating atmospheres that lead to reverie. A new space replacing the daily space with the lure of safe space in a public context. A hyper-reality space with reality and fantasy, where borders are erased with imaginary episodes of confusion and bewilderment, without distinction. The charm and fascination of a space that reads like magic. The magic of a space which is defined as stage extravaganza, the large theatre, the consumer surveys in the fine control mode in which you visit a national monument. The shopping center has to survive the times to be a testimony of our time. An icon, a symbol that conveys a message, the message reads ‘consumer’. In short, a Shopping Center is a mix of unprecedented insights that speak of a widespread phenomenon of bewilderment. Its space and the reactions of contemporary man unfold in it like a fish in water. What are the key aspects which allow us to recognize the essential quality of a shopping center in this concurrence of perplexities? First, we want to record a service function of space much deeper than the immediately obvious, i.e. a purchase occurs. A building that appears to be involved with the environment and its people from the hand of the unexpected circumstances; surprise and attention. And that, in turn, also involves the visitor beyond the purchase. This dedication to service closely links the mall with its architectural nature. It is not the function of a lifeless machine. It is a feature that suggests unsuspected perceptions linked to the purchase, which speaks of an organism that lives and breathes in unison with the visitor. Second, in addition to the vocation of service-oriented desire for consumption, the Mall environment serves a particular society - The consumer society. A new society which relates to building a sense of community developed to the level of their desires. This community also constitutes the most powerful asset to the success of the daily life of the Shopping Center. Third, we emphasize that the so called economy of the experience is combined with the consumer zeal of a company that is identified by the Shopping Center. It connects to form a holistic and planned experience. This experience takes shape in the entity that ensues from the premeditated association and synergy, in the sense of a collaboration for success. A set of concrete commercial and independent establishments, take part in the spatial and commercial adventure that is the Mall and they are the instigators of the consumption. This holistic behavior finds culmination in the amplification of a claim that becomes unitary, like an immense force that leads to an increased profitability to all the levels. Consummation is a reference of one human being overturned in an architecture assimilated into a legitimate, emotional design with stability. A holistic quality is born of the essence of the building - and by virtue of the Conditions of Alexander, Christopher Alexander, determines the system condition of the Shopping Center. Fourth, we propose to establish what character the Mall will form when joined with the concept of its typology. This is going to allow the architectural work to be formed. As a result of the holistic structure that we see, the Mall is perceived as a system whose parts have their own function, justifying their existence in the ecosystem. Across a gestalt there is a powerful capacity of communication between the system and its context. We visualize on the one that stands out our building, turning both, Center and environment, in accomplices of a few special relations who complement each other in his realities. This relationship within a complex and diverse environment gives the Mall a range of unique spatial perceptions, the result of disparate experiences, which because of its root origin of gestalt, are integrated into a unified and coordinated manner fully intelligible and organized. This is the final formal essence of the Shopping Center. We can conclude here that the Mall as architecture is a structured system and should be perceived as a unit both from a physical and spatial perspective as this is the essence of its architecture. Fifth, the Mall as a system. A system which is being supported by a broad theoretical corpus, the General Systems Theory, which offers sufficient methodology to descend into consideration and give an enlightened conclusion on the overall understanding of the Mall. Consideration of the Mall as a system is a result of its holistic structure. The whole does not behave like any of the parties and they do not behave the way they used to before belonging to the whole, because they inhibit many of their qualities to their advantage. It arises the need for an ongoing dialogue between marketing processes and its translation into the physical world, the design. The system generates multiple perceptions to be integrated into a body which is to be understood as unitary. As a system, the Mall is inserted into the contemporary paradigm, creating dual realities that are not exclusive and are reactions of uncertainty that the system be properly designed at all levels, faced with their ability to self-regulate. Likewise, considering the visitor, the customer, like the quantum spectator who interacts with the system permanently. Moreover, a complex system confronts us with the Commercial mix, the effective location of parts in order to relate to the body and its importance in the architecture we are conceiving. Unpredictable architecture, which stands as the challenge of the operation and the designer. Design that becomes the tool of the system to create success for the overall operation. The discussion of the styling is merely the result of analysis that also seeks the success of the system, i.e. the styling should send the right message for the environment to ensure its survival. Sixth, the idea of negotiation as an architecture project, a mechanism inherent to the status of the proposed system. The project solution is never evident at the Shopping Center because of the unpredictability of the process itself. It can only be the fruit of the commitment of all stakeholders to achieve the objective of the operation. This is achieved from the balance of interests, of commercial and design. A commitment to negotiation and a negotiation linked to coordination. The pursuit of stability is key, as instability is always present and constantly requires strategies to build the object you are configuring. Seventh, proposes space-time itself as a circumstance that determines and structures the perception of the Mall in a singular way. We introduce concepts as chronotope and paradox to help us place the relationship between time and space within the Mall in the context of shopping. A consequence of the parallel flow of historical time - the time outside - and the time inside the Mall, the big shopping center formula is precisely that of having the feeling of timelessness in the space. The social triumph of the mall is the ability to resolve in space and in time all postmodern paradoxes and, beyond that, of contemporary man, condensing into a small space and time an enormous amount of cultural symbols, often contradictory, but they attract the practice of consumerism. Eighth, global level. Globalization which doesn’t ignore the local level. Architecture that is inserted into the dynamics of a global economy, reflects the contradictions that it imposes, mainly in the processes of inclusion and exclusion. Inclusion and exclusion affect the debate of the local level, which the Mall must incorporate as an unavoidable tool of recognition. The eight fundamental principles, when applied as a whole, confirm that the built heritage, which corresponds to the general Mall idea, can be presented as a cohesive conceptual whole. This becomes part of a coherent architectural family, whose functional structures are able to be established. The Third chapter presents in a detailed way the figure of the architect Victor Gruen, recognized as the creator of the modern Mall. Studying his professional experience, it is shown how the different keys analyzed in previous chapters are appearing in a natural way. "Victor Gruen may well have been the most influential architect of the twentieth century." Malcolm Gladwell. The Terrazo Jungle. Fifty Years Ago, The Mall Was Born. America Never Would Be The Same. 2004. In The New Yorker. He was a complex, troubled man and the paradoxes along his career were notable. Nevertheless, always he appeared as a straight man. Garret Eckbo, the recognized landscape painter and collaborator of Gruen was astonished how Gruen had been capable of combining comity and humanity in this career of rates, into that the American commercialization turned, Johnson, in 1962, weighting many Gruen's skills demonstrated that he was not sure if anyone of them, architects artists, had been capable of doing what Gruen did. He goes beyond just the creation of a beautiful building. In playing on people and suggesting what they ought to do, he is a master. (…) his architecture is clean - hardly architecture, no flights of fancy. But when you get hold of its complexity, you've got something beyond the design... You can't say there's someone like him. Architecture is lucky to have him as an architect." Philip Johnson. Article in Fortune Review. 1962. The Document of the thesis closes with Gruen's vision of realizing a tour through the different chapters of his essential book, Shopping towns USA: The Planning of Shopping Centers. It’s mere index turns out to be a monument to the process of the gestation of the Mall. The book, simply acted in its basic structure as a silent witness, as the canonical reference for the contemporary Malls. The Fourth Chapter of the Document of the thesis is a recapitulation of the previous work, which synthesizes the concepts of function and style related to the Shopping Center, and clearly defines how they are defined so we can conclude that we have found an architectural new type in the panorama of the architectural discipline. Therefore, the Conclusion of the thesis integrates this development in a theoretical body of references that relate to an architectural specific and particular type, which receives the singularity of the Shopping Center as an architectural independent phenomenon as it has tried to demonstrate from the beginning of the work. To conclude, as a result of the integrative process and the development of the theoretical body of references, the essential characteristics of the order and concept of the architectural typology form the existence of a new architecture; architecture never before defined as such, in the theoretical typology of the discipline. A theoretical typology for a new architecture is proposed throughout the discussed research and forms a conclusion of the different parameters that have been analysed. As a building complex, from the study of the essential characteristics and of the perceptible constants, the typology is more clearly defined and thus, becomes a useful tool and precedent for the consideration of the discipline. The thesis then justifies how the building complex known as Shopping Center constitutes a new type of architectural typology.

50 Years Ago We Marched: What began on the grounds of Lincoln University, ended on the steps of the Alabama State Capitol

LINCOLN UNIVERSITY - On March 25, 1965, a bus loaded with Lincoln University students and staff arrived in Montgomery, Ala. to join the Selma march for racial and voting equality. Although the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was in force, African-Americans continued to feel the effects of segregation. The 1960s was a decade of social unrest and change. In the Deep South, specifically Alabama, racial segregation was a cultural norm resistant to change. Governor George Wallace never concealed his personal viewpoints and political stance of the white majority, declaring “Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.” The march was aimed at obtaining African-Americans their constitutionally protected right to vote. However, Alabama’s deep-rooted culture of racial bias began to be challenged by a shift in American attitudes towards equality. Both black and whites wanted to end discrimination by using passive resistance, a movement utilized by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. That passive resistance was often met with violence, sometimes at the hands of law enforcement and local citizens. The Selma to Montgomery march was a result of a protest for voting equality. The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Southern Christian Leadership Counsel (SCLC) among other students marched along the streets to bring awareness to the voter registration campaign, which was organized to end discrimination in voting based on race. Violent acts of police officers and others were some of the everyday challenges protesters were facing. Forty-one participants from Lincoln University arrived in Montgomery to take part in the 1965 march for equality. Students from Lincoln University’s Journalism 383 class spent part of their 2015 spring semester researching the historical event. Here are their stories: Peter Kellogg “We’ve been watching the television, reading about it in the newspapers,” said Peter Kellogg during a February 2015 telephone interview. “Everyone knew the civil rights movement was going on, and it was important that we give him (Robert Newton) some assistance … and Newton said we needed to get involve and do something,” Kellogg, a lecturer in the 1960s at Lincoln University, discussed how the bus trip originated. “That’s why the bus happened,” Kellogg said. “Because of what he (Newton) did - that’s why Lincoln students went and participated.” “People were excited and the people along the sidewalk were supportive,” Kellogg said. However, the mood flipped from excited to scared and feeling intimidated. “It seems though every office building there was a guy in a blue uniform with binoculars standing in the crowd with troops and police. And if looks could kill me, we could have all been dead.” He says the hatred and intimidation was intense. Kellogg, being white, was an immediate target among many white people. He didn’t realize how dangerous the event in Alabama was until he and the others in the bus heard about the death of Viola Liuzzo. The married mother of five from Detroit was shot and killed by members of the Ku Klux Klan while shuttling activists to the Montgomery airport. “We found out about her death on the ride back,” Kellogg recalled. “Because it was a loss of life, and it shows the violence … we could have been exposed to that danger!” After returning to LU, Kellogg’s outlook on life took a dramatic turn. Kellogg noted King’s belief that a person should be willing to die for important causes. “The idea is that life is about something larger and more important than your own immediate gratification, and career success or personal achievements,” Kellogg said. “The civil rights movement … it made me, it made my life more significant because it was about something important.” The civil rights movement influenced Kellogg to change his career path and to become a black history lecturer. Until this day, he has no regrets and believes that his choices made him as a better individual. The bus ride to Alabama, he says, began with the actions of just one student. Robert Newton Robert Newton was the initiator, recruiter and leader of the Lincoln University movement to join Dr. Martin Luther King’s march in Selma. “In the 60s much of the civil rights activists came out of college,” said Newton during a recent phone interview. Many of the events that involved segregation compelled college students to fight for equality. “We had selected boycotts of merchants, when blacks were not allowed to try on clothes,” Newton said. “You could buy clothes at department stores, but no blacks could work at the department stores as sales people. If you bought clothes there you couldn’t try them on, you had to buy them first and take them home and try them on.” Newton said the students risked their lives to be a part of history and influence change. He not only recognized the historic event of his fellow Lincolnites, but also recognized other college students and historical black colleges and universities who played a vital role in history. “You had the S.N.C.C organization, in terms of voting rights and other things, including a lot of participation and working off the bureau,” Newton said. Other schools and places such as UNT, Greenville and Howard University and other historically black schools had groups that came out as leaders. Newton believes that much has changed from 50 years ago. “I think we’ve certainly come a long way from what I’ve seen from the standpoint of growing up outside of Birmingham, Alabama,” Newton said. He believes that college campuses today are more organized in their approach to social causes. “The campus appears to be some more integrated amongst students in terms of organizations and friendships.” Barbara Flint Dr. Barbara Flint grew up in the southern part of Arkansas and came to Lincoln University in 1961. She describes her experience at Lincoln as “being at Lincoln when the world was changing.“ She was an active member of Lincoln’s History Club, which focused on current events and issues and influenced her decision to join the Selma march. “The first idea was to raise some money and then we started talking about ‘why can’t we go?’ I very much wanted to be a living witness in history.” Reflecting on the march and journey to Montgomery, Flint describes it as being filled with tension. “We were very conscious of the fact that once we got on the road past Tennessee we didn’t know what was going to happen,” said Flint during a February 2015 phone interview. “Many of the students had not been beyond Missouri, so they didn’t have that sense of what happens in the South. Having lived there you knew the balance as well as what is likely to happen and what is not likely to happen. As my father use to say, ‘you have to know how to stay on that line of balance.’” Upon arriving in Alabama she remembers the feeling of excitement and relief from everyone on the bus. “We were tired and very happy to be there and we were trying to figure out where we were going to join and get into the march,” Flint said. “There were so many people coming in and then we were also trying to stay together; that was one of the things that really stuck out for me, not just for us but the people who were coming in. You didn’t want to lose sight of the people you came with.” Flint says she was keenly aware of her surroundings. For her, it was more than just marching forward. “I can still hear those helicopters now,” Flint recalled. “Every time the helicopters would come over the sound would make people jump and look up - I think that demonstrated the extent of the tenseness that was there at the time because the helicopters kept coming over every few minutes.” She said that the marchers sang “we are not afraid,” but that fear remained with every step. “Just having been there and being a witness and marching you realize that I’m one of those drops that’s going to make up this flood and with this flood things will move,” said Flint. As a student at Lincoln in 1965, Flint says the Selma experience undoubtedly changed her life. “You can’t expect to do exactly what you came to Lincoln to do,” Flint says. “That march - along with all the other marchers and the action that was taking place - directly changed the paths that I and many other people at Lincoln would take.” She says current students and new generations need to reflect on their personal role in society. “Decide what needs to be done and ask yourself ‘how can I best contribute to it?’” Flint said. She notes technology and social media can be used to reach audiences in ways unavailable to her generation in 1965. “So you don’t always have to wait for someone else to step out there and say ‘let’s march,’ you can express your vision and your views and you have the means to do so (so) others can follow you. Jaci Newsom Jaci Newsom came to Lincoln in 1965 from Atlanta. She came to Lincoln to major in sociology and being in Jefferson City was largely different from what she had grown up with. “To be able to come into a restaurant, sit down and be served a nice meal was eye-opening to me,” said Newsom during a recent interview. She eventually became accustomed to the relaxed attitude of Missouri and was shocked by the situation she encountered on an out-of-town trip. “I took a bus trip from Atlanta to Pensacola and I encountered the worse racism that I have ever seen. I was at bus stop, I went in to be served and they would not serve me. There was a policeman sitting there at the table and he told me that privately owned places could select not to serve you.” Newsom describes her experience of marching in Montgomery as being one with a purpose. “We felt as though we achieved something - we felt a sense of unity,” Newsom said. “We were very excited (because) we were going to hear from Martin Luther King. To actually be in the presence of him and the other civil rights workers there was just such enthusiasm and excitement yet there was also some apprehension of what we might encounter.” Many of the marchers showed their inspiration and determination while pressing forward towards the grounds of the Alabama Capitol building. Newsom recalled that the marchers were singing the lyrics “ain’t gonna let nobody turn me around” and “we shall overcome.” “ I started seeing people just like me,” Newsom said. “I don’t recall any of the scowling, the hitting, the things I would see on TV later. I just saw a sea of humanity marching towards the Capitol. I don’t remember what Martin Luther King said but it was always the same message: keep the faith; we’re going to get where we’re going and let us remember what our purpose is.” Newsom offers advice on what individuals can do to make their society a more productive and peaceful place. “We have come a long way and we have ways to change things that we did not have before,” Newsom said. “You need to work in positive ways to change.” Referencing the recent unrest in Ferguson, Mo., she believes that people become destructive as a way to show and vent anger. Her generation, she says, was raised to react in lawful ways – and believe in hope. “We have faith to do things in a way that was lawful and it makes me sad what people do when they feel without hope, and there is hope,” Newsom says. “Non-violence does work - we need to include everyone to make this world a better place.” Newsom graduated from Lincoln in 1969 and describes her experience at Lincoln as, “I grew up and did more growing at Lincoln than I think I did for the rest of my life.”

The role of voice input for human-machine communication.

Optimism is growing that the near future will witness rapid growth in human-computer interaction using voice. System prototypes have recently been built that demonstrate speaker-independent real-time speech recognition, and understanding of naturally spoken utterances with vocabularies of 1000 to 2000 words, and larger. Already, computer manufacturers are building speech recognition subsystems into their new product lines. However, before this technology can be broadly useful, a substantial knowledge base is needed about human spoken language and performance during computer-based spoken interaction. This paper reviews application areas in which spoken interaction can play a significant role, assesses potential benefits of spoken interaction with machines, and compares voice with other modalities of human-computer interaction. It also discusses information that will be needed to build a firm empirical foundation for the design of future spoken and multimodal interfaces. Finally, it argues for a more systematic and scientific approach to investigating spoken input and performance with future language technology.